Use of biological Glue (Bioglue®) in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a study in pigs

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Brandão,Luis Felipe
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Torricelli,Fabio Cesar Miranda, Melo,Glauco, Takano,Luiz Fernando, Mitre,Anuar Ibrahim, Arap,Marco Antonio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Braz J Urol (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382015000200252
Resumo: Introduction Partial nephrectomy is the standard of care for localized renal tumors. However, bleeding and warm ischemia time are still controversial when laparoscopic surgeries are carried out. Herein, we aim to compare the outcomes from laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with and without the use of biological glue with purified bovine albumin and glutaraldehyde (BioGlue®). Materials and Methods Twenty-four kidneys of 12 pigs were used in this study. A pre-determined lower pole segment was resected (3 cm x 1 cm) and one of two different hemostatic techniques was performed. In one kidney, hemostatic “U suture” (poliglecaprone 3.0) was performed and in the contra-lateral kidney, only the biological glue was applied. Data recorded was comprised of warm ischemia time (seconds) and estimated blood loss (mL) for each procedure. In cases of bleeding after glue administration, a complementary suture was done. Results Mean warm ischemia time was 492.9±113.1 (351-665) seconds and 746±185.3 (409-1125) seconds for biological glue and suture groups, respectively. There was a positive significant difference in terms of warm ischemia favoring the biological glue group over the suture group (p<0.001). Mean blood loss was 39.4 (0-115) mL for the biological glue group and 39.1 (5-120) mL for the suture group (p=0.62). Conclusion Biological glue is an important tool for laparoscopic partial nephrectomies. It is effective for hemostatic control in selected cases, and it can be used in combination with the traditional suture techniques.
id SBU-1_781a985c267999972ee0a661e5f039c5
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1677-55382015000200252
network_acronym_str SBU-1
network_name_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Use of biological Glue (Bioglue®) in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a study in pigsBio-glue [Supplementary Concept]KidneyNephrectomyLaparoscopy Introduction Partial nephrectomy is the standard of care for localized renal tumors. However, bleeding and warm ischemia time are still controversial when laparoscopic surgeries are carried out. Herein, we aim to compare the outcomes from laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with and without the use of biological glue with purified bovine albumin and glutaraldehyde (BioGlue®). Materials and Methods Twenty-four kidneys of 12 pigs were used in this study. A pre-determined lower pole segment was resected (3 cm x 1 cm) and one of two different hemostatic techniques was performed. In one kidney, hemostatic “U suture” (poliglecaprone 3.0) was performed and in the contra-lateral kidney, only the biological glue was applied. Data recorded was comprised of warm ischemia time (seconds) and estimated blood loss (mL) for each procedure. In cases of bleeding after glue administration, a complementary suture was done. Results Mean warm ischemia time was 492.9±113.1 (351-665) seconds and 746±185.3 (409-1125) seconds for biological glue and suture groups, respectively. There was a positive significant difference in terms of warm ischemia favoring the biological glue group over the suture group (p<0.001). Mean blood loss was 39.4 (0-115) mL for the biological glue group and 39.1 (5-120) mL for the suture group (p=0.62). Conclusion Biological glue is an important tool for laparoscopic partial nephrectomies. It is effective for hemostatic control in selected cases, and it can be used in combination with the traditional suture techniques. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2015-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382015000200252International braz j urol v.41 n.2 2015reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.02.10info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBrandão,Luis FelipeTorricelli,Fabio Cesar MirandaMelo,GlaucoTakano,Luiz FernandoMitre,Anuar IbrahimArap,Marco Antonioeng2015-06-01T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382015000200252Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2015-06-01T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Use of biological Glue (Bioglue®) in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a study in pigs
title Use of biological Glue (Bioglue®) in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a study in pigs
spellingShingle Use of biological Glue (Bioglue®) in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a study in pigs
Brandão,Luis Felipe
Bio-glue [Supplementary Concept]
Kidney
Nephrectomy
Laparoscopy
title_short Use of biological Glue (Bioglue®) in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a study in pigs
title_full Use of biological Glue (Bioglue®) in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a study in pigs
title_fullStr Use of biological Glue (Bioglue®) in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a study in pigs
title_full_unstemmed Use of biological Glue (Bioglue®) in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a study in pigs
title_sort Use of biological Glue (Bioglue®) in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a study in pigs
author Brandão,Luis Felipe
author_facet Brandão,Luis Felipe
Torricelli,Fabio Cesar Miranda
Melo,Glauco
Takano,Luiz Fernando
Mitre,Anuar Ibrahim
Arap,Marco Antonio
author_role author
author2 Torricelli,Fabio Cesar Miranda
Melo,Glauco
Takano,Luiz Fernando
Mitre,Anuar Ibrahim
Arap,Marco Antonio
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Brandão,Luis Felipe
Torricelli,Fabio Cesar Miranda
Melo,Glauco
Takano,Luiz Fernando
Mitre,Anuar Ibrahim
Arap,Marco Antonio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bio-glue [Supplementary Concept]
Kidney
Nephrectomy
Laparoscopy
topic Bio-glue [Supplementary Concept]
Kidney
Nephrectomy
Laparoscopy
description Introduction Partial nephrectomy is the standard of care for localized renal tumors. However, bleeding and warm ischemia time are still controversial when laparoscopic surgeries are carried out. Herein, we aim to compare the outcomes from laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with and without the use of biological glue with purified bovine albumin and glutaraldehyde (BioGlue®). Materials and Methods Twenty-four kidneys of 12 pigs were used in this study. A pre-determined lower pole segment was resected (3 cm x 1 cm) and one of two different hemostatic techniques was performed. In one kidney, hemostatic “U suture” (poliglecaprone 3.0) was performed and in the contra-lateral kidney, only the biological glue was applied. Data recorded was comprised of warm ischemia time (seconds) and estimated blood loss (mL) for each procedure. In cases of bleeding after glue administration, a complementary suture was done. Results Mean warm ischemia time was 492.9±113.1 (351-665) seconds and 746±185.3 (409-1125) seconds for biological glue and suture groups, respectively. There was a positive significant difference in terms of warm ischemia favoring the biological glue group over the suture group (p<0.001). Mean blood loss was 39.4 (0-115) mL for the biological glue group and 39.1 (5-120) mL for the suture group (p=0.62). Conclusion Biological glue is an important tool for laparoscopic partial nephrectomies. It is effective for hemostatic control in selected cases, and it can be used in combination with the traditional suture techniques.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382015000200252
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382015000200252
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.02.10
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International braz j urol v.41 n.2 2015
reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron:SBU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron_str SBU
institution SBU
reponame_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
collection International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br
_version_ 1750318074101235712