4-Ports endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: preliminary and learning curve results
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | International Braz J Urol (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382016000300438 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Introduction There is a lack of studies in our national scenario regarding the results obtained by laparoscopic radical prostatectomy technique (LRP). Except for a few series, there are no consistent data on oncological, functional, and perioperative results on LRP held in Brazil. As for the LRP technique performed by extraperitoneal access (ELRP), when performed by a single surgeon, the results are even scarcer. Objective To analyze the early perioperative and oncologic results obtained with the ELRP, throughout the technical evolution of a single surgeon. Patients and methods A non-randomized retrospective study was held in a Brazilian hospital of reference. In the 5-year period, 115 patients underwent the ELRP procedure. Patients were divided into two groups, the first 57 cases (Group 1) and the following 58 cases, (Group 2). A comparative analysis between the groups of efficacy results and ELRP safety was carried out. Results The average age of patients was 62.8 year-old and the PSA of 6.9ng/dl. The total surgery time was 135.8 minutes on average, and the urethral-bladder anastomosis was 21.9 min (23.3 min versus 20.7 min). The positive surgical margins (PSM) rate was 17.1%, showing no difference between groups (16.4% versus 17.9%; p=0.835). There was statistical difference between the groups in relation to the anastomosis time, estimated blood loss and the withdrawal time of the urinary catheter. Conclusion The ELRP technique proved to be a safe and effective procedure in the treatment of prostate cancer, with low morbidity. |
id |
SBU-1_ee98b1e857242fc0bc92b780633684e5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1677-55382016000300438 |
network_acronym_str |
SBU-1 |
network_name_str |
International Braz J Urol (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
4-Ports endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: preliminary and learning curve resultsEndoscopyProstatectomyLearningMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresABSTRACT Introduction There is a lack of studies in our national scenario regarding the results obtained by laparoscopic radical prostatectomy technique (LRP). Except for a few series, there are no consistent data on oncological, functional, and perioperative results on LRP held in Brazil. As for the LRP technique performed by extraperitoneal access (ELRP), when performed by a single surgeon, the results are even scarcer. Objective To analyze the early perioperative and oncologic results obtained with the ELRP, throughout the technical evolution of a single surgeon. Patients and methods A non-randomized retrospective study was held in a Brazilian hospital of reference. In the 5-year period, 115 patients underwent the ELRP procedure. Patients were divided into two groups, the first 57 cases (Group 1) and the following 58 cases, (Group 2). A comparative analysis between the groups of efficacy results and ELRP safety was carried out. Results The average age of patients was 62.8 year-old and the PSA of 6.9ng/dl. The total surgery time was 135.8 minutes on average, and the urethral-bladder anastomosis was 21.9 min (23.3 min versus 20.7 min). The positive surgical margins (PSM) rate was 17.1%, showing no difference between groups (16.4% versus 17.9%; p=0.835). There was statistical difference between the groups in relation to the anastomosis time, estimated blood loss and the withdrawal time of the urinary catheter. Conclusion The ELRP technique proved to be a safe and effective procedure in the treatment of prostate cancer, with low morbidity.Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2016-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382016000300438International braz j urol v.42 n.3 2016reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0323info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBarbosa Junior,Humberto do NascimentoSiqueira Junior,Tiberio MorenoBarreto,FrançualdoMenezes,Leonardo GomesLuna,Mauro José CatundaCalado,Adriano Almeidaeng2016-06-28T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382016000300438Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2016-06-28T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
4-Ports endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: preliminary and learning curve results |
title |
4-Ports endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: preliminary and learning curve results |
spellingShingle |
4-Ports endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: preliminary and learning curve results Barbosa Junior,Humberto do Nascimento Endoscopy Prostatectomy Learning Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures |
title_short |
4-Ports endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: preliminary and learning curve results |
title_full |
4-Ports endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: preliminary and learning curve results |
title_fullStr |
4-Ports endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: preliminary and learning curve results |
title_full_unstemmed |
4-Ports endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: preliminary and learning curve results |
title_sort |
4-Ports endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: preliminary and learning curve results |
author |
Barbosa Junior,Humberto do Nascimento |
author_facet |
Barbosa Junior,Humberto do Nascimento Siqueira Junior,Tiberio Moreno Barreto,Françualdo Menezes,Leonardo Gomes Luna,Mauro José Catunda Calado,Adriano Almeida |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Siqueira Junior,Tiberio Moreno Barreto,Françualdo Menezes,Leonardo Gomes Luna,Mauro José Catunda Calado,Adriano Almeida |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Barbosa Junior,Humberto do Nascimento Siqueira Junior,Tiberio Moreno Barreto,Françualdo Menezes,Leonardo Gomes Luna,Mauro José Catunda Calado,Adriano Almeida |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Endoscopy Prostatectomy Learning Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures |
topic |
Endoscopy Prostatectomy Learning Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures |
description |
ABSTRACT Introduction There is a lack of studies in our national scenario regarding the results obtained by laparoscopic radical prostatectomy technique (LRP). Except for a few series, there are no consistent data on oncological, functional, and perioperative results on LRP held in Brazil. As for the LRP technique performed by extraperitoneal access (ELRP), when performed by a single surgeon, the results are even scarcer. Objective To analyze the early perioperative and oncologic results obtained with the ELRP, throughout the technical evolution of a single surgeon. Patients and methods A non-randomized retrospective study was held in a Brazilian hospital of reference. In the 5-year period, 115 patients underwent the ELRP procedure. Patients were divided into two groups, the first 57 cases (Group 1) and the following 58 cases, (Group 2). A comparative analysis between the groups of efficacy results and ELRP safety was carried out. Results The average age of patients was 62.8 year-old and the PSA of 6.9ng/dl. The total surgery time was 135.8 minutes on average, and the urethral-bladder anastomosis was 21.9 min (23.3 min versus 20.7 min). The positive surgical margins (PSM) rate was 17.1%, showing no difference between groups (16.4% versus 17.9%; p=0.835). There was statistical difference between the groups in relation to the anastomosis time, estimated blood loss and the withdrawal time of the urinary catheter. Conclusion The ELRP technique proved to be a safe and effective procedure in the treatment of prostate cancer, with low morbidity. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382016000300438 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382016000300438 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0323 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
International braz j urol v.42 n.3 2016 reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU) instacron:SBU |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU) |
instacron_str |
SBU |
institution |
SBU |
reponame_str |
International Braz J Urol (Online) |
collection |
International Braz J Urol (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br |
_version_ |
1750318074914930688 |