Forage production dynamics of winter annual grasses sown on different dates
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982011000300007 |
Resumo: | This experiment was carried out from April to September 2008 with the objective of evaluating the forage production dynamics of winter annual grasses (Avena strigosa Schereb cv. IAPAR-61; Lolium multiflorum Lam cv. Comum; Avena strigosa cv. Comum; Avena sativa cv. IPR 126; and Triticum aestivum L cv. BRS Tarumã) on four sowing dates (April 4th, April 24th, May 14th and June 3rd). A completely randomized blocks with four replications was used. It was evaluated number of days and production at the first cutting, total production, number of cuts and density of plants and tillers. There is a strong interaction among cultivars and sowing dates for all analyzed variables and this indicates opportunities of choosing multiple combinations among cultivar and sowing dates to manipulate forage production aiming at easing forage gaps. The late season oats (IPR 126 and IAPAR 61) present high production and forage distribution capacities, especially if sown until mid-April. |
id |
SBZ-1_cd5d9e05c3f91456ffcb98b13e867546 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1516-35982011000300007 |
network_acronym_str |
SBZ-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Forage production dynamics of winter annual grasses sown on different datesannual-ryegrassblack oatforage budgetforage productionwhite oatThis experiment was carried out from April to September 2008 with the objective of evaluating the forage production dynamics of winter annual grasses (Avena strigosa Schereb cv. IAPAR-61; Lolium multiflorum Lam cv. Comum; Avena strigosa cv. Comum; Avena sativa cv. IPR 126; and Triticum aestivum L cv. BRS Tarumã) on four sowing dates (April 4th, April 24th, May 14th and June 3rd). A completely randomized blocks with four replications was used. It was evaluated number of days and production at the first cutting, total production, number of cuts and density of plants and tillers. There is a strong interaction among cultivars and sowing dates for all analyzed variables and this indicates opportunities of choosing multiple combinations among cultivar and sowing dates to manipulate forage production aiming at easing forage gaps. The late season oats (IPR 126 and IAPAR 61) present high production and forage distribution capacities, especially if sown until mid-April.Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia2011-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982011000300007Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia v.40 n.3 2011reponame:Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)instacron:SBZ10.1590/S1516-35982011000300007info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPin,Edison AntonioSoares,André BrugnaraPossenti,Jean CarloFerrazza,Jussara Mariaeng2011-03-21T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-35982011000300007Revistahttps://www.rbz.org.br/pt-br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||bz@sbz.org.br|| secretariarbz@sbz.org.br1806-92901516-3598opendoar:2011-03-21T00:00Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Forage production dynamics of winter annual grasses sown on different dates |
title |
Forage production dynamics of winter annual grasses sown on different dates |
spellingShingle |
Forage production dynamics of winter annual grasses sown on different dates Pin,Edison Antonio annual-ryegrass black oat forage budget forage production white oat |
title_short |
Forage production dynamics of winter annual grasses sown on different dates |
title_full |
Forage production dynamics of winter annual grasses sown on different dates |
title_fullStr |
Forage production dynamics of winter annual grasses sown on different dates |
title_full_unstemmed |
Forage production dynamics of winter annual grasses sown on different dates |
title_sort |
Forage production dynamics of winter annual grasses sown on different dates |
author |
Pin,Edison Antonio |
author_facet |
Pin,Edison Antonio Soares,André Brugnara Possenti,Jean Carlo Ferrazza,Jussara Maria |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Soares,André Brugnara Possenti,Jean Carlo Ferrazza,Jussara Maria |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pin,Edison Antonio Soares,André Brugnara Possenti,Jean Carlo Ferrazza,Jussara Maria |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
annual-ryegrass black oat forage budget forage production white oat |
topic |
annual-ryegrass black oat forage budget forage production white oat |
description |
This experiment was carried out from April to September 2008 with the objective of evaluating the forage production dynamics of winter annual grasses (Avena strigosa Schereb cv. IAPAR-61; Lolium multiflorum Lam cv. Comum; Avena strigosa cv. Comum; Avena sativa cv. IPR 126; and Triticum aestivum L cv. BRS Tarumã) on four sowing dates (April 4th, April 24th, May 14th and June 3rd). A completely randomized blocks with four replications was used. It was evaluated number of days and production at the first cutting, total production, number of cuts and density of plants and tillers. There is a strong interaction among cultivars and sowing dates for all analyzed variables and this indicates opportunities of choosing multiple combinations among cultivar and sowing dates to manipulate forage production aiming at easing forage gaps. The late season oats (IPR 126 and IAPAR 61) present high production and forage distribution capacities, especially if sown until mid-April. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-03-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982011000300007 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982011000300007 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1516-35982011000300007 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia v.40 n.3 2011 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ) instacron:SBZ |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ) |
instacron_str |
SBZ |
institution |
SBZ |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||bz@sbz.org.br|| secretariarbz@sbz.org.br |
_version_ |
1750318147440738304 |