Comparison of the outcomes of the sling technique using a commercial and hand-made polypropylene sling
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | International Braz J Urol (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382011000400012 |
Resumo: | PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes and costs of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery using a hand-made sling (Marlex®) versus a commerciallyavailable suburethral polypropylene sling (Advantage®). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine women with SUI due to bladder neck hypermobility and/or sphincter incompetence diagnosed by clinical examination and urodynamic studies were divided into two groups: group 1 (n = 19) consisted of patients from an academic center (Department of Urology, University Hospital of Federal University of Maranhao, and group 2 (n = 20) patients from private practice. The hand-made polypropylene suburethral sling was used in group 1 and the commercial sling in group 2. The patients were evaluated 30, 60 and 90 days after surgery. RESULTS: The mean duration of surgery was 43 min. in group 1 and 51 min. in group 2. No postoperative voiding difficulties were observed in group 1 (100%), as well as, in 94.7% of patients of group 2. A bladder catheter was not required in any of the patients of the two groups at the end of the study. The level of satisfaction was 100% in group 1, whereas, one patient of group 2 considered the surgery to be unsuccessful. Urodynamic studies showed low amplitude uninhibited contraction in 11.1% of patients of group 1 and 10.5% of group 2. No complications were observed in either group. CONCLUSION: The hand-made polypropylene mesh (Marlex®) can be used for sling procedures, saving costs and yielding results similar to that obtained with commercial sling systems. |
id |
SBU-1_9ba126a53d6af76cb47f68b241e20186 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1677-55382011000400012 |
network_acronym_str |
SBU-1 |
network_name_str |
International Braz J Urol (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison of the outcomes of the sling technique using a commercial and hand-made polypropylene slingsurgical tapeurinary incontinencesuburethral slingoutcomepolypropylenesPURPOSE: To compare the outcomes and costs of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery using a hand-made sling (Marlex®) versus a commerciallyavailable suburethral polypropylene sling (Advantage®). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine women with SUI due to bladder neck hypermobility and/or sphincter incompetence diagnosed by clinical examination and urodynamic studies were divided into two groups: group 1 (n = 19) consisted of patients from an academic center (Department of Urology, University Hospital of Federal University of Maranhao, and group 2 (n = 20) patients from private practice. The hand-made polypropylene suburethral sling was used in group 1 and the commercial sling in group 2. The patients were evaluated 30, 60 and 90 days after surgery. RESULTS: The mean duration of surgery was 43 min. in group 1 and 51 min. in group 2. No postoperative voiding difficulties were observed in group 1 (100%), as well as, in 94.7% of patients of group 2. A bladder catheter was not required in any of the patients of the two groups at the end of the study. The level of satisfaction was 100% in group 1, whereas, one patient of group 2 considered the surgery to be unsuccessful. Urodynamic studies showed low amplitude uninhibited contraction in 11.1% of patients of group 1 and 10.5% of group 2. No complications were observed in either group. CONCLUSION: The hand-made polypropylene mesh (Marlex®) can be used for sling procedures, saving costs and yielding results similar to that obtained with commercial sling systems.Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2011-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382011000400012International braz j urol v.37 n.4 2011reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/S1677-55382011000400012info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBrito,Luciane Maria OliveiraSousa,Antonio de Pádua SilvaFigueiredo Neto,José Albuquerque deDuarte,Thaiana BezerraPinheiro,George do LagoChein,Maria Bethânia da Costaeng2011-10-19T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382011000400012Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2011-10-19T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of the outcomes of the sling technique using a commercial and hand-made polypropylene sling |
title |
Comparison of the outcomes of the sling technique using a commercial and hand-made polypropylene sling |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of the outcomes of the sling technique using a commercial and hand-made polypropylene sling Brito,Luciane Maria Oliveira surgical tape urinary incontinence suburethral sling outcome polypropylenes |
title_short |
Comparison of the outcomes of the sling technique using a commercial and hand-made polypropylene sling |
title_full |
Comparison of the outcomes of the sling technique using a commercial and hand-made polypropylene sling |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of the outcomes of the sling technique using a commercial and hand-made polypropylene sling |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of the outcomes of the sling technique using a commercial and hand-made polypropylene sling |
title_sort |
Comparison of the outcomes of the sling technique using a commercial and hand-made polypropylene sling |
author |
Brito,Luciane Maria Oliveira |
author_facet |
Brito,Luciane Maria Oliveira Sousa,Antonio de Pádua Silva Figueiredo Neto,José Albuquerque de Duarte,Thaiana Bezerra Pinheiro,George do Lago Chein,Maria Bethânia da Costa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sousa,Antonio de Pádua Silva Figueiredo Neto,José Albuquerque de Duarte,Thaiana Bezerra Pinheiro,George do Lago Chein,Maria Bethânia da Costa |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Brito,Luciane Maria Oliveira Sousa,Antonio de Pádua Silva Figueiredo Neto,José Albuquerque de Duarte,Thaiana Bezerra Pinheiro,George do Lago Chein,Maria Bethânia da Costa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
surgical tape urinary incontinence suburethral sling outcome polypropylenes |
topic |
surgical tape urinary incontinence suburethral sling outcome polypropylenes |
description |
PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes and costs of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery using a hand-made sling (Marlex®) versus a commerciallyavailable suburethral polypropylene sling (Advantage®). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine women with SUI due to bladder neck hypermobility and/or sphincter incompetence diagnosed by clinical examination and urodynamic studies were divided into two groups: group 1 (n = 19) consisted of patients from an academic center (Department of Urology, University Hospital of Federal University of Maranhao, and group 2 (n = 20) patients from private practice. The hand-made polypropylene suburethral sling was used in group 1 and the commercial sling in group 2. The patients were evaluated 30, 60 and 90 days after surgery. RESULTS: The mean duration of surgery was 43 min. in group 1 and 51 min. in group 2. No postoperative voiding difficulties were observed in group 1 (100%), as well as, in 94.7% of patients of group 2. A bladder catheter was not required in any of the patients of the two groups at the end of the study. The level of satisfaction was 100% in group 1, whereas, one patient of group 2 considered the surgery to be unsuccessful. Urodynamic studies showed low amplitude uninhibited contraction in 11.1% of patients of group 1 and 10.5% of group 2. No complications were observed in either group. CONCLUSION: The hand-made polypropylene mesh (Marlex®) can be used for sling procedures, saving costs and yielding results similar to that obtained with commercial sling systems. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382011000400012 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382011000400012 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1677-55382011000400012 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
International braz j urol v.37 n.4 2011 reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU) instacron:SBU |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU) |
instacron_str |
SBU |
institution |
SBU |
reponame_str |
International Braz J Urol (Online) |
collection |
International Braz J Urol (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br |
_version_ |
1750318072342773760 |