Efficacy of botulinum toxin type A 100 units versus 200 units for treatment of refractory idiopathic overactive bladder
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | International Braz J Urol (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382015000601132 |
Resumo: | Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single intra detrusor injection of BoNTA comparing two different doses (100 U or 200 U) in patients with idiopathic overactive bladder. Materials and Methods: A randomized prospective study evaluated the efficacy of BoNTA in management of refractory idiopathic overactive bladder and included 80 patients. All patients were assessed initially by taking a history, a physical examination, overactive bladder symptom score, urine analysis, routine laboratory investigations, KUB and pelviabdominal. OABSS was adjusted on all patients postoperative at 1,3,6,9 months also Urodynamic was done for all patients preoperative and postoperative at 3, 6, 9 months. Results: The mean age was 30.22±8.37 and 31.35±7.61 in group I and II respectively. There was no statistically difference between both groups in all parameters all over the study except at 9 months after treatment. Hematuria was observed 6 and 9 patients in group I and II respectively. Dysuria was observed in 6 and 15 patients in group I and II respectively. UTI was detected in 3 and 7 patients in group I and II respectively. Conclusion: A single-injection procedure of 100 U or 200 U BoNTA is an effective and safe treatment for patients with IOAB who failed anticholinergic regimens. OABSS and QoL were improved for 6 months; 100 U injections seemed to have comparable results with 200 U. There was a significant difference at month 9 towards 200 U with more incidences of adverse events. |
id |
SBU-1_7018e547125d31cee7e2be096f37a3d4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1677-55382015000601132 |
network_acronym_str |
SBU-1 |
network_name_str |
International Braz J Urol (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Efficacy of botulinum toxin type A 100 units versus 200 units for treatment of refractory idiopathic overactive bladderBotulinum ToxinsTherapeuticsUrinary BladderOveractive Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single intra detrusor injection of BoNTA comparing two different doses (100 U or 200 U) in patients with idiopathic overactive bladder. Materials and Methods: A randomized prospective study evaluated the efficacy of BoNTA in management of refractory idiopathic overactive bladder and included 80 patients. All patients were assessed initially by taking a history, a physical examination, overactive bladder symptom score, urine analysis, routine laboratory investigations, KUB and pelviabdominal. OABSS was adjusted on all patients postoperative at 1,3,6,9 months also Urodynamic was done for all patients preoperative and postoperative at 3, 6, 9 months. Results: The mean age was 30.22±8.37 and 31.35±7.61 in group I and II respectively. There was no statistically difference between both groups in all parameters all over the study except at 9 months after treatment. Hematuria was observed 6 and 9 patients in group I and II respectively. Dysuria was observed in 6 and 15 patients in group I and II respectively. UTI was detected in 3 and 7 patients in group I and II respectively. Conclusion: A single-injection procedure of 100 U or 200 U BoNTA is an effective and safe treatment for patients with IOAB who failed anticholinergic regimens. OABSS and QoL were improved for 6 months; 100 U injections seemed to have comparable results with 200 U. There was a significant difference at month 9 towards 200 U with more incidences of adverse events.Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2015-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382015000601132International braz j urol v.41 n.6 2015reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0221info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAbdelwahab,OsamaSherif,HammoudaSoliman,TarkElbarky,IhabEshazly,Alyeng2016-01-13T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382015000601132Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2016-01-13T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Efficacy of botulinum toxin type A 100 units versus 200 units for treatment of refractory idiopathic overactive bladder |
title |
Efficacy of botulinum toxin type A 100 units versus 200 units for treatment of refractory idiopathic overactive bladder |
spellingShingle |
Efficacy of botulinum toxin type A 100 units versus 200 units for treatment of refractory idiopathic overactive bladder Abdelwahab,Osama Botulinum Toxins Therapeutics Urinary Bladder Overactive |
title_short |
Efficacy of botulinum toxin type A 100 units versus 200 units for treatment of refractory idiopathic overactive bladder |
title_full |
Efficacy of botulinum toxin type A 100 units versus 200 units for treatment of refractory idiopathic overactive bladder |
title_fullStr |
Efficacy of botulinum toxin type A 100 units versus 200 units for treatment of refractory idiopathic overactive bladder |
title_full_unstemmed |
Efficacy of botulinum toxin type A 100 units versus 200 units for treatment of refractory idiopathic overactive bladder |
title_sort |
Efficacy of botulinum toxin type A 100 units versus 200 units for treatment of refractory idiopathic overactive bladder |
author |
Abdelwahab,Osama |
author_facet |
Abdelwahab,Osama Sherif,Hammouda Soliman,Tark Elbarky,Ihab Eshazly,Aly |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sherif,Hammouda Soliman,Tark Elbarky,Ihab Eshazly,Aly |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Abdelwahab,Osama Sherif,Hammouda Soliman,Tark Elbarky,Ihab Eshazly,Aly |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Botulinum Toxins Therapeutics Urinary Bladder Overactive |
topic |
Botulinum Toxins Therapeutics Urinary Bladder Overactive |
description |
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single intra detrusor injection of BoNTA comparing two different doses (100 U or 200 U) in patients with idiopathic overactive bladder. Materials and Methods: A randomized prospective study evaluated the efficacy of BoNTA in management of refractory idiopathic overactive bladder and included 80 patients. All patients were assessed initially by taking a history, a physical examination, overactive bladder symptom score, urine analysis, routine laboratory investigations, KUB and pelviabdominal. OABSS was adjusted on all patients postoperative at 1,3,6,9 months also Urodynamic was done for all patients preoperative and postoperative at 3, 6, 9 months. Results: The mean age was 30.22±8.37 and 31.35±7.61 in group I and II respectively. There was no statistically difference between both groups in all parameters all over the study except at 9 months after treatment. Hematuria was observed 6 and 9 patients in group I and II respectively. Dysuria was observed in 6 and 15 patients in group I and II respectively. UTI was detected in 3 and 7 patients in group I and II respectively. Conclusion: A single-injection procedure of 100 U or 200 U BoNTA is an effective and safe treatment for patients with IOAB who failed anticholinergic regimens. OABSS and QoL were improved for 6 months; 100 U injections seemed to have comparable results with 200 U. There was a significant difference at month 9 towards 200 U with more incidences of adverse events. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382015000601132 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382015000601132 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0221 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
International braz j urol v.41 n.6 2015 reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU) instacron:SBU |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU) |
instacron_str |
SBU |
institution |
SBU |
reponame_str |
International Braz J Urol (Online) |
collection |
International Braz J Urol (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br |
_version_ |
1750318074526957568 |