Experiência positiva de parto: fatores determinantes e influenciadores na perspectiva de mulheres
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR |
Texto Completo: | https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/17304 |
Resumo: | Objective: To understand the parturition process of women by identifying the factors that influenced a positive experience of childbirth as well as their apprehension of this process. Method: It is a mixed explanatory sequential research. In the quantitative Stage (1st), the study used a cross-sectional design, applying the T-IHAMC questionnaire to 265 postpartum women from cohabitation from January to June 2021. For data analysis, the study used descriptive statistics and to estimate the related risks the regression of Poisson. In the qualitative stage (2nd), the research used open interviews, applied between one and six months after birth, with 44 puerperal women who participated in the first stage and presented an understandable narrative. A thematic analysis was performed. The combination of the methods occurred in the connection and integration of the results and discussion. Results and discussion: Factors closest to a positive experience: knew how the vagina looked (98.02%) and did not consider minor lacerations as a bad experience; newborns presented Apgar ≥ 7/5th minute (96.92%), indications of the inductions met recommendations (96.43%), used misoprostol for induction (84.38%), choice of companion (95.47%), were assisted in the immediate puerperium (78.11%), did not present bleeding (95.09%), postpartum complications (70.19%) or infections (83.9%). We’re not left alone (82.2%) and valued care availability and the nurse obstetrician. Were guided concerning the follow-up visit (55.08%). Were offered pain relief methods (78.9%), were allowed to drink and eat (76.36%), amniotomy (60.75%) and Kristeller (86.14%) were not performed. Visited the hospital in labor (61.89%) and in the active phase. Factors that negatively interfered with the experience: predominance of cesarean section (61.89%), women did not go into labor (64.91%), absence of birth plan (100%), separation of the binomial (100%), deprivation of skin-to-skin contact/breastfeeding during the first hour (55.09%) companion restriction (99.6%), absence of doula (99.08%), lack of analgesia and lack of knowledge by women (97.25%), directed pull (94.06%), pre-establishment of the delivery position (90.1%), excessive vaginal touch by more than one professional (56.88%), movement deprivation in labor (55.05%), maintain venous access in labor (58.26%). Feared induction. Occurrence of disrespectful situations (69.49%), lack of privacy (83.9%), choices were not taken seriously (78.39%), perineal trauma or cesarean section (84.41%). Communication and security presented divergences between the stages, contemplated only in the quantitative one. Insecurity and disrespect presented higher chances for women who gave birth normally. Conclusion: Influencing factors were closer to a positive experience when related to clinical, protocol factors, or care availability. Negative experiences were related to excessive interventions, deprivation of rights and choice, ineffective communication, insecurity, lack of privacy, and restriction of the companion. There was a preference for cesarean section for women who: feared pain and how they would be treated in labor due to lack of information, previous trauma, and suffering of other parturients. Associations regarding the type of delivery showed that women who performed cesarean section feel safer and have lower chances of suffering disrespect. This study aims to collaborate in the elaboration of policies, protocols, and norms that ensure that the woman and her baby do not only survive but also experience this moment with dignity and intensively. |
id |
SCAR_11b836f300c491e0591bdc1c65155c48 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufscar.br:ufscar/17304 |
network_acronym_str |
SCAR |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR |
repository_id_str |
4322 |
spelling |
Paes, Luciana Braz de OliveiraFabbro, Márcia Regina Cangianihttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6978014098495031https://lattes.cnpq.br/6215595989869981f52b8966-f936-458c-936e-8eb580359e122023-01-31T13:12:48Z2023-01-31T13:12:48Z2022-12-01PAES, Luciana Braz de Oliveira. Experiência positiva de parto: fatores determinantes e influenciadores na perspectiva de mulheres. 2022. Tese (Doutorado em Enfermagem) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2022. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/17304.https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/17304Objective: To understand the parturition process of women by identifying the factors that influenced a positive experience of childbirth as well as their apprehension of this process. Method: It is a mixed explanatory sequential research. In the quantitative Stage (1st), the study used a cross-sectional design, applying the T-IHAMC questionnaire to 265 postpartum women from cohabitation from January to June 2021. For data analysis, the study used descriptive statistics and to estimate the related risks the regression of Poisson. In the qualitative stage (2nd), the research used open interviews, applied between one and six months after birth, with 44 puerperal women who participated in the first stage and presented an understandable narrative. A thematic analysis was performed. The combination of the methods occurred in the connection and integration of the results and discussion. Results and discussion: Factors closest to a positive experience: knew how the vagina looked (98.02%) and did not consider minor lacerations as a bad experience; newborns presented Apgar ≥ 7/5th minute (96.92%), indications of the inductions met recommendations (96.43%), used misoprostol for induction (84.38%), choice of companion (95.47%), were assisted in the immediate puerperium (78.11%), did not present bleeding (95.09%), postpartum complications (70.19%) or infections (83.9%). We’re not left alone (82.2%) and valued care availability and the nurse obstetrician. Were guided concerning the follow-up visit (55.08%). Were offered pain relief methods (78.9%), were allowed to drink and eat (76.36%), amniotomy (60.75%) and Kristeller (86.14%) were not performed. Visited the hospital in labor (61.89%) and in the active phase. Factors that negatively interfered with the experience: predominance of cesarean section (61.89%), women did not go into labor (64.91%), absence of birth plan (100%), separation of the binomial (100%), deprivation of skin-to-skin contact/breastfeeding during the first hour (55.09%) companion restriction (99.6%), absence of doula (99.08%), lack of analgesia and lack of knowledge by women (97.25%), directed pull (94.06%), pre-establishment of the delivery position (90.1%), excessive vaginal touch by more than one professional (56.88%), movement deprivation in labor (55.05%), maintain venous access in labor (58.26%). Feared induction. Occurrence of disrespectful situations (69.49%), lack of privacy (83.9%), choices were not taken seriously (78.39%), perineal trauma or cesarean section (84.41%). Communication and security presented divergences between the stages, contemplated only in the quantitative one. Insecurity and disrespect presented higher chances for women who gave birth normally. Conclusion: Influencing factors were closer to a positive experience when related to clinical, protocol factors, or care availability. Negative experiences were related to excessive interventions, deprivation of rights and choice, ineffective communication, insecurity, lack of privacy, and restriction of the companion. There was a preference for cesarean section for women who: feared pain and how they would be treated in labor due to lack of information, previous trauma, and suffering of other parturients. Associations regarding the type of delivery showed that women who performed cesarean section feel safer and have lower chances of suffering disrespect. This study aims to collaborate in the elaboration of policies, protocols, and norms that ensure that the woman and her baby do not only survive but also experience this moment with dignity and intensively.Objetivo: compreender o processo de parturição de mulheres pela identificação dos fatores que influenciaram na experiência positiva de parto e da apreensão desse processo por elas. Método: misto do tipo explanatório sequencial. Na etapa quantitativa (1a.), utilizou-se o desenho transversal com aplicação do questionário T-IHAMC, entre janeiro a junho de 2021, com 265 puérperas do alojamento conjunto. Para análise, utilizou-se a estatística descritiva e, para estimar os riscos relativos, a regressão de Poisson. Na etapa qualitativa (2a.), utilizou-se a entrevista aberta, aplicada entre um a seis meses após nascimento, com 44 puérperas que participaram da 1ª etapa e apresentavam narrativa compreensível. Realizou-se a análise temática. A combinação dos métodos ocorreu na conexão e integração dos resultados e discussão. Resultados e Discussão: Fatores mais próximos de uma experiência positiva: sabiam como ficou a vagina (98,02%) e não entenderam como experiência ruim pequenas lacerações; recém-nascidos apresentarem Apgar ≥7/5º minuto (96,92%), indicações das induções atenderam recomendações (96,43%), utilizado misoprostol para indução (84,38%), escolha do acompanhante (95,47%), serem assistidas no puerpério imediato (78,11%), não apresentarem hemorragias (95,09%), intercorrências pós-parto (70,19%) ou infecções (83,9%). Não foram deixadas sozinhas (82,2%), valorizaram a disponibilidade de atenção e a enfermeira obstetra. Orientadas quanto o retorno (55,08%). Foram oferecidos métodos de alívio da dor (78,9%), puderam beber e comer (76,36%), não foi realizado amniotomia (60,75%) e Kristeller (86,14%). Procuraram o hospital em trabalho de parto (TP) (61,89%) e na fase ativa. Fatores que interfeririam negativamente na experiência: predomínio da cesárea (61,89%), mulheres não entraram em TP (64,91%), ausência do plano de parto (100%), separação do binômio (100%), privação do contato pele a pele/amamentação na primeira hora (55,09%), restrição do acompanhante (99,6%), ausência da doula (99,08%), escassez da analgesia e desconhecimento pelas mulheres (97,25%), puxo dirigido (94,06%), preestabelecimento da posição de parir (90,1%), excesso de toque vaginal por mais de um profissional (56,88%), privação da movimentação no TP (55,05%), manter acesso venoso no TP (58,26%). A indução foi temida. Houve situações desrespeitosas (69,49%), não tiveram privacidade (83,9%), as escolhas não foram levadas a sério (78,39%), trauma perineal ou cesárea (84,41%). A comunicação e a segurança apresentaram divergências entre as etapas, contempladas apenas na quantitativa. A insegurança e o desrespeito apresentaram maiores chances para mulheres que realizaram parto normal. Conclusão: Os fatores que influenciaram estavam mais próximos da experiência positiva quando relacionados a fatores clínicos, protocolares ou disponibilidade de atenção. As experiências negativas estiveram relacionadas ao excesso de intervenções, privação de direitos e de escolha, comunicação ineficaz, insegurança, ausência de privacidade e restrição do acompanhante. Houve preferência pela cesárea para mulheres que: tinham medo da dor e como seriam tratadas no TP, por falta de informação, traumas anteriores e sofrimento de outras parturientes. Associações quanto ao tipo de parto mostraram que mulheres que realizaram cesárea sentem-se mais seguras e tem menores chances de desrespeito. Espera-se que este estudo colabore na elaboração de políticas, protocolos, normas, que assegurem que a mulher e seu bebê não só sobrevivam, mas vivenciem com intensidade e dignidade este momento.Não recebi financiamentoporUniversidade Federal de São CarlosCâmpus São CarlosPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem - PPGEnfUFSCarAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAcontecimentos que mudam a vidaEstudos mistosMulheresPartoPeríodo pós-parto.Life-changing eventsMixed studiesWomenParturitionPostpartum periodCIENCIAS DA SAUDE::ENFERMAGEMCIENCIAS DA SAUDE::SAUDE COLETIVACIENCIAS DA SAUDECIENCIAS DA SAUDE::MEDICINA::CLINICA MEDICA::GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIACIENCIAS DA SAUDE::ENFERMAGEM::ENFERMAGEM OBSTETRICAExperiência positiva de parto: fatores determinantes e influenciadores na perspectiva de mulheresPositive childbirth experience: determining and influencing factors from the perspective of womeninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis60060040a34035-edb0-4b65-b11f-892e8ca332b7reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCARinstname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)instacron:UFSCARCC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8810https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/17304/3/license_rdff337d95da1fce0a22c77480e5e9a7aecMD53ORIGINALTese_EXPERIÊNCIA POSITIVA DE PARTO fatores determinantes e influenciadores na perspectiva de mulheres_Luciana Braz De Oliveira Paes.pdfTese_EXPERIÊNCIA POSITIVA DE PARTO fatores determinantes e influenciadores na perspectiva de mulheres_Luciana Braz De Oliveira Paes.pdfTeseapplication/pdf5013258https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/17304/1/Tese_EXPERI%c3%8aNCIA%20POSITIVA%20DE%20PARTO%20fatores%20determinantes%20e%20influenciadores%20na%20perspectiva%20de%20mulheres_Luciana%20Braz%20De%20Oliveira%20Paes.pdffc4407edfc8b808bdc2a1e532c6b0d60MD51carta comprovante - 2020.pdfcarta comprovante - 2020.pdfCarta comprovanteapplication/pdf68923https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/17304/2/carta%20comprovante%20-%202020.pdf04c900bac088913cc3448cb1285d9767MD52TEXTTese_EXPERIÊNCIA POSITIVA DE PARTO fatores determinantes e influenciadores na perspectiva de mulheres_Luciana Braz De Oliveira Paes.pdf.txtTese_EXPERIÊNCIA POSITIVA DE PARTO fatores determinantes e influenciadores na perspectiva de mulheres_Luciana Braz De Oliveira Paes.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain494106https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/17304/4/Tese_EXPERI%c3%8aNCIA%20POSITIVA%20DE%20PARTO%20fatores%20determinantes%20e%20influenciadores%20na%20perspectiva%20de%20mulheres_Luciana%20Braz%20De%20Oliveira%20Paes.pdf.txt80912d553431d69a5e56f5177a315945MD54carta comprovante - 2020.pdf.txtcarta comprovante - 2020.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain1183https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/17304/6/carta%20comprovante%20-%202020.pdf.txt222f8555c71bc0f753fa8a8278053c47MD56THUMBNAILTese_EXPERIÊNCIA POSITIVA DE PARTO fatores determinantes e influenciadores na perspectiva de mulheres_Luciana Braz De Oliveira Paes.pdf.jpgTese_EXPERIÊNCIA POSITIVA DE PARTO fatores determinantes e influenciadores na perspectiva de mulheres_Luciana Braz De Oliveira Paes.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg6374https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/17304/5/Tese_EXPERI%c3%8aNCIA%20POSITIVA%20DE%20PARTO%20fatores%20determinantes%20e%20influenciadores%20na%20perspectiva%20de%20mulheres_Luciana%20Braz%20De%20Oliveira%20Paes.pdf.jpg387e6ac5c77f5d273d2230e82c8582f8MD55carta comprovante - 2020.pdf.jpgcarta comprovante - 2020.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg6740https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/17304/7/carta%20comprovante%20-%202020.pdf.jpg23f76d300f266209091cbfc483934950MD57ufscar/173042023-09-18 18:32:29.548oai:repositorio.ufscar.br:ufscar/17304Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufscar.br/oai/requestopendoar:43222023-09-18T18:32:29Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Experiência positiva de parto: fatores determinantes e influenciadores na perspectiva de mulheres |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Positive childbirth experience: determining and influencing factors from the perspective of women |
title |
Experiência positiva de parto: fatores determinantes e influenciadores na perspectiva de mulheres |
spellingShingle |
Experiência positiva de parto: fatores determinantes e influenciadores na perspectiva de mulheres Paes, Luciana Braz de Oliveira Acontecimentos que mudam a vida Estudos mistos Mulheres Parto Período pós-parto. Life-changing events Mixed studies Women Parturition Postpartum period CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::ENFERMAGEM CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::SAUDE COLETIVA CIENCIAS DA SAUDE CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::MEDICINA::CLINICA MEDICA::GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::ENFERMAGEM::ENFERMAGEM OBSTETRICA |
title_short |
Experiência positiva de parto: fatores determinantes e influenciadores na perspectiva de mulheres |
title_full |
Experiência positiva de parto: fatores determinantes e influenciadores na perspectiva de mulheres |
title_fullStr |
Experiência positiva de parto: fatores determinantes e influenciadores na perspectiva de mulheres |
title_full_unstemmed |
Experiência positiva de parto: fatores determinantes e influenciadores na perspectiva de mulheres |
title_sort |
Experiência positiva de parto: fatores determinantes e influenciadores na perspectiva de mulheres |
author |
Paes, Luciana Braz de Oliveira |
author_facet |
Paes, Luciana Braz de Oliveira |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.authorlattes.por.fl_str_mv |
https://lattes.cnpq.br/6215595989869981 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Paes, Luciana Braz de Oliveira |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Fabbro, Márcia Regina Cangiani |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/6978014098495031 |
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv |
f52b8966-f936-458c-936e-8eb580359e12 |
contributor_str_mv |
Fabbro, Márcia Regina Cangiani |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Acontecimentos que mudam a vida Estudos mistos Mulheres Parto Período pós-parto. |
topic |
Acontecimentos que mudam a vida Estudos mistos Mulheres Parto Período pós-parto. Life-changing events Mixed studies Women Parturition Postpartum period CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::ENFERMAGEM CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::SAUDE COLETIVA CIENCIAS DA SAUDE CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::MEDICINA::CLINICA MEDICA::GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::ENFERMAGEM::ENFERMAGEM OBSTETRICA |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Life-changing events Mixed studies Women Parturition Postpartum period |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::ENFERMAGEM CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::SAUDE COLETIVA CIENCIAS DA SAUDE CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::MEDICINA::CLINICA MEDICA::GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::ENFERMAGEM::ENFERMAGEM OBSTETRICA |
description |
Objective: To understand the parturition process of women by identifying the factors that influenced a positive experience of childbirth as well as their apprehension of this process. Method: It is a mixed explanatory sequential research. In the quantitative Stage (1st), the study used a cross-sectional design, applying the T-IHAMC questionnaire to 265 postpartum women from cohabitation from January to June 2021. For data analysis, the study used descriptive statistics and to estimate the related risks the regression of Poisson. In the qualitative stage (2nd), the research used open interviews, applied between one and six months after birth, with 44 puerperal women who participated in the first stage and presented an understandable narrative. A thematic analysis was performed. The combination of the methods occurred in the connection and integration of the results and discussion. Results and discussion: Factors closest to a positive experience: knew how the vagina looked (98.02%) and did not consider minor lacerations as a bad experience; newborns presented Apgar ≥ 7/5th minute (96.92%), indications of the inductions met recommendations (96.43%), used misoprostol for induction (84.38%), choice of companion (95.47%), were assisted in the immediate puerperium (78.11%), did not present bleeding (95.09%), postpartum complications (70.19%) or infections (83.9%). We’re not left alone (82.2%) and valued care availability and the nurse obstetrician. Were guided concerning the follow-up visit (55.08%). Were offered pain relief methods (78.9%), were allowed to drink and eat (76.36%), amniotomy (60.75%) and Kristeller (86.14%) were not performed. Visited the hospital in labor (61.89%) and in the active phase. Factors that negatively interfered with the experience: predominance of cesarean section (61.89%), women did not go into labor (64.91%), absence of birth plan (100%), separation of the binomial (100%), deprivation of skin-to-skin contact/breastfeeding during the first hour (55.09%) companion restriction (99.6%), absence of doula (99.08%), lack of analgesia and lack of knowledge by women (97.25%), directed pull (94.06%), pre-establishment of the delivery position (90.1%), excessive vaginal touch by more than one professional (56.88%), movement deprivation in labor (55.05%), maintain venous access in labor (58.26%). Feared induction. Occurrence of disrespectful situations (69.49%), lack of privacy (83.9%), choices were not taken seriously (78.39%), perineal trauma or cesarean section (84.41%). Communication and security presented divergences between the stages, contemplated only in the quantitative one. Insecurity and disrespect presented higher chances for women who gave birth normally. Conclusion: Influencing factors were closer to a positive experience when related to clinical, protocol factors, or care availability. Negative experiences were related to excessive interventions, deprivation of rights and choice, ineffective communication, insecurity, lack of privacy, and restriction of the companion. There was a preference for cesarean section for women who: feared pain and how they would be treated in labor due to lack of information, previous trauma, and suffering of other parturients. Associations regarding the type of delivery showed that women who performed cesarean section feel safer and have lower chances of suffering disrespect. This study aims to collaborate in the elaboration of policies, protocols, and norms that ensure that the woman and her baby do not only survive but also experience this moment with dignity and intensively. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2022-12-01 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2023-01-31T13:12:48Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2023-01-31T13:12:48Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
PAES, Luciana Braz de Oliveira. Experiência positiva de parto: fatores determinantes e influenciadores na perspectiva de mulheres. 2022. Tese (Doutorado em Enfermagem) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2022. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/17304. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/17304 |
identifier_str_mv |
PAES, Luciana Braz de Oliveira. Experiência positiva de parto: fatores determinantes e influenciadores na perspectiva de mulheres. 2022. Tese (Doutorado em Enfermagem) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2022. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/17304. |
url |
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/17304 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
600 600 |
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv |
40a34035-edb0-4b65-b11f-892e8ca332b7 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos Câmpus São Carlos |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem - PPGEnf |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFSCar |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos Câmpus São Carlos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) instacron:UFSCAR |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) |
instacron_str |
UFSCAR |
institution |
UFSCAR |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/17304/3/license_rdf https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/17304/1/Tese_EXPERI%c3%8aNCIA%20POSITIVA%20DE%20PARTO%20fatores%20determinantes%20e%20influenciadores%20na%20perspectiva%20de%20mulheres_Luciana%20Braz%20De%20Oliveira%20Paes.pdf https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/17304/2/carta%20comprovante%20-%202020.pdf https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/17304/4/Tese_EXPERI%c3%8aNCIA%20POSITIVA%20DE%20PARTO%20fatores%20determinantes%20e%20influenciadores%20na%20perspectiva%20de%20mulheres_Luciana%20Braz%20De%20Oliveira%20Paes.pdf.txt https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/17304/6/carta%20comprovante%20-%202020.pdf.txt https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/17304/5/Tese_EXPERI%c3%8aNCIA%20POSITIVA%20DE%20PARTO%20fatores%20determinantes%20e%20influenciadores%20na%20perspectiva%20de%20mulheres_Luciana%20Braz%20De%20Oliveira%20Paes.pdf.jpg https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/17304/7/carta%20comprovante%20-%202020.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
f337d95da1fce0a22c77480e5e9a7aec fc4407edfc8b808bdc2a1e532c6b0d60 04c900bac088913cc3448cb1285d9767 80912d553431d69a5e56f5177a315945 222f8555c71bc0f753fa8a8278053c47 387e6ac5c77f5d273d2230e82c8582f8 23f76d300f266209091cbfc483934950 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1813715658728275968 |