Residual intake and gain for the evaluation of performance, non-carcass components, and carcass characteristics of confined crossbred Texel lambs

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carneiro,Mayara Mitiko Yoshihara
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Morais,Maria da Graça, Souza,Andréa Roberto Duarte Lopes, Fernandes,Henrique Jorge, Feijó,Gelson Luís Dias, Bonin,Marina de Nadai, Franco,Gumercindo Loriano, Rocha,Raizza Fátima Abadia Tulux
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982019000100704
Resumo: ABSTRACT We evaluated performance, non-carcass components, and carcass characteristics of crossbred Texel lambs in different categories of residual intake and gain (RIG). We assessed 77 crossbred (¼ Pantaneira and ¾ Texel) non-castrated animals in two study phases. The first phase included 47 lambs with an initial average weight of 29.9±5.5 kg, and the second phase included 30 lambs with initial average weight of 22.4±3.3 kg. Dry matter intake (DMI) and average daily gain (ADG) were evaluated for 70 days. Animals were divided into three groups in terms of efficiency: efficient (high RIG), intermediate (medium RIG), or inefficient (low RIG), based on the standard deviation of the mean for the RIG variable. We measured the yield of non-carcass components, carcass characteristics, and yield of meat cuts. Efficiency group had no association with DMI, nor with initial and final body weights of the animals. The ADG of efficient (0.310 kg day−1) and intermediate (0.290 kg day−1) animals was greater than observed in inefficient (0.260 kg day−1) animals. Lambs in the efficient and intermediate groups had significantly higher levels of all efficiency indicators evaluated. Efficient and intermediate animals yielded significantly more wool/skin in comparison with lambs in the inefficient group. Animals with high RIG also had lower relative weight of testicles/scrotal sac in comparison with inefficient animals. Fat deposition in the omentum and mesentery as well as total fat were decreased in efficient animals. No significant differences occurred among groups regarding carcass characteristics and yield of meat cuts. The RIG index allows for the identification of lambs with higher growth rates and greater wool/skin yield and lower proportion of visceral fat.
id SBZ-1_86bfedc3108f1bc894feb5ac6235d3f8
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-35982019000100704
network_acronym_str SBZ-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Residual intake and gain for the evaluation of performance, non-carcass components, and carcass characteristics of confined crossbred Texel lambsfeedlotresidual feed intakesheeptissue compositionvisceral fatABSTRACT We evaluated performance, non-carcass components, and carcass characteristics of crossbred Texel lambs in different categories of residual intake and gain (RIG). We assessed 77 crossbred (¼ Pantaneira and ¾ Texel) non-castrated animals in two study phases. The first phase included 47 lambs with an initial average weight of 29.9±5.5 kg, and the second phase included 30 lambs with initial average weight of 22.4±3.3 kg. Dry matter intake (DMI) and average daily gain (ADG) were evaluated for 70 days. Animals were divided into three groups in terms of efficiency: efficient (high RIG), intermediate (medium RIG), or inefficient (low RIG), based on the standard deviation of the mean for the RIG variable. We measured the yield of non-carcass components, carcass characteristics, and yield of meat cuts. Efficiency group had no association with DMI, nor with initial and final body weights of the animals. The ADG of efficient (0.310 kg day−1) and intermediate (0.290 kg day−1) animals was greater than observed in inefficient (0.260 kg day−1) animals. Lambs in the efficient and intermediate groups had significantly higher levels of all efficiency indicators evaluated. Efficient and intermediate animals yielded significantly more wool/skin in comparison with lambs in the inefficient group. Animals with high RIG also had lower relative weight of testicles/scrotal sac in comparison with inefficient animals. Fat deposition in the omentum and mesentery as well as total fat were decreased in efficient animals. No significant differences occurred among groups regarding carcass characteristics and yield of meat cuts. The RIG index allows for the identification of lambs with higher growth rates and greater wool/skin yield and lower proportion of visceral fat.Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982019000100704Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia v.48 2019reponame:Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)instacron:SBZ10.1590/rbz4820180206info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarneiro,Mayara Mitiko YoshiharaMorais,Maria da GraçaSouza,Andréa Roberto Duarte LopesFernandes,Henrique JorgeFeijó,Gelson Luís DiasBonin,Marina de NadaiFranco,Gumercindo LorianoRocha,Raizza Fátima Abadia Tuluxeng2019-06-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-35982019000100704Revistahttps://www.rbz.org.br/pt-br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||bz@sbz.org.br|| secretariarbz@sbz.org.br1806-92901516-3598opendoar:2019-06-07T00:00Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Residual intake and gain for the evaluation of performance, non-carcass components, and carcass characteristics of confined crossbred Texel lambs
title Residual intake and gain for the evaluation of performance, non-carcass components, and carcass characteristics of confined crossbred Texel lambs
spellingShingle Residual intake and gain for the evaluation of performance, non-carcass components, and carcass characteristics of confined crossbred Texel lambs
Carneiro,Mayara Mitiko Yoshihara
feedlot
residual feed intake
sheep
tissue composition
visceral fat
title_short Residual intake and gain for the evaluation of performance, non-carcass components, and carcass characteristics of confined crossbred Texel lambs
title_full Residual intake and gain for the evaluation of performance, non-carcass components, and carcass characteristics of confined crossbred Texel lambs
title_fullStr Residual intake and gain for the evaluation of performance, non-carcass components, and carcass characteristics of confined crossbred Texel lambs
title_full_unstemmed Residual intake and gain for the evaluation of performance, non-carcass components, and carcass characteristics of confined crossbred Texel lambs
title_sort Residual intake and gain for the evaluation of performance, non-carcass components, and carcass characteristics of confined crossbred Texel lambs
author Carneiro,Mayara Mitiko Yoshihara
author_facet Carneiro,Mayara Mitiko Yoshihara
Morais,Maria da Graça
Souza,Andréa Roberto Duarte Lopes
Fernandes,Henrique Jorge
Feijó,Gelson Luís Dias
Bonin,Marina de Nadai
Franco,Gumercindo Loriano
Rocha,Raizza Fátima Abadia Tulux
author_role author
author2 Morais,Maria da Graça
Souza,Andréa Roberto Duarte Lopes
Fernandes,Henrique Jorge
Feijó,Gelson Luís Dias
Bonin,Marina de Nadai
Franco,Gumercindo Loriano
Rocha,Raizza Fátima Abadia Tulux
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carneiro,Mayara Mitiko Yoshihara
Morais,Maria da Graça
Souza,Andréa Roberto Duarte Lopes
Fernandes,Henrique Jorge
Feijó,Gelson Luís Dias
Bonin,Marina de Nadai
Franco,Gumercindo Loriano
Rocha,Raizza Fátima Abadia Tulux
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv feedlot
residual feed intake
sheep
tissue composition
visceral fat
topic feedlot
residual feed intake
sheep
tissue composition
visceral fat
description ABSTRACT We evaluated performance, non-carcass components, and carcass characteristics of crossbred Texel lambs in different categories of residual intake and gain (RIG). We assessed 77 crossbred (¼ Pantaneira and ¾ Texel) non-castrated animals in two study phases. The first phase included 47 lambs with an initial average weight of 29.9±5.5 kg, and the second phase included 30 lambs with initial average weight of 22.4±3.3 kg. Dry matter intake (DMI) and average daily gain (ADG) were evaluated for 70 days. Animals were divided into three groups in terms of efficiency: efficient (high RIG), intermediate (medium RIG), or inefficient (low RIG), based on the standard deviation of the mean for the RIG variable. We measured the yield of non-carcass components, carcass characteristics, and yield of meat cuts. Efficiency group had no association with DMI, nor with initial and final body weights of the animals. The ADG of efficient (0.310 kg day−1) and intermediate (0.290 kg day−1) animals was greater than observed in inefficient (0.260 kg day−1) animals. Lambs in the efficient and intermediate groups had significantly higher levels of all efficiency indicators evaluated. Efficient and intermediate animals yielded significantly more wool/skin in comparison with lambs in the inefficient group. Animals with high RIG also had lower relative weight of testicles/scrotal sac in comparison with inefficient animals. Fat deposition in the omentum and mesentery as well as total fat were decreased in efficient animals. No significant differences occurred among groups regarding carcass characteristics and yield of meat cuts. The RIG index allows for the identification of lambs with higher growth rates and greater wool/skin yield and lower proportion of visceral fat.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982019000100704
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982019000100704
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/rbz4820180206
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia v.48 2019
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)
instacron:SBZ
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)
instacron_str SBZ
institution SBZ
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||bz@sbz.org.br|| secretariarbz@sbz.org.br
_version_ 1750318153589587968