Adjuvant radiotherapy for the primary treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma: are we offering the best?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Srougi,Victor
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Bessa Junior,Jose, Tanno,Fabio Y., Ferreira,Amanda M., Hoff,Ana O., Bezerra,João E., Almeida,Cristiane M., Almeida,Madson Q., Mendonça,Berenice B., Nahas,William C., Chambô,Jose L., Srougi,Miguel, Fragoso,Maria C. B. V.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Braz J Urol (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382017000500841
Resumo: ABSTRACT Purpose: To evaluate the role of ARDT after surgical resection of ACC. Materials and Methods: Records of patients from our institutional ACC database were retrospectively assessed. A paired comparison analysis was used to evaluate the oncological outcomes between patients treated with surgery followed by ARDT or surgery only (control). The endpoints were LRFS, RFS, and OS. A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis was also performed to evaluate local recurrence of ACC when ARDT was used. Results: Ten patients were included in each Group. The median follow-up times were 32 months and 35 months for the ARDT and control Groups, respectively. The results for LRFS (p=0.11), RFS (p=0.92), and OS (p=0.47) were similar among subsets. The mean time to present with local recurrence was significantly longer in the ARDT group compared with the control Group (419±206 days vs. 181±86 days, respectively; p=0.03). ARDT was well tolerated by the patients; there were no reports of late toxicity. The meta-analysis, which included four retrospective series, revealed that ARDT had a protective effect on LRFS (HR=0.4; CI=0.17-0.94). Conclusions: ARDT may reduce the chance and prolong the time to ACC local recurrence. However, there were no benefits for disease recurrence control or overall survival for patients who underwent this complementary therapy.
id SBU-1_c77d87da0ed6909a37c0ef9847fb0bde
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1677-55382017000500841
network_acronym_str SBU-1
network_name_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Adjuvant radiotherapy for the primary treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma: are we offering the best?Adrenocortical CarcinomaRadiotherapyAdjuvantTherapeuticsABSTRACT Purpose: To evaluate the role of ARDT after surgical resection of ACC. Materials and Methods: Records of patients from our institutional ACC database were retrospectively assessed. A paired comparison analysis was used to evaluate the oncological outcomes between patients treated with surgery followed by ARDT or surgery only (control). The endpoints were LRFS, RFS, and OS. A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis was also performed to evaluate local recurrence of ACC when ARDT was used. Results: Ten patients were included in each Group. The median follow-up times were 32 months and 35 months for the ARDT and control Groups, respectively. The results for LRFS (p=0.11), RFS (p=0.92), and OS (p=0.47) were similar among subsets. The mean time to present with local recurrence was significantly longer in the ARDT group compared with the control Group (419±206 days vs. 181±86 days, respectively; p=0.03). ARDT was well tolerated by the patients; there were no reports of late toxicity. The meta-analysis, which included four retrospective series, revealed that ARDT had a protective effect on LRFS (HR=0.4; CI=0.17-0.94). Conclusions: ARDT may reduce the chance and prolong the time to ACC local recurrence. However, there were no benefits for disease recurrence control or overall survival for patients who underwent this complementary therapy.Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2017-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382017000500841International braz j urol v.43 n.5 2017reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2017.0095info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSrougi,VictorBessa Junior,JoseTanno,Fabio Y.Ferreira,Amanda M.Hoff,Ana O.Bezerra,João E.Almeida,Cristiane M.Almeida,Madson Q.Mendonça,Berenice B.Nahas,William C.Chambô,Jose L.Srougi,MiguelFragoso,Maria C. B. V.eng2017-11-17T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382017000500841Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2017-11-17T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Adjuvant radiotherapy for the primary treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma: are we offering the best?
title Adjuvant radiotherapy for the primary treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma: are we offering the best?
spellingShingle Adjuvant radiotherapy for the primary treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma: are we offering the best?
Srougi,Victor
Adrenocortical Carcinoma
Radiotherapy
Adjuvant
Therapeutics
title_short Adjuvant radiotherapy for the primary treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma: are we offering the best?
title_full Adjuvant radiotherapy for the primary treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma: are we offering the best?
title_fullStr Adjuvant radiotherapy for the primary treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma: are we offering the best?
title_full_unstemmed Adjuvant radiotherapy for the primary treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma: are we offering the best?
title_sort Adjuvant radiotherapy for the primary treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma: are we offering the best?
author Srougi,Victor
author_facet Srougi,Victor
Bessa Junior,Jose
Tanno,Fabio Y.
Ferreira,Amanda M.
Hoff,Ana O.
Bezerra,João E.
Almeida,Cristiane M.
Almeida,Madson Q.
Mendonça,Berenice B.
Nahas,William C.
Chambô,Jose L.
Srougi,Miguel
Fragoso,Maria C. B. V.
author_role author
author2 Bessa Junior,Jose
Tanno,Fabio Y.
Ferreira,Amanda M.
Hoff,Ana O.
Bezerra,João E.
Almeida,Cristiane M.
Almeida,Madson Q.
Mendonça,Berenice B.
Nahas,William C.
Chambô,Jose L.
Srougi,Miguel
Fragoso,Maria C. B. V.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Srougi,Victor
Bessa Junior,Jose
Tanno,Fabio Y.
Ferreira,Amanda M.
Hoff,Ana O.
Bezerra,João E.
Almeida,Cristiane M.
Almeida,Madson Q.
Mendonça,Berenice B.
Nahas,William C.
Chambô,Jose L.
Srougi,Miguel
Fragoso,Maria C. B. V.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Adrenocortical Carcinoma
Radiotherapy
Adjuvant
Therapeutics
topic Adrenocortical Carcinoma
Radiotherapy
Adjuvant
Therapeutics
description ABSTRACT Purpose: To evaluate the role of ARDT after surgical resection of ACC. Materials and Methods: Records of patients from our institutional ACC database were retrospectively assessed. A paired comparison analysis was used to evaluate the oncological outcomes between patients treated with surgery followed by ARDT or surgery only (control). The endpoints were LRFS, RFS, and OS. A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis was also performed to evaluate local recurrence of ACC when ARDT was used. Results: Ten patients were included in each Group. The median follow-up times were 32 months and 35 months for the ARDT and control Groups, respectively. The results for LRFS (p=0.11), RFS (p=0.92), and OS (p=0.47) were similar among subsets. The mean time to present with local recurrence was significantly longer in the ARDT group compared with the control Group (419±206 days vs. 181±86 days, respectively; p=0.03). ARDT was well tolerated by the patients; there were no reports of late toxicity. The meta-analysis, which included four retrospective series, revealed that ARDT had a protective effect on LRFS (HR=0.4; CI=0.17-0.94). Conclusions: ARDT may reduce the chance and prolong the time to ACC local recurrence. However, there were no benefits for disease recurrence control or overall survival for patients who underwent this complementary therapy.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382017000500841
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382017000500841
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2017.0095
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International braz j urol v.43 n.5 2017
reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron:SBU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron_str SBU
institution SBU
reponame_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
collection International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br
_version_ 1750318075799928832