Evaluation of whey fermented by Enterococcus faecium in consortium with Veilonella parvula in ruminant feeding

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira,Juliana Silva de
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Queiroz,Augusto César de, Mantovani,Hilário Cuquetto, Bayão,Geraldo Fábio Viana, Detmann,Edenio, Santos,Edson Mauro, Silva,Thiago Carvalho da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982012000100025
Resumo: The objective of this study was to evaluate the whey fermented by Enterococcus faecium in consortium with Veilonella parvula on the in vitro growth of ruminal bacteria and as a supplement in the cattle diet. In the in vitro experiment, a randomized design, with the following combinations was used: ruminal bacteria; ruminal bacteria and inactive whey; ruminal bacteria and active whey; and active whey. In the in vivo experiment, five fistulated Zebu Holstein-Zebu crossbred heifers were distributed in a 5 × 5 Latin square. Supplements were formulated without the addition of whey, with the addition of two levels of unfermented whey (2.5 and 5 L/day) or two levels of fermented whey (2.5 and 5 L/day). A positive effect of the whey fermentation was detected on the consumption of dry matter, organic matter, crude protein, ether extract, non-fiber carbohydrates and neutral detergent fiber, corrected for ash and protein in kg/day. No effects of whey were observed on the pH and concentration of rumen ammonia nitrogen, serum concentration of urea and glucose, urinary excretion of urea or nutrient digestibility, except for the total digestible nutrients. Supplementation with whey improved the apparent nitrogen balance, but supplementation with fermented whey decreased the intestinal flow of microbial nitrogen and microbial synthesis efficiency in relation to the unfermented whey. The whey fermentation process does not optimize the physiological responses of heifers supplemented with 2.5 and 5.0 L of whey.
id SBZ-1_92c2227b1cb08248bebdeb6c08a722a3
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-35982012000100025
network_acronym_str SBZ-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of whey fermented by Enterococcus faecium in consortium with Veilonella parvula in ruminant feedinglactateorganic acidspropionic acidrumenThe objective of this study was to evaluate the whey fermented by Enterococcus faecium in consortium with Veilonella parvula on the in vitro growth of ruminal bacteria and as a supplement in the cattle diet. In the in vitro experiment, a randomized design, with the following combinations was used: ruminal bacteria; ruminal bacteria and inactive whey; ruminal bacteria and active whey; and active whey. In the in vivo experiment, five fistulated Zebu Holstein-Zebu crossbred heifers were distributed in a 5 × 5 Latin square. Supplements were formulated without the addition of whey, with the addition of two levels of unfermented whey (2.5 and 5 L/day) or two levels of fermented whey (2.5 and 5 L/day). A positive effect of the whey fermentation was detected on the consumption of dry matter, organic matter, crude protein, ether extract, non-fiber carbohydrates and neutral detergent fiber, corrected for ash and protein in kg/day. No effects of whey were observed on the pH and concentration of rumen ammonia nitrogen, serum concentration of urea and glucose, urinary excretion of urea or nutrient digestibility, except for the total digestible nutrients. Supplementation with whey improved the apparent nitrogen balance, but supplementation with fermented whey decreased the intestinal flow of microbial nitrogen and microbial synthesis efficiency in relation to the unfermented whey. The whey fermentation process does not optimize the physiological responses of heifers supplemented with 2.5 and 5.0 L of whey.Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia2012-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982012000100025Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia v.41 n.1 2012reponame:Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)instacron:SBZ10.1590/S1516-35982012000100025info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira,Juliana Silva deQueiroz,Augusto César deMantovani,Hilário CuquettoBayão,Geraldo Fábio VianaDetmann,EdenioSantos,Edson MauroSilva,Thiago Carvalho daeng2012-02-14T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-35982012000100025Revistahttps://www.rbz.org.br/pt-br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||bz@sbz.org.br|| secretariarbz@sbz.org.br1806-92901516-3598opendoar:2012-02-14T00:00Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of whey fermented by Enterococcus faecium in consortium with Veilonella parvula in ruminant feeding
title Evaluation of whey fermented by Enterococcus faecium in consortium with Veilonella parvula in ruminant feeding
spellingShingle Evaluation of whey fermented by Enterococcus faecium in consortium with Veilonella parvula in ruminant feeding
Oliveira,Juliana Silva de
lactate
organic acids
propionic acid
rumen
title_short Evaluation of whey fermented by Enterococcus faecium in consortium with Veilonella parvula in ruminant feeding
title_full Evaluation of whey fermented by Enterococcus faecium in consortium with Veilonella parvula in ruminant feeding
title_fullStr Evaluation of whey fermented by Enterococcus faecium in consortium with Veilonella parvula in ruminant feeding
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of whey fermented by Enterococcus faecium in consortium with Veilonella parvula in ruminant feeding
title_sort Evaluation of whey fermented by Enterococcus faecium in consortium with Veilonella parvula in ruminant feeding
author Oliveira,Juliana Silva de
author_facet Oliveira,Juliana Silva de
Queiroz,Augusto César de
Mantovani,Hilário Cuquetto
Bayão,Geraldo Fábio Viana
Detmann,Edenio
Santos,Edson Mauro
Silva,Thiago Carvalho da
author_role author
author2 Queiroz,Augusto César de
Mantovani,Hilário Cuquetto
Bayão,Geraldo Fábio Viana
Detmann,Edenio
Santos,Edson Mauro
Silva,Thiago Carvalho da
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira,Juliana Silva de
Queiroz,Augusto César de
Mantovani,Hilário Cuquetto
Bayão,Geraldo Fábio Viana
Detmann,Edenio
Santos,Edson Mauro
Silva,Thiago Carvalho da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv lactate
organic acids
propionic acid
rumen
topic lactate
organic acids
propionic acid
rumen
description The objective of this study was to evaluate the whey fermented by Enterococcus faecium in consortium with Veilonella parvula on the in vitro growth of ruminal bacteria and as a supplement in the cattle diet. In the in vitro experiment, a randomized design, with the following combinations was used: ruminal bacteria; ruminal bacteria and inactive whey; ruminal bacteria and active whey; and active whey. In the in vivo experiment, five fistulated Zebu Holstein-Zebu crossbred heifers were distributed in a 5 × 5 Latin square. Supplements were formulated without the addition of whey, with the addition of two levels of unfermented whey (2.5 and 5 L/day) or two levels of fermented whey (2.5 and 5 L/day). A positive effect of the whey fermentation was detected on the consumption of dry matter, organic matter, crude protein, ether extract, non-fiber carbohydrates and neutral detergent fiber, corrected for ash and protein in kg/day. No effects of whey were observed on the pH and concentration of rumen ammonia nitrogen, serum concentration of urea and glucose, urinary excretion of urea or nutrient digestibility, except for the total digestible nutrients. Supplementation with whey improved the apparent nitrogen balance, but supplementation with fermented whey decreased the intestinal flow of microbial nitrogen and microbial synthesis efficiency in relation to the unfermented whey. The whey fermentation process does not optimize the physiological responses of heifers supplemented with 2.5 and 5.0 L of whey.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982012000100025
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982012000100025
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1516-35982012000100025
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia v.41 n.1 2012
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)
instacron:SBZ
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)
instacron_str SBZ
institution SBZ
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||bz@sbz.org.br|| secretariarbz@sbz.org.br
_version_ 1750318149126848512