Distributional patterns and possible origin of leafhoppers (Homoptera, Cicadellidae)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nielson,Mervin W.
Data de Publicação: 2000
Outros Autores: Knight,William J.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Zoologia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-81752000000100010
Resumo: The zoogeographical distribution of 42 cicadellid subfamilies and their assigned tribes and genera is compiled with distributional maps and proposed dispersal pathways of genera that are shared interzoogeographically. Possible origin of the subfamilies and tribes is proposed in an ancestral context from which the more modern extant groups evolved whereas origin of genera is in a more modern context. Notwithstanding their complex biogeography, the distributional data of the higher groups indicate that all of the cosmopolitan and near cosmopolitan subfamilies arose during early Cretaceous or possibly the late Jurassic period (140-116 m.y.a.) when continental drift was in its early stages. Nearly all of the New World and some Old World subfamilies are considered of more recent origin (late Cretaceous-Tertiary). Ninety percent of the known genera (2,126) are endemic to their respective zoogeographical region and subregion, thus indicating relatively high host specificity and low rate of dispersal. The majority (76%) of known extant genera are pantropical in origin, suggesting early or possible Gondwanaland origin of their ancestors. Dispersal pathways of genera shared by more than one zoogeographical region were generally south to north (Neotropical/Nearctic, Oriental/Palaearctic) or west to east (Palaearctic/Nearctic, Oriental/Australian), from regions of high diversity to regions of low diversity and from warmer climates to cooler climates. The most diverse and richest leafhopper fauna are present in the Neotropical and Ethiopian regions although taxal affinities between them are poorest. The most depauperate fauna are in the Nearctic region and in Australia, reflecting the impact of isolating and ecological factors on distribution and radiation. Ecological barriers were more evident between the Ethiopian and Oriental fauna than between any other zoogeographical combination. Taxal affinities appeared to be correlated with close continental proximities. Vicariance (physical) was the principal event that appealed to explain the distribution of many subfamilies and tribes whereas dispersal accounted for distribution of the majority of interzoogeographical genera.
id SBZ-3_cb5032ada68c4434568566e53c009c29
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0101-81752000000100010
network_acronym_str SBZ-3
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Zoologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Distributional patterns and possible origin of leafhoppers (Homoptera, Cicadellidae)LeafhoppersCicadellidaedistributiondispersalvicarianceoriginclassificatonhabitatsThe zoogeographical distribution of 42 cicadellid subfamilies and their assigned tribes and genera is compiled with distributional maps and proposed dispersal pathways of genera that are shared interzoogeographically. Possible origin of the subfamilies and tribes is proposed in an ancestral context from which the more modern extant groups evolved whereas origin of genera is in a more modern context. Notwithstanding their complex biogeography, the distributional data of the higher groups indicate that all of the cosmopolitan and near cosmopolitan subfamilies arose during early Cretaceous or possibly the late Jurassic period (140-116 m.y.a.) when continental drift was in its early stages. Nearly all of the New World and some Old World subfamilies are considered of more recent origin (late Cretaceous-Tertiary). Ninety percent of the known genera (2,126) are endemic to their respective zoogeographical region and subregion, thus indicating relatively high host specificity and low rate of dispersal. The majority (76%) of known extant genera are pantropical in origin, suggesting early or possible Gondwanaland origin of their ancestors. Dispersal pathways of genera shared by more than one zoogeographical region were generally south to north (Neotropical/Nearctic, Oriental/Palaearctic) or west to east (Palaearctic/Nearctic, Oriental/Australian), from regions of high diversity to regions of low diversity and from warmer climates to cooler climates. The most diverse and richest leafhopper fauna are present in the Neotropical and Ethiopian regions although taxal affinities between them are poorest. The most depauperate fauna are in the Nearctic region and in Australia, reflecting the impact of isolating and ecological factors on distribution and radiation. Ecological barriers were more evident between the Ethiopian and Oriental fauna than between any other zoogeographical combination. Taxal affinities appeared to be correlated with close continental proximities. Vicariance (physical) was the principal event that appealed to explain the distribution of many subfamilies and tribes whereas dispersal accounted for distribution of the majority of interzoogeographical genera.Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia2000-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-81752000000100010Revista Brasileira de Zoologia v.17 n.1 2000reponame:Revista Brasileira de Zoologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia (SBZ)instacron:SBZ10.1590/S0101-81752000000100010info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNielson,Mervin W.Knight,William J.eng2009-05-22T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0101-81752000000100010Revistahttp://calvados.c3sl.ufpr.br/ojs2/index.php/zooONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sbz@bio.ufpr.br1806-969X0101-8175opendoar:2009-05-22T00:00Revista Brasileira de Zoologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia (SBZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Distributional patterns and possible origin of leafhoppers (Homoptera, Cicadellidae)
title Distributional patterns and possible origin of leafhoppers (Homoptera, Cicadellidae)
spellingShingle Distributional patterns and possible origin of leafhoppers (Homoptera, Cicadellidae)
Nielson,Mervin W.
Leafhoppers
Cicadellidae
distribution
dispersal
vicariance
origin
classificaton
habitats
title_short Distributional patterns and possible origin of leafhoppers (Homoptera, Cicadellidae)
title_full Distributional patterns and possible origin of leafhoppers (Homoptera, Cicadellidae)
title_fullStr Distributional patterns and possible origin of leafhoppers (Homoptera, Cicadellidae)
title_full_unstemmed Distributional patterns and possible origin of leafhoppers (Homoptera, Cicadellidae)
title_sort Distributional patterns and possible origin of leafhoppers (Homoptera, Cicadellidae)
author Nielson,Mervin W.
author_facet Nielson,Mervin W.
Knight,William J.
author_role author
author2 Knight,William J.
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nielson,Mervin W.
Knight,William J.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Leafhoppers
Cicadellidae
distribution
dispersal
vicariance
origin
classificaton
habitats
topic Leafhoppers
Cicadellidae
distribution
dispersal
vicariance
origin
classificaton
habitats
description The zoogeographical distribution of 42 cicadellid subfamilies and their assigned tribes and genera is compiled with distributional maps and proposed dispersal pathways of genera that are shared interzoogeographically. Possible origin of the subfamilies and tribes is proposed in an ancestral context from which the more modern extant groups evolved whereas origin of genera is in a more modern context. Notwithstanding their complex biogeography, the distributional data of the higher groups indicate that all of the cosmopolitan and near cosmopolitan subfamilies arose during early Cretaceous or possibly the late Jurassic period (140-116 m.y.a.) when continental drift was in its early stages. Nearly all of the New World and some Old World subfamilies are considered of more recent origin (late Cretaceous-Tertiary). Ninety percent of the known genera (2,126) are endemic to their respective zoogeographical region and subregion, thus indicating relatively high host specificity and low rate of dispersal. The majority (76%) of known extant genera are pantropical in origin, suggesting early or possible Gondwanaland origin of their ancestors. Dispersal pathways of genera shared by more than one zoogeographical region were generally south to north (Neotropical/Nearctic, Oriental/Palaearctic) or west to east (Palaearctic/Nearctic, Oriental/Australian), from regions of high diversity to regions of low diversity and from warmer climates to cooler climates. The most diverse and richest leafhopper fauna are present in the Neotropical and Ethiopian regions although taxal affinities between them are poorest. The most depauperate fauna are in the Nearctic region and in Australia, reflecting the impact of isolating and ecological factors on distribution and radiation. Ecological barriers were more evident between the Ethiopian and Oriental fauna than between any other zoogeographical combination. Taxal affinities appeared to be correlated with close continental proximities. Vicariance (physical) was the principal event that appealed to explain the distribution of many subfamilies and tribes whereas dispersal accounted for distribution of the majority of interzoogeographical genera.
publishDate 2000
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2000-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-81752000000100010
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-81752000000100010
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0101-81752000000100010
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Zoologia v.17 n.1 2000
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Zoologia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia (SBZ)
instacron:SBZ
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia (SBZ)
instacron_str SBZ
institution SBZ
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Zoologia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Zoologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Zoologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia (SBZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sbz@bio.ufpr.br
_version_ 1754820981950513152