Prostate cancer detection using multiparametric 3 – tesla MRI and fusion biopsy: preliminary results

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mussi,Thais Caldara
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Garcia,Rodrigo Gobbo, Queiroz,Marcos Roberto Gomes de, Lemos,Gustavo Caserta, Baroni,Ronaldo Hueb
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Braz J Urol (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382016000500897
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of transrectal ultrasonography (US) biopsy with imaging fusion using multiparametric (mp) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa), with an emphasis on clinically significant tumors according to histological criteria. Materials and Methods: A total of 189 consecutive US/MRI fusion biopsies were performed obtaining systematic and guided samples of suspicious areas on mpMRI using a 3 Tesla magnet without endorectal coil. Clinical significance for prostate cancer was established based on Epstein criteria. Results: In our casuistic, the average Gleason score was 7 and the average PSA was 5.0ng/mL. Of the 189 patients that received US/MRI biopsies, 110 (58.2%) were positive for PCa. Of those cases, 88 (80%) were clinically significant, accounting for 46.6% of all patients. We divided the MRI findings into 5 Likert scales of probability of having clinically significant PCa. The positivity of US/MRI biopsy for clinically significant PCa was 0%, 17.6% 23.5%, 53.4% and 84.4% for Likert scores 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in terms of biopsy results between different levels of suspicion on mpMRI and also when biopsy results were divided into groups of clinically non-significant versus clinically significant between different levels of suspicion on mpMRI (p-value <0.05 in both analyzes). Conclusion: We found that there is a significant difference in cancer detection using US/MRI fusion biopsy between low-probability and intermediate/high probability Likert scores using mpMRI.
id SBU-1_d7e53bfda98f0b190f60992e9bbe9264
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1677-55382016000500897
network_acronym_str SBU-1
network_name_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Prostate cancer detection using multiparametric 3 – tesla MRI and fusion biopsy: preliminary resultsProstatic NeoplasmsMagneticResonance ImagingBiopsyProstateABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of transrectal ultrasonography (US) biopsy with imaging fusion using multiparametric (mp) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa), with an emphasis on clinically significant tumors according to histological criteria. Materials and Methods: A total of 189 consecutive US/MRI fusion biopsies were performed obtaining systematic and guided samples of suspicious areas on mpMRI using a 3 Tesla magnet without endorectal coil. Clinical significance for prostate cancer was established based on Epstein criteria. Results: In our casuistic, the average Gleason score was 7 and the average PSA was 5.0ng/mL. Of the 189 patients that received US/MRI biopsies, 110 (58.2%) were positive for PCa. Of those cases, 88 (80%) were clinically significant, accounting for 46.6% of all patients. We divided the MRI findings into 5 Likert scales of probability of having clinically significant PCa. The positivity of US/MRI biopsy for clinically significant PCa was 0%, 17.6% 23.5%, 53.4% and 84.4% for Likert scores 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in terms of biopsy results between different levels of suspicion on mpMRI and also when biopsy results were divided into groups of clinically non-significant versus clinically significant between different levels of suspicion on mpMRI (p-value <0.05 in both analyzes). Conclusion: We found that there is a significant difference in cancer detection using US/MRI fusion biopsy between low-probability and intermediate/high probability Likert scores using mpMRI.Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2016-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382016000500897International braz j urol v.42 n.5 2016reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0204info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMussi,Thais CaldaraGarcia,Rodrigo GobboQueiroz,Marcos Roberto Gomes deLemos,Gustavo CasertaBaroni,Ronaldo Huebeng2016-10-18T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382016000500897Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2016-10-18T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Prostate cancer detection using multiparametric 3 – tesla MRI and fusion biopsy: preliminary results
title Prostate cancer detection using multiparametric 3 – tesla MRI and fusion biopsy: preliminary results
spellingShingle Prostate cancer detection using multiparametric 3 – tesla MRI and fusion biopsy: preliminary results
Mussi,Thais Caldara
Prostatic Neoplasms
Magnetic
Resonance Imaging
Biopsy
Prostate
title_short Prostate cancer detection using multiparametric 3 – tesla MRI and fusion biopsy: preliminary results
title_full Prostate cancer detection using multiparametric 3 – tesla MRI and fusion biopsy: preliminary results
title_fullStr Prostate cancer detection using multiparametric 3 – tesla MRI and fusion biopsy: preliminary results
title_full_unstemmed Prostate cancer detection using multiparametric 3 – tesla MRI and fusion biopsy: preliminary results
title_sort Prostate cancer detection using multiparametric 3 – tesla MRI and fusion biopsy: preliminary results
author Mussi,Thais Caldara
author_facet Mussi,Thais Caldara
Garcia,Rodrigo Gobbo
Queiroz,Marcos Roberto Gomes de
Lemos,Gustavo Caserta
Baroni,Ronaldo Hueb
author_role author
author2 Garcia,Rodrigo Gobbo
Queiroz,Marcos Roberto Gomes de
Lemos,Gustavo Caserta
Baroni,Ronaldo Hueb
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mussi,Thais Caldara
Garcia,Rodrigo Gobbo
Queiroz,Marcos Roberto Gomes de
Lemos,Gustavo Caserta
Baroni,Ronaldo Hueb
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Prostatic Neoplasms
Magnetic
Resonance Imaging
Biopsy
Prostate
topic Prostatic Neoplasms
Magnetic
Resonance Imaging
Biopsy
Prostate
description ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of transrectal ultrasonography (US) biopsy with imaging fusion using multiparametric (mp) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa), with an emphasis on clinically significant tumors according to histological criteria. Materials and Methods: A total of 189 consecutive US/MRI fusion biopsies were performed obtaining systematic and guided samples of suspicious areas on mpMRI using a 3 Tesla magnet without endorectal coil. Clinical significance for prostate cancer was established based on Epstein criteria. Results: In our casuistic, the average Gleason score was 7 and the average PSA was 5.0ng/mL. Of the 189 patients that received US/MRI biopsies, 110 (58.2%) were positive for PCa. Of those cases, 88 (80%) were clinically significant, accounting for 46.6% of all patients. We divided the MRI findings into 5 Likert scales of probability of having clinically significant PCa. The positivity of US/MRI biopsy for clinically significant PCa was 0%, 17.6% 23.5%, 53.4% and 84.4% for Likert scores 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in terms of biopsy results between different levels of suspicion on mpMRI and also when biopsy results were divided into groups of clinically non-significant versus clinically significant between different levels of suspicion on mpMRI (p-value <0.05 in both analyzes). Conclusion: We found that there is a significant difference in cancer detection using US/MRI fusion biopsy between low-probability and intermediate/high probability Likert scores using mpMRI.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382016000500897
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382016000500897
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0204
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International braz j urol v.42 n.5 2016
reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron:SBU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron_str SBU
institution SBU
reponame_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
collection International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br
_version_ 1750318075017691136