Evaluation of whey fermented by Enterococcus faecium in consortium with Veilonella parvula in ruminant feeding
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982012000100025 |
Resumo: | The objective of this study was to evaluate the whey fermented by Enterococcus faecium in consortium with Veilonella parvula on the in vitro growth of ruminal bacteria and as a supplement in the cattle diet. In the in vitro experiment, a randomized design, with the following combinations was used: ruminal bacteria; ruminal bacteria and inactive whey; ruminal bacteria and active whey; and active whey. In the in vivo experiment, five fistulated Zebu Holstein-Zebu crossbred heifers were distributed in a 5 × 5 Latin square. Supplements were formulated without the addition of whey, with the addition of two levels of unfermented whey (2.5 and 5 L/day) or two levels of fermented whey (2.5 and 5 L/day). A positive effect of the whey fermentation was detected on the consumption of dry matter, organic matter, crude protein, ether extract, non-fiber carbohydrates and neutral detergent fiber, corrected for ash and protein in kg/day. No effects of whey were observed on the pH and concentration of rumen ammonia nitrogen, serum concentration of urea and glucose, urinary excretion of urea or nutrient digestibility, except for the total digestible nutrients. Supplementation with whey improved the apparent nitrogen balance, but supplementation with fermented whey decreased the intestinal flow of microbial nitrogen and microbial synthesis efficiency in relation to the unfermented whey. The whey fermentation process does not optimize the physiological responses of heifers supplemented with 2.5 and 5.0 L of whey. |
id |
SBZ-1_92c2227b1cb08248bebdeb6c08a722a3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1516-35982012000100025 |
network_acronym_str |
SBZ-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluation of whey fermented by Enterococcus faecium in consortium with Veilonella parvula in ruminant feedinglactateorganic acidspropionic acidrumenThe objective of this study was to evaluate the whey fermented by Enterococcus faecium in consortium with Veilonella parvula on the in vitro growth of ruminal bacteria and as a supplement in the cattle diet. In the in vitro experiment, a randomized design, with the following combinations was used: ruminal bacteria; ruminal bacteria and inactive whey; ruminal bacteria and active whey; and active whey. In the in vivo experiment, five fistulated Zebu Holstein-Zebu crossbred heifers were distributed in a 5 × 5 Latin square. Supplements were formulated without the addition of whey, with the addition of two levels of unfermented whey (2.5 and 5 L/day) or two levels of fermented whey (2.5 and 5 L/day). A positive effect of the whey fermentation was detected on the consumption of dry matter, organic matter, crude protein, ether extract, non-fiber carbohydrates and neutral detergent fiber, corrected for ash and protein in kg/day. No effects of whey were observed on the pH and concentration of rumen ammonia nitrogen, serum concentration of urea and glucose, urinary excretion of urea or nutrient digestibility, except for the total digestible nutrients. Supplementation with whey improved the apparent nitrogen balance, but supplementation with fermented whey decreased the intestinal flow of microbial nitrogen and microbial synthesis efficiency in relation to the unfermented whey. The whey fermentation process does not optimize the physiological responses of heifers supplemented with 2.5 and 5.0 L of whey.Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia2012-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982012000100025Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia v.41 n.1 2012reponame:Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)instacron:SBZ10.1590/S1516-35982012000100025info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira,Juliana Silva deQueiroz,Augusto César deMantovani,Hilário CuquettoBayão,Geraldo Fábio VianaDetmann,EdenioSantos,Edson MauroSilva,Thiago Carvalho daeng2012-02-14T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-35982012000100025Revistahttps://www.rbz.org.br/pt-br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||bz@sbz.org.br|| secretariarbz@sbz.org.br1806-92901516-3598opendoar:2012-02-14T00:00Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of whey fermented by Enterococcus faecium in consortium with Veilonella parvula in ruminant feeding |
title |
Evaluation of whey fermented by Enterococcus faecium in consortium with Veilonella parvula in ruminant feeding |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of whey fermented by Enterococcus faecium in consortium with Veilonella parvula in ruminant feeding Oliveira,Juliana Silva de lactate organic acids propionic acid rumen |
title_short |
Evaluation of whey fermented by Enterococcus faecium in consortium with Veilonella parvula in ruminant feeding |
title_full |
Evaluation of whey fermented by Enterococcus faecium in consortium with Veilonella parvula in ruminant feeding |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of whey fermented by Enterococcus faecium in consortium with Veilonella parvula in ruminant feeding |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of whey fermented by Enterococcus faecium in consortium with Veilonella parvula in ruminant feeding |
title_sort |
Evaluation of whey fermented by Enterococcus faecium in consortium with Veilonella parvula in ruminant feeding |
author |
Oliveira,Juliana Silva de |
author_facet |
Oliveira,Juliana Silva de Queiroz,Augusto César de Mantovani,Hilário Cuquetto Bayão,Geraldo Fábio Viana Detmann,Edenio Santos,Edson Mauro Silva,Thiago Carvalho da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Queiroz,Augusto César de Mantovani,Hilário Cuquetto Bayão,Geraldo Fábio Viana Detmann,Edenio Santos,Edson Mauro Silva,Thiago Carvalho da |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira,Juliana Silva de Queiroz,Augusto César de Mantovani,Hilário Cuquetto Bayão,Geraldo Fábio Viana Detmann,Edenio Santos,Edson Mauro Silva,Thiago Carvalho da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
lactate organic acids propionic acid rumen |
topic |
lactate organic acids propionic acid rumen |
description |
The objective of this study was to evaluate the whey fermented by Enterococcus faecium in consortium with Veilonella parvula on the in vitro growth of ruminal bacteria and as a supplement in the cattle diet. In the in vitro experiment, a randomized design, with the following combinations was used: ruminal bacteria; ruminal bacteria and inactive whey; ruminal bacteria and active whey; and active whey. In the in vivo experiment, five fistulated Zebu Holstein-Zebu crossbred heifers were distributed in a 5 × 5 Latin square. Supplements were formulated without the addition of whey, with the addition of two levels of unfermented whey (2.5 and 5 L/day) or two levels of fermented whey (2.5 and 5 L/day). A positive effect of the whey fermentation was detected on the consumption of dry matter, organic matter, crude protein, ether extract, non-fiber carbohydrates and neutral detergent fiber, corrected for ash and protein in kg/day. No effects of whey were observed on the pH and concentration of rumen ammonia nitrogen, serum concentration of urea and glucose, urinary excretion of urea or nutrient digestibility, except for the total digestible nutrients. Supplementation with whey improved the apparent nitrogen balance, but supplementation with fermented whey decreased the intestinal flow of microbial nitrogen and microbial synthesis efficiency in relation to the unfermented whey. The whey fermentation process does not optimize the physiological responses of heifers supplemented with 2.5 and 5.0 L of whey. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982012000100025 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982012000100025 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1516-35982012000100025 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia v.41 n.1 2012 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ) instacron:SBZ |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ) |
instacron_str |
SBZ |
institution |
SBZ |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||bz@sbz.org.br|| secretariarbz@sbz.org.br |
_version_ |
1750318149126848512 |