Gleason score and laterality concordance between prostate biopsy and prostatectomy specimens

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nepple,Kenneth G.
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: Wahls,Terry L., Hillis,Stephen L., Joudi,Fadi N.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Braz J Urol (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382009000500007
Resumo: Objectives: Prostate biopsy involvement and Gleason score guide treatment decisions in prostate cancer. We evaluated concordance in Gleason score and laterality between biopsy and radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) specimens and factors that influenced this relationship. Material and Methods: We reviewed 538 prostate cancer diagnoses at a Veterans Affairs medical center (2000-2005) to identify men with prostate biopsy and RRP specimens. During this time there was a move from limited (6 core) to extended (12 core) biopsy schemes. Discordance in Gleason score was defined as any change in Gleason score. Results: 152 men underwent RRP with biopsy showing Gleason < 7 in 56%, 7 in 36%, and > 7 in 8%. Biopsy involvement was unilateral in 59% and bilateral in 41%. Compared to the biopsy, RRP Gleason score was concordant in 76 (50%), higher in 51 (34%), and lower in 25 (16%). Bilateral involvement was concordant in 97%, while unilateral involvement was concordant in only 20%. Both Gleason score and laterality were concordant in only 26%. Gleason concordance was higher in those with 8 or more cores compared to < 8 cores taken (54% vs. 34%, p = 0.046), but concordance was not affected by age, PSA, prostate volume, or length of time from biopsy to RRP. During later years, concordance did not improve despite taking more cores. Conclusions: Prostate biopsy underestimated prostatectomy Gleason score in 34% of men and bilateral involvement in 80% of those with unilateral disease on biopsy. Taking at least eight cores improves the accuracy of the prostate biopsy.
id SBU-1_8359a724ea57a53244b958dde239600c
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1677-55382009000500007
network_acronym_str SBU-1
network_name_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Gleason score and laterality concordance between prostate biopsy and prostatectomy specimensprostate neoplasmsbiopsyprostatectomyObjectives: Prostate biopsy involvement and Gleason score guide treatment decisions in prostate cancer. We evaluated concordance in Gleason score and laterality between biopsy and radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) specimens and factors that influenced this relationship. Material and Methods: We reviewed 538 prostate cancer diagnoses at a Veterans Affairs medical center (2000-2005) to identify men with prostate biopsy and RRP specimens. During this time there was a move from limited (6 core) to extended (12 core) biopsy schemes. Discordance in Gleason score was defined as any change in Gleason score. Results: 152 men underwent RRP with biopsy showing Gleason < 7 in 56%, 7 in 36%, and > 7 in 8%. Biopsy involvement was unilateral in 59% and bilateral in 41%. Compared to the biopsy, RRP Gleason score was concordant in 76 (50%), higher in 51 (34%), and lower in 25 (16%). Bilateral involvement was concordant in 97%, while unilateral involvement was concordant in only 20%. Both Gleason score and laterality were concordant in only 26%. Gleason concordance was higher in those with 8 or more cores compared to < 8 cores taken (54% vs. 34%, p = 0.046), but concordance was not affected by age, PSA, prostate volume, or length of time from biopsy to RRP. During later years, concordance did not improve despite taking more cores. Conclusions: Prostate biopsy underestimated prostatectomy Gleason score in 34% of men and bilateral involvement in 80% of those with unilateral disease on biopsy. Taking at least eight cores improves the accuracy of the prostate biopsy.Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2009-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382009000500007International braz j urol v.35 n.5 2009reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/S1677-55382009000500007info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNepple,Kenneth G.Wahls,Terry L.Hillis,Stephen L.Joudi,Fadi N.eng2009-12-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382009000500007Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2009-12-07T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Gleason score and laterality concordance between prostate biopsy and prostatectomy specimens
title Gleason score and laterality concordance between prostate biopsy and prostatectomy specimens
spellingShingle Gleason score and laterality concordance between prostate biopsy and prostatectomy specimens
Nepple,Kenneth G.
prostate neoplasms
biopsy
prostatectomy
title_short Gleason score and laterality concordance between prostate biopsy and prostatectomy specimens
title_full Gleason score and laterality concordance between prostate biopsy and prostatectomy specimens
title_fullStr Gleason score and laterality concordance between prostate biopsy and prostatectomy specimens
title_full_unstemmed Gleason score and laterality concordance between prostate biopsy and prostatectomy specimens
title_sort Gleason score and laterality concordance between prostate biopsy and prostatectomy specimens
author Nepple,Kenneth G.
author_facet Nepple,Kenneth G.
Wahls,Terry L.
Hillis,Stephen L.
Joudi,Fadi N.
author_role author
author2 Wahls,Terry L.
Hillis,Stephen L.
Joudi,Fadi N.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nepple,Kenneth G.
Wahls,Terry L.
Hillis,Stephen L.
Joudi,Fadi N.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv prostate neoplasms
biopsy
prostatectomy
topic prostate neoplasms
biopsy
prostatectomy
description Objectives: Prostate biopsy involvement and Gleason score guide treatment decisions in prostate cancer. We evaluated concordance in Gleason score and laterality between biopsy and radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) specimens and factors that influenced this relationship. Material and Methods: We reviewed 538 prostate cancer diagnoses at a Veterans Affairs medical center (2000-2005) to identify men with prostate biopsy and RRP specimens. During this time there was a move from limited (6 core) to extended (12 core) biopsy schemes. Discordance in Gleason score was defined as any change in Gleason score. Results: 152 men underwent RRP with biopsy showing Gleason < 7 in 56%, 7 in 36%, and > 7 in 8%. Biopsy involvement was unilateral in 59% and bilateral in 41%. Compared to the biopsy, RRP Gleason score was concordant in 76 (50%), higher in 51 (34%), and lower in 25 (16%). Bilateral involvement was concordant in 97%, while unilateral involvement was concordant in only 20%. Both Gleason score and laterality were concordant in only 26%. Gleason concordance was higher in those with 8 or more cores compared to < 8 cores taken (54% vs. 34%, p = 0.046), but concordance was not affected by age, PSA, prostate volume, or length of time from biopsy to RRP. During later years, concordance did not improve despite taking more cores. Conclusions: Prostate biopsy underestimated prostatectomy Gleason score in 34% of men and bilateral involvement in 80% of those with unilateral disease on biopsy. Taking at least eight cores improves the accuracy of the prostate biopsy.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382009000500007
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382009000500007
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1677-55382009000500007
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International braz j urol v.35 n.5 2009
reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron:SBU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron_str SBU
institution SBU
reponame_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
collection International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br
_version_ 1750318071287906304