When prone position is contraindicated or not preferable, can supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy solve the problem?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Youssef,A.
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Esmat,M., Wael,M.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Braz J Urol (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382012000100008
Resumo: PURPOSE: To assess safety and efficacy of supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients for whom prone position or general anesthesia is contraindicated or not preferable due to associated comorbidities, overweight or ipsilateral upper ureteric calculi. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty two patients (37 males and 15 females, mean age 33 ± 10.2 years) were included in this study. Supine position was selected due to anesthetic considerations (preexisting compromised cardiopulmonary status, morbid obesity (body mass index > 40 kg/m²) and/or other associated medical comorbidities), impossible prone position due to bone deformities or associated ipsilateral upper ureteric stone. Regional anesthesia was used in 24 patients while 28 patients underwent general anesthesia. After standard cystoscopy and retrograde ureteropyelography in the dorsal lithotomy position, the position was modified using 3 liters of saline bag below the ipsilateral upper flank. Percutaneous access to the pelvicalyceal system was performed through the posterior axillary line under fluoroscopic guidance. RESULTS: Successful renal puncture was achieved in all cases. Single access via the lower calyx was the most commonly used access (36 cases). Stone-free rate was 92.3%. Postoperative complications classified according to Clavien Dindo classification included bleeding requiring transfusion (3.8%), urinary leakage requiring ureteric stenting (5.8%), prolonged fever (7.7%), deep venous thrombosis (1.9%) [grade III in all] and urinary leakage requiring ureteric stenting (5.8%) [grade IIIa]. CONCLUSIONS: The modified supine position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a safe and effective option that offers several advantages with an excellent outcome. It can be performed safely for morbidly obese patients and those with cardiopulmonary compromise.
id SBU-1_cd7db35f070995affe8a90097e376788
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1677-55382012000100008
network_acronym_str SBU-1
network_name_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling When prone position is contraindicated or not preferable, can supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy solve the problem?Kidney calculiPercutaneousnephrolithotomySupine positionPURPOSE: To assess safety and efficacy of supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients for whom prone position or general anesthesia is contraindicated or not preferable due to associated comorbidities, overweight or ipsilateral upper ureteric calculi. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty two patients (37 males and 15 females, mean age 33 ± 10.2 years) were included in this study. Supine position was selected due to anesthetic considerations (preexisting compromised cardiopulmonary status, morbid obesity (body mass index > 40 kg/m²) and/or other associated medical comorbidities), impossible prone position due to bone deformities or associated ipsilateral upper ureteric stone. Regional anesthesia was used in 24 patients while 28 patients underwent general anesthesia. After standard cystoscopy and retrograde ureteropyelography in the dorsal lithotomy position, the position was modified using 3 liters of saline bag below the ipsilateral upper flank. Percutaneous access to the pelvicalyceal system was performed through the posterior axillary line under fluoroscopic guidance. RESULTS: Successful renal puncture was achieved in all cases. Single access via the lower calyx was the most commonly used access (36 cases). Stone-free rate was 92.3%. Postoperative complications classified according to Clavien Dindo classification included bleeding requiring transfusion (3.8%), urinary leakage requiring ureteric stenting (5.8%), prolonged fever (7.7%), deep venous thrombosis (1.9%) [grade III in all] and urinary leakage requiring ureteric stenting (5.8%) [grade IIIa]. CONCLUSIONS: The modified supine position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a safe and effective option that offers several advantages with an excellent outcome. It can be performed safely for morbidly obese patients and those with cardiopulmonary compromise.Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2012-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382012000100008International braz j urol v.38 n.1 2012reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/S1677-55382012000100008info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessYoussef,A.Esmat,M.Wael,M.eng2012-03-28T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382012000100008Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2012-03-28T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv When prone position is contraindicated or not preferable, can supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy solve the problem?
title When prone position is contraindicated or not preferable, can supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy solve the problem?
spellingShingle When prone position is contraindicated or not preferable, can supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy solve the problem?
Youssef,A.
Kidney calculi
Percutaneous
nephrolithotomy
Supine position
title_short When prone position is contraindicated or not preferable, can supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy solve the problem?
title_full When prone position is contraindicated or not preferable, can supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy solve the problem?
title_fullStr When prone position is contraindicated or not preferable, can supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy solve the problem?
title_full_unstemmed When prone position is contraindicated or not preferable, can supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy solve the problem?
title_sort When prone position is contraindicated or not preferable, can supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy solve the problem?
author Youssef,A.
author_facet Youssef,A.
Esmat,M.
Wael,M.
author_role author
author2 Esmat,M.
Wael,M.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Youssef,A.
Esmat,M.
Wael,M.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Kidney calculi
Percutaneous
nephrolithotomy
Supine position
topic Kidney calculi
Percutaneous
nephrolithotomy
Supine position
description PURPOSE: To assess safety and efficacy of supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients for whom prone position or general anesthesia is contraindicated or not preferable due to associated comorbidities, overweight or ipsilateral upper ureteric calculi. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty two patients (37 males and 15 females, mean age 33 ± 10.2 years) were included in this study. Supine position was selected due to anesthetic considerations (preexisting compromised cardiopulmonary status, morbid obesity (body mass index > 40 kg/m²) and/or other associated medical comorbidities), impossible prone position due to bone deformities or associated ipsilateral upper ureteric stone. Regional anesthesia was used in 24 patients while 28 patients underwent general anesthesia. After standard cystoscopy and retrograde ureteropyelography in the dorsal lithotomy position, the position was modified using 3 liters of saline bag below the ipsilateral upper flank. Percutaneous access to the pelvicalyceal system was performed through the posterior axillary line under fluoroscopic guidance. RESULTS: Successful renal puncture was achieved in all cases. Single access via the lower calyx was the most commonly used access (36 cases). Stone-free rate was 92.3%. Postoperative complications classified according to Clavien Dindo classification included bleeding requiring transfusion (3.8%), urinary leakage requiring ureteric stenting (5.8%), prolonged fever (7.7%), deep venous thrombosis (1.9%) [grade III in all] and urinary leakage requiring ureteric stenting (5.8%) [grade IIIa]. CONCLUSIONS: The modified supine position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a safe and effective option that offers several advantages with an excellent outcome. It can be performed safely for morbidly obese patients and those with cardiopulmonary compromise.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382012000100008
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382012000100008
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1677-55382012000100008
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International braz j urol v.38 n.1 2012
reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron:SBU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron_str SBU
institution SBU
reponame_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
collection International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br
_version_ 1750318072433999872