Case selection and outcome of radical perineal prostatectomy in localized prostate cancer
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2003 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | International Braz J Urol (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382003000400002 |
Resumo: | Radical prostatectomy continues to play a central role in the management of localized prostate cancer. The majority of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer will undergo radical prostatectomy. A decrease in the morbidity of this surgical procedure has been accomplished through an improved understanding of pelvic anatomy and a greater understanding of the natural history of prostate cancer. Recently, minimally invasive techniques have been applied to radical prostatectomy (laparoscopic prostatectomy) in order to further decrease the morbidity of this operation. What remains to be determined is whether this approach confers the same long term surgical outcomes as the open approach. One method which offers known long term outcomes coupled with decreased morbidity is the radical perineal prostatectomy. The purpose of this paper is to review the criteria for patient selection as well as outcomes of the radical perineal prostatectomy. |
id |
SBU-1_5f70777e48dd2844471c3255bc04b3bb |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1677-55382003000400002 |
network_acronym_str |
SBU-1 |
network_name_str |
International Braz J Urol (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Case selection and outcome of radical perineal prostatectomy in localized prostate cancerprostatic neoplasmsprostatectomyperinealoutcomessurgical techniqueRadical prostatectomy continues to play a central role in the management of localized prostate cancer. The majority of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer will undergo radical prostatectomy. A decrease in the morbidity of this surgical procedure has been accomplished through an improved understanding of pelvic anatomy and a greater understanding of the natural history of prostate cancer. Recently, minimally invasive techniques have been applied to radical prostatectomy (laparoscopic prostatectomy) in order to further decrease the morbidity of this operation. What remains to be determined is whether this approach confers the same long term surgical outcomes as the open approach. One method which offers known long term outcomes coupled with decreased morbidity is the radical perineal prostatectomy. The purpose of this paper is to review the criteria for patient selection as well as outcomes of the radical perineal prostatectomy.Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2003-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382003000400002International braz j urol v.29 n.4 2003reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/S1677-55382003000400002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHolzbeierlein,Jeffrey MLangenstroer,PeterPorter II,H.JThrasher,J. Brantleyeng2004-03-11T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382003000400002Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2004-03-11T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Case selection and outcome of radical perineal prostatectomy in localized prostate cancer |
title |
Case selection and outcome of radical perineal prostatectomy in localized prostate cancer |
spellingShingle |
Case selection and outcome of radical perineal prostatectomy in localized prostate cancer Holzbeierlein,Jeffrey M prostatic neoplasms prostatectomy perineal outcomes surgical technique |
title_short |
Case selection and outcome of radical perineal prostatectomy in localized prostate cancer |
title_full |
Case selection and outcome of radical perineal prostatectomy in localized prostate cancer |
title_fullStr |
Case selection and outcome of radical perineal prostatectomy in localized prostate cancer |
title_full_unstemmed |
Case selection and outcome of radical perineal prostatectomy in localized prostate cancer |
title_sort |
Case selection and outcome of radical perineal prostatectomy in localized prostate cancer |
author |
Holzbeierlein,Jeffrey M |
author_facet |
Holzbeierlein,Jeffrey M Langenstroer,Peter Porter II,H.J Thrasher,J. Brantley |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Langenstroer,Peter Porter II,H.J Thrasher,J. Brantley |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Holzbeierlein,Jeffrey M Langenstroer,Peter Porter II,H.J Thrasher,J. Brantley |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
prostatic neoplasms prostatectomy perineal outcomes surgical technique |
topic |
prostatic neoplasms prostatectomy perineal outcomes surgical technique |
description |
Radical prostatectomy continues to play a central role in the management of localized prostate cancer. The majority of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer will undergo radical prostatectomy. A decrease in the morbidity of this surgical procedure has been accomplished through an improved understanding of pelvic anatomy and a greater understanding of the natural history of prostate cancer. Recently, minimally invasive techniques have been applied to radical prostatectomy (laparoscopic prostatectomy) in order to further decrease the morbidity of this operation. What remains to be determined is whether this approach confers the same long term surgical outcomes as the open approach. One method which offers known long term outcomes coupled with decreased morbidity is the radical perineal prostatectomy. The purpose of this paper is to review the criteria for patient selection as well as outcomes of the radical perineal prostatectomy. |
publishDate |
2003 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2003-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382003000400002 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382003000400002 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1677-55382003000400002 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
International braz j urol v.29 n.4 2003 reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU) instacron:SBU |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU) |
instacron_str |
SBU |
institution |
SBU |
reponame_str |
International Braz J Urol (Online) |
collection |
International Braz J Urol (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br |
_version_ |
1750318068615086081 |