Simulation of Holstein and Jersey profitability by varying milk price payment system

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cunha,Daniel de Noronha Figueiredo Vieira da
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Pereira,José Carlos, Campos,Oriel Fajardo de, Gomes,Sebastião Teixeira, Braga,José Luis, Martuscello,Janaina Azevedo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982010000400028
Resumo: The objective of the study was to compare through simulation Holstein and Jersey breed herds, considering the farm size, zootechnical and economic indexes and profitability of the activity, by using different systems of bonus payment for milk price based in percentage of fat and protein in the milk. The comparisons were made, initially, disregarding the bonus payment for milk price based on the increase in the fat and protein percentage in milk. After that, the profitability of the activity was compared considering bonus payment for milk price of the Jersey breed herd, for each unit increment in fat and protein percentage in milk above those obtained with the Holstein breed herd. Finally, the profitability of the activity was compared by using the bonus payment for milk price based on quality of that used by company A systems. When there was no bonus payment for milk price based in the percentage of fat and protein in the milk, the profit obtained with the Holstein breed was higher because of the lower production costs. In order to make the activity more profitable with the Jersey breed, a bonus payment of 5% for milk price would be needed for each percentage unit of fat above the percentage of that obtained with the Holstein breed, or a bonus payment of 10% in the milk price for each percentage unit of protein above the percentage obtained with the Holstein breed. By using the bonus payment system proposed by Gimenes and Ponchio, the annual profit with the Jersey breed was higher than the profit obtained with the Holstein breed. However, with the application of the bonus payment system used by company A, the Holstein breed became more profitable than the Jersey breed.
id SBZ-1_f253e9f9310ba94ec8571e6c5c1beb36
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-35982010000400028
network_acronym_str SBZ-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Simulation of Holstein and Jersey profitability by varying milk price payment systemdairy cattlemilk fatmilk protein modelingsimulationThe objective of the study was to compare through simulation Holstein and Jersey breed herds, considering the farm size, zootechnical and economic indexes and profitability of the activity, by using different systems of bonus payment for milk price based in percentage of fat and protein in the milk. The comparisons were made, initially, disregarding the bonus payment for milk price based on the increase in the fat and protein percentage in milk. After that, the profitability of the activity was compared considering bonus payment for milk price of the Jersey breed herd, for each unit increment in fat and protein percentage in milk above those obtained with the Holstein breed herd. Finally, the profitability of the activity was compared by using the bonus payment for milk price based on quality of that used by company A systems. When there was no bonus payment for milk price based in the percentage of fat and protein in the milk, the profit obtained with the Holstein breed was higher because of the lower production costs. In order to make the activity more profitable with the Jersey breed, a bonus payment of 5% for milk price would be needed for each percentage unit of fat above the percentage of that obtained with the Holstein breed, or a bonus payment of 10% in the milk price for each percentage unit of protein above the percentage obtained with the Holstein breed. By using the bonus payment system proposed by Gimenes and Ponchio, the annual profit with the Jersey breed was higher than the profit obtained with the Holstein breed. However, with the application of the bonus payment system used by company A, the Holstein breed became more profitable than the Jersey breed.Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia2010-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982010000400028Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia v.39 n.4 2010reponame:Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)instacron:SBZ10.1590/S1516-35982010000400028info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCunha,Daniel de Noronha Figueiredo Vieira daPereira,José CarlosCampos,Oriel Fajardo deGomes,Sebastião TeixeiraBraga,José LuisMartuscello,Janaina Azevedoeng2010-08-31T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-35982010000400028Revistahttps://www.rbz.org.br/pt-br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||bz@sbz.org.br|| secretariarbz@sbz.org.br1806-92901516-3598opendoar:2010-08-31T00:00Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Simulation of Holstein and Jersey profitability by varying milk price payment system
title Simulation of Holstein and Jersey profitability by varying milk price payment system
spellingShingle Simulation of Holstein and Jersey profitability by varying milk price payment system
Cunha,Daniel de Noronha Figueiredo Vieira da
dairy cattle
milk fat
milk protein modeling
simulation
title_short Simulation of Holstein and Jersey profitability by varying milk price payment system
title_full Simulation of Holstein and Jersey profitability by varying milk price payment system
title_fullStr Simulation of Holstein and Jersey profitability by varying milk price payment system
title_full_unstemmed Simulation of Holstein and Jersey profitability by varying milk price payment system
title_sort Simulation of Holstein and Jersey profitability by varying milk price payment system
author Cunha,Daniel de Noronha Figueiredo Vieira da
author_facet Cunha,Daniel de Noronha Figueiredo Vieira da
Pereira,José Carlos
Campos,Oriel Fajardo de
Gomes,Sebastião Teixeira
Braga,José Luis
Martuscello,Janaina Azevedo
author_role author
author2 Pereira,José Carlos
Campos,Oriel Fajardo de
Gomes,Sebastião Teixeira
Braga,José Luis
Martuscello,Janaina Azevedo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cunha,Daniel de Noronha Figueiredo Vieira da
Pereira,José Carlos
Campos,Oriel Fajardo de
Gomes,Sebastião Teixeira
Braga,José Luis
Martuscello,Janaina Azevedo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv dairy cattle
milk fat
milk protein modeling
simulation
topic dairy cattle
milk fat
milk protein modeling
simulation
description The objective of the study was to compare through simulation Holstein and Jersey breed herds, considering the farm size, zootechnical and economic indexes and profitability of the activity, by using different systems of bonus payment for milk price based in percentage of fat and protein in the milk. The comparisons were made, initially, disregarding the bonus payment for milk price based on the increase in the fat and protein percentage in milk. After that, the profitability of the activity was compared considering bonus payment for milk price of the Jersey breed herd, for each unit increment in fat and protein percentage in milk above those obtained with the Holstein breed herd. Finally, the profitability of the activity was compared by using the bonus payment for milk price based on quality of that used by company A systems. When there was no bonus payment for milk price based in the percentage of fat and protein in the milk, the profit obtained with the Holstein breed was higher because of the lower production costs. In order to make the activity more profitable with the Jersey breed, a bonus payment of 5% for milk price would be needed for each percentage unit of fat above the percentage of that obtained with the Holstein breed, or a bonus payment of 10% in the milk price for each percentage unit of protein above the percentage obtained with the Holstein breed. By using the bonus payment system proposed by Gimenes and Ponchio, the annual profit with the Jersey breed was higher than the profit obtained with the Holstein breed. However, with the application of the bonus payment system used by company A, the Holstein breed became more profitable than the Jersey breed.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982010000400028
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982010000400028
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1516-35982010000400028
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia v.39 n.4 2010
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)
instacron:SBZ
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)
instacron_str SBZ
institution SBZ
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||bz@sbz.org.br|| secretariarbz@sbz.org.br
_version_ 1750318146036695040