Polychaeta, Annelida, and Articulata are not monophyletic: articulating the Metameria (Metazoa, Coelomata)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Almeida,Waltécio de Oliveira
Data de Publicação: 2003
Outros Autores: Christoffersen,Martin Lindsey, Amorim,Dalton de Souza, Garraffoni,André Rinaldo Senna, Silva,Gustavo Sene
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Zoologia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-81752003000100006
Resumo: Polychaetes are metameric worms recognized for having parapodia, chaetae, and nuchal organs. Some authors have extended the Annelida to include Pogonophora, Echiura, and Clitellata. These suggestions are insufficient to generate a monophyletic group. They do not take into account two very large and important clades that in a cladistic analysis at a higher level are shown to be nested within the Annelida: the Ecdysozoa (arthropods and related taxa) and Enterocoela (deuterostomes and related taxa). Evolutionary histories of most characters across metazoan phyla are still very poorly known. Metameres and coeloms have been considered homoplastic in the literature, and yet the homeobox genes responsible for the expression of metamerism and of paired appendages, at least, are very largely distributed among the Metazoa. A phylogenetic analysis was performed for the ingroups of Polychaeta, including Clitellata, Enterocoela, and Ecdysozoa as terminal taxa. The remaining non-metameric phyla Platyhelminthes, Nemertea, Mollusca, and Sipuncula were included to root the tree within the Bilateria. Empirical data was obtained from the literature and run with the software Hennig86 with two comparative interpretations of a priori hypotheses of primary homology: one with negative characters (coding losses) and another considering only positive characters (without assumptions about losses). The most relevant conclusions are: (1) Annelida and Polychaeta are non-monophyletic, even when including Echiura, Clitellata, and Pogonophora; (2) Articulata, as traditionally circumscribed for Annelida and Arthropoda, is also not monophyletic; (3) Metameria becomes monophyletic only when Ecdysozoa and Enterocoela are included in addition to the traditional annelid taxa; (4) Ecdysozoa are the sister group of Aphrodita; (5) Clitellata are related to deposit-feeding sedentary polychaetes (scolecids), and Questidae represent their sister group; (6) Owenia plus Enterocoela form a monophyletic group related to the tubicolous polychaetes.
id SBZ-3_77c6722d46499787e62266c07f0d7382
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0101-81752003000100006
network_acronym_str SBZ-3
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Zoologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Polychaeta, Annelida, and Articulata are not monophyletic: articulating the Metameria (Metazoa, Coelomata)BilateriaClitellataEcdysozoaEnterocoelaMetazoaphylogenyPolychaetaPolychaetes are metameric worms recognized for having parapodia, chaetae, and nuchal organs. Some authors have extended the Annelida to include Pogonophora, Echiura, and Clitellata. These suggestions are insufficient to generate a monophyletic group. They do not take into account two very large and important clades that in a cladistic analysis at a higher level are shown to be nested within the Annelida: the Ecdysozoa (arthropods and related taxa) and Enterocoela (deuterostomes and related taxa). Evolutionary histories of most characters across metazoan phyla are still very poorly known. Metameres and coeloms have been considered homoplastic in the literature, and yet the homeobox genes responsible for the expression of metamerism and of paired appendages, at least, are very largely distributed among the Metazoa. A phylogenetic analysis was performed for the ingroups of Polychaeta, including Clitellata, Enterocoela, and Ecdysozoa as terminal taxa. The remaining non-metameric phyla Platyhelminthes, Nemertea, Mollusca, and Sipuncula were included to root the tree within the Bilateria. Empirical data was obtained from the literature and run with the software Hennig86 with two comparative interpretations of a priori hypotheses of primary homology: one with negative characters (coding losses) and another considering only positive characters (without assumptions about losses). The most relevant conclusions are: (1) Annelida and Polychaeta are non-monophyletic, even when including Echiura, Clitellata, and Pogonophora; (2) Articulata, as traditionally circumscribed for Annelida and Arthropoda, is also not monophyletic; (3) Metameria becomes monophyletic only when Ecdysozoa and Enterocoela are included in addition to the traditional annelid taxa; (4) Ecdysozoa are the sister group of Aphrodita; (5) Clitellata are related to deposit-feeding sedentary polychaetes (scolecids), and Questidae represent their sister group; (6) Owenia plus Enterocoela form a monophyletic group related to the tubicolous polychaetes.Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia2003-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-81752003000100006Revista Brasileira de Zoologia v.20 n.1 2003reponame:Revista Brasileira de Zoologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia (SBZ)instacron:SBZ10.1590/S0101-81752003000100006info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlmeida,Waltécio de OliveiraChristoffersen,Martin LindseyAmorim,Dalton de SouzaGarraffoni,André Rinaldo SennaSilva,Gustavo Seneeng2003-09-03T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0101-81752003000100006Revistahttp://calvados.c3sl.ufpr.br/ojs2/index.php/zooONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sbz@bio.ufpr.br1806-969X0101-8175opendoar:2003-09-03T00:00Revista Brasileira de Zoologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia (SBZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Polychaeta, Annelida, and Articulata are not monophyletic: articulating the Metameria (Metazoa, Coelomata)
title Polychaeta, Annelida, and Articulata are not monophyletic: articulating the Metameria (Metazoa, Coelomata)
spellingShingle Polychaeta, Annelida, and Articulata are not monophyletic: articulating the Metameria (Metazoa, Coelomata)
Almeida,Waltécio de Oliveira
Bilateria
Clitellata
Ecdysozoa
Enterocoela
Metazoa
phylogeny
Polychaeta
title_short Polychaeta, Annelida, and Articulata are not monophyletic: articulating the Metameria (Metazoa, Coelomata)
title_full Polychaeta, Annelida, and Articulata are not monophyletic: articulating the Metameria (Metazoa, Coelomata)
title_fullStr Polychaeta, Annelida, and Articulata are not monophyletic: articulating the Metameria (Metazoa, Coelomata)
title_full_unstemmed Polychaeta, Annelida, and Articulata are not monophyletic: articulating the Metameria (Metazoa, Coelomata)
title_sort Polychaeta, Annelida, and Articulata are not monophyletic: articulating the Metameria (Metazoa, Coelomata)
author Almeida,Waltécio de Oliveira
author_facet Almeida,Waltécio de Oliveira
Christoffersen,Martin Lindsey
Amorim,Dalton de Souza
Garraffoni,André Rinaldo Senna
Silva,Gustavo Sene
author_role author
author2 Christoffersen,Martin Lindsey
Amorim,Dalton de Souza
Garraffoni,André Rinaldo Senna
Silva,Gustavo Sene
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Almeida,Waltécio de Oliveira
Christoffersen,Martin Lindsey
Amorim,Dalton de Souza
Garraffoni,André Rinaldo Senna
Silva,Gustavo Sene
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bilateria
Clitellata
Ecdysozoa
Enterocoela
Metazoa
phylogeny
Polychaeta
topic Bilateria
Clitellata
Ecdysozoa
Enterocoela
Metazoa
phylogeny
Polychaeta
description Polychaetes are metameric worms recognized for having parapodia, chaetae, and nuchal organs. Some authors have extended the Annelida to include Pogonophora, Echiura, and Clitellata. These suggestions are insufficient to generate a monophyletic group. They do not take into account two very large and important clades that in a cladistic analysis at a higher level are shown to be nested within the Annelida: the Ecdysozoa (arthropods and related taxa) and Enterocoela (deuterostomes and related taxa). Evolutionary histories of most characters across metazoan phyla are still very poorly known. Metameres and coeloms have been considered homoplastic in the literature, and yet the homeobox genes responsible for the expression of metamerism and of paired appendages, at least, are very largely distributed among the Metazoa. A phylogenetic analysis was performed for the ingroups of Polychaeta, including Clitellata, Enterocoela, and Ecdysozoa as terminal taxa. The remaining non-metameric phyla Platyhelminthes, Nemertea, Mollusca, and Sipuncula were included to root the tree within the Bilateria. Empirical data was obtained from the literature and run with the software Hennig86 with two comparative interpretations of a priori hypotheses of primary homology: one with negative characters (coding losses) and another considering only positive characters (without assumptions about losses). The most relevant conclusions are: (1) Annelida and Polychaeta are non-monophyletic, even when including Echiura, Clitellata, and Pogonophora; (2) Articulata, as traditionally circumscribed for Annelida and Arthropoda, is also not monophyletic; (3) Metameria becomes monophyletic only when Ecdysozoa and Enterocoela are included in addition to the traditional annelid taxa; (4) Ecdysozoa are the sister group of Aphrodita; (5) Clitellata are related to deposit-feeding sedentary polychaetes (scolecids), and Questidae represent their sister group; (6) Owenia plus Enterocoela form a monophyletic group related to the tubicolous polychaetes.
publishDate 2003
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2003-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-81752003000100006
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-81752003000100006
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0101-81752003000100006
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Zoologia v.20 n.1 2003
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Zoologia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia (SBZ)
instacron:SBZ
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia (SBZ)
instacron_str SBZ
institution SBZ
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Zoologia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Zoologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Zoologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia (SBZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sbz@bio.ufpr.br
_version_ 1754820983793909760