Locally advanced penile carcinoma: classic emasculation or testis-sparing surgery?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | International Braz J Urol (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382012000600750 |
Resumo: | Purpose The study evaluates the clinical and pathological findings of 16 patients with locally advanced penile carcinoma (PC) submitted to emasculation, and discusses questions related to the usefulness of bilateral orchiectomy. Materials and Methods Between 1999 and 2010, 172 patients with PC were treated. Sixteen (9%) underwent emasculation. Data were retrieved from the institution's database including age, ethnicity, date of surgery, residential setting, level of schooling, time to diagnosis, type of reconstruction, complications, tumor stage and grade, vascular and perineural invasion along with invasion of corpus cavernosum, corpus spongiosum, testicles, scrotum and urethra. Results A total of 16 patients (average: 63.1 years) with locally advanced PC were included. All were illiterate or semiliterate rural dwellers and 87% were white. The time to diagnosis was 8-12 months. The mean follow-up time was 31.9 months (1-119). By the time of the last follow-up, only seven patients (43.75%) were alive. Tumors were pT4 (n = 6), pT3 (n = 8), pT2 (n = 2), Grade I (n = 5) and Grade II (n = 11). The histopathological examination revealed invasion of the urethra (n = 13), scrotum (n = 5) and testicles (n = 1). The surgical margin was positive in one patient. Six patients (37.5%) had vascular invasion and 11 (68.7%) had perineural invasion. Currently, only one of the former is alive. Conclusions The finding of focal microscopic testicular infiltration in only one of 32 testicles, even in the presence of clinically apparent scrotal invasion, suggests that emasculation without bilateral orchiectomy is a safe treatment option for patients with locally advanced PC. |
id |
SBU-1_af63c3ace23ba606ca98d355949fc08e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1677-55382012000600750 |
network_acronym_str |
SBU-1 |
network_name_str |
International Braz J Urol (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Locally advanced penile carcinoma: classic emasculation or testis-sparing surgery?OrchiectomyPenile NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Squamous CellPenis Purpose The study evaluates the clinical and pathological findings of 16 patients with locally advanced penile carcinoma (PC) submitted to emasculation, and discusses questions related to the usefulness of bilateral orchiectomy. Materials and Methods Between 1999 and 2010, 172 patients with PC were treated. Sixteen (9%) underwent emasculation. Data were retrieved from the institution's database including age, ethnicity, date of surgery, residential setting, level of schooling, time to diagnosis, type of reconstruction, complications, tumor stage and grade, vascular and perineural invasion along with invasion of corpus cavernosum, corpus spongiosum, testicles, scrotum and urethra. Results A total of 16 patients (average: 63.1 years) with locally advanced PC were included. All were illiterate or semiliterate rural dwellers and 87% were white. The time to diagnosis was 8-12 months. The mean follow-up time was 31.9 months (1-119). By the time of the last follow-up, only seven patients (43.75%) were alive. Tumors were pT4 (n = 6), pT3 (n = 8), pT2 (n = 2), Grade I (n = 5) and Grade II (n = 11). The histopathological examination revealed invasion of the urethra (n = 13), scrotum (n = 5) and testicles (n = 1). The surgical margin was positive in one patient. Six patients (37.5%) had vascular invasion and 11 (68.7%) had perineural invasion. Currently, only one of the former is alive. Conclusions The finding of focal microscopic testicular infiltration in only one of 32 testicles, even in the presence of clinically apparent scrotal invasion, suggests that emasculation without bilateral orchiectomy is a safe treatment option for patients with locally advanced PC. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2012-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382012000600750International braz j urol v.38 n.6 2012reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/1677-553820133806750info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGonzaga-Silva,Lúcio FlávioLima,George R. M.Tavares,José M.Pinheiro,Vladmir O.Magalhães,George A.Tomas,Manoel E.Nogueira,Cleto D.Lima,Marcos V. A.eng2013-04-05T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382012000600750Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2013-04-05T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Locally advanced penile carcinoma: classic emasculation or testis-sparing surgery? |
title |
Locally advanced penile carcinoma: classic emasculation or testis-sparing surgery? |
spellingShingle |
Locally advanced penile carcinoma: classic emasculation or testis-sparing surgery? Gonzaga-Silva,Lúcio Flávio Orchiectomy Penile Neoplasms Carcinoma, Squamous Cell Penis |
title_short |
Locally advanced penile carcinoma: classic emasculation or testis-sparing surgery? |
title_full |
Locally advanced penile carcinoma: classic emasculation or testis-sparing surgery? |
title_fullStr |
Locally advanced penile carcinoma: classic emasculation or testis-sparing surgery? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Locally advanced penile carcinoma: classic emasculation or testis-sparing surgery? |
title_sort |
Locally advanced penile carcinoma: classic emasculation or testis-sparing surgery? |
author |
Gonzaga-Silva,Lúcio Flávio |
author_facet |
Gonzaga-Silva,Lúcio Flávio Lima,George R. M. Tavares,José M. Pinheiro,Vladmir O. Magalhães,George A. Tomas,Manoel E. Nogueira,Cleto D. Lima,Marcos V. A. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lima,George R. M. Tavares,José M. Pinheiro,Vladmir O. Magalhães,George A. Tomas,Manoel E. Nogueira,Cleto D. Lima,Marcos V. A. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gonzaga-Silva,Lúcio Flávio Lima,George R. M. Tavares,José M. Pinheiro,Vladmir O. Magalhães,George A. Tomas,Manoel E. Nogueira,Cleto D. Lima,Marcos V. A. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Orchiectomy Penile Neoplasms Carcinoma, Squamous Cell Penis |
topic |
Orchiectomy Penile Neoplasms Carcinoma, Squamous Cell Penis |
description |
Purpose The study evaluates the clinical and pathological findings of 16 patients with locally advanced penile carcinoma (PC) submitted to emasculation, and discusses questions related to the usefulness of bilateral orchiectomy. Materials and Methods Between 1999 and 2010, 172 patients with PC were treated. Sixteen (9%) underwent emasculation. Data were retrieved from the institution's database including age, ethnicity, date of surgery, residential setting, level of schooling, time to diagnosis, type of reconstruction, complications, tumor stage and grade, vascular and perineural invasion along with invasion of corpus cavernosum, corpus spongiosum, testicles, scrotum and urethra. Results A total of 16 patients (average: 63.1 years) with locally advanced PC were included. All were illiterate or semiliterate rural dwellers and 87% were white. The time to diagnosis was 8-12 months. The mean follow-up time was 31.9 months (1-119). By the time of the last follow-up, only seven patients (43.75%) were alive. Tumors were pT4 (n = 6), pT3 (n = 8), pT2 (n = 2), Grade I (n = 5) and Grade II (n = 11). The histopathological examination revealed invasion of the urethra (n = 13), scrotum (n = 5) and testicles (n = 1). The surgical margin was positive in one patient. Six patients (37.5%) had vascular invasion and 11 (68.7%) had perineural invasion. Currently, only one of the former is alive. Conclusions The finding of focal microscopic testicular infiltration in only one of 32 testicles, even in the presence of clinically apparent scrotal invasion, suggests that emasculation without bilateral orchiectomy is a safe treatment option for patients with locally advanced PC. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382012000600750 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382012000600750 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1677-553820133806750 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
International braz j urol v.38 n.6 2012 reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU) instacron:SBU |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU) |
instacron_str |
SBU |
institution |
SBU |
reponame_str |
International Braz J Urol (Online) |
collection |
International Braz J Urol (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br |
_version_ |
1750318072839798784 |