Computed tomography window affects kidney stones measurements

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Danilovic,Alexandre
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Rocha,Bruno Aragão, Marchini,Giovanni Scala, Traxer,Olivier, Batagello,Carlos, Vicentini,Fabio Carvalho, Torricelli,Fábio César Miranda, Srougi,Miguel, Nahas,William Carlos, Mazzucchi,Eduardo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Braz J Urol (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382019000500948
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objectives Measurements of stone features may vary according to the non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) technique. Using magnified bone window is the most accurate method to measure urinary stones. Possible differences between stone measurements in different NCCT windows have not been evaluated in stones located in the kidney. The aim of this study is to compare measurements of kidney stone features between NCCT bone and soft tissue windows in patients submitted to retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Materials and Methods Preoperative and 90th postoperative day NCCT were performed in 92 consecutive symptomatic adult patients (115 renal units) with kidney stones between 5 mm to 20 mm (< 15 mm in the lower calyx) treated by RIRS. NCCT were evaluated in the magnified bone window and soft tissue window in three axes in a different time by a single radiologist blinded for the measurements of the NCCT other method. Results Stone largest size (7.92±3.81 vs. 9.13±4.08; mm), volume (435.5±472.7 vs. 683.1±665.0; mm3) and density (989.4±330.2 vs. 893.0±324.6; HU) differed between bone and soft-tissue windows, respectively (p<0.0001) 5.2% of the renal units (6/115) were reclassified from residual fragments > 2 mm on soft tissue window to 0-2 mm on bone window. Conclusion Kidney stone measurements vary according to NCCT window. Measurements in soft tissue window NCCT of stone diameter and volume are larger and stone density is lesser than in bone window. These differences may have impact on clinical decisions.
id SBU-1_6cdb47dd399ace1533c6f1f0857095d6
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1677-55382019000500948
network_acronym_str SBU-1
network_name_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Computed tomography window affects kidney stones measurementsKidney CalculiNephrolithiasisPatient Outcome AssessmentABSTRACT Objectives Measurements of stone features may vary according to the non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) technique. Using magnified bone window is the most accurate method to measure urinary stones. Possible differences between stone measurements in different NCCT windows have not been evaluated in stones located in the kidney. The aim of this study is to compare measurements of kidney stone features between NCCT bone and soft tissue windows in patients submitted to retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Materials and Methods Preoperative and 90th postoperative day NCCT were performed in 92 consecutive symptomatic adult patients (115 renal units) with kidney stones between 5 mm to 20 mm (< 15 mm in the lower calyx) treated by RIRS. NCCT were evaluated in the magnified bone window and soft tissue window in three axes in a different time by a single radiologist blinded for the measurements of the NCCT other method. Results Stone largest size (7.92±3.81 vs. 9.13±4.08; mm), volume (435.5±472.7 vs. 683.1±665.0; mm3) and density (989.4±330.2 vs. 893.0±324.6; HU) differed between bone and soft-tissue windows, respectively (p<0.0001) 5.2% of the renal units (6/115) were reclassified from residual fragments > 2 mm on soft tissue window to 0-2 mm on bone window. Conclusion Kidney stone measurements vary according to NCCT window. Measurements in soft tissue window NCCT of stone diameter and volume are larger and stone density is lesser than in bone window. These differences may have impact on clinical decisions.Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2019-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382019000500948International braz j urol v.45 n.5 2019reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2018.0819info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDanilovic,AlexandreRocha,Bruno AragãoMarchini,Giovanni ScalaTraxer,OlivierBatagello,CarlosVicentini,Fabio CarvalhoTorricelli,Fábio César MirandaSrougi,MiguelNahas,William CarlosMazzucchi,Eduardoeng2019-11-05T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382019000500948Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2019-11-05T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Computed tomography window affects kidney stones measurements
title Computed tomography window affects kidney stones measurements
spellingShingle Computed tomography window affects kidney stones measurements
Danilovic,Alexandre
Kidney Calculi
Nephrolithiasis
Patient Outcome Assessment
title_short Computed tomography window affects kidney stones measurements
title_full Computed tomography window affects kidney stones measurements
title_fullStr Computed tomography window affects kidney stones measurements
title_full_unstemmed Computed tomography window affects kidney stones measurements
title_sort Computed tomography window affects kidney stones measurements
author Danilovic,Alexandre
author_facet Danilovic,Alexandre
Rocha,Bruno Aragão
Marchini,Giovanni Scala
Traxer,Olivier
Batagello,Carlos
Vicentini,Fabio Carvalho
Torricelli,Fábio César Miranda
Srougi,Miguel
Nahas,William Carlos
Mazzucchi,Eduardo
author_role author
author2 Rocha,Bruno Aragão
Marchini,Giovanni Scala
Traxer,Olivier
Batagello,Carlos
Vicentini,Fabio Carvalho
Torricelli,Fábio César Miranda
Srougi,Miguel
Nahas,William Carlos
Mazzucchi,Eduardo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Danilovic,Alexandre
Rocha,Bruno Aragão
Marchini,Giovanni Scala
Traxer,Olivier
Batagello,Carlos
Vicentini,Fabio Carvalho
Torricelli,Fábio César Miranda
Srougi,Miguel
Nahas,William Carlos
Mazzucchi,Eduardo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Kidney Calculi
Nephrolithiasis
Patient Outcome Assessment
topic Kidney Calculi
Nephrolithiasis
Patient Outcome Assessment
description ABSTRACT Objectives Measurements of stone features may vary according to the non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) technique. Using magnified bone window is the most accurate method to measure urinary stones. Possible differences between stone measurements in different NCCT windows have not been evaluated in stones located in the kidney. The aim of this study is to compare measurements of kidney stone features between NCCT bone and soft tissue windows in patients submitted to retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Materials and Methods Preoperative and 90th postoperative day NCCT were performed in 92 consecutive symptomatic adult patients (115 renal units) with kidney stones between 5 mm to 20 mm (< 15 mm in the lower calyx) treated by RIRS. NCCT were evaluated in the magnified bone window and soft tissue window in three axes in a different time by a single radiologist blinded for the measurements of the NCCT other method. Results Stone largest size (7.92±3.81 vs. 9.13±4.08; mm), volume (435.5±472.7 vs. 683.1±665.0; mm3) and density (989.4±330.2 vs. 893.0±324.6; HU) differed between bone and soft-tissue windows, respectively (p<0.0001) 5.2% of the renal units (6/115) were reclassified from residual fragments > 2 mm on soft tissue window to 0-2 mm on bone window. Conclusion Kidney stone measurements vary according to NCCT window. Measurements in soft tissue window NCCT of stone diameter and volume are larger and stone density is lesser than in bone window. These differences may have impact on clinical decisions.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382019000500948
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382019000500948
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2018.0819
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International braz j urol v.45 n.5 2019
reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron:SBU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron_str SBU
institution SBU
reponame_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
collection International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br
_version_ 1750318077172514816