Penile fracture: experience in 56 cases

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Koifman,Leandro
Data de Publicação: 2003
Outros Autores: Cavalcanti,André G., Manes,Carlos Henrique, R. Filho,Daibes, Favorito,Luciano A.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Braz J Urol (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382003000100007
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work is to report the diagnostic and therapeutic options for 55 patients with clinical diagnosis of penile fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patients were retrospectively assessed between 1982 and 2002. The primary diagnostic evaluation method for 55 patients (56 fractures) was clinical history and physical exam. Ten (17.8%) cases required complementary exams. Ultrasound (US) was performed in 2 cases, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 1 case. Retrograde urethrocystogram was performed in suspicious urethral injury, which happened for 7 patients. RESULTS: Of 56 assessed cases, 49 (89.5%) were submitted to surgical exploration, and only 7 were conservatively conducted. Surgical treatment was performed in 48 patients (49 fractures), in these cases, 47 (95.9%) presented tunica albuginea disruption and solely 2 (4.1%) evidenced lesion of dorsal vein. Ultrasonography confirmed disruption of tunica albuginea in 1 (50%) case, and in the other it was not possible to determinate the origin of the lesion, and the patient was submitted to surgical exploration, which confirmed the condition. MRI was used only in 1 case, confirming the lesion. Among 7 patients submitted to conservative management, until now, 3 (42.8%) required surgical intervention to correct penile chordee. CONCLUSIONS: Penile fracture is an entity of eminently clinical diagnosis, which management should be surgical and immediate, avoiding thus complications related to erectile dysfunction. When suspecting an associated urethral injury, Urethrocystogram is recommended. In cases where there is diagnostic uncertainty, ultrasound and/or MRI may be used to reveal the condition.
id SBU-1_e86c43a5170bbe2b0f253f05c26b6ba0
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1677-55382003000100007
network_acronym_str SBU-1
network_name_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Penile fracture: experience in 56 casespenisurethrafracturestherapeuticssurgeryOBJECTIVE: The aim of this work is to report the diagnostic and therapeutic options for 55 patients with clinical diagnosis of penile fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patients were retrospectively assessed between 1982 and 2002. The primary diagnostic evaluation method for 55 patients (56 fractures) was clinical history and physical exam. Ten (17.8%) cases required complementary exams. Ultrasound (US) was performed in 2 cases, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 1 case. Retrograde urethrocystogram was performed in suspicious urethral injury, which happened for 7 patients. RESULTS: Of 56 assessed cases, 49 (89.5%) were submitted to surgical exploration, and only 7 were conservatively conducted. Surgical treatment was performed in 48 patients (49 fractures), in these cases, 47 (95.9%) presented tunica albuginea disruption and solely 2 (4.1%) evidenced lesion of dorsal vein. Ultrasonography confirmed disruption of tunica albuginea in 1 (50%) case, and in the other it was not possible to determinate the origin of the lesion, and the patient was submitted to surgical exploration, which confirmed the condition. MRI was used only in 1 case, confirming the lesion. Among 7 patients submitted to conservative management, until now, 3 (42.8%) required surgical intervention to correct penile chordee. CONCLUSIONS: Penile fracture is an entity of eminently clinical diagnosis, which management should be surgical and immediate, avoiding thus complications related to erectile dysfunction. When suspecting an associated urethral injury, Urethrocystogram is recommended. In cases where there is diagnostic uncertainty, ultrasound and/or MRI may be used to reveal the condition.Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2003-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382003000100007International braz j urol v.29 n.1 2003reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/S1677-55382003000100007info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKoifman,LeandroCavalcanti,André G.Manes,Carlos HenriqueR. Filho,DaibesFavorito,Luciano A.eng2003-09-22T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382003000100007Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2003-09-22T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Penile fracture: experience in 56 cases
title Penile fracture: experience in 56 cases
spellingShingle Penile fracture: experience in 56 cases
Koifman,Leandro
penis
urethra
fractures
therapeutics
surgery
title_short Penile fracture: experience in 56 cases
title_full Penile fracture: experience in 56 cases
title_fullStr Penile fracture: experience in 56 cases
title_full_unstemmed Penile fracture: experience in 56 cases
title_sort Penile fracture: experience in 56 cases
author Koifman,Leandro
author_facet Koifman,Leandro
Cavalcanti,André G.
Manes,Carlos Henrique
R. Filho,Daibes
Favorito,Luciano A.
author_role author
author2 Cavalcanti,André G.
Manes,Carlos Henrique
R. Filho,Daibes
Favorito,Luciano A.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Koifman,Leandro
Cavalcanti,André G.
Manes,Carlos Henrique
R. Filho,Daibes
Favorito,Luciano A.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv penis
urethra
fractures
therapeutics
surgery
topic penis
urethra
fractures
therapeutics
surgery
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work is to report the diagnostic and therapeutic options for 55 patients with clinical diagnosis of penile fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patients were retrospectively assessed between 1982 and 2002. The primary diagnostic evaluation method for 55 patients (56 fractures) was clinical history and physical exam. Ten (17.8%) cases required complementary exams. Ultrasound (US) was performed in 2 cases, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 1 case. Retrograde urethrocystogram was performed in suspicious urethral injury, which happened for 7 patients. RESULTS: Of 56 assessed cases, 49 (89.5%) were submitted to surgical exploration, and only 7 were conservatively conducted. Surgical treatment was performed in 48 patients (49 fractures), in these cases, 47 (95.9%) presented tunica albuginea disruption and solely 2 (4.1%) evidenced lesion of dorsal vein. Ultrasonography confirmed disruption of tunica albuginea in 1 (50%) case, and in the other it was not possible to determinate the origin of the lesion, and the patient was submitted to surgical exploration, which confirmed the condition. MRI was used only in 1 case, confirming the lesion. Among 7 patients submitted to conservative management, until now, 3 (42.8%) required surgical intervention to correct penile chordee. CONCLUSIONS: Penile fracture is an entity of eminently clinical diagnosis, which management should be surgical and immediate, avoiding thus complications related to erectile dysfunction. When suspecting an associated urethral injury, Urethrocystogram is recommended. In cases where there is diagnostic uncertainty, ultrasound and/or MRI may be used to reveal the condition.
publishDate 2003
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2003-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382003000100007
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382003000100007
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1677-55382003000100007
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International braz j urol v.29 n.1 2003
reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron:SBU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron_str SBU
institution SBU
reponame_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
collection International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br
_version_ 1750318068563705856