Can infundibular height predict the clearance of lower pole calyceal stone after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Arzoz-Fabregas,M.
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: Ibarz-Servio,L., Blasco-Casares,F. J., Ramon-Dalmau,M., Ruiz-Marcellan,F. J.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Braz J Urol (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382009000200003
Resumo: PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) on lower calyceal calculi in relation to the renal anatomical factors and determine which of these factors can be used to select patients who will benefit from SWL. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed retrospectively 78 patients with single radiopaque lower calyceal stones treated with SWL. The patients were evaluated 3 months after lithotripsy with a simple abdominal X-ray and a kidney ultrasound scan. The success of the treatment, removal of all fragments, was correlated with renal anatomical factors measured in the pre-treatment intravenous urography: infundibulopelvic angle, lower infundibulum width, lower infundibulum length, ratio length/width, infundibulum height, and number of minor calyces in the lower calyceal group. RESULTS: Three months after SWL treatment, 39 patients were stone-free (NR group) and 39 had residual fragments (R group). Both groups presented no differences in relation to infundibulopelvic angle, width and length of the lower calyceal infundibulum, length/width ratio of the lower infundibulum or number of lower calyces. Height of the infundibulum, described as the distance between the line passing through the lowest part of the calyx containing the calculus and the highest point of the lower lip of renal pelvis, was the only parameter in which significant differences (p = 0.002) were found between the NR and R groups. CONCLUSIONS: Lower Infundibular height could be a good measurement tool for deciding which patients with lower calyceal lithiasis would benefit from SWL treatment. Height of less than 22 mm suggests a good outcome from lithotripsy.
id SBU-1_e42e15229948463bbd6104c439f791ff
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1677-55382009000200003
network_acronym_str SBU-1
network_name_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Can infundibular height predict the clearance of lower pole calyceal stone after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?kidneykidney calculilithotripsyanatomykidney calicesPURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) on lower calyceal calculi in relation to the renal anatomical factors and determine which of these factors can be used to select patients who will benefit from SWL. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed retrospectively 78 patients with single radiopaque lower calyceal stones treated with SWL. The patients were evaluated 3 months after lithotripsy with a simple abdominal X-ray and a kidney ultrasound scan. The success of the treatment, removal of all fragments, was correlated with renal anatomical factors measured in the pre-treatment intravenous urography: infundibulopelvic angle, lower infundibulum width, lower infundibulum length, ratio length/width, infundibulum height, and number of minor calyces in the lower calyceal group. RESULTS: Three months after SWL treatment, 39 patients were stone-free (NR group) and 39 had residual fragments (R group). Both groups presented no differences in relation to infundibulopelvic angle, width and length of the lower calyceal infundibulum, length/width ratio of the lower infundibulum or number of lower calyces. Height of the infundibulum, described as the distance between the line passing through the lowest part of the calyx containing the calculus and the highest point of the lower lip of renal pelvis, was the only parameter in which significant differences (p = 0.002) were found between the NR and R groups. CONCLUSIONS: Lower Infundibular height could be a good measurement tool for deciding which patients with lower calyceal lithiasis would benefit from SWL treatment. Height of less than 22 mm suggests a good outcome from lithotripsy.Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2009-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382009000200003International braz j urol v.35 n.2 2009reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/S1677-55382009000200003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessArzoz-Fabregas,M.Ibarz-Servio,L.Blasco-Casares,F. J.Ramon-Dalmau,M.Ruiz-Marcellan,F. J.eng2009-06-15T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382009000200003Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2009-06-15T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Can infundibular height predict the clearance of lower pole calyceal stone after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?
title Can infundibular height predict the clearance of lower pole calyceal stone after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?
spellingShingle Can infundibular height predict the clearance of lower pole calyceal stone after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?
Arzoz-Fabregas,M.
kidney
kidney calculi
lithotripsy
anatomy
kidney calices
title_short Can infundibular height predict the clearance of lower pole calyceal stone after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?
title_full Can infundibular height predict the clearance of lower pole calyceal stone after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?
title_fullStr Can infundibular height predict the clearance of lower pole calyceal stone after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?
title_full_unstemmed Can infundibular height predict the clearance of lower pole calyceal stone after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?
title_sort Can infundibular height predict the clearance of lower pole calyceal stone after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?
author Arzoz-Fabregas,M.
author_facet Arzoz-Fabregas,M.
Ibarz-Servio,L.
Blasco-Casares,F. J.
Ramon-Dalmau,M.
Ruiz-Marcellan,F. J.
author_role author
author2 Ibarz-Servio,L.
Blasco-Casares,F. J.
Ramon-Dalmau,M.
Ruiz-Marcellan,F. J.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Arzoz-Fabregas,M.
Ibarz-Servio,L.
Blasco-Casares,F. J.
Ramon-Dalmau,M.
Ruiz-Marcellan,F. J.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv kidney
kidney calculi
lithotripsy
anatomy
kidney calices
topic kidney
kidney calculi
lithotripsy
anatomy
kidney calices
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) on lower calyceal calculi in relation to the renal anatomical factors and determine which of these factors can be used to select patients who will benefit from SWL. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed retrospectively 78 patients with single radiopaque lower calyceal stones treated with SWL. The patients were evaluated 3 months after lithotripsy with a simple abdominal X-ray and a kidney ultrasound scan. The success of the treatment, removal of all fragments, was correlated with renal anatomical factors measured in the pre-treatment intravenous urography: infundibulopelvic angle, lower infundibulum width, lower infundibulum length, ratio length/width, infundibulum height, and number of minor calyces in the lower calyceal group. RESULTS: Three months after SWL treatment, 39 patients were stone-free (NR group) and 39 had residual fragments (R group). Both groups presented no differences in relation to infundibulopelvic angle, width and length of the lower calyceal infundibulum, length/width ratio of the lower infundibulum or number of lower calyces. Height of the infundibulum, described as the distance between the line passing through the lowest part of the calyx containing the calculus and the highest point of the lower lip of renal pelvis, was the only parameter in which significant differences (p = 0.002) were found between the NR and R groups. CONCLUSIONS: Lower Infundibular height could be a good measurement tool for deciding which patients with lower calyceal lithiasis would benefit from SWL treatment. Height of less than 22 mm suggests a good outcome from lithotripsy.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382009000200003
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382009000200003
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1677-55382009000200003
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International braz j urol v.35 n.2 2009
reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron:SBU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron_str SBU
institution SBU
reponame_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
collection International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br
_version_ 1750318070964944896