Inconsciente e instinto de morte: um itinerário do debate inicial de Deleuze com a psicanálise
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR |
Texto Completo: | https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/4800 |
Resumo: | Masochism: Coldness and Cruelty, published in 1967 by Deleuze criticizes psychoanalysis for sustaining the false notion of sadomasochism, and proposes a distinction between death instinct and death drive, so that sadism and masochism are regarded as different processes and mutually exclusive. Deleuze relies on Freud s arguments, more precisely on the text Beyond the Pleasure Principle (1920), to conceive the death instinct as a transcendental principle and to differentiate it from its psychic representative, the death drive. Deleuze thus initiates a philosophical investigation around the transcendental field and the pleasure principle. This investigation runs parallel to an intense debate on psychoanalytical theory, and continues during his later works. Deleuze appreciates the freudian suggestion of an unconscious functioning indifferent to the pleasure principle and governed by repetition. He proposes to develop the concept in the form of transcendental synthesis of time. Difference and Repetition (1968) places Freud in a dialogue with other philosophers especially Hume, Bergson and Nietzsche and postulates three transcendental syntheses marked by repetition, or three passive syntheses of time, which are constitutive of the unconscious and independent of the pleasure principle. From Deleuze s philosophical advances, a reevaluation of several psychoanalytical concepts begins, founded on an understanding of the death instinct as the positive and originating principle of the repetition, as the power that engenders thinking in thought under the effect of violence. Logic of Sense (1969) leads this line of investigation to the argument that the senses are produced by the power of the paradoxes and identifies the death instinct with no sense. Some concepts of Freud, Klein and Lacan are included in the composition of a new image of philosophy and of what it means to think. Trying to demonstrate that thought and sense are produced in close relationship with the erogenous body, Deleuze returns to the psychosexual development but now from the perspective of his philosophical concepts, and presents his own version of the genesis and dynamics of the psychological instances. In view of this philosophical course taking by Deleuze, this doctoral research proposed to explore his discussion with psychoanalysis, according to a trajectory outlined by the concept of death instinct along these three works. We demonstrate how Deleuze understands and appropriates of some psychoanalytic concepts, linking them with other concepts of his philosophy. We indicate which issues from psychoanalysis were valued in the composition of a transcendental philosophy of difference. From a systematic exposition of the criticisms and proposals that Deleuze addresses to the psychoanalytical field in this particular period, we carried out a confrontation between Deleuze's philosophical interventions and the original psychoanalytical texts. Ultimately, this research intends to contribute to a discussion about the pertinence, coherence and relevance of this debate for both domains. |
id |
SCAR_149b24947aa12ee21c8a52252aa757a3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufscar.br:ufscar/4800 |
network_acronym_str |
SCAR |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR |
repository_id_str |
4322 |
spelling |
Sanches, AlineSimanke, Richard Theisenhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/5431145327759147http://lattes.cnpq.br/0570819174001324634b317f-ad14-4beb-ac08-ac53e805d1f62016-06-02T20:12:19Z2013-09-092016-06-02T20:12:19Z2013-04-18SANCHES, Aline. Unconscious and death instinct: itinerary of Deleuze s initial debate on psychoanalysis. 2013. 243 f. Tese (Doutorado em Ciências Humanas) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2013.https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/4800Masochism: Coldness and Cruelty, published in 1967 by Deleuze criticizes psychoanalysis for sustaining the false notion of sadomasochism, and proposes a distinction between death instinct and death drive, so that sadism and masochism are regarded as different processes and mutually exclusive. Deleuze relies on Freud s arguments, more precisely on the text Beyond the Pleasure Principle (1920), to conceive the death instinct as a transcendental principle and to differentiate it from its psychic representative, the death drive. Deleuze thus initiates a philosophical investigation around the transcendental field and the pleasure principle. This investigation runs parallel to an intense debate on psychoanalytical theory, and continues during his later works. Deleuze appreciates the freudian suggestion of an unconscious functioning indifferent to the pleasure principle and governed by repetition. He proposes to develop the concept in the form of transcendental synthesis of time. Difference and Repetition (1968) places Freud in a dialogue with other philosophers especially Hume, Bergson and Nietzsche and postulates three transcendental syntheses marked by repetition, or three passive syntheses of time, which are constitutive of the unconscious and independent of the pleasure principle. From Deleuze s philosophical advances, a reevaluation of several psychoanalytical concepts begins, founded on an understanding of the death instinct as the positive and originating principle of the repetition, as the power that engenders thinking in thought under the effect of violence. Logic of Sense (1969) leads this line of investigation to the argument that the senses are produced by the power of the paradoxes and identifies the death instinct with no sense. Some concepts of Freud, Klein and Lacan are included in the composition of a new image of philosophy and of what it means to think. Trying to demonstrate that thought and sense are produced in close relationship with the erogenous body, Deleuze returns to the psychosexual development but now from the perspective of his philosophical concepts, and presents his own version of the genesis and dynamics of the psychological instances. In view of this philosophical course taking by Deleuze, this doctoral research proposed to explore his discussion with psychoanalysis, according to a trajectory outlined by the concept of death instinct along these three works. We demonstrate how Deleuze understands and appropriates of some psychoanalytic concepts, linking them with other concepts of his philosophy. We indicate which issues from psychoanalysis were valued in the composition of a transcendental philosophy of difference. From a systematic exposition of the criticisms and proposals that Deleuze addresses to the psychoanalytical field in this particular period, we carried out a confrontation between Deleuze's philosophical interventions and the original psychoanalytical texts. Ultimately, this research intends to contribute to a discussion about the pertinence, coherence and relevance of this debate for both domains.Apresentação de Sacher-Masoch, publicado por Deleuze em 1967, critica a psicanálise por sustentar a falsa noção de sadomasoquismo, ao mesmo tempo em que propõe uma distinção entre instinto de morte e pulsão de morte para que o sadismo e o masoquismo sejam considerados como processos diferentes e mutuamente exclusivos. Deleuze apoia-se nos argumentos de Freud, particularmente no texto Além do princípio de prazer (1920), para conceber o instinto de morte como um princípio transcendental e diferenciá-lo de seu representante psíquico, a pulsão de morte. Deleuze inaugura assim uma investigação filosófica a respeito do campo transcendental e do princípio de prazer, investigação que se fará acompanhada de um intenso debate com a teoria psicanalítica e que terá continuidade em suas obras posteriores. Deleuze valoriza a sugestão freudiana de um funcionamento inconsciente indiferente ao princípio do prazer e regido pela repetição, e propõe retomá-lo sob a forma de sínteses transcendentais do tempo. Diferença e Repetição (1968) coloca Freud em diálogo com outros filósofos principalmente Hume, Bergson e Nietzsche e postula três sínteses transcendentais marcadas pela repetição, ou três sínteses passivas do tempo, que são constitutivas do inconsciente e independentes do princípio de prazer. Daí deriva-se uma releitura de várias noções psicanalíticas a partir de seus avanços filosóficos, que se fundamenta em uma compreensão do instinto de morte como o princípio positivo originário da repetição e a força que engendra o pensar no pensamento sob o efeito de uma violência. Lógica do Sentido (1969) conduz esta linha de investigação para o problema da produção de sentidos a partir da força dos paradoxos e identifica o instinto de morte ao não senso. Algumas coordenadas de Freud, Klein e Lacan são retomadas na composição de uma nova imagem da filosofia e do que significa pensar. Buscando demonstrar que o pensamento e o sentido se produzem em estreita relação com o corpo erógeno e pulsional, Deleuze retoma o desenvolvimento psicossexual à luz de seus conceitos filosóficos e apresenta sua própria versão da gênese e da dinâmica das instâncias psíquicas. Tendo em conta este percurso filosófico de Deleuze, esta pesquisa de doutorado dedicou-se a explorar o seu debate com a psicanálise, segundo uma trajetória delineada pelo conceito de instinto de morte ao longo destas três obras. Procuramos demonstrar como Deleuze compreende e se apropria de algumas noções psicanalíticas, articulando-as com os demais conceitos de sua filosofia. Indicamos quais temas advindos da psicanálise foram valorizados na composição de uma filosofia transcendental da diferença. A partir de uma exposição sistemática das críticas e propostas que este filósofo dirige ao campo psicanalítico neste período específico, realizamos o confronto direto entre as intervenções filosóficas de Deleuze e os textos psicanalíticos originais. Assim, pretendeu-se com esta pesquisa oferecer contribuições para uma discussão sobre a pertinência, coerência e relevância deste debate para ambos os domínios.Universidade Federal de Minas Geraisapplication/pdfporUniversidade Federal de São CarlosPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia - PPGFilUFSCarBRFilosofiaDeleuze, Gilles, 1925-1995Freud, Sigmund, 1856-1939InconscienteMetapsicologiaDiferença (Filosofia)InstintoUnconsciousMetapsychologyInstinctPhilosophy of differenceCIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIAInconsciente e instinto de morte: um itinerário do debate inicial de Deleuze com a psicanáliseUnconscious and death instinct: itinerary of Deleuze s initial debate on psychoanalysisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis-1-16e47f2ed-1a9b-4459-997d-bfbf7d5c1328info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCARinstname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)instacron:UFSCARORIGINAL5370.pdfapplication/pdf1832455https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/4800/1/5370.pdffdd70676088a2a2b57ea28153b9121d6MD51TEXT5370.pdf.txt5370.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain0https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/4800/2/5370.pdf.txtd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eMD52THUMBNAIL5370.pdf.jpg5370.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg4474https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/4800/3/5370.pdf.jpg4eded753824daf41e97b2d0f910f8111MD53ufscar/48002023-09-18 18:31:35.04oai:repositorio.ufscar.br:ufscar/4800Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufscar.br/oai/requestopendoar:43222023-09-18T18:31:35Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Inconsciente e instinto de morte: um itinerário do debate inicial de Deleuze com a psicanálise |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Unconscious and death instinct: itinerary of Deleuze s initial debate on psychoanalysis |
title |
Inconsciente e instinto de morte: um itinerário do debate inicial de Deleuze com a psicanálise |
spellingShingle |
Inconsciente e instinto de morte: um itinerário do debate inicial de Deleuze com a psicanálise Sanches, Aline Filosofia Deleuze, Gilles, 1925-1995 Freud, Sigmund, 1856-1939 Inconsciente Metapsicologia Diferença (Filosofia) Instinto Unconscious Metapsychology Instinct Philosophy of difference CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
title_short |
Inconsciente e instinto de morte: um itinerário do debate inicial de Deleuze com a psicanálise |
title_full |
Inconsciente e instinto de morte: um itinerário do debate inicial de Deleuze com a psicanálise |
title_fullStr |
Inconsciente e instinto de morte: um itinerário do debate inicial de Deleuze com a psicanálise |
title_full_unstemmed |
Inconsciente e instinto de morte: um itinerário do debate inicial de Deleuze com a psicanálise |
title_sort |
Inconsciente e instinto de morte: um itinerário do debate inicial de Deleuze com a psicanálise |
author |
Sanches, Aline |
author_facet |
Sanches, Aline |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.authorlattes.por.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/0570819174001324 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sanches, Aline |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Simanke, Richard Theisen |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/5431145327759147 |
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv |
634b317f-ad14-4beb-ac08-ac53e805d1f6 |
contributor_str_mv |
Simanke, Richard Theisen |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Filosofia Deleuze, Gilles, 1925-1995 Freud, Sigmund, 1856-1939 Inconsciente Metapsicologia Diferença (Filosofia) Instinto |
topic |
Filosofia Deleuze, Gilles, 1925-1995 Freud, Sigmund, 1856-1939 Inconsciente Metapsicologia Diferença (Filosofia) Instinto Unconscious Metapsychology Instinct Philosophy of difference CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Unconscious Metapsychology Instinct Philosophy of difference |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
description |
Masochism: Coldness and Cruelty, published in 1967 by Deleuze criticizes psychoanalysis for sustaining the false notion of sadomasochism, and proposes a distinction between death instinct and death drive, so that sadism and masochism are regarded as different processes and mutually exclusive. Deleuze relies on Freud s arguments, more precisely on the text Beyond the Pleasure Principle (1920), to conceive the death instinct as a transcendental principle and to differentiate it from its psychic representative, the death drive. Deleuze thus initiates a philosophical investigation around the transcendental field and the pleasure principle. This investigation runs parallel to an intense debate on psychoanalytical theory, and continues during his later works. Deleuze appreciates the freudian suggestion of an unconscious functioning indifferent to the pleasure principle and governed by repetition. He proposes to develop the concept in the form of transcendental synthesis of time. Difference and Repetition (1968) places Freud in a dialogue with other philosophers especially Hume, Bergson and Nietzsche and postulates three transcendental syntheses marked by repetition, or three passive syntheses of time, which are constitutive of the unconscious and independent of the pleasure principle. From Deleuze s philosophical advances, a reevaluation of several psychoanalytical concepts begins, founded on an understanding of the death instinct as the positive and originating principle of the repetition, as the power that engenders thinking in thought under the effect of violence. Logic of Sense (1969) leads this line of investigation to the argument that the senses are produced by the power of the paradoxes and identifies the death instinct with no sense. Some concepts of Freud, Klein and Lacan are included in the composition of a new image of philosophy and of what it means to think. Trying to demonstrate that thought and sense are produced in close relationship with the erogenous body, Deleuze returns to the psychosexual development but now from the perspective of his philosophical concepts, and presents his own version of the genesis and dynamics of the psychological instances. In view of this philosophical course taking by Deleuze, this doctoral research proposed to explore his discussion with psychoanalysis, according to a trajectory outlined by the concept of death instinct along these three works. We demonstrate how Deleuze understands and appropriates of some psychoanalytic concepts, linking them with other concepts of his philosophy. We indicate which issues from psychoanalysis were valued in the composition of a transcendental philosophy of difference. From a systematic exposition of the criticisms and proposals that Deleuze addresses to the psychoanalytical field in this particular period, we carried out a confrontation between Deleuze's philosophical interventions and the original psychoanalytical texts. Ultimately, this research intends to contribute to a discussion about the pertinence, coherence and relevance of this debate for both domains. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2013-09-09 2016-06-02T20:12:19Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2013-04-18 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2016-06-02T20:12:19Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
SANCHES, Aline. Unconscious and death instinct: itinerary of Deleuze s initial debate on psychoanalysis. 2013. 243 f. Tese (Doutorado em Ciências Humanas) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2013. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/4800 |
identifier_str_mv |
SANCHES, Aline. Unconscious and death instinct: itinerary of Deleuze s initial debate on psychoanalysis. 2013. 243 f. Tese (Doutorado em Ciências Humanas) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2013. |
url |
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/4800 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
-1 -1 |
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv |
6e47f2ed-1a9b-4459-997d-bfbf7d5c1328 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia - PPGFil |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFSCar |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
BR |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) instacron:UFSCAR |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) |
instacron_str |
UFSCAR |
institution |
UFSCAR |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/4800/1/5370.pdf https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/4800/2/5370.pdf.txt https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/4800/3/5370.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
fdd70676088a2a2b57ea28153b9121d6 d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e 4eded753824daf41e97b2d0f910f8111 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1813715538927419392 |