Características, fatores críticos e indicadores de agilidade no gerenciamento de projetos de produtos inovadores

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Almeida, Luís Fernando Magnanini de
Data de Publicação: 2012
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/3703
Resumo: The theory of project management presents difficulties when applied to the development of innovative products. To solve these difficulties, a series of management methods were created. These methods receive the nomenclature of agile project management and increase the agility of the management process which would be a strategy to deal with the difficulties in those particular projects. However, the concept of agility is vague in the project management theory and the studies found that attempts to measure this performance was not satisfactory, presenting too much subjectivity in the definitions of constructs and starting from little robust definitions of agility. To try to solve this problem, a new model for agility in project management was proposed by Conforto (2011), relying on a definition coined from a systematic literature review of several areas that exhibit this same concept, and perform another systematic review on the models to measure agility in order to incorporate their strengths and create solutions to major weaknesses. This study aims to examine the relationships between the dimensions present in this model of agility to manage projects, in order to verify its validity and possibility its future use as a basis for measurement. Thus, the observed relationships between some features arising from the use of practices from the theory of agile project management theory, critical factors that may impact on the performance of the practices and indicators of agility. For this, a survey was made at the members from eight communities in Brazil Linkedin® chosen from among 79 candidates and selected according to 7 criteria. Also, was created the theoretical concept of "profile 500" which can be used in future research with have analysis made between members of this social network. There was obtained 172 valid responses from 966 users considered eligible for the study. Correlation analysis showed that the relationships proposed in the model of Conforto (2011) are valid and that agility is related to the presence of certain characteristics and are not inherent to the management method chosen, but this performance is related to customer participation and time taken decision. Finally, there was evidenced the importance of customer participation in the design and validation of partial results for a faster management process, and the necessity of carrying out the planning, development and validation with the participation of the client to perform better agility.
id SCAR_241732b6bf094f0b236422f08ddf9730
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufscar.br:ufscar/3703
network_acronym_str SCAR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
repository_id_str 4322
spelling Almeida, Luís Fernando Magnanini deSilva, Sérgio Luis dahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4164265591178698http://lattes.cnpq.br/95223058149319924c0f7bc8-1c36-4c07-8430-6390c9561ec52016-06-02T19:51:56Z2012-10-082016-06-02T19:51:56Z2012-08-13ALMEIDA, Luís Fernando Magnanini de. Características, fatores críticos e indicadores de agilidade no gerenciamento de projetos de produtos inovadores. 2012. 159 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Exatas e da Terra) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2012.https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/3703The theory of project management presents difficulties when applied to the development of innovative products. To solve these difficulties, a series of management methods were created. These methods receive the nomenclature of agile project management and increase the agility of the management process which would be a strategy to deal with the difficulties in those particular projects. However, the concept of agility is vague in the project management theory and the studies found that attempts to measure this performance was not satisfactory, presenting too much subjectivity in the definitions of constructs and starting from little robust definitions of agility. To try to solve this problem, a new model for agility in project management was proposed by Conforto (2011), relying on a definition coined from a systematic literature review of several areas that exhibit this same concept, and perform another systematic review on the models to measure agility in order to incorporate their strengths and create solutions to major weaknesses. This study aims to examine the relationships between the dimensions present in this model of agility to manage projects, in order to verify its validity and possibility its future use as a basis for measurement. Thus, the observed relationships between some features arising from the use of practices from the theory of agile project management theory, critical factors that may impact on the performance of the practices and indicators of agility. For this, a survey was made at the members from eight communities in Brazil Linkedin® chosen from among 79 candidates and selected according to 7 criteria. Also, was created the theoretical concept of "profile 500" which can be used in future research with have analysis made between members of this social network. There was obtained 172 valid responses from 966 users considered eligible for the study. Correlation analysis showed that the relationships proposed in the model of Conforto (2011) are valid and that agility is related to the presence of certain characteristics and are not inherent to the management method chosen, but this performance is related to customer participation and time taken decision. Finally, there was evidenced the importance of customer participation in the design and validation of partial results for a faster management process, and the necessity of carrying out the planning, development and validation with the participation of the client to perform better agility.A teoria de gerenciamento de projetos apresenta dificuldades quando aplicada ao desenvolvimento de produtos inovadores. Para solucioná-las, surgiram uma série de métodos de gestão que podem ser agrupados sobre a nomenclatura de gerenciamento ágil de projetos. Esses, afirmam que o aumento da agilidade no processo de gestão seria uma estratégia para lidar com essas dificuldades. Contudo, o próprio conceito de agilidade é vago na teoria de gerenciamento de projetos e as tentativas encontradas de se medir esse desempenho não foram satisfatórias, apresentando demasiada subjetividade nos construtos e partindo de definições pouco robustas de agilidade. Para tentar solucionar esse problema, um novo modelo de agilidade para o gerenciamento de projetos foi proposto por Conforto (2011), se baseando em uma definição de agilidade cunhada a partir de uma revisão bibliográfica sistemática de diversas áreas que apresentam esse mesmo conceito, além de realizar outra revisão sistemática sobre os modelos de agilidade, de modo a incorporar os seus pontos fortes e criar soluções para os principais pontos fracos. Este estudo se propõe a verificar as relações entre as dimensões presentes neste modelo de agilidade para o gerenciamento de projetos a fim de verificar sua validade e possibilidade de utilização futura como base para medida. Desse modo, observa as relações entre algumas características advindas da utilização das práticas provenientes da teoria do gerenciamento ágil de projetos, fatores críticos que possam impactar no desempenho das práticas e os indicadores de agilidade. Para isso, foi realizado um levantamento estatístico entre os membros provenientes de 8 comunidades do Linkedin® Brasil escolhidas dentre 79 candidatas e selecionadas segundo a 7 critérios. Também cria o conceito teórico do perfil 500 o qual pode ser utilizado em pesquisas futuras que tenham como população de análise membros de comunidades dessa rede social. Obteve-se 172 respostas válidas dentre 966 usuários considerados aptos a participar do estudo. As análises de correlação mostraram que as relações propostas pelo modelo de Conforto (2011) são válidas e que a agilidade está relacionada à presença de certas características e não são inerentes ao método escolhido, sendo esse desempenho relacionado com a participação do cliente e tempo de tomada de decisão. Por fim, verificou-se a importância da participação do cliente no planejamento e validação dos resultados parciais para a agilidade do processo, e da necessidade realização do ciclo de planejamento, desenvolvimento e validação com a participação do cliente para um melhor desempenho em agilidade.Financiadora de Estudos e Projetosapplication/pdfporUniversidade Federal de São CarlosPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia de Produção - PPGEPUFSCarBREngenharia de produçãoGestão de projetosDesenvolvimento de produtosMedição de desempenhoModelo de agilidadeGerenciamento agil de projetosAgilidadeAgile project managementProduct developmentProject managementAgility modelAgilityENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA DE PRODUCAOCaracterísticas, fatores críticos e indicadores de agilidade no gerenciamento de projetos de produtos inovadoresinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis-1-1acc6b2d7-0553-439f-9299-36e7f88c66f7info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCARinstname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)instacron:UFSCARORIGINAL4571.pdfapplication/pdf2835932https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/3703/1/4571.pdf857c4fae6471592b22f205d753d4cdcdMD51TEXT4571.pdf.txt4571.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain0https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/3703/2/4571.pdf.txtd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eMD52THUMBNAIL4571.pdf.jpg4571.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg6724https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/3703/3/4571.pdf.jpgbcc6dbb13fe5134b1dcf8620853b69f8MD53ufscar/37032023-09-18 18:31:32.962oai:repositorio.ufscar.br:ufscar/3703Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufscar.br/oai/requestopendoar:43222023-09-18T18:31:32Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Características, fatores críticos e indicadores de agilidade no gerenciamento de projetos de produtos inovadores
title Características, fatores críticos e indicadores de agilidade no gerenciamento de projetos de produtos inovadores
spellingShingle Características, fatores críticos e indicadores de agilidade no gerenciamento de projetos de produtos inovadores
Almeida, Luís Fernando Magnanini de
Engenharia de produção
Gestão de projetos
Desenvolvimento de produtos
Medição de desempenho
Modelo de agilidade
Gerenciamento agil de projetos
Agilidade
Agile project management
Product development
Project management
Agility model
Agility
ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA DE PRODUCAO
title_short Características, fatores críticos e indicadores de agilidade no gerenciamento de projetos de produtos inovadores
title_full Características, fatores críticos e indicadores de agilidade no gerenciamento de projetos de produtos inovadores
title_fullStr Características, fatores críticos e indicadores de agilidade no gerenciamento de projetos de produtos inovadores
title_full_unstemmed Características, fatores críticos e indicadores de agilidade no gerenciamento de projetos de produtos inovadores
title_sort Características, fatores críticos e indicadores de agilidade no gerenciamento de projetos de produtos inovadores
author Almeida, Luís Fernando Magnanini de
author_facet Almeida, Luís Fernando Magnanini de
author_role author
dc.contributor.authorlattes.por.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/9522305814931992
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Almeida, Luís Fernando Magnanini de
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Silva, Sérgio Luis da
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/4164265591178698
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv 4c0f7bc8-1c36-4c07-8430-6390c9561ec5
contributor_str_mv Silva, Sérgio Luis da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Engenharia de produção
Gestão de projetos
Desenvolvimento de produtos
Medição de desempenho
Modelo de agilidade
Gerenciamento agil de projetos
Agilidade
topic Engenharia de produção
Gestão de projetos
Desenvolvimento de produtos
Medição de desempenho
Modelo de agilidade
Gerenciamento agil de projetos
Agilidade
Agile project management
Product development
Project management
Agility model
Agility
ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA DE PRODUCAO
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Agile project management
Product development
Project management
Agility model
Agility
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA DE PRODUCAO
description The theory of project management presents difficulties when applied to the development of innovative products. To solve these difficulties, a series of management methods were created. These methods receive the nomenclature of agile project management and increase the agility of the management process which would be a strategy to deal with the difficulties in those particular projects. However, the concept of agility is vague in the project management theory and the studies found that attempts to measure this performance was not satisfactory, presenting too much subjectivity in the definitions of constructs and starting from little robust definitions of agility. To try to solve this problem, a new model for agility in project management was proposed by Conforto (2011), relying on a definition coined from a systematic literature review of several areas that exhibit this same concept, and perform another systematic review on the models to measure agility in order to incorporate their strengths and create solutions to major weaknesses. This study aims to examine the relationships between the dimensions present in this model of agility to manage projects, in order to verify its validity and possibility its future use as a basis for measurement. Thus, the observed relationships between some features arising from the use of practices from the theory of agile project management theory, critical factors that may impact on the performance of the practices and indicators of agility. For this, a survey was made at the members from eight communities in Brazil Linkedin® chosen from among 79 candidates and selected according to 7 criteria. Also, was created the theoretical concept of "profile 500" which can be used in future research with have analysis made between members of this social network. There was obtained 172 valid responses from 966 users considered eligible for the study. Correlation analysis showed that the relationships proposed in the model of Conforto (2011) are valid and that agility is related to the presence of certain characteristics and are not inherent to the management method chosen, but this performance is related to customer participation and time taken decision. Finally, there was evidenced the importance of customer participation in the design and validation of partial results for a faster management process, and the necessity of carrying out the planning, development and validation with the participation of the client to perform better agility.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2012-10-08
2016-06-02T19:51:56Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2012-08-13
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2016-06-02T19:51:56Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv ALMEIDA, Luís Fernando Magnanini de. Características, fatores críticos e indicadores de agilidade no gerenciamento de projetos de produtos inovadores. 2012. 159 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Exatas e da Terra) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2012.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/3703
identifier_str_mv ALMEIDA, Luís Fernando Magnanini de. Características, fatores críticos e indicadores de agilidade no gerenciamento de projetos de produtos inovadores. 2012. 159 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Exatas e da Terra) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2012.
url https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/3703
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv -1
-1
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv acc6b2d7-0553-439f-9299-36e7f88c66f7
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia de Produção - PPGEP
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFSCar
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv BR
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron:UFSCAR
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron_str UFSCAR
institution UFSCAR
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
collection Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/3703/1/4571.pdf
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/3703/2/4571.pdf.txt
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/3703/3/4571.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 857c4fae6471592b22f205d753d4cdcd
d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e
bcc6dbb13fe5134b1dcf8620853b69f8
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1802136269406339072