Intermediate-term outcomes of laparoscopic pectopexy and vaginal sacrospinous fixation: a comparative study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Astepe,Bahar Sariibrahim
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Karsli,Aybike, Köleli,Işil, Aksakal,Orhan Seyfi, Terzi,Hasan, Kale,Ahmet
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Braz J Urol (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382019000500999
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective To compare the intermediate-term follow-up results of laparoscopic pectopexy and vaginal sacrospinous fixation procedures. Materials and Methods Forty-three women who had vaginal sacrospinous fixations(SSF) using Dr. Aksakal’s Desta suture carrier and 36 women who had laparoscopic pectopexies were re-examined 7 to 43 months after surgery. The PISQ-12 and P-QOL questionnaires were answered by all of the women. Results The apical descensus relapse rates did not differ between the groups (14% in the SSF vs. 11.1% in the pectopexy group). The de novo cystocele rates were higher in the SSF group (25.6% in the SSF vs. 8.3% in the pectopexy group). There were no significant differences in the de novo rectocele numbers between the groups. The treatment satisfaction rates were high in both groups (93% in the SSF vs. 91.7% in the pectopexy group), which was not statistically significant. Moreover, the postoperative de novo urge and stress urinary incontinence rates did not differ; however, the postoperative sexual function scores (PISQ-12) (36.86±3.15 in the SSF group vs. 38.21±5.69 in the pectopexy group) were better in the pectopexy group. The general P-QOL scores were not significantly different between the surgery groups. Conclusion The vaginal sacrospinous fixation maintains its value in prolapse surgery with the increasing importance of native tissue repair. The new laparoscopic pectopexy technique has comparable positive follow-up results with the conventional sacrospinous fixation procedure.
id SBU-1_c425f4e65f2b4fe1be684c093a80b44b
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1677-55382019000500999
network_acronym_str SBU-1
network_name_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Intermediate-term outcomes of laparoscopic pectopexy and vaginal sacrospinous fixation: a comparative studyPelvic Organ ProlapseHand-Assisted LaparoscopyTreatment OutcomeABSTRACT Objective To compare the intermediate-term follow-up results of laparoscopic pectopexy and vaginal sacrospinous fixation procedures. Materials and Methods Forty-three women who had vaginal sacrospinous fixations(SSF) using Dr. Aksakal’s Desta suture carrier and 36 women who had laparoscopic pectopexies were re-examined 7 to 43 months after surgery. The PISQ-12 and P-QOL questionnaires were answered by all of the women. Results The apical descensus relapse rates did not differ between the groups (14% in the SSF vs. 11.1% in the pectopexy group). The de novo cystocele rates were higher in the SSF group (25.6% in the SSF vs. 8.3% in the pectopexy group). There were no significant differences in the de novo rectocele numbers between the groups. The treatment satisfaction rates were high in both groups (93% in the SSF vs. 91.7% in the pectopexy group), which was not statistically significant. Moreover, the postoperative de novo urge and stress urinary incontinence rates did not differ; however, the postoperative sexual function scores (PISQ-12) (36.86±3.15 in the SSF group vs. 38.21±5.69 in the pectopexy group) were better in the pectopexy group. The general P-QOL scores were not significantly different between the surgery groups. Conclusion The vaginal sacrospinous fixation maintains its value in prolapse surgery with the increasing importance of native tissue repair. The new laparoscopic pectopexy technique has comparable positive follow-up results with the conventional sacrospinous fixation procedure.Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2019-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382019000500999International braz j urol v.45 n.5 2019reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2019.0103info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAstepe,Bahar SariibrahimKarsli,AybikeKöleli,IşilAksakal,Orhan SeyfiTerzi,HasanKale,Ahmeteng2019-11-05T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382019000500999Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2019-11-05T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Intermediate-term outcomes of laparoscopic pectopexy and vaginal sacrospinous fixation: a comparative study
title Intermediate-term outcomes of laparoscopic pectopexy and vaginal sacrospinous fixation: a comparative study
spellingShingle Intermediate-term outcomes of laparoscopic pectopexy and vaginal sacrospinous fixation: a comparative study
Astepe,Bahar Sariibrahim
Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Hand-Assisted Laparoscopy
Treatment Outcome
title_short Intermediate-term outcomes of laparoscopic pectopexy and vaginal sacrospinous fixation: a comparative study
title_full Intermediate-term outcomes of laparoscopic pectopexy and vaginal sacrospinous fixation: a comparative study
title_fullStr Intermediate-term outcomes of laparoscopic pectopexy and vaginal sacrospinous fixation: a comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Intermediate-term outcomes of laparoscopic pectopexy and vaginal sacrospinous fixation: a comparative study
title_sort Intermediate-term outcomes of laparoscopic pectopexy and vaginal sacrospinous fixation: a comparative study
author Astepe,Bahar Sariibrahim
author_facet Astepe,Bahar Sariibrahim
Karsli,Aybike
Köleli,Işil
Aksakal,Orhan Seyfi
Terzi,Hasan
Kale,Ahmet
author_role author
author2 Karsli,Aybike
Köleli,Işil
Aksakal,Orhan Seyfi
Terzi,Hasan
Kale,Ahmet
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Astepe,Bahar Sariibrahim
Karsli,Aybike
Köleli,Işil
Aksakal,Orhan Seyfi
Terzi,Hasan
Kale,Ahmet
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Hand-Assisted Laparoscopy
Treatment Outcome
topic Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Hand-Assisted Laparoscopy
Treatment Outcome
description ABSTRACT Objective To compare the intermediate-term follow-up results of laparoscopic pectopexy and vaginal sacrospinous fixation procedures. Materials and Methods Forty-three women who had vaginal sacrospinous fixations(SSF) using Dr. Aksakal’s Desta suture carrier and 36 women who had laparoscopic pectopexies were re-examined 7 to 43 months after surgery. The PISQ-12 and P-QOL questionnaires were answered by all of the women. Results The apical descensus relapse rates did not differ between the groups (14% in the SSF vs. 11.1% in the pectopexy group). The de novo cystocele rates were higher in the SSF group (25.6% in the SSF vs. 8.3% in the pectopexy group). There were no significant differences in the de novo rectocele numbers between the groups. The treatment satisfaction rates were high in both groups (93% in the SSF vs. 91.7% in the pectopexy group), which was not statistically significant. Moreover, the postoperative de novo urge and stress urinary incontinence rates did not differ; however, the postoperative sexual function scores (PISQ-12) (36.86±3.15 in the SSF group vs. 38.21±5.69 in the pectopexy group) were better in the pectopexy group. The general P-QOL scores were not significantly different between the surgery groups. Conclusion The vaginal sacrospinous fixation maintains its value in prolapse surgery with the increasing importance of native tissue repair. The new laparoscopic pectopexy technique has comparable positive follow-up results with the conventional sacrospinous fixation procedure.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382019000500999
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382019000500999
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2019.0103
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International braz j urol v.45 n.5 2019
reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron:SBU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron_str SBU
institution SBU
reponame_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
collection International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br
_version_ 1750318077185097728