Influence of a probiotic on broiler performance
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982011001200018 |
Resumo: | The objective of the present study was to evaluate the influence of a probiotic product (composition: Lactobacillus acidophillus (3.5 × 10(11) CFU), Streptcoccus faecium (3.5 × 10(11) CFU) and Bifidobacterium bifidum (3.5 × 10(11) CFU)) on broiler performance. A total of 1200 one-day-old broilers were reared until 42 days of age, and distributed in a completely randomized experimental design with 3 treatments (antibiotic, probiotic and control) with 10 replicates of 40 birds each. Weight gain, feed intake, feed conversion ratio and mortality were evaluated. Concerning weight gain, in the periods of 0-7 and 0-14 days of age, the group fed the antibiotic product presented higher values as compared with the other treatments. However, in the periods of 0-21, 0-28 and 0-35 days of age, birds fed the antibiotic presented higher weight gain only in relation to the control group. Feed intake differences were detected only in the initial period of 0-7 days of age, with the group fed the antibiotic product presenting higher feed intake as compared with that fed the probiotic product, although these groups were not different from the control group. No statistical difference was detected in feed conversion ratio among treatments in any of the evaluated age intervals. Mortality was different only in the period of 0-14 days of age, which was higher in the control group as compared with that of the birds fed the probiotic product, but it was not different from the group receiving the antibiotic. Treatment with probiotic product containing Lactobacillus acidophillus, Streptococcus faecium and Bifidobacterium bifidum does not affect broiler performance. |
id |
SBZ-1_563c1e1aafcfea8873391c1a8521b17b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1516-35982011001200018 |
network_acronym_str |
SBZ-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Influence of a probiotic on broiler performanceadditivesantibioticsgrowth promoternutritionThe objective of the present study was to evaluate the influence of a probiotic product (composition: Lactobacillus acidophillus (3.5 × 10(11) CFU), Streptcoccus faecium (3.5 × 10(11) CFU) and Bifidobacterium bifidum (3.5 × 10(11) CFU)) on broiler performance. A total of 1200 one-day-old broilers were reared until 42 days of age, and distributed in a completely randomized experimental design with 3 treatments (antibiotic, probiotic and control) with 10 replicates of 40 birds each. Weight gain, feed intake, feed conversion ratio and mortality were evaluated. Concerning weight gain, in the periods of 0-7 and 0-14 days of age, the group fed the antibiotic product presented higher values as compared with the other treatments. However, in the periods of 0-21, 0-28 and 0-35 days of age, birds fed the antibiotic presented higher weight gain only in relation to the control group. Feed intake differences were detected only in the initial period of 0-7 days of age, with the group fed the antibiotic product presenting higher feed intake as compared with that fed the probiotic product, although these groups were not different from the control group. No statistical difference was detected in feed conversion ratio among treatments in any of the evaluated age intervals. Mortality was different only in the period of 0-14 days of age, which was higher in the control group as compared with that of the birds fed the probiotic product, but it was not different from the group receiving the antibiotic. Treatment with probiotic product containing Lactobacillus acidophillus, Streptococcus faecium and Bifidobacterium bifidum does not affect broiler performance.Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia2011-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982011001200018Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia v.40 n.12 2011reponame:Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)instacron:SBZ10.1590/S1516-35982011001200018info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBitterncourt,Letícia CardosoSilva,Claudia Cassimira daGarcia,Paula Duarte Silva RangelDonato,Daniella Carolina ZanardoAlbuquerque,Ricardo deAraújo,Lúcio Francelinoeng2012-01-19T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-35982011001200018Revistahttps://www.rbz.org.br/pt-br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||bz@sbz.org.br|| secretariarbz@sbz.org.br1806-92901516-3598opendoar:2012-01-19T00:00Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Influence of a probiotic on broiler performance |
title |
Influence of a probiotic on broiler performance |
spellingShingle |
Influence of a probiotic on broiler performance Bitterncourt,Letícia Cardoso additives antibiotics growth promoter nutrition |
title_short |
Influence of a probiotic on broiler performance |
title_full |
Influence of a probiotic on broiler performance |
title_fullStr |
Influence of a probiotic on broiler performance |
title_full_unstemmed |
Influence of a probiotic on broiler performance |
title_sort |
Influence of a probiotic on broiler performance |
author |
Bitterncourt,Letícia Cardoso |
author_facet |
Bitterncourt,Letícia Cardoso Silva,Claudia Cassimira da Garcia,Paula Duarte Silva Rangel Donato,Daniella Carolina Zanardo Albuquerque,Ricardo de Araújo,Lúcio Francelino |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva,Claudia Cassimira da Garcia,Paula Duarte Silva Rangel Donato,Daniella Carolina Zanardo Albuquerque,Ricardo de Araújo,Lúcio Francelino |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bitterncourt,Letícia Cardoso Silva,Claudia Cassimira da Garcia,Paula Duarte Silva Rangel Donato,Daniella Carolina Zanardo Albuquerque,Ricardo de Araújo,Lúcio Francelino |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
additives antibiotics growth promoter nutrition |
topic |
additives antibiotics growth promoter nutrition |
description |
The objective of the present study was to evaluate the influence of a probiotic product (composition: Lactobacillus acidophillus (3.5 × 10(11) CFU), Streptcoccus faecium (3.5 × 10(11) CFU) and Bifidobacterium bifidum (3.5 × 10(11) CFU)) on broiler performance. A total of 1200 one-day-old broilers were reared until 42 days of age, and distributed in a completely randomized experimental design with 3 treatments (antibiotic, probiotic and control) with 10 replicates of 40 birds each. Weight gain, feed intake, feed conversion ratio and mortality were evaluated. Concerning weight gain, in the periods of 0-7 and 0-14 days of age, the group fed the antibiotic product presented higher values as compared with the other treatments. However, in the periods of 0-21, 0-28 and 0-35 days of age, birds fed the antibiotic presented higher weight gain only in relation to the control group. Feed intake differences were detected only in the initial period of 0-7 days of age, with the group fed the antibiotic product presenting higher feed intake as compared with that fed the probiotic product, although these groups were not different from the control group. No statistical difference was detected in feed conversion ratio among treatments in any of the evaluated age intervals. Mortality was different only in the period of 0-14 days of age, which was higher in the control group as compared with that of the birds fed the probiotic product, but it was not different from the group receiving the antibiotic. Treatment with probiotic product containing Lactobacillus acidophillus, Streptococcus faecium and Bifidobacterium bifidum does not affect broiler performance. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982011001200018 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982011001200018 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1516-35982011001200018 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia v.40 n.12 2011 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ) instacron:SBZ |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ) |
instacron_str |
SBZ |
institution |
SBZ |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||bz@sbz.org.br|| secretariarbz@sbz.org.br |
_version_ |
1750318148766138368 |