4-Ports endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: preliminary and learning curve results

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Barbosa Junior,Humberto do Nascimento
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Siqueira Junior,Tiberio Moreno, Barreto,Françualdo, Menezes,Leonardo Gomes, Luna,Mauro José Catunda, Calado,Adriano Almeida
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Braz J Urol (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382016000300438
Resumo: ABSTRACT Introduction There is a lack of studies in our national scenario regarding the results obtained by laparoscopic radical prostatectomy technique (LRP). Except for a few series, there are no consistent data on oncological, functional, and perioperative results on LRP held in Brazil. As for the LRP technique performed by extraperitoneal access (ELRP), when performed by a single surgeon, the results are even scarcer. Objective To analyze the early perioperative and oncologic results obtained with the ELRP, throughout the technical evolution of a single surgeon. Patients and methods A non-randomized retrospective study was held in a Brazilian hospital of reference. In the 5-year period, 115 patients underwent the ELRP procedure. Patients were divided into two groups, the first 57 cases (Group 1) and the following 58 cases, (Group 2). A comparative analysis between the groups of efficacy results and ELRP safety was carried out. Results The average age of patients was 62.8 year-old and the PSA of 6.9ng/dl. The total surgery time was 135.8 minutes on average, and the urethral-bladder anastomosis was 21.9 min (23.3 min versus 20.7 min). The positive surgical margins (PSM) rate was 17.1%, showing no difference between groups (16.4% versus 17.9%; p=0.835). There was statistical difference between the groups in relation to the anastomosis time, estimated blood loss and the withdrawal time of the urinary catheter. Conclusion The ELRP technique proved to be a safe and effective procedure in the treatment of prostate cancer, with low morbidity.
id SBU-1_ee98b1e857242fc0bc92b780633684e5
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1677-55382016000300438
network_acronym_str SBU-1
network_name_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling 4-Ports endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: preliminary and learning curve resultsEndoscopyProstatectomyLearningMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresABSTRACT Introduction There is a lack of studies in our national scenario regarding the results obtained by laparoscopic radical prostatectomy technique (LRP). Except for a few series, there are no consistent data on oncological, functional, and perioperative results on LRP held in Brazil. As for the LRP technique performed by extraperitoneal access (ELRP), when performed by a single surgeon, the results are even scarcer. Objective To analyze the early perioperative and oncologic results obtained with the ELRP, throughout the technical evolution of a single surgeon. Patients and methods A non-randomized retrospective study was held in a Brazilian hospital of reference. In the 5-year period, 115 patients underwent the ELRP procedure. Patients were divided into two groups, the first 57 cases (Group 1) and the following 58 cases, (Group 2). A comparative analysis between the groups of efficacy results and ELRP safety was carried out. Results The average age of patients was 62.8 year-old and the PSA of 6.9ng/dl. The total surgery time was 135.8 minutes on average, and the urethral-bladder anastomosis was 21.9 min (23.3 min versus 20.7 min). The positive surgical margins (PSM) rate was 17.1%, showing no difference between groups (16.4% versus 17.9%; p=0.835). There was statistical difference between the groups in relation to the anastomosis time, estimated blood loss and the withdrawal time of the urinary catheter. Conclusion The ELRP technique proved to be a safe and effective procedure in the treatment of prostate cancer, with low morbidity.Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2016-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382016000300438International braz j urol v.42 n.3 2016reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0323info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBarbosa Junior,Humberto do NascimentoSiqueira Junior,Tiberio MorenoBarreto,FrançualdoMenezes,Leonardo GomesLuna,Mauro José CatundaCalado,Adriano Almeidaeng2016-06-28T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382016000300438Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2016-06-28T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv 4-Ports endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: preliminary and learning curve results
title 4-Ports endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: preliminary and learning curve results
spellingShingle 4-Ports endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: preliminary and learning curve results
Barbosa Junior,Humberto do Nascimento
Endoscopy
Prostatectomy
Learning
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
title_short 4-Ports endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: preliminary and learning curve results
title_full 4-Ports endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: preliminary and learning curve results
title_fullStr 4-Ports endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: preliminary and learning curve results
title_full_unstemmed 4-Ports endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: preliminary and learning curve results
title_sort 4-Ports endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: preliminary and learning curve results
author Barbosa Junior,Humberto do Nascimento
author_facet Barbosa Junior,Humberto do Nascimento
Siqueira Junior,Tiberio Moreno
Barreto,Françualdo
Menezes,Leonardo Gomes
Luna,Mauro José Catunda
Calado,Adriano Almeida
author_role author
author2 Siqueira Junior,Tiberio Moreno
Barreto,Françualdo
Menezes,Leonardo Gomes
Luna,Mauro José Catunda
Calado,Adriano Almeida
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Barbosa Junior,Humberto do Nascimento
Siqueira Junior,Tiberio Moreno
Barreto,Françualdo
Menezes,Leonardo Gomes
Luna,Mauro José Catunda
Calado,Adriano Almeida
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Endoscopy
Prostatectomy
Learning
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
topic Endoscopy
Prostatectomy
Learning
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
description ABSTRACT Introduction There is a lack of studies in our national scenario regarding the results obtained by laparoscopic radical prostatectomy technique (LRP). Except for a few series, there are no consistent data on oncological, functional, and perioperative results on LRP held in Brazil. As for the LRP technique performed by extraperitoneal access (ELRP), when performed by a single surgeon, the results are even scarcer. Objective To analyze the early perioperative and oncologic results obtained with the ELRP, throughout the technical evolution of a single surgeon. Patients and methods A non-randomized retrospective study was held in a Brazilian hospital of reference. In the 5-year period, 115 patients underwent the ELRP procedure. Patients were divided into two groups, the first 57 cases (Group 1) and the following 58 cases, (Group 2). A comparative analysis between the groups of efficacy results and ELRP safety was carried out. Results The average age of patients was 62.8 year-old and the PSA of 6.9ng/dl. The total surgery time was 135.8 minutes on average, and the urethral-bladder anastomosis was 21.9 min (23.3 min versus 20.7 min). The positive surgical margins (PSM) rate was 17.1%, showing no difference between groups (16.4% versus 17.9%; p=0.835). There was statistical difference between the groups in relation to the anastomosis time, estimated blood loss and the withdrawal time of the urinary catheter. Conclusion The ELRP technique proved to be a safe and effective procedure in the treatment of prostate cancer, with low morbidity.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382016000300438
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382016000300438
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0323
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International braz j urol v.42 n.3 2016
reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron:SBU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron_str SBU
institution SBU
reponame_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
collection International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br
_version_ 1750318074914930688