Experiência positiva de parto: fatores determinantes e influenciadores na perspectiva de mulheres

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Paes, Luciana Braz de Oliveira
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Tese
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/17304
Resumo: Objective: To understand the parturition process of women by identifying the factors that influenced a positive experience of childbirth as well as their apprehension of this process. Method: It is a mixed explanatory sequential research. In the quantitative Stage (1st), the study used a cross-sectional design, applying the T-IHAMC questionnaire to 265 postpartum women from cohabitation from January to June 2021. For data analysis, the study used descriptive statistics and to estimate the related risks the regression of Poisson. In the qualitative stage (2nd), the research used open interviews, applied between one and six months after birth, with 44 puerperal women who participated in the first stage and presented an understandable narrative. A thematic analysis was performed. The combination of the methods occurred in the connection and integration of the results and discussion. Results and discussion: Factors closest to a positive experience: knew how the vagina looked (98.02%) and did not consider minor lacerations as a bad experience; newborns presented Apgar ≥ 7/5th minute (96.92%), indications of the inductions met recommendations (96.43%), used misoprostol for induction (84.38%), choice of companion (95.47%), were assisted in the immediate puerperium (78.11%), did not present bleeding (95.09%), postpartum complications (70.19%) or infections (83.9%). We’re not left alone (82.2%) and valued care availability and the nurse obstetrician. Were guided concerning the follow-up visit (55.08%). Were offered pain relief methods (78.9%), were allowed to drink and eat (76.36%), amniotomy (60.75%) and Kristeller (86.14%) were not performed. Visited the hospital in labor (61.89%) and in the active phase. Factors that negatively interfered with the experience: predominance of cesarean section (61.89%), women did not go into labor (64.91%), absence of birth plan (100%), separation of the binomial (100%), deprivation of skin-to-skin contact/breastfeeding during the first hour (55.09%) companion restriction (99.6%), absence of doula (99.08%), lack of analgesia and lack of knowledge by women (97.25%), directed pull (94.06%), pre-establishment of the delivery position (90.1%), excessive vaginal touch by more than one professional (56.88%), movement deprivation in labor (55.05%), maintain venous access in labor (58.26%). Feared induction. Occurrence of disrespectful situations (69.49%), lack of privacy (83.9%), choices were not taken seriously (78.39%), perineal trauma or cesarean section (84.41%). Communication and security presented divergences between the stages, contemplated only in the quantitative one. Insecurity and disrespect presented higher chances for women who gave birth normally. Conclusion: Influencing factors were closer to a positive experience when related to clinical, protocol factors, or care availability. Negative experiences were related to excessive interventions, deprivation of rights and choice, ineffective communication, insecurity, lack of privacy, and restriction of the companion. There was a preference for cesarean section for women who: feared pain and how they would be treated in labor due to lack of information, previous trauma, and suffering of other parturients. Associations regarding the type of delivery showed that women who performed cesarean section feel safer and have lower chances of suffering disrespect. This study aims to collaborate in the elaboration of policies, protocols, and norms that ensure that the woman and her baby do not only survive but also experience this moment with dignity and intensively.
id SCAR_11b836f300c491e0591bdc1c65155c48
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufscar.br:ufscar/17304
network_acronym_str SCAR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
repository_id_str 4322
spelling Paes, Luciana Braz de OliveiraFabbro, Márcia Regina Cangianihttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6978014098495031https://lattes.cnpq.br/6215595989869981f52b8966-f936-458c-936e-8eb580359e122023-01-31T13:12:48Z2023-01-31T13:12:48Z2022-12-01PAES, Luciana Braz de Oliveira. Experiência positiva de parto: fatores determinantes e influenciadores na perspectiva de mulheres. 2022. Tese (Doutorado em Enfermagem) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2022. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/17304.https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/17304Objective: To understand the parturition process of women by identifying the factors that influenced a positive experience of childbirth as well as their apprehension of this process. Method: It is a mixed explanatory sequential research. In the quantitative Stage (1st), the study used a cross-sectional design, applying the T-IHAMC questionnaire to 265 postpartum women from cohabitation from January to June 2021. For data analysis, the study used descriptive statistics and to estimate the related risks the regression of Poisson. In the qualitative stage (2nd), the research used open interviews, applied between one and six months after birth, with 44 puerperal women who participated in the first stage and presented an understandable narrative. A thematic analysis was performed. The combination of the methods occurred in the connection and integration of the results and discussion. Results and discussion: Factors closest to a positive experience: knew how the vagina looked (98.02%) and did not consider minor lacerations as a bad experience; newborns presented Apgar ≥ 7/5th minute (96.92%), indications of the inductions met recommendations (96.43%), used misoprostol for induction (84.38%), choice of companion (95.47%), were assisted in the immediate puerperium (78.11%), did not present bleeding (95.09%), postpartum complications (70.19%) or infections (83.9%). We’re not left alone (82.2%) and valued care availability and the nurse obstetrician. Were guided concerning the follow-up visit (55.08%). Were offered pain relief methods (78.9%), were allowed to drink and eat (76.36%), amniotomy (60.75%) and Kristeller (86.14%) were not performed. Visited the hospital in labor (61.89%) and in the active phase. Factors that negatively interfered with the experience: predominance of cesarean section (61.89%), women did not go into labor (64.91%), absence of birth plan (100%), separation of the binomial (100%), deprivation of skin-to-skin contact/breastfeeding during the first hour (55.09%) companion restriction (99.6%), absence of doula (99.08%), lack of analgesia and lack of knowledge by women (97.25%), directed pull (94.06%), pre-establishment of the delivery position (90.1%), excessive vaginal touch by more than one professional (56.88%), movement deprivation in labor (55.05%), maintain venous access in labor (58.26%). Feared induction. Occurrence of disrespectful situations (69.49%), lack of privacy (83.9%), choices were not taken seriously (78.39%), perineal trauma or cesarean section (84.41%). Communication and security presented divergences between the stages, contemplated only in the quantitative one. Insecurity and disrespect presented higher chances for women who gave birth normally. Conclusion: Influencing factors were closer to a positive experience when related to clinical, protocol factors, or care availability. Negative experiences were related to excessive interventions, deprivation of rights and choice, ineffective communication, insecurity, lack of privacy, and restriction of the companion. There was a preference for cesarean section for women who: feared pain and how they would be treated in labor due to lack of information, previous trauma, and suffering of other parturients. Associations regarding the type of delivery showed that women who performed cesarean section feel safer and have lower chances of suffering disrespect. This study aims to collaborate in the elaboration of policies, protocols, and norms that ensure that the woman and her baby do not only survive but also experience this moment with dignity and intensively.Objetivo: compreender o processo de parturição de mulheres pela identificação dos fatores que influenciaram na experiência positiva de parto e da apreensão desse processo por elas. Método: misto do tipo explanatório sequencial. Na etapa quantitativa (1a.), utilizou-se o desenho transversal com aplicação do questionário T-IHAMC, entre janeiro a junho de 2021, com 265 puérperas do alojamento conjunto. Para análise, utilizou-se a estatística descritiva e, para estimar os riscos relativos, a regressão de Poisson. Na etapa qualitativa (2a.), utilizou-se a entrevista aberta, aplicada entre um a seis meses após nascimento, com 44 puérperas que participaram da 1ª etapa e apresentavam narrativa compreensível. Realizou-se a análise temática. A combinação dos métodos ocorreu na conexão e integração dos resultados e discussão. Resultados e Discussão: Fatores mais próximos de uma experiência positiva: sabiam como ficou a vagina (98,02%) e não entenderam como experiência ruim pequenas lacerações; recém-nascidos apresentarem Apgar ≥7/5º minuto (96,92%), indicações das induções atenderam recomendações (96,43%), utilizado misoprostol para indução (84,38%), escolha do acompanhante (95,47%), serem assistidas no puerpério imediato (78,11%), não apresentarem hemorragias (95,09%), intercorrências pós-parto (70,19%) ou infecções (83,9%). Não foram deixadas sozinhas (82,2%), valorizaram a disponibilidade de atenção e a enfermeira obstetra. Orientadas quanto o retorno (55,08%). Foram oferecidos métodos de alívio da dor (78,9%), puderam beber e comer (76,36%), não foi realizado amniotomia (60,75%) e Kristeller (86,14%). Procuraram o hospital em trabalho de parto (TP) (61,89%) e na fase ativa. Fatores que interfeririam negativamente na experiência: predomínio da cesárea (61,89%), mulheres não entraram em TP (64,91%), ausência do plano de parto (100%), separação do binômio (100%), privação do contato pele a pele/amamentação na primeira hora (55,09%), restrição do acompanhante (99,6%), ausência da doula (99,08%), escassez da analgesia e desconhecimento pelas mulheres (97,25%), puxo dirigido (94,06%), preestabelecimento da posição de parir (90,1%), excesso de toque vaginal por mais de um profissional (56,88%), privação da movimentação no TP (55,05%), manter acesso venoso no TP (58,26%). A indução foi temida. Houve situações desrespeitosas (69,49%), não tiveram privacidade (83,9%), as escolhas não foram levadas a sério (78,39%), trauma perineal ou cesárea (84,41%). A comunicação e a segurança apresentaram divergências entre as etapas, contempladas apenas na quantitativa. A insegurança e o desrespeito apresentaram maiores chances para mulheres que realizaram parto normal. Conclusão: Os fatores que influenciaram estavam mais próximos da experiência positiva quando relacionados a fatores clínicos, protocolares ou disponibilidade de atenção. As experiências negativas estiveram relacionadas ao excesso de intervenções, privação de direitos e de escolha, comunicação ineficaz, insegurança, ausência de privacidade e restrição do acompanhante. Houve preferência pela cesárea para mulheres que: tinham medo da dor e como seriam tratadas no TP, por falta de informação, traumas anteriores e sofrimento de outras parturientes. Associações quanto ao tipo de parto mostraram que mulheres que realizaram cesárea sentem-se mais seguras e tem menores chances de desrespeito. Espera-se que este estudo colabore na elaboração de políticas, protocolos, normas, que assegurem que a mulher e seu bebê não só sobrevivam, mas vivenciem com intensidade e dignidade este momento.Não recebi financiamentoporUniversidade Federal de São CarlosCâmpus São CarlosPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem - PPGEnfUFSCarAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAcontecimentos que mudam a vidaEstudos mistosMulheresPartoPeríodo pós-parto.Life-changing eventsMixed studiesWomenParturitionPostpartum periodCIENCIAS DA SAUDE::ENFERMAGEMCIENCIAS DA SAUDE::SAUDE COLETIVACIENCIAS DA SAUDECIENCIAS DA SAUDE::MEDICINA::CLINICA MEDICA::GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIACIENCIAS DA SAUDE::ENFERMAGEM::ENFERMAGEM OBSTETRICAExperiência positiva de parto: fatores determinantes e influenciadores na perspectiva de mulheresPositive childbirth experience: determining and influencing factors from the perspective of womeninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis60060040a34035-edb0-4b65-b11f-892e8ca332b7reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCARinstname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)instacron:UFSCARCC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8810https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/17304/3/license_rdff337d95da1fce0a22c77480e5e9a7aecMD53ORIGINALTese_EXPERIÊNCIA POSITIVA DE PARTO fatores determinantes e influenciadores na perspectiva de mulheres_Luciana Braz De Oliveira Paes.pdfTese_EXPERIÊNCIA POSITIVA DE PARTO fatores determinantes e influenciadores na perspectiva de mulheres_Luciana Braz De Oliveira Paes.pdfTeseapplication/pdf5013258https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/17304/1/Tese_EXPERI%c3%8aNCIA%20POSITIVA%20DE%20PARTO%20fatores%20determinantes%20e%20influenciadores%20na%20perspectiva%20de%20mulheres_Luciana%20Braz%20De%20Oliveira%20Paes.pdffc4407edfc8b808bdc2a1e532c6b0d60MD51carta comprovante - 2020.pdfcarta comprovante - 2020.pdfCarta comprovanteapplication/pdf68923https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/17304/2/carta%20comprovante%20-%202020.pdf04c900bac088913cc3448cb1285d9767MD52TEXTTese_EXPERIÊNCIA POSITIVA DE PARTO fatores determinantes e influenciadores na perspectiva de mulheres_Luciana Braz De Oliveira Paes.pdf.txtTese_EXPERIÊNCIA POSITIVA DE PARTO fatores determinantes e influenciadores na perspectiva de mulheres_Luciana Braz De Oliveira Paes.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain494106https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/17304/4/Tese_EXPERI%c3%8aNCIA%20POSITIVA%20DE%20PARTO%20fatores%20determinantes%20e%20influenciadores%20na%20perspectiva%20de%20mulheres_Luciana%20Braz%20De%20Oliveira%20Paes.pdf.txt80912d553431d69a5e56f5177a315945MD54carta comprovante - 2020.pdf.txtcarta comprovante - 2020.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain1183https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/17304/6/carta%20comprovante%20-%202020.pdf.txt222f8555c71bc0f753fa8a8278053c47MD56THUMBNAILTese_EXPERIÊNCIA POSITIVA DE PARTO fatores determinantes e influenciadores na perspectiva de mulheres_Luciana Braz De Oliveira Paes.pdf.jpgTese_EXPERIÊNCIA POSITIVA DE PARTO fatores determinantes e influenciadores na perspectiva de mulheres_Luciana Braz De Oliveira Paes.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg6374https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/17304/5/Tese_EXPERI%c3%8aNCIA%20POSITIVA%20DE%20PARTO%20fatores%20determinantes%20e%20influenciadores%20na%20perspectiva%20de%20mulheres_Luciana%20Braz%20De%20Oliveira%20Paes.pdf.jpg387e6ac5c77f5d273d2230e82c8582f8MD55carta comprovante - 2020.pdf.jpgcarta comprovante - 2020.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg6740https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/17304/7/carta%20comprovante%20-%202020.pdf.jpg23f76d300f266209091cbfc483934950MD57ufscar/173042023-09-18 18:32:29.548oai:repositorio.ufscar.br:ufscar/17304Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufscar.br/oai/requestopendoar:43222023-09-18T18:32:29Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Experiência positiva de parto: fatores determinantes e influenciadores na perspectiva de mulheres
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Positive childbirth experience: determining and influencing factors from the perspective of women
title Experiência positiva de parto: fatores determinantes e influenciadores na perspectiva de mulheres
spellingShingle Experiência positiva de parto: fatores determinantes e influenciadores na perspectiva de mulheres
Paes, Luciana Braz de Oliveira
Acontecimentos que mudam a vida
Estudos mistos
Mulheres
Parto
Período pós-parto.
Life-changing events
Mixed studies
Women
Parturition
Postpartum period
CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::ENFERMAGEM
CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::SAUDE COLETIVA
CIENCIAS DA SAUDE
CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::MEDICINA::CLINICA MEDICA::GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA
CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::ENFERMAGEM::ENFERMAGEM OBSTETRICA
title_short Experiência positiva de parto: fatores determinantes e influenciadores na perspectiva de mulheres
title_full Experiência positiva de parto: fatores determinantes e influenciadores na perspectiva de mulheres
title_fullStr Experiência positiva de parto: fatores determinantes e influenciadores na perspectiva de mulheres
title_full_unstemmed Experiência positiva de parto: fatores determinantes e influenciadores na perspectiva de mulheres
title_sort Experiência positiva de parto: fatores determinantes e influenciadores na perspectiva de mulheres
author Paes, Luciana Braz de Oliveira
author_facet Paes, Luciana Braz de Oliveira
author_role author
dc.contributor.authorlattes.por.fl_str_mv https://lattes.cnpq.br/6215595989869981
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Paes, Luciana Braz de Oliveira
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Fabbro, Márcia Regina Cangiani
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/6978014098495031
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv f52b8966-f936-458c-936e-8eb580359e12
contributor_str_mv Fabbro, Márcia Regina Cangiani
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Acontecimentos que mudam a vida
Estudos mistos
Mulheres
Parto
Período pós-parto.
topic Acontecimentos que mudam a vida
Estudos mistos
Mulheres
Parto
Período pós-parto.
Life-changing events
Mixed studies
Women
Parturition
Postpartum period
CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::ENFERMAGEM
CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::SAUDE COLETIVA
CIENCIAS DA SAUDE
CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::MEDICINA::CLINICA MEDICA::GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA
CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::ENFERMAGEM::ENFERMAGEM OBSTETRICA
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Life-changing events
Mixed studies
Women
Parturition
Postpartum period
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::ENFERMAGEM
CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::SAUDE COLETIVA
CIENCIAS DA SAUDE
CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::MEDICINA::CLINICA MEDICA::GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA
CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::ENFERMAGEM::ENFERMAGEM OBSTETRICA
description Objective: To understand the parturition process of women by identifying the factors that influenced a positive experience of childbirth as well as their apprehension of this process. Method: It is a mixed explanatory sequential research. In the quantitative Stage (1st), the study used a cross-sectional design, applying the T-IHAMC questionnaire to 265 postpartum women from cohabitation from January to June 2021. For data analysis, the study used descriptive statistics and to estimate the related risks the regression of Poisson. In the qualitative stage (2nd), the research used open interviews, applied between one and six months after birth, with 44 puerperal women who participated in the first stage and presented an understandable narrative. A thematic analysis was performed. The combination of the methods occurred in the connection and integration of the results and discussion. Results and discussion: Factors closest to a positive experience: knew how the vagina looked (98.02%) and did not consider minor lacerations as a bad experience; newborns presented Apgar ≥ 7/5th minute (96.92%), indications of the inductions met recommendations (96.43%), used misoprostol for induction (84.38%), choice of companion (95.47%), were assisted in the immediate puerperium (78.11%), did not present bleeding (95.09%), postpartum complications (70.19%) or infections (83.9%). We’re not left alone (82.2%) and valued care availability and the nurse obstetrician. Were guided concerning the follow-up visit (55.08%). Were offered pain relief methods (78.9%), were allowed to drink and eat (76.36%), amniotomy (60.75%) and Kristeller (86.14%) were not performed. Visited the hospital in labor (61.89%) and in the active phase. Factors that negatively interfered with the experience: predominance of cesarean section (61.89%), women did not go into labor (64.91%), absence of birth plan (100%), separation of the binomial (100%), deprivation of skin-to-skin contact/breastfeeding during the first hour (55.09%) companion restriction (99.6%), absence of doula (99.08%), lack of analgesia and lack of knowledge by women (97.25%), directed pull (94.06%), pre-establishment of the delivery position (90.1%), excessive vaginal touch by more than one professional (56.88%), movement deprivation in labor (55.05%), maintain venous access in labor (58.26%). Feared induction. Occurrence of disrespectful situations (69.49%), lack of privacy (83.9%), choices were not taken seriously (78.39%), perineal trauma or cesarean section (84.41%). Communication and security presented divergences between the stages, contemplated only in the quantitative one. Insecurity and disrespect presented higher chances for women who gave birth normally. Conclusion: Influencing factors were closer to a positive experience when related to clinical, protocol factors, or care availability. Negative experiences were related to excessive interventions, deprivation of rights and choice, ineffective communication, insecurity, lack of privacy, and restriction of the companion. There was a preference for cesarean section for women who: feared pain and how they would be treated in labor due to lack of information, previous trauma, and suffering of other parturients. Associations regarding the type of delivery showed that women who performed cesarean section feel safer and have lower chances of suffering disrespect. This study aims to collaborate in the elaboration of policies, protocols, and norms that ensure that the woman and her baby do not only survive but also experience this moment with dignity and intensively.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2022-12-01
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2023-01-31T13:12:48Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2023-01-31T13:12:48Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv PAES, Luciana Braz de Oliveira. Experiência positiva de parto: fatores determinantes e influenciadores na perspectiva de mulheres. 2022. Tese (Doutorado em Enfermagem) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2022. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/17304.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/17304
identifier_str_mv PAES, Luciana Braz de Oliveira. Experiência positiva de parto: fatores determinantes e influenciadores na perspectiva de mulheres. 2022. Tese (Doutorado em Enfermagem) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2022. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/17304.
url https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/17304
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
600
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv 40a34035-edb0-4b65-b11f-892e8ca332b7
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Câmpus São Carlos
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem - PPGEnf
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFSCar
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Câmpus São Carlos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron:UFSCAR
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron_str UFSCAR
institution UFSCAR
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
collection Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/17304/3/license_rdf
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/17304/1/Tese_EXPERI%c3%8aNCIA%20POSITIVA%20DE%20PARTO%20fatores%20determinantes%20e%20influenciadores%20na%20perspectiva%20de%20mulheres_Luciana%20Braz%20De%20Oliveira%20Paes.pdf
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/17304/2/carta%20comprovante%20-%202020.pdf
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/17304/4/Tese_EXPERI%c3%8aNCIA%20POSITIVA%20DE%20PARTO%20fatores%20determinantes%20e%20influenciadores%20na%20perspectiva%20de%20mulheres_Luciana%20Braz%20De%20Oliveira%20Paes.pdf.txt
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/17304/6/carta%20comprovante%20-%202020.pdf.txt
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/17304/5/Tese_EXPERI%c3%8aNCIA%20POSITIVA%20DE%20PARTO%20fatores%20determinantes%20e%20influenciadores%20na%20perspectiva%20de%20mulheres_Luciana%20Braz%20De%20Oliveira%20Paes.pdf.jpg
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/17304/7/carta%20comprovante%20-%202020.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv f337d95da1fce0a22c77480e5e9a7aec
fc4407edfc8b808bdc2a1e532c6b0d60
04c900bac088913cc3448cb1285d9767
80912d553431d69a5e56f5177a315945
222f8555c71bc0f753fa8a8278053c47
387e6ac5c77f5d273d2230e82c8582f8
23f76d300f266209091cbfc483934950
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1802136417001799680