Comparison of the outcomes of the sling technique using a commercial and hand-made polypropylene sling

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Brito,Luciane Maria Oliveira
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Sousa,Antonio de Pádua Silva, Figueiredo Neto,José Albuquerque de, Duarte,Thaiana Bezerra, Pinheiro,George do Lago, Chein,Maria Bethânia da Costa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Braz J Urol (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382011000400012
Resumo: PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes and costs of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery using a hand-made sling (Marlex®) versus a commerciallyavailable suburethral polypropylene sling (Advantage®). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine women with SUI due to bladder neck hypermobility and/or sphincter incompetence diagnosed by clinical examination and urodynamic studies were divided into two groups: group 1 (n = 19) consisted of patients from an academic center (Department of Urology, University Hospital of Federal University of Maranhao, and group 2 (n = 20) patients from private practice. The hand-made polypropylene suburethral sling was used in group 1 and the commercial sling in group 2. The patients were evaluated 30, 60 and 90 days after surgery. RESULTS: The mean duration of surgery was 43 min. in group 1 and 51 min. in group 2. No postoperative voiding difficulties were observed in group 1 (100%), as well as, in 94.7% of patients of group 2. A bladder catheter was not required in any of the patients of the two groups at the end of the study. The level of satisfaction was 100% in group 1, whereas, one patient of group 2 considered the surgery to be unsuccessful. Urodynamic studies showed low amplitude uninhibited contraction in 11.1% of patients of group 1 and 10.5% of group 2. No complications were observed in either group. CONCLUSION: The hand-made polypropylene mesh (Marlex®) can be used for sling procedures, saving costs and yielding results similar to that obtained with commercial sling systems.
id SBU-1_9ba126a53d6af76cb47f68b241e20186
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1677-55382011000400012
network_acronym_str SBU-1
network_name_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of the outcomes of the sling technique using a commercial and hand-made polypropylene slingsurgical tapeurinary incontinencesuburethral slingoutcomepolypropylenesPURPOSE: To compare the outcomes and costs of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery using a hand-made sling (Marlex®) versus a commerciallyavailable suburethral polypropylene sling (Advantage®). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine women with SUI due to bladder neck hypermobility and/or sphincter incompetence diagnosed by clinical examination and urodynamic studies were divided into two groups: group 1 (n = 19) consisted of patients from an academic center (Department of Urology, University Hospital of Federal University of Maranhao, and group 2 (n = 20) patients from private practice. The hand-made polypropylene suburethral sling was used in group 1 and the commercial sling in group 2. The patients were evaluated 30, 60 and 90 days after surgery. RESULTS: The mean duration of surgery was 43 min. in group 1 and 51 min. in group 2. No postoperative voiding difficulties were observed in group 1 (100%), as well as, in 94.7% of patients of group 2. A bladder catheter was not required in any of the patients of the two groups at the end of the study. The level of satisfaction was 100% in group 1, whereas, one patient of group 2 considered the surgery to be unsuccessful. Urodynamic studies showed low amplitude uninhibited contraction in 11.1% of patients of group 1 and 10.5% of group 2. No complications were observed in either group. CONCLUSION: The hand-made polypropylene mesh (Marlex®) can be used for sling procedures, saving costs and yielding results similar to that obtained with commercial sling systems.Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2011-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382011000400012International braz j urol v.37 n.4 2011reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/S1677-55382011000400012info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBrito,Luciane Maria OliveiraSousa,Antonio de Pádua SilvaFigueiredo Neto,José Albuquerque deDuarte,Thaiana BezerraPinheiro,George do LagoChein,Maria Bethânia da Costaeng2011-10-19T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382011000400012Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2011-10-19T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of the outcomes of the sling technique using a commercial and hand-made polypropylene sling
title Comparison of the outcomes of the sling technique using a commercial and hand-made polypropylene sling
spellingShingle Comparison of the outcomes of the sling technique using a commercial and hand-made polypropylene sling
Brito,Luciane Maria Oliveira
surgical tape
urinary incontinence
suburethral sling
outcome
polypropylenes
title_short Comparison of the outcomes of the sling technique using a commercial and hand-made polypropylene sling
title_full Comparison of the outcomes of the sling technique using a commercial and hand-made polypropylene sling
title_fullStr Comparison of the outcomes of the sling technique using a commercial and hand-made polypropylene sling
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the outcomes of the sling technique using a commercial and hand-made polypropylene sling
title_sort Comparison of the outcomes of the sling technique using a commercial and hand-made polypropylene sling
author Brito,Luciane Maria Oliveira
author_facet Brito,Luciane Maria Oliveira
Sousa,Antonio de Pádua Silva
Figueiredo Neto,José Albuquerque de
Duarte,Thaiana Bezerra
Pinheiro,George do Lago
Chein,Maria Bethânia da Costa
author_role author
author2 Sousa,Antonio de Pádua Silva
Figueiredo Neto,José Albuquerque de
Duarte,Thaiana Bezerra
Pinheiro,George do Lago
Chein,Maria Bethânia da Costa
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Brito,Luciane Maria Oliveira
Sousa,Antonio de Pádua Silva
Figueiredo Neto,José Albuquerque de
Duarte,Thaiana Bezerra
Pinheiro,George do Lago
Chein,Maria Bethânia da Costa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv surgical tape
urinary incontinence
suburethral sling
outcome
polypropylenes
topic surgical tape
urinary incontinence
suburethral sling
outcome
polypropylenes
description PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes and costs of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery using a hand-made sling (Marlex®) versus a commerciallyavailable suburethral polypropylene sling (Advantage®). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine women with SUI due to bladder neck hypermobility and/or sphincter incompetence diagnosed by clinical examination and urodynamic studies were divided into two groups: group 1 (n = 19) consisted of patients from an academic center (Department of Urology, University Hospital of Federal University of Maranhao, and group 2 (n = 20) patients from private practice. The hand-made polypropylene suburethral sling was used in group 1 and the commercial sling in group 2. The patients were evaluated 30, 60 and 90 days after surgery. RESULTS: The mean duration of surgery was 43 min. in group 1 and 51 min. in group 2. No postoperative voiding difficulties were observed in group 1 (100%), as well as, in 94.7% of patients of group 2. A bladder catheter was not required in any of the patients of the two groups at the end of the study. The level of satisfaction was 100% in group 1, whereas, one patient of group 2 considered the surgery to be unsuccessful. Urodynamic studies showed low amplitude uninhibited contraction in 11.1% of patients of group 1 and 10.5% of group 2. No complications were observed in either group. CONCLUSION: The hand-made polypropylene mesh (Marlex®) can be used for sling procedures, saving costs and yielding results similar to that obtained with commercial sling systems.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382011000400012
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382011000400012
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1677-55382011000400012
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International braz j urol v.37 n.4 2011
reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron:SBU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron_str SBU
institution SBU
reponame_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
collection International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br
_version_ 1750318072342773760