Anaerobic bio-digestion of concentrate obtained in the process of ultra filtration of effluents from tilapia processing unit

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Souza,Milena Alves de
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Chaguri,Milena Penteado, Castelini,Fabrício Rogério, Lucas Junior,Jorge de, Vidotti,Rose Meire
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982012000200002
Resumo: The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficiency of the process of biodigestion of the protein concentrate resulting from the ultrafiltration of the effluent from a slaughterhouse freezer of Nile tilapia. Bench digesters were used with excrements and water (control) in comparison with a mixture of cattle manure and effluent from the stages of filleting and bleeding of tilapias. The effluent obtained in the continuous process (bleeding + filleting) was the one with highest accumulated population from the 37th day, as well as greatest daily production. Gases composition did not differ between the protein concentrates, but the gas obtained with the use of the effluent from the filleting stage presented highest methane gas average (78.05%) in comparison with those obtained in the bleeding stage (69.95%) and in the continuous process (70.02%) or by the control method (68.59%).
id SBZ-1_ca1d8d02a78f4948400b9401e4b63ab5
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-35982012000200002
network_acronym_str SBZ-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Anaerobic bio-digestion of concentrate obtained in the process of ultra filtration of effluents from tilapia processing unitbiogasbleedingfilletingfreshwater-fishmethaneThe objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficiency of the process of biodigestion of the protein concentrate resulting from the ultrafiltration of the effluent from a slaughterhouse freezer of Nile tilapia. Bench digesters were used with excrements and water (control) in comparison with a mixture of cattle manure and effluent from the stages of filleting and bleeding of tilapias. The effluent obtained in the continuous process (bleeding + filleting) was the one with highest accumulated population from the 37th day, as well as greatest daily production. Gases composition did not differ between the protein concentrates, but the gas obtained with the use of the effluent from the filleting stage presented highest methane gas average (78.05%) in comparison with those obtained in the bleeding stage (69.95%) and in the continuous process (70.02%) or by the control method (68.59%).Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia2012-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982012000200002Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia v.41 n.2 2012reponame:Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)instacron:SBZ10.1590/S1516-35982012000200002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSouza,Milena Alves deChaguri,Milena PenteadoCastelini,Fabrício RogérioLucas Junior,Jorge deVidotti,Rose Meireeng2012-03-19T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-35982012000200002Revistahttps://www.rbz.org.br/pt-br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||bz@sbz.org.br|| secretariarbz@sbz.org.br1806-92901516-3598opendoar:2012-03-19T00:00Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Anaerobic bio-digestion of concentrate obtained in the process of ultra filtration of effluents from tilapia processing unit
title Anaerobic bio-digestion of concentrate obtained in the process of ultra filtration of effluents from tilapia processing unit
spellingShingle Anaerobic bio-digestion of concentrate obtained in the process of ultra filtration of effluents from tilapia processing unit
Souza,Milena Alves de
biogas
bleeding
filleting
freshwater-fish
methane
title_short Anaerobic bio-digestion of concentrate obtained in the process of ultra filtration of effluents from tilapia processing unit
title_full Anaerobic bio-digestion of concentrate obtained in the process of ultra filtration of effluents from tilapia processing unit
title_fullStr Anaerobic bio-digestion of concentrate obtained in the process of ultra filtration of effluents from tilapia processing unit
title_full_unstemmed Anaerobic bio-digestion of concentrate obtained in the process of ultra filtration of effluents from tilapia processing unit
title_sort Anaerobic bio-digestion of concentrate obtained in the process of ultra filtration of effluents from tilapia processing unit
author Souza,Milena Alves de
author_facet Souza,Milena Alves de
Chaguri,Milena Penteado
Castelini,Fabrício Rogério
Lucas Junior,Jorge de
Vidotti,Rose Meire
author_role author
author2 Chaguri,Milena Penteado
Castelini,Fabrício Rogério
Lucas Junior,Jorge de
Vidotti,Rose Meire
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Souza,Milena Alves de
Chaguri,Milena Penteado
Castelini,Fabrício Rogério
Lucas Junior,Jorge de
Vidotti,Rose Meire
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv biogas
bleeding
filleting
freshwater-fish
methane
topic biogas
bleeding
filleting
freshwater-fish
methane
description The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficiency of the process of biodigestion of the protein concentrate resulting from the ultrafiltration of the effluent from a slaughterhouse freezer of Nile tilapia. Bench digesters were used with excrements and water (control) in comparison with a mixture of cattle manure and effluent from the stages of filleting and bleeding of tilapias. The effluent obtained in the continuous process (bleeding + filleting) was the one with highest accumulated population from the 37th day, as well as greatest daily production. Gases composition did not differ between the protein concentrates, but the gas obtained with the use of the effluent from the filleting stage presented highest methane gas average (78.05%) in comparison with those obtained in the bleeding stage (69.95%) and in the continuous process (70.02%) or by the control method (68.59%).
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982012000200002
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982012000200002
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1516-35982012000200002
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia v.41 n.2 2012
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)
instacron:SBZ
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)
instacron_str SBZ
institution SBZ
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||bz@sbz.org.br|| secretariarbz@sbz.org.br
_version_ 1750318149143625728