Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in unusual venous anatomy – donor and recepient implications

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Patil,Avinash Bapusaheb
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Javali,Tarun Dilip, Nagaraj,Harohalli K., Prakash Babu,S. M. L., Nayak,Arvind
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Braz J Urol (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382017000400671
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objectives Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is now a commonly performed procedure in most of renal transplantation centers. However, the suitability of laparoscopy for donors with abnormal venous anatomy is still a subject of debate. Materials and methods Between August 2007 and August 2014, 243 laparoscopic donor nephrectomies were performed in our institution. All donors were evaluated with preoperative three-dimensional spiral computed tomography (CT) angiography Thirteen (5.35%) donors had a left renal vein anomaly. A retrospective analysis was performed to collect donor and recipient demographics and perioperative data. Results Four donors had a type I retroaortic vein, seven had type II retroaortic vein and a circumaortic vein was seen in three donors. The mean operative time was 114±11 minutes and mean warm ischemia time was 202±12 seconds. The mean blood loss was 52.7±18.4mL and no donor required blood transfusion. Mean recipient creatinine at the time of discharge was 1.15±0.18mg/dL, and creatinine at six months and one year follow-up was 1.12±0.13mg/dL and 1.2±0.14mg/dL, respectively. There were no significant differences in operative time, blood loss, warm ischemia time, donor hospital stay or recipient creatinine at 6 months follow-up, following laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in patients with or without left renal vein anomalies. Conclusion Preoperative delineation of venous anatomy using CT angiography is as important as arterial anatomy. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is safe and feasible in patients with retroaortic or circumaortic renal vein with good recipient outcome.
id SBU-1_e9a8092c46457a807197241b5267b7ed
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1677-55382017000400671
network_acronym_str SBU-1
network_name_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in unusual venous anatomy – donor and recepient implicationsLaparoscopyVeinsKidney TransplantationABSTRACT Objectives Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is now a commonly performed procedure in most of renal transplantation centers. However, the suitability of laparoscopy for donors with abnormal venous anatomy is still a subject of debate. Materials and methods Between August 2007 and August 2014, 243 laparoscopic donor nephrectomies were performed in our institution. All donors were evaluated with preoperative three-dimensional spiral computed tomography (CT) angiography Thirteen (5.35%) donors had a left renal vein anomaly. A retrospective analysis was performed to collect donor and recipient demographics and perioperative data. Results Four donors had a type I retroaortic vein, seven had type II retroaortic vein and a circumaortic vein was seen in three donors. The mean operative time was 114±11 minutes and mean warm ischemia time was 202±12 seconds. The mean blood loss was 52.7±18.4mL and no donor required blood transfusion. Mean recipient creatinine at the time of discharge was 1.15±0.18mg/dL, and creatinine at six months and one year follow-up was 1.12±0.13mg/dL and 1.2±0.14mg/dL, respectively. There were no significant differences in operative time, blood loss, warm ischemia time, donor hospital stay or recipient creatinine at 6 months follow-up, following laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in patients with or without left renal vein anomalies. Conclusion Preoperative delineation of venous anatomy using CT angiography is as important as arterial anatomy. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is safe and feasible in patients with retroaortic or circumaortic renal vein with good recipient outcome.Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2017-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382017000400671International braz j urol v.43 n.4 2017reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2016.0309info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPatil,Avinash BapusahebJavali,Tarun DilipNagaraj,Harohalli K.Prakash Babu,S. M. L.Nayak,Arvindeng2017-08-17T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382017000400671Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2017-08-17T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in unusual venous anatomy – donor and recepient implications
title Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in unusual venous anatomy – donor and recepient implications
spellingShingle Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in unusual venous anatomy – donor and recepient implications
Patil,Avinash Bapusaheb
Laparoscopy
Veins
Kidney Transplantation
title_short Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in unusual venous anatomy – donor and recepient implications
title_full Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in unusual venous anatomy – donor and recepient implications
title_fullStr Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in unusual venous anatomy – donor and recepient implications
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in unusual venous anatomy – donor and recepient implications
title_sort Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in unusual venous anatomy – donor and recepient implications
author Patil,Avinash Bapusaheb
author_facet Patil,Avinash Bapusaheb
Javali,Tarun Dilip
Nagaraj,Harohalli K.
Prakash Babu,S. M. L.
Nayak,Arvind
author_role author
author2 Javali,Tarun Dilip
Nagaraj,Harohalli K.
Prakash Babu,S. M. L.
Nayak,Arvind
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Patil,Avinash Bapusaheb
Javali,Tarun Dilip
Nagaraj,Harohalli K.
Prakash Babu,S. M. L.
Nayak,Arvind
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Laparoscopy
Veins
Kidney Transplantation
topic Laparoscopy
Veins
Kidney Transplantation
description ABSTRACT Objectives Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is now a commonly performed procedure in most of renal transplantation centers. However, the suitability of laparoscopy for donors with abnormal venous anatomy is still a subject of debate. Materials and methods Between August 2007 and August 2014, 243 laparoscopic donor nephrectomies were performed in our institution. All donors were evaluated with preoperative three-dimensional spiral computed tomography (CT) angiography Thirteen (5.35%) donors had a left renal vein anomaly. A retrospective analysis was performed to collect donor and recipient demographics and perioperative data. Results Four donors had a type I retroaortic vein, seven had type II retroaortic vein and a circumaortic vein was seen in three donors. The mean operative time was 114±11 minutes and mean warm ischemia time was 202±12 seconds. The mean blood loss was 52.7±18.4mL and no donor required blood transfusion. Mean recipient creatinine at the time of discharge was 1.15±0.18mg/dL, and creatinine at six months and one year follow-up was 1.12±0.13mg/dL and 1.2±0.14mg/dL, respectively. There were no significant differences in operative time, blood loss, warm ischemia time, donor hospital stay or recipient creatinine at 6 months follow-up, following laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in patients with or without left renal vein anomalies. Conclusion Preoperative delineation of venous anatomy using CT angiography is as important as arterial anatomy. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is safe and feasible in patients with retroaortic or circumaortic renal vein with good recipient outcome.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382017000400671
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382017000400671
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2016.0309
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International braz j urol v.43 n.4 2017
reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron:SBU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron_str SBU
institution SBU
reponame_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
collection International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br
_version_ 1750318075504230400