Novel penile circumcision suturing devices versus the shang ring for adult male circumcision: a prospective study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Han,Hu
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Xie,Da-wei, Zhou,Xiao-guang, Zhang,Xiao-dong
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Braz J Urol (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382017000400736
Resumo: ABSTRACT Introduction To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel penile circumcision suturing devices PCSD and Shang ring (SR) for circumcision in an adult population. Materials and Methods A total of 124 outpatients were randomly assigned to receive PCSD (n=62) or SR (n=62). Patient characteristics, operative time, blood loss, return to normal activities time (RNAT), visual analogue scale (VAS), scar width, wound healing time, cosmetic result, and complications were recorded. Results There were no significant differences in blood loss, RNAT, or complications between the two groups. There were no significant differences in the VAS scores at the operation, at 6 or 24 hours after surgery (P>0.05). The wound scar width was wider in the SR group than in the PCSD group (P<0.01). Patients in the SR group had significantly longer wound healing time compared with those in the PCSD group (P<0.01). Patients who underwent PCSD were significantly more satisfied with the cosmetic results (P<0.01). Conclusions SR and PCSD are safe and effective minimally invasive techniques for adult male circumcision. Compared with SRs, PCSDs have the advantages of faster postoperative incision healing and a good effect on wound cosmetics.
id SBU-1_bf63da1c3d304321e1e6917a23d45118
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1677-55382017000400736
network_acronym_str SBU-1
network_name_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Novel penile circumcision suturing devices versus the shang ring for adult male circumcision: a prospective studyCircumcision, MalePenisSurgical Procedures, OperativeABSTRACT Introduction To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel penile circumcision suturing devices PCSD and Shang ring (SR) for circumcision in an adult population. Materials and Methods A total of 124 outpatients were randomly assigned to receive PCSD (n=62) or SR (n=62). Patient characteristics, operative time, blood loss, return to normal activities time (RNAT), visual analogue scale (VAS), scar width, wound healing time, cosmetic result, and complications were recorded. Results There were no significant differences in blood loss, RNAT, or complications between the two groups. There were no significant differences in the VAS scores at the operation, at 6 or 24 hours after surgery (P>0.05). The wound scar width was wider in the SR group than in the PCSD group (P<0.01). Patients in the SR group had significantly longer wound healing time compared with those in the PCSD group (P<0.01). Patients who underwent PCSD were significantly more satisfied with the cosmetic results (P<0.01). Conclusions SR and PCSD are safe and effective minimally invasive techniques for adult male circumcision. Compared with SRs, PCSDs have the advantages of faster postoperative incision healing and a good effect on wound cosmetics.Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2017-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382017000400736International braz j urol v.43 n.4 2017reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2016.0204info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHan,HuXie,Da-weiZhou,Xiao-guangZhang,Xiao-dongeng2017-08-17T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382017000400736Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2017-08-17T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Novel penile circumcision suturing devices versus the shang ring for adult male circumcision: a prospective study
title Novel penile circumcision suturing devices versus the shang ring for adult male circumcision: a prospective study
spellingShingle Novel penile circumcision suturing devices versus the shang ring for adult male circumcision: a prospective study
Han,Hu
Circumcision, Male
Penis
Surgical Procedures, Operative
title_short Novel penile circumcision suturing devices versus the shang ring for adult male circumcision: a prospective study
title_full Novel penile circumcision suturing devices versus the shang ring for adult male circumcision: a prospective study
title_fullStr Novel penile circumcision suturing devices versus the shang ring for adult male circumcision: a prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Novel penile circumcision suturing devices versus the shang ring for adult male circumcision: a prospective study
title_sort Novel penile circumcision suturing devices versus the shang ring for adult male circumcision: a prospective study
author Han,Hu
author_facet Han,Hu
Xie,Da-wei
Zhou,Xiao-guang
Zhang,Xiao-dong
author_role author
author2 Xie,Da-wei
Zhou,Xiao-guang
Zhang,Xiao-dong
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Han,Hu
Xie,Da-wei
Zhou,Xiao-guang
Zhang,Xiao-dong
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Circumcision, Male
Penis
Surgical Procedures, Operative
topic Circumcision, Male
Penis
Surgical Procedures, Operative
description ABSTRACT Introduction To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel penile circumcision suturing devices PCSD and Shang ring (SR) for circumcision in an adult population. Materials and Methods A total of 124 outpatients were randomly assigned to receive PCSD (n=62) or SR (n=62). Patient characteristics, operative time, blood loss, return to normal activities time (RNAT), visual analogue scale (VAS), scar width, wound healing time, cosmetic result, and complications were recorded. Results There were no significant differences in blood loss, RNAT, or complications between the two groups. There were no significant differences in the VAS scores at the operation, at 6 or 24 hours after surgery (P>0.05). The wound scar width was wider in the SR group than in the PCSD group (P<0.01). Patients in the SR group had significantly longer wound healing time compared with those in the PCSD group (P<0.01). Patients who underwent PCSD were significantly more satisfied with the cosmetic results (P<0.01). Conclusions SR and PCSD are safe and effective minimally invasive techniques for adult male circumcision. Compared with SRs, PCSDs have the advantages of faster postoperative incision healing and a good effect on wound cosmetics.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382017000400736
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382017000400736
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2016.0204
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International braz j urol v.43 n.4 2017
reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron:SBU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron_str SBU
institution SBU
reponame_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
collection International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br
_version_ 1750318075785248768