Behaviorismo radical e subjetividade.
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2006 |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR |
Texto Completo: | https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/4813 |
Resumo: | In radical behaviorism, subjectivity is studied, generally speaking, in terms of the theory of private events. The theory of private events has its roots in the problem of accessibility in the thesis, that is, that a person has privileged access to certain events that occur under his skin (privacy). If we examine the origins of this thesis, we will find that it reaches radical behaviorism via the paths of dualism and logical positivism (through methodological behaviorism). However, if we interpret radical behaviorism on the basis of a relational metaphysics, the influence of dualism and logical positivism can be overlooked. This opens the possibility that radical behaviorism can do without the theory of private events. Nevertheless, if we abandon the theory of private events, what will be the consequence for of the study of subjectivity? The main objective of this work is to answer this question. Here, we uphold the thesis that the study of subjectivity in radical behaviorism, without reference to the theory of private events, can be fruitfully pursued. This can be achieved through the concepts of body and world , and through the construction of a theory of the self compatible with radical behaviorism. Thus, this work seeks to offer an interpretation of radical behaviorism, based on a relational metaphysics, which separates subjectivity from privacy. This interpretation also considers the possibility of productive dialogues between radical behaviorism and other psychological and philosophical theories (such as James psychology, Gestalttheorie , and analytic philosophy). According to this interpretation, subjectivity is related to the products of discriminative verbal behavior (identified as the I). As this product depends on a verbal community (which arranges discriminative contingencies), subjectivity comes to be considered social. Moreover, the person-verbal community interface renders the defense of a pure subjectivity not viable, as well as that of an unmitigated objectivism. Because of this, radical behaviorism may be capable of deconstructing the objective-subjective debate: these terms are subordinated to the relation of behavior. It is concluded that the radical character of radical behaviorism is not due to its dealing with private events, but to the study of behavior without resorting to non-behavioral instances. |
id |
SCAR_64df02c2314f93214812d77df257977d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufscar.br:ufscar/4813 |
network_acronym_str |
SCAR |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR |
repository_id_str |
4322 |
spelling |
Lopes, Carlos EduardoAbib, José Antônio Damásiohttp://genos.cnpq.br:12010/dwlattes/owa/prc_imp_cv_int?f_cod=K4783411P1http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/controladorbuscacv0c9413ab-db9f-43f8-9b17-2082a7243e642016-06-02T20:12:20Z2007-07-062016-06-02T20:12:20Z2006-02-10LOPES, Carlos Eduardo. Behaviorismo radical e subjetividade.. 2006. 232 f. Tese (Doutorado em Ciências Humanas) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2006.https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/4813In radical behaviorism, subjectivity is studied, generally speaking, in terms of the theory of private events. The theory of private events has its roots in the problem of accessibility in the thesis, that is, that a person has privileged access to certain events that occur under his skin (privacy). If we examine the origins of this thesis, we will find that it reaches radical behaviorism via the paths of dualism and logical positivism (through methodological behaviorism). However, if we interpret radical behaviorism on the basis of a relational metaphysics, the influence of dualism and logical positivism can be overlooked. This opens the possibility that radical behaviorism can do without the theory of private events. Nevertheless, if we abandon the theory of private events, what will be the consequence for of the study of subjectivity? The main objective of this work is to answer this question. Here, we uphold the thesis that the study of subjectivity in radical behaviorism, without reference to the theory of private events, can be fruitfully pursued. This can be achieved through the concepts of body and world , and through the construction of a theory of the self compatible with radical behaviorism. Thus, this work seeks to offer an interpretation of radical behaviorism, based on a relational metaphysics, which separates subjectivity from privacy. This interpretation also considers the possibility of productive dialogues between radical behaviorism and other psychological and philosophical theories (such as James psychology, Gestalttheorie , and analytic philosophy). According to this interpretation, subjectivity is related to the products of discriminative verbal behavior (identified as the I). As this product depends on a verbal community (which arranges discriminative contingencies), subjectivity comes to be considered social. Moreover, the person-verbal community interface renders the defense of a pure subjectivity not viable, as well as that of an unmitigated objectivism. Because of this, radical behaviorism may be capable of deconstructing the objective-subjective debate: these terms are subordinated to the relation of behavior. It is concluded that the radical character of radical behaviorism is not due to its dealing with private events, but to the study of behavior without resorting to non-behavioral instances.No behaviorismo radical a subjetividade é estudada, geralmente, recorrendo-se à teoria de eventos privados. A teoria de eventos privados tem em sua raiz a problemática da acessibilidade , ou seja, a tese de que a pessoa tem acesso privilegiado a determinados eventos que ocorrem sob sua pele (privacidade). Analisando a origem dessa tese encontraremos que ela chega ao behaviorismo radical pela via do dualismo e do positivismo lógico (através do behaviorismo metodológico). No entanto, quando se interpreta o behaviorismo radical a partir de uma metafísica relacional, elimina-se a influência tanto do dualismo, quanto do positivismo lógico. Com isso, o behaviorismo radical pode abandonar a teoria de eventos privados. Mas diante dessa possibilidade como ficaria o estudo da subjetividade? Responder a essa questão é o principal objetivo deste trabalho. Defende-se, aqui, a tese de que é viável empreender um estudo da subjetividade no behaviorismo radical desvinculado da teoria de eventos privados. Isso pode ser feito através dos conceitos de corpo e mundo, e da construção de uma teoria do self compatível com o behaviorismo radical. Dessa forma, o presente trabalho busca apresentar uma interpretação do behaviorismo radical, pautada em uma metafísica relacional, que desvincula subjetividade de privacidade. Essa interpretação considera também a possibilidade de diálogos produtivos entre o behaviorismo radical e outras teorias psicológicas e filosóficas (tais como psicologia jamesiana, Gestalttheorie e filosofia analítica). De acordo com essa interpretação, subjetividade está relacionada com os produtos do comportamento verbal discriminativo (que se identifica com o eu). Como esse produto depende de uma comunidade verbal (que arranja contingências discriminativas) a subjetividade passa a ser considerada social. Além disso, a interface pessoa-comunidade verbal torna inviável a defesa de uma subjetividade pura, bem como de um objetivismo pleno. Com isso, o behaviorismo radical parece ser capaz de desconstruir o debate subjetivo-objetivo: esses termos estão subordinados à relação comportamental. Por fim, conclui-se que a radicalidade do behaviorismo radical não está em considerar os eventos privados em sua explicação do comportamento, mas em estudar o comportamento sem recorrer a instâncias não-comportamentais.Universidade Federal de Minas Geraisapplication/pdfporUniversidade Federal de São CarlosPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia - PPGFilUFSCarBRBehariorismo (Psicologia)SubjetividadeMundo (Psicologia)Corpo - filosofiaSelf (Psicologia)Behaviorismo radicalMetafísica relacionalRadical behaviorismSubjectivityRelational metaphysicsWorldBodySelfCIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIABehaviorismo radical e subjetividade.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis-1-1c4bd4d86-9a84-46d9-be4d-0c86b5aa3f37info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCARinstname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)instacron:UFSCARORIGINALDissCEL.pdfapplication/pdf1452278https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/4813/1/DissCEL.pdfec88e046699e0f20355101ecc9530b54MD51THUMBNAILDissCEL.pdf.jpgDissCEL.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg5437https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/4813/2/DissCEL.pdf.jpg60b993f21244556a1a1d492edee6c476MD52ufscar/48132023-09-18 18:31:03.96oai:repositorio.ufscar.br:ufscar/4813Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufscar.br/oai/requestopendoar:43222023-09-18T18:31:03Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Behaviorismo radical e subjetividade. |
title |
Behaviorismo radical e subjetividade. |
spellingShingle |
Behaviorismo radical e subjetividade. Lopes, Carlos Eduardo Behariorismo (Psicologia) Subjetividade Mundo (Psicologia) Corpo - filosofia Self (Psicologia) Behaviorismo radical Metafísica relacional Radical behaviorism Subjectivity Relational metaphysics World Body Self CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
title_short |
Behaviorismo radical e subjetividade. |
title_full |
Behaviorismo radical e subjetividade. |
title_fullStr |
Behaviorismo radical e subjetividade. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Behaviorismo radical e subjetividade. |
title_sort |
Behaviorismo radical e subjetividade. |
author |
Lopes, Carlos Eduardo |
author_facet |
Lopes, Carlos Eduardo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.authorlattes.por.fl_str_mv |
http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/controladorbuscacv |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lopes, Carlos Eduardo |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Abib, José Antônio Damásio |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://genos.cnpq.br:12010/dwlattes/owa/prc_imp_cv_int?f_cod=K4783411P1 |
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv |
0c9413ab-db9f-43f8-9b17-2082a7243e64 |
contributor_str_mv |
Abib, José Antônio Damásio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Behariorismo (Psicologia) Subjetividade Mundo (Psicologia) Corpo - filosofia Self (Psicologia) Behaviorismo radical Metafísica relacional |
topic |
Behariorismo (Psicologia) Subjetividade Mundo (Psicologia) Corpo - filosofia Self (Psicologia) Behaviorismo radical Metafísica relacional Radical behaviorism Subjectivity Relational metaphysics World Body Self CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Radical behaviorism Subjectivity Relational metaphysics World Body Self |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
description |
In radical behaviorism, subjectivity is studied, generally speaking, in terms of the theory of private events. The theory of private events has its roots in the problem of accessibility in the thesis, that is, that a person has privileged access to certain events that occur under his skin (privacy). If we examine the origins of this thesis, we will find that it reaches radical behaviorism via the paths of dualism and logical positivism (through methodological behaviorism). However, if we interpret radical behaviorism on the basis of a relational metaphysics, the influence of dualism and logical positivism can be overlooked. This opens the possibility that radical behaviorism can do without the theory of private events. Nevertheless, if we abandon the theory of private events, what will be the consequence for of the study of subjectivity? The main objective of this work is to answer this question. Here, we uphold the thesis that the study of subjectivity in radical behaviorism, without reference to the theory of private events, can be fruitfully pursued. This can be achieved through the concepts of body and world , and through the construction of a theory of the self compatible with radical behaviorism. Thus, this work seeks to offer an interpretation of radical behaviorism, based on a relational metaphysics, which separates subjectivity from privacy. This interpretation also considers the possibility of productive dialogues between radical behaviorism and other psychological and philosophical theories (such as James psychology, Gestalttheorie , and analytic philosophy). According to this interpretation, subjectivity is related to the products of discriminative verbal behavior (identified as the I). As this product depends on a verbal community (which arranges discriminative contingencies), subjectivity comes to be considered social. Moreover, the person-verbal community interface renders the defense of a pure subjectivity not viable, as well as that of an unmitigated objectivism. Because of this, radical behaviorism may be capable of deconstructing the objective-subjective debate: these terms are subordinated to the relation of behavior. It is concluded that the radical character of radical behaviorism is not due to its dealing with private events, but to the study of behavior without resorting to non-behavioral instances. |
publishDate |
2006 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2006-02-10 |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2007-07-06 2016-06-02T20:12:20Z |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2016-06-02T20:12:20Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
LOPES, Carlos Eduardo. Behaviorismo radical e subjetividade.. 2006. 232 f. Tese (Doutorado em Ciências Humanas) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2006. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/4813 |
identifier_str_mv |
LOPES, Carlos Eduardo. Behaviorismo radical e subjetividade.. 2006. 232 f. Tese (Doutorado em Ciências Humanas) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2006. |
url |
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/4813 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
-1 -1 |
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv |
c4bd4d86-9a84-46d9-be4d-0c86b5aa3f37 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia - PPGFil |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFSCar |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
BR |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) instacron:UFSCAR |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) |
instacron_str |
UFSCAR |
institution |
UFSCAR |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/4813/1/DissCEL.pdf https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/4813/2/DissCEL.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
ec88e046699e0f20355101ecc9530b54 60b993f21244556a1a1d492edee6c476 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1813715538968313856 |