Presenting signs and symptoms of artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Diao,Linley
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Nealon,Samantha W., Carpinito,Gianpaolo P., Badkhshan,Shervin, Wolfe,Avery R., Dropkin,Benjamin M., Sanders,Sarah C., Hudak,Steven J., Morey,Allen F.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Braz J Urol (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382022000400679
Resumo: ABSTRACT Purpose To characterize the most common presentation and clinical risk factors for artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) cuff erosion to distinguish the relative frequency of symptoms that should trigger further evaluation in these patients. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed our tertiary center database to identify men who presented with AUS cuff erosion between 2007 – 2020. A similar cohort of men who underwent AUS placement without erosion were randomly selected from the same database for symptom comparison. Risk factors for cuff erosion – pelvic radiation, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), high-grade prostate cancer (Gleason score ≥ 8) – were recorded for each patient. Presenting signs and symptoms of cuff erosion were grouped into three categories: obstructive symptoms, worsening incontinence, and localized scrotal inflammation (SI). Results Of 893 men who underwent AUS placement during the study interval, 61 (6.8%) sustained cuff erosion. Most erosion patients (40/61, 66%) presented with scrotal inflammatory changes including tenderness, erythema, and swelling. Fewer men reported obstructive symptoms (26/61, 43%) and worsening incontinence (21/61, 34%). Men with SI or obstructive symptoms presented significantly earlier than those with worsening incontinence (SI 14 ± 18 vs. obstructive symptoms 15 ± 16 vs. incontinence 37 ± 48 months after AUS insertion, p<0.01). Relative to the non-erosion control group (n=61), men who suffered erosion had a higher prevalence of pelvic radiation (71 vs. 49%, p=0.02). Conclusion AUS cuff erosion most commonly presents as SI symptoms. Obstructive voiding symptoms and worsening incontinence are also common. Any of these symptoms should prompt further investigation of cuff erosion.
id SBU-1_ff789c4006d2354af736e039e3542a4c
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1677-55382022000400679
network_acronym_str SBU-1
network_name_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Presenting signs and symptoms of artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosionUrinary IncontinenceUrinary Sphincter, ArtificialMaleABSTRACT Purpose To characterize the most common presentation and clinical risk factors for artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) cuff erosion to distinguish the relative frequency of symptoms that should trigger further evaluation in these patients. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed our tertiary center database to identify men who presented with AUS cuff erosion between 2007 – 2020. A similar cohort of men who underwent AUS placement without erosion were randomly selected from the same database for symptom comparison. Risk factors for cuff erosion – pelvic radiation, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), high-grade prostate cancer (Gleason score ≥ 8) – were recorded for each patient. Presenting signs and symptoms of cuff erosion were grouped into three categories: obstructive symptoms, worsening incontinence, and localized scrotal inflammation (SI). Results Of 893 men who underwent AUS placement during the study interval, 61 (6.8%) sustained cuff erosion. Most erosion patients (40/61, 66%) presented with scrotal inflammatory changes including tenderness, erythema, and swelling. Fewer men reported obstructive symptoms (26/61, 43%) and worsening incontinence (21/61, 34%). Men with SI or obstructive symptoms presented significantly earlier than those with worsening incontinence (SI 14 ± 18 vs. obstructive symptoms 15 ± 16 vs. incontinence 37 ± 48 months after AUS insertion, p<0.01). Relative to the non-erosion control group (n=61), men who suffered erosion had a higher prevalence of pelvic radiation (71 vs. 49%, p=0.02). Conclusion AUS cuff erosion most commonly presents as SI symptoms. Obstructive voiding symptoms and worsening incontinence are also common. Any of these symptoms should prompt further investigation of cuff erosion.Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2022-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382022000400679International braz j urol v.48 n.4 2022reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2022.0089info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDiao,LinleyNealon,Samantha W.Carpinito,Gianpaolo P.Badkhshan,ShervinWolfe,Avery R.Dropkin,Benjamin M.Sanders,Sarah C.Hudak,Steven J.Morey,Allen F.eng2022-07-22T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382022000400679Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2022-07-22T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Presenting signs and symptoms of artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion
title Presenting signs and symptoms of artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion
spellingShingle Presenting signs and symptoms of artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion
Diao,Linley
Urinary Incontinence
Urinary Sphincter, Artificial
Male
title_short Presenting signs and symptoms of artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion
title_full Presenting signs and symptoms of artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion
title_fullStr Presenting signs and symptoms of artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion
title_full_unstemmed Presenting signs and symptoms of artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion
title_sort Presenting signs and symptoms of artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion
author Diao,Linley
author_facet Diao,Linley
Nealon,Samantha W.
Carpinito,Gianpaolo P.
Badkhshan,Shervin
Wolfe,Avery R.
Dropkin,Benjamin M.
Sanders,Sarah C.
Hudak,Steven J.
Morey,Allen F.
author_role author
author2 Nealon,Samantha W.
Carpinito,Gianpaolo P.
Badkhshan,Shervin
Wolfe,Avery R.
Dropkin,Benjamin M.
Sanders,Sarah C.
Hudak,Steven J.
Morey,Allen F.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Diao,Linley
Nealon,Samantha W.
Carpinito,Gianpaolo P.
Badkhshan,Shervin
Wolfe,Avery R.
Dropkin,Benjamin M.
Sanders,Sarah C.
Hudak,Steven J.
Morey,Allen F.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Urinary Incontinence
Urinary Sphincter, Artificial
Male
topic Urinary Incontinence
Urinary Sphincter, Artificial
Male
description ABSTRACT Purpose To characterize the most common presentation and clinical risk factors for artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) cuff erosion to distinguish the relative frequency of symptoms that should trigger further evaluation in these patients. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed our tertiary center database to identify men who presented with AUS cuff erosion between 2007 – 2020. A similar cohort of men who underwent AUS placement without erosion were randomly selected from the same database for symptom comparison. Risk factors for cuff erosion – pelvic radiation, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), high-grade prostate cancer (Gleason score ≥ 8) – were recorded for each patient. Presenting signs and symptoms of cuff erosion were grouped into three categories: obstructive symptoms, worsening incontinence, and localized scrotal inflammation (SI). Results Of 893 men who underwent AUS placement during the study interval, 61 (6.8%) sustained cuff erosion. Most erosion patients (40/61, 66%) presented with scrotal inflammatory changes including tenderness, erythema, and swelling. Fewer men reported obstructive symptoms (26/61, 43%) and worsening incontinence (21/61, 34%). Men with SI or obstructive symptoms presented significantly earlier than those with worsening incontinence (SI 14 ± 18 vs. obstructive symptoms 15 ± 16 vs. incontinence 37 ± 48 months after AUS insertion, p<0.01). Relative to the non-erosion control group (n=61), men who suffered erosion had a higher prevalence of pelvic radiation (71 vs. 49%, p=0.02). Conclusion AUS cuff erosion most commonly presents as SI symptoms. Obstructive voiding symptoms and worsening incontinence are also common. Any of these symptoms should prompt further investigation of cuff erosion.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382022000400679
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382022000400679
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2022.0089
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International braz j urol v.48 n.4 2022
reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron:SBU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron_str SBU
institution SBU
reponame_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
collection International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br
_version_ 1750318078357405696