Locally advanced penile carcinoma: classic emasculation or testis-sparing surgery?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gonzaga-Silva,Lúcio Flávio
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Lima,George R. M., Tavares,José M., Pinheiro,Vladmir O., Magalhães,George A., Tomas,Manoel E., Nogueira,Cleto D., Lima,Marcos V. A.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Braz J Urol (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382012000600750
Resumo: Purpose The study evaluates the clinical and pathological findings of 16 patients with locally advanced penile carcinoma (PC) submitted to emasculation, and discusses questions related to the usefulness of bilateral orchiectomy. Materials and Methods Between 1999 and 2010, 172 patients with PC were treated. Sixteen (9%) underwent emasculation. Data were retrieved from the institution's database including age, ethnicity, date of surgery, residential setting, level of schooling, time to diagnosis, type of reconstruction, complications, tumor stage and grade, vascular and perineural invasion along with invasion of corpus cavernosum, corpus spongiosum, testicles, scrotum and urethra. Results A total of 16 patients (average: 63.1 years) with locally advanced PC were included. All were illiterate or semiliterate rural dwellers and 87% were white. The time to diagnosis was 8-12 months. The mean follow-up time was 31.9 months (1-119). By the time of the last follow-up, only seven patients (43.75%) were alive. Tumors were pT4 (n = 6), pT3 (n = 8), pT2 (n = 2), Grade I (n = 5) and Grade II (n = 11). The histopathological examination revealed invasion of the urethra (n = 13), scrotum (n = 5) and testicles (n = 1). The surgical margin was positive in one patient. Six patients (37.5%) had vascular invasion and 11 (68.7%) had perineural invasion. Currently, only one of the former is alive. Conclusions The finding of focal microscopic testicular infiltration in only one of 32 testicles, even in the presence of clinically apparent scrotal invasion, suggests that emasculation without bilateral orchiectomy is a safe treatment option for patients with locally advanced PC.
id SBU-1_af63c3ace23ba606ca98d355949fc08e
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1677-55382012000600750
network_acronym_str SBU-1
network_name_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Locally advanced penile carcinoma: classic emasculation or testis-sparing surgery?OrchiectomyPenile NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Squamous CellPenis Purpose The study evaluates the clinical and pathological findings of 16 patients with locally advanced penile carcinoma (PC) submitted to emasculation, and discusses questions related to the usefulness of bilateral orchiectomy. Materials and Methods Between 1999 and 2010, 172 patients with PC were treated. Sixteen (9%) underwent emasculation. Data were retrieved from the institution's database including age, ethnicity, date of surgery, residential setting, level of schooling, time to diagnosis, type of reconstruction, complications, tumor stage and grade, vascular and perineural invasion along with invasion of corpus cavernosum, corpus spongiosum, testicles, scrotum and urethra. Results A total of 16 patients (average: 63.1 years) with locally advanced PC were included. All were illiterate or semiliterate rural dwellers and 87% were white. The time to diagnosis was 8-12 months. The mean follow-up time was 31.9 months (1-119). By the time of the last follow-up, only seven patients (43.75%) were alive. Tumors were pT4 (n = 6), pT3 (n = 8), pT2 (n = 2), Grade I (n = 5) and Grade II (n = 11). The histopathological examination revealed invasion of the urethra (n = 13), scrotum (n = 5) and testicles (n = 1). The surgical margin was positive in one patient. Six patients (37.5%) had vascular invasion and 11 (68.7%) had perineural invasion. Currently, only one of the former is alive. Conclusions The finding of focal microscopic testicular infiltration in only one of 32 testicles, even in the presence of clinically apparent scrotal invasion, suggests that emasculation without bilateral orchiectomy is a safe treatment option for patients with locally advanced PC. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2012-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382012000600750International braz j urol v.38 n.6 2012reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/1677-553820133806750info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGonzaga-Silva,Lúcio FlávioLima,George R. M.Tavares,José M.Pinheiro,Vladmir O.Magalhães,George A.Tomas,Manoel E.Nogueira,Cleto D.Lima,Marcos V. A.eng2013-04-05T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382012000600750Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2013-04-05T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Locally advanced penile carcinoma: classic emasculation or testis-sparing surgery?
title Locally advanced penile carcinoma: classic emasculation or testis-sparing surgery?
spellingShingle Locally advanced penile carcinoma: classic emasculation or testis-sparing surgery?
Gonzaga-Silva,Lúcio Flávio
Orchiectomy
Penile Neoplasms
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
Penis
title_short Locally advanced penile carcinoma: classic emasculation or testis-sparing surgery?
title_full Locally advanced penile carcinoma: classic emasculation or testis-sparing surgery?
title_fullStr Locally advanced penile carcinoma: classic emasculation or testis-sparing surgery?
title_full_unstemmed Locally advanced penile carcinoma: classic emasculation or testis-sparing surgery?
title_sort Locally advanced penile carcinoma: classic emasculation or testis-sparing surgery?
author Gonzaga-Silva,Lúcio Flávio
author_facet Gonzaga-Silva,Lúcio Flávio
Lima,George R. M.
Tavares,José M.
Pinheiro,Vladmir O.
Magalhães,George A.
Tomas,Manoel E.
Nogueira,Cleto D.
Lima,Marcos V. A.
author_role author
author2 Lima,George R. M.
Tavares,José M.
Pinheiro,Vladmir O.
Magalhães,George A.
Tomas,Manoel E.
Nogueira,Cleto D.
Lima,Marcos V. A.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gonzaga-Silva,Lúcio Flávio
Lima,George R. M.
Tavares,José M.
Pinheiro,Vladmir O.
Magalhães,George A.
Tomas,Manoel E.
Nogueira,Cleto D.
Lima,Marcos V. A.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Orchiectomy
Penile Neoplasms
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
Penis
topic Orchiectomy
Penile Neoplasms
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
Penis
description Purpose The study evaluates the clinical and pathological findings of 16 patients with locally advanced penile carcinoma (PC) submitted to emasculation, and discusses questions related to the usefulness of bilateral orchiectomy. Materials and Methods Between 1999 and 2010, 172 patients with PC were treated. Sixteen (9%) underwent emasculation. Data were retrieved from the institution's database including age, ethnicity, date of surgery, residential setting, level of schooling, time to diagnosis, type of reconstruction, complications, tumor stage and grade, vascular and perineural invasion along with invasion of corpus cavernosum, corpus spongiosum, testicles, scrotum and urethra. Results A total of 16 patients (average: 63.1 years) with locally advanced PC were included. All were illiterate or semiliterate rural dwellers and 87% were white. The time to diagnosis was 8-12 months. The mean follow-up time was 31.9 months (1-119). By the time of the last follow-up, only seven patients (43.75%) were alive. Tumors were pT4 (n = 6), pT3 (n = 8), pT2 (n = 2), Grade I (n = 5) and Grade II (n = 11). The histopathological examination revealed invasion of the urethra (n = 13), scrotum (n = 5) and testicles (n = 1). The surgical margin was positive in one patient. Six patients (37.5%) had vascular invasion and 11 (68.7%) had perineural invasion. Currently, only one of the former is alive. Conclusions The finding of focal microscopic testicular infiltration in only one of 32 testicles, even in the presence of clinically apparent scrotal invasion, suggests that emasculation without bilateral orchiectomy is a safe treatment option for patients with locally advanced PC.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382012000600750
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382012000600750
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1677-553820133806750
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International braz j urol v.38 n.6 2012
reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron:SBU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron_str SBU
institution SBU
reponame_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
collection International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br
_version_ 1750318072839798784