Patient positioning during digital rectal examination of the prostate: preferences, tolerability, and results

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Romero,Frederico R.
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Romero,Antonio W., Tambara Filho,Renato, Brenny Filho,Thadeu, Oliveira Júnior,Fernando Cesar de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Braz J Urol (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382011000300011
Resumo: PURPOSE: To evaluate the preferred position used by Brazilian Urologists to perform DRE, the position that Brazilian patients prefer or think it is less embarrassing to have a DRE, and to evaluate the results of DRE with patients in left lateral decubitus, modified lithotomy, standing-up, or the physician will have them place their elbows on the table and squat down slightly. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Brazilian Urologists were contacted by e-mail, and 200 patients answered a questionnaire while undergoing prostate cancer screening. RESULTS: The preferred position was modified lithotomy position reported by 63.4% of Urologists, and left lateral position reported by 42.7% of the patients. Total DRE time was lower in the standing-up position. Pain and urinary urgency scores were similar regardless of the position used, and bowel urgency score was higher in patients squatting down. Patients were similar in terms of age and PSA level, but there was a significant difference between the standard deviations of estimated prostate weight in left lateral position. There were no differences in prostate asymmetry, positive DRE, or incomplete palpation of the prostate rates among different examination positions. CONCLUSIONS: Despite individual subjective preferences, a faster examination time in the standing-up position, and higher bowel urgency scores in patients with their elbows placed on the table and squatting down slightly, there were similar rates of prostate asymmetry, positive DRE, and incomplete palpation of the prostate, and comparable patient tolerability among different examination techniques.
id SBU-1_a0f60c9c70a228f122db6aa494c8f62a
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1677-55382011000300011
network_acronym_str SBU-1
network_name_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Patient positioning during digital rectal examination of the prostate: preferences, tolerability, and resultspatient positioningprostatediagnosispaindigital rectal examinationPURPOSE: To evaluate the preferred position used by Brazilian Urologists to perform DRE, the position that Brazilian patients prefer or think it is less embarrassing to have a DRE, and to evaluate the results of DRE with patients in left lateral decubitus, modified lithotomy, standing-up, or the physician will have them place their elbows on the table and squat down slightly. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Brazilian Urologists were contacted by e-mail, and 200 patients answered a questionnaire while undergoing prostate cancer screening. RESULTS: The preferred position was modified lithotomy position reported by 63.4% of Urologists, and left lateral position reported by 42.7% of the patients. Total DRE time was lower in the standing-up position. Pain and urinary urgency scores were similar regardless of the position used, and bowel urgency score was higher in patients squatting down. Patients were similar in terms of age and PSA level, but there was a significant difference between the standard deviations of estimated prostate weight in left lateral position. There were no differences in prostate asymmetry, positive DRE, or incomplete palpation of the prostate rates among different examination positions. CONCLUSIONS: Despite individual subjective preferences, a faster examination time in the standing-up position, and higher bowel urgency scores in patients with their elbows placed on the table and squatting down slightly, there were similar rates of prostate asymmetry, positive DRE, and incomplete palpation of the prostate, and comparable patient tolerability among different examination techniques.Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2011-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382011000300011International braz j urol v.37 n.3 2011reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/S1677-55382011000300011info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRomero,Frederico R.Romero,Antonio W.Tambara Filho,RenatoBrenny Filho,ThadeuOliveira Júnior,Fernando Cesar deeng2011-07-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382011000300011Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2011-07-27T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Patient positioning during digital rectal examination of the prostate: preferences, tolerability, and results
title Patient positioning during digital rectal examination of the prostate: preferences, tolerability, and results
spellingShingle Patient positioning during digital rectal examination of the prostate: preferences, tolerability, and results
Romero,Frederico R.
patient positioning
prostate
diagnosis
pain
digital rectal examination
title_short Patient positioning during digital rectal examination of the prostate: preferences, tolerability, and results
title_full Patient positioning during digital rectal examination of the prostate: preferences, tolerability, and results
title_fullStr Patient positioning during digital rectal examination of the prostate: preferences, tolerability, and results
title_full_unstemmed Patient positioning during digital rectal examination of the prostate: preferences, tolerability, and results
title_sort Patient positioning during digital rectal examination of the prostate: preferences, tolerability, and results
author Romero,Frederico R.
author_facet Romero,Frederico R.
Romero,Antonio W.
Tambara Filho,Renato
Brenny Filho,Thadeu
Oliveira Júnior,Fernando Cesar de
author_role author
author2 Romero,Antonio W.
Tambara Filho,Renato
Brenny Filho,Thadeu
Oliveira Júnior,Fernando Cesar de
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Romero,Frederico R.
Romero,Antonio W.
Tambara Filho,Renato
Brenny Filho,Thadeu
Oliveira Júnior,Fernando Cesar de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv patient positioning
prostate
diagnosis
pain
digital rectal examination
topic patient positioning
prostate
diagnosis
pain
digital rectal examination
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the preferred position used by Brazilian Urologists to perform DRE, the position that Brazilian patients prefer or think it is less embarrassing to have a DRE, and to evaluate the results of DRE with patients in left lateral decubitus, modified lithotomy, standing-up, or the physician will have them place their elbows on the table and squat down slightly. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Brazilian Urologists were contacted by e-mail, and 200 patients answered a questionnaire while undergoing prostate cancer screening. RESULTS: The preferred position was modified lithotomy position reported by 63.4% of Urologists, and left lateral position reported by 42.7% of the patients. Total DRE time was lower in the standing-up position. Pain and urinary urgency scores were similar regardless of the position used, and bowel urgency score was higher in patients squatting down. Patients were similar in terms of age and PSA level, but there was a significant difference between the standard deviations of estimated prostate weight in left lateral position. There were no differences in prostate asymmetry, positive DRE, or incomplete palpation of the prostate rates among different examination positions. CONCLUSIONS: Despite individual subjective preferences, a faster examination time in the standing-up position, and higher bowel urgency scores in patients with their elbows placed on the table and squatting down slightly, there were similar rates of prostate asymmetry, positive DRE, and incomplete palpation of the prostate, and comparable patient tolerability among different examination techniques.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382011000300011
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382011000300011
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1677-55382011000300011
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International braz j urol v.37 n.3 2011
reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron:SBU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron_str SBU
institution SBU
reponame_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
collection International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br
_version_ 1750318072319705088