Relationship between residual feed intake and enteric methane emission in Nellore cattle
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982015000700255 |
Resumo: | Feed intake and average daily gain (ADG) in Nellore cattle were determined to calculate residual feed intake in two performance tests: first during the growth phase (RFIgrowth) and then during a measurement of the methane emission phase (RFImet). During the RFIgrowth test, 62 males and 56 females were classified as low-, medium-, and high-RFI. Enteric methane emission was measured in 46 animals; 23 males used for RFImet measurement plus 23 females (22 low-RFIgrowth and 24 high-RFIgrowth). Diet consisted of Brachiaria brizantha cv. Marandu hay (445 g/kg DM) and concentrate (555 g/kg DM). During the RFIgrowth and RFImet phases, DMI was lower in the animals with low RFI, with no difference in ADG. Residual feed intake was -0.359 and 0.367 kg DM/d for low- and high-RFI animals. Enteric methane emission (g/d, g/kg BW0.75 and g/kg ADG) did not differ between RFIgrowth classes. Enteric methane emission (g/d) was higher in high RFImet and lower in low RFImet males. Spearman correlations among traits obtained during both tests, which were high between metabolic BW (r = 0.959) and between DMI (r = 0.718), and zero between ADG (r = -0.062), resulted in moderate correlation between RFIgrowth and RFImet (r = 0.412). However, it is not possible to confirm that high-efficiency animals release less enteric methane, since different results were obtained when enteric methane was compared between the RFIgrowth and RFImet classes. |
id |
SBZ-1_959233feaff1e4a4437ee6efb0cf1f16 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1516-35982015000700255 |
network_acronym_str |
SBZ-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Relationship between residual feed intake and enteric methane emission in Nellore cattlebeef cattleenteric methane productionfeed efficiencyperformancesulfur hexafluorideFeed intake and average daily gain (ADG) in Nellore cattle were determined to calculate residual feed intake in two performance tests: first during the growth phase (RFIgrowth) and then during a measurement of the methane emission phase (RFImet). During the RFIgrowth test, 62 males and 56 females were classified as low-, medium-, and high-RFI. Enteric methane emission was measured in 46 animals; 23 males used for RFImet measurement plus 23 females (22 low-RFIgrowth and 24 high-RFIgrowth). Diet consisted of Brachiaria brizantha cv. Marandu hay (445 g/kg DM) and concentrate (555 g/kg DM). During the RFIgrowth and RFImet phases, DMI was lower in the animals with low RFI, with no difference in ADG. Residual feed intake was -0.359 and 0.367 kg DM/d for low- and high-RFI animals. Enteric methane emission (g/d, g/kg BW0.75 and g/kg ADG) did not differ between RFIgrowth classes. Enteric methane emission (g/d) was higher in high RFImet and lower in low RFImet males. Spearman correlations among traits obtained during both tests, which were high between metabolic BW (r = 0.959) and between DMI (r = 0.718), and zero between ADG (r = -0.062), resulted in moderate correlation between RFIgrowth and RFImet (r = 0.412). However, it is not possible to confirm that high-efficiency animals release less enteric methane, since different results were obtained when enteric methane was compared between the RFIgrowth and RFImet classes.Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia2015-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982015000700255Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia v.44 n.7 2015reponame:Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)instacron:SBZ10.1590/S1806-92902015000700004info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMercadante,Maria Eugênia ZerlottiCaliman,Ana Paula de MeloCanesin,Roberta CarrilhoBonilha,Sarah Figueiredo MartinsBerndt,AlexandreFrighetto,Rosa Toyoko ShiraishiMagnani,ElaineBranco,Renata Helenaeng2015-07-24T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-35982015000700255Revistahttps://www.rbz.org.br/pt-br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||bz@sbz.org.br|| secretariarbz@sbz.org.br1806-92901516-3598opendoar:2015-07-24T00:00Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Relationship between residual feed intake and enteric methane emission in Nellore cattle |
title |
Relationship between residual feed intake and enteric methane emission in Nellore cattle |
spellingShingle |
Relationship between residual feed intake and enteric methane emission in Nellore cattle Mercadante,Maria Eugênia Zerlotti beef cattle enteric methane production feed efficiency performance sulfur hexafluoride |
title_short |
Relationship between residual feed intake and enteric methane emission in Nellore cattle |
title_full |
Relationship between residual feed intake and enteric methane emission in Nellore cattle |
title_fullStr |
Relationship between residual feed intake and enteric methane emission in Nellore cattle |
title_full_unstemmed |
Relationship between residual feed intake and enteric methane emission in Nellore cattle |
title_sort |
Relationship between residual feed intake and enteric methane emission in Nellore cattle |
author |
Mercadante,Maria Eugênia Zerlotti |
author_facet |
Mercadante,Maria Eugênia Zerlotti Caliman,Ana Paula de Melo Canesin,Roberta Carrilho Bonilha,Sarah Figueiredo Martins Berndt,Alexandre Frighetto,Rosa Toyoko Shiraishi Magnani,Elaine Branco,Renata Helena |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Caliman,Ana Paula de Melo Canesin,Roberta Carrilho Bonilha,Sarah Figueiredo Martins Berndt,Alexandre Frighetto,Rosa Toyoko Shiraishi Magnani,Elaine Branco,Renata Helena |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mercadante,Maria Eugênia Zerlotti Caliman,Ana Paula de Melo Canesin,Roberta Carrilho Bonilha,Sarah Figueiredo Martins Berndt,Alexandre Frighetto,Rosa Toyoko Shiraishi Magnani,Elaine Branco,Renata Helena |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
beef cattle enteric methane production feed efficiency performance sulfur hexafluoride |
topic |
beef cattle enteric methane production feed efficiency performance sulfur hexafluoride |
description |
Feed intake and average daily gain (ADG) in Nellore cattle were determined to calculate residual feed intake in two performance tests: first during the growth phase (RFIgrowth) and then during a measurement of the methane emission phase (RFImet). During the RFIgrowth test, 62 males and 56 females were classified as low-, medium-, and high-RFI. Enteric methane emission was measured in 46 animals; 23 males used for RFImet measurement plus 23 females (22 low-RFIgrowth and 24 high-RFIgrowth). Diet consisted of Brachiaria brizantha cv. Marandu hay (445 g/kg DM) and concentrate (555 g/kg DM). During the RFIgrowth and RFImet phases, DMI was lower in the animals with low RFI, with no difference in ADG. Residual feed intake was -0.359 and 0.367 kg DM/d for low- and high-RFI animals. Enteric methane emission (g/d, g/kg BW0.75 and g/kg ADG) did not differ between RFIgrowth classes. Enteric methane emission (g/d) was higher in high RFImet and lower in low RFImet males. Spearman correlations among traits obtained during both tests, which were high between metabolic BW (r = 0.959) and between DMI (r = 0.718), and zero between ADG (r = -0.062), resulted in moderate correlation between RFIgrowth and RFImet (r = 0.412). However, it is not possible to confirm that high-efficiency animals release less enteric methane, since different results were obtained when enteric methane was compared between the RFIgrowth and RFImet classes. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-07-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982015000700255 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982015000700255 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1806-92902015000700004 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia v.44 n.7 2015 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ) instacron:SBZ |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ) |
instacron_str |
SBZ |
institution |
SBZ |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||bz@sbz.org.br|| secretariarbz@sbz.org.br |
_version_ |
1750318151445250048 |