Diclosulam e sulfentrazone no manejo das plantas infestantes na cultura da soja resistente ao glifosato e efeito da palha e precipitação sobre estes herbicidas

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Minozzi, Guilherme Barbosa
Data de Publicação: 2014
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/29
Resumo: The Roundup Ready (RR) soybean facilitated weed management by allowing the use of glyphosate in all stages of crop development. But the continuous use of this herbicide can select resistant weed biotypes and tolerant species, suggesting the need of developing new management practices. Thus, the aim of this proposal was to evaluate the effectiveness of different managements in soybean using residual and post-emergent herbicides in the control of weeds and the interference caused by straw and rainfall on the efficacy of the herbicides diclosulam and sulfentrazone. In the first experiment, in the field, was used the randomized block design with four repetitions and 14 treatments, involving the application of glyphosate (712 g ha-1) + 2,4-D (670 g ha-1) in the burndown application of weeds, 14 days before planting soybeans, with and without the presence of residual herbicides, diclosulam (29.4 g ha-1) and sulfentrazone (600 g ha-1), and treatments with glyphosate in post emergence at a single time in stages V2 (Second fully expanded trifoliate) or V4 (Fourth fully expanded trifoliate) at the dose (712 g ha-1) or in both stages V2 and V4 (356 g ha-1 in each one). In the second trial, in the greenhouse, was used a randomized block design with four repetitions in a factorial 2 x 3 x 5, being two herbicides diclosulam (29.4 g ha-1) and sulfentrazone (600 g ha-1), three levels of corn straw on the soil surface (0, 5 and 10 t ha-1) and five simulations of 20mm of rain (without rain, 24, 72, 120 and 240 hours after application of the herbicide), each experimental unit consisted of a vase and after rain simulation was sown in pots one biomarker, which was assessed for phytotoxicity. In the field experiment, it was noted the importance of applying a residual herbicide in the burndown, to reduce applications of glyphosate in post emergence, the treatment with diclosulam and a single application of glyphosate in V4 promoted the highest soybean yield of 3484,93 kg ha-1 against 719 kg ha-1 of the untreated treatment. In green house interaction was observed between the amount of straw (which can intercept the jet sprayed) and the time of occurrence of rain after application of herbicides and in this case diclosulam proved to be less dependent of water to reach its target.
id SCAR_a7f7d572411afc71da46987c9323197b
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufscar.br:ufscar/29
network_acronym_str SCAR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
repository_id_str 4322
spelling Minozzi, Guilherme BarbosaMonquero, Patrícia Andreahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2766526793830455http://lattes.cnpq.br/3296134429563429017378cd-f7af-493e-afaf-10d3428ecbb92016-06-02T18:55:28Z2014-09-182016-06-02T18:55:28Z2014-03-21MINOZZI, Guilherme Barbosa. Diclosulam e sulfentrazone no manejo das plantas infestantes na cultura da soja resistente ao glifosato e efeito da palha e precipitação sobre estes herbicidas. 2014. 60 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Agrárias) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2014.https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/29The Roundup Ready (RR) soybean facilitated weed management by allowing the use of glyphosate in all stages of crop development. But the continuous use of this herbicide can select resistant weed biotypes and tolerant species, suggesting the need of developing new management practices. Thus, the aim of this proposal was to evaluate the effectiveness of different managements in soybean using residual and post-emergent herbicides in the control of weeds and the interference caused by straw and rainfall on the efficacy of the herbicides diclosulam and sulfentrazone. In the first experiment, in the field, was used the randomized block design with four repetitions and 14 treatments, involving the application of glyphosate (712 g ha-1) + 2,4-D (670 g ha-1) in the burndown application of weeds, 14 days before planting soybeans, with and without the presence of residual herbicides, diclosulam (29.4 g ha-1) and sulfentrazone (600 g ha-1), and treatments with glyphosate in post emergence at a single time in stages V2 (Second fully expanded trifoliate) or V4 (Fourth fully expanded trifoliate) at the dose (712 g ha-1) or in both stages V2 and V4 (356 g ha-1 in each one). In the second trial, in the greenhouse, was used a randomized block design with four repetitions in a factorial 2 x 3 x 5, being two herbicides diclosulam (29.4 g ha-1) and sulfentrazone (600 g ha-1), three levels of corn straw on the soil surface (0, 5 and 10 t ha-1) and five simulations of 20mm of rain (without rain, 24, 72, 120 and 240 hours after application of the herbicide), each experimental unit consisted of a vase and after rain simulation was sown in pots one biomarker, which was assessed for phytotoxicity. In the field experiment, it was noted the importance of applying a residual herbicide in the burndown, to reduce applications of glyphosate in post emergence, the treatment with diclosulam and a single application of glyphosate in V4 promoted the highest soybean yield of 3484,93 kg ha-1 against 719 kg ha-1 of the untreated treatment. In green house interaction was observed between the amount of straw (which can intercept the jet sprayed) and the time of occurrence of rain after application of herbicides and in this case diclosulam proved to be less dependent of water to reach its target.O cultivo da soja transgênica Roundup Ready (RR) facilitou o manejo das plantas infestantes por permitir o uso do glifosato em todos os estádios de desenvolvimento da cultura. Porém, o uso contínuo desse herbicida pode selecionar biótipos resistentes ou espécies tolerantes de plantas infestantes sugerindo a necessidade do desenvolvimento de novas práticas de manejo. Dessa forma, o objetivo deste trabalhofoi avaliar a eficácia de diferentes manejos de plantas infestantes na cultura da soja, utilizando herbicidas residuais e pós-emergentes e verificar a interferência da palha e da precipitação sobre a eficácia dos herbicidas diclosulam e sulfentrazone. No primeiro experimento, em campo, utilizou-se o delineamento em blocos ao acaso com 4 repetições e 14 tratamentos, envolvendo a aplicação de glifosato (712 g ha-1) + 2,4-D (670 g ha-1) na dessecação das plantas infestantes, 14 dias antes da semeadura da soja (MonSoy 7211 RR) de forma isolada ou combinada com herbicidas residuais diclosulam (29,4 g ha-1) e sulfentrazone (600 g ha-1) e tratamentos com a aplicação de glifosato em pós emergência em uma única vez nos estádios de desenvolvimento da soja V2 (2° trifólio totalmente expandido) ou V4 (4° trifólio totalmente expandido) na dose de (712 g ha-1) ou parceladamente nos estádios de desenvolvimento V2 e V4 (356 g ha- 1 em cada). No segundo ensaio, em casa de vegetação, foi utilizado o delineamento em blocos ao acaso, com 4 repetições no esquema fatorial 2 x 3 x 5, sendo dois herbicidas diclosulam (29,4 g ha-1) e sulfentrazone (600 g ha-1), três níveis de palha de milho sobre o solo (0; 5 e 10 t ha-1) e cinco épocas de simulação de 20 mm de chuva, (sem chuva; 24; 72; 120 e 240 horas após a aplicação do herbicida) cada unidade experimental foi composta por um vaso e após a simulação de chuva foi semeado nos vasos o bioindicador Cucumis sativus, que foi avaliado com relação a fitotoxicidade. No experimento de campo, observou-se a importância de aplicar herbicida residual na dessecação, para diminuir as aplicações de glifosato em pós emergência. O tratamento com diclosulam e uma única aplicação de glifosato em V4 promoveu a maior produtividade da soja 3484,93 kg ha-1 contra 719 kg ha-1 da testemunha. Em casa de vegetação observou-se interação entre quantidade de palha (que pode interceptar o jato pulverizado) e o tempo de ocorrência da chuva após a aplicação dos herbicidas e neste caso o diclosulam mostrou ser menos dependente da água para atingir seu alvo.Financiadora de Estudos e Projetosapplication/pdfporUniversidade Federal de São CarlosPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Agricultura e Ambiente - PPGAA-ArUFSCarBRHerbicidasInibidores da acetolactato sintaseInibidores da protoporfirinogênio oxidasePlantio diretoPrecipitaçãoResidual herbicidesAcetolactate synthase inhibitorsProtoporphorinogen oxidase inhibitorsNo tillagePrecipitationCIENCIAS AGRARIASDiclosulam e sulfentrazone no manejo das plantas infestantes na cultura da soja resistente ao glifosato e efeito da palha e precipitação sobre estes herbicidasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis-1-1bfc5bfb9-6225-4b8d-a42e-76b79def61fainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCARinstname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)instacron:UFSCARORIGINAL6148.pdfapplication/pdf667547https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/29/1/6148.pdff68fc760491d5919cffc86069dd54cf8MD51TEXT6148.pdf.txt6148.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain0https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/29/2/6148.pdf.txtd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eMD52THUMBNAIL6148.pdf.jpg6148.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg6509https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/29/3/6148.pdf.jpg732bf84a32583b0e5a840d375b5fca29MD53ufscar/292023-09-18 18:31:43.814oai:repositorio.ufscar.br:ufscar/29Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufscar.br/oai/requestopendoar:43222023-09-18T18:31:43Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Diclosulam e sulfentrazone no manejo das plantas infestantes na cultura da soja resistente ao glifosato e efeito da palha e precipitação sobre estes herbicidas
title Diclosulam e sulfentrazone no manejo das plantas infestantes na cultura da soja resistente ao glifosato e efeito da palha e precipitação sobre estes herbicidas
spellingShingle Diclosulam e sulfentrazone no manejo das plantas infestantes na cultura da soja resistente ao glifosato e efeito da palha e precipitação sobre estes herbicidas
Minozzi, Guilherme Barbosa
Herbicidas
Inibidores da acetolactato sintase
Inibidores da protoporfirinogênio oxidase
Plantio direto
Precipitação
Residual herbicides
Acetolactate synthase inhibitors
Protoporphorinogen oxidase inhibitors
No tillage
Precipitation
CIENCIAS AGRARIAS
title_short Diclosulam e sulfentrazone no manejo das plantas infestantes na cultura da soja resistente ao glifosato e efeito da palha e precipitação sobre estes herbicidas
title_full Diclosulam e sulfentrazone no manejo das plantas infestantes na cultura da soja resistente ao glifosato e efeito da palha e precipitação sobre estes herbicidas
title_fullStr Diclosulam e sulfentrazone no manejo das plantas infestantes na cultura da soja resistente ao glifosato e efeito da palha e precipitação sobre estes herbicidas
title_full_unstemmed Diclosulam e sulfentrazone no manejo das plantas infestantes na cultura da soja resistente ao glifosato e efeito da palha e precipitação sobre estes herbicidas
title_sort Diclosulam e sulfentrazone no manejo das plantas infestantes na cultura da soja resistente ao glifosato e efeito da palha e precipitação sobre estes herbicidas
author Minozzi, Guilherme Barbosa
author_facet Minozzi, Guilherme Barbosa
author_role author
dc.contributor.authorlattes.por.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/3296134429563429
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Minozzi, Guilherme Barbosa
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Monquero, Patrícia Andrea
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/2766526793830455
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv 017378cd-f7af-493e-afaf-10d3428ecbb9
contributor_str_mv Monquero, Patrícia Andrea
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Herbicidas
Inibidores da acetolactato sintase
Inibidores da protoporfirinogênio oxidase
Plantio direto
Precipitação
topic Herbicidas
Inibidores da acetolactato sintase
Inibidores da protoporfirinogênio oxidase
Plantio direto
Precipitação
Residual herbicides
Acetolactate synthase inhibitors
Protoporphorinogen oxidase inhibitors
No tillage
Precipitation
CIENCIAS AGRARIAS
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Residual herbicides
Acetolactate synthase inhibitors
Protoporphorinogen oxidase inhibitors
No tillage
Precipitation
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CIENCIAS AGRARIAS
description The Roundup Ready (RR) soybean facilitated weed management by allowing the use of glyphosate in all stages of crop development. But the continuous use of this herbicide can select resistant weed biotypes and tolerant species, suggesting the need of developing new management practices. Thus, the aim of this proposal was to evaluate the effectiveness of different managements in soybean using residual and post-emergent herbicides in the control of weeds and the interference caused by straw and rainfall on the efficacy of the herbicides diclosulam and sulfentrazone. In the first experiment, in the field, was used the randomized block design with four repetitions and 14 treatments, involving the application of glyphosate (712 g ha-1) + 2,4-D (670 g ha-1) in the burndown application of weeds, 14 days before planting soybeans, with and without the presence of residual herbicides, diclosulam (29.4 g ha-1) and sulfentrazone (600 g ha-1), and treatments with glyphosate in post emergence at a single time in stages V2 (Second fully expanded trifoliate) or V4 (Fourth fully expanded trifoliate) at the dose (712 g ha-1) or in both stages V2 and V4 (356 g ha-1 in each one). In the second trial, in the greenhouse, was used a randomized block design with four repetitions in a factorial 2 x 3 x 5, being two herbicides diclosulam (29.4 g ha-1) and sulfentrazone (600 g ha-1), three levels of corn straw on the soil surface (0, 5 and 10 t ha-1) and five simulations of 20mm of rain (without rain, 24, 72, 120 and 240 hours after application of the herbicide), each experimental unit consisted of a vase and after rain simulation was sown in pots one biomarker, which was assessed for phytotoxicity. In the field experiment, it was noted the importance of applying a residual herbicide in the burndown, to reduce applications of glyphosate in post emergence, the treatment with diclosulam and a single application of glyphosate in V4 promoted the highest soybean yield of 3484,93 kg ha-1 against 719 kg ha-1 of the untreated treatment. In green house interaction was observed between the amount of straw (which can intercept the jet sprayed) and the time of occurrence of rain after application of herbicides and in this case diclosulam proved to be less dependent of water to reach its target.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2014-09-18
2016-06-02T18:55:28Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2014-03-21
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2016-06-02T18:55:28Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv MINOZZI, Guilherme Barbosa. Diclosulam e sulfentrazone no manejo das plantas infestantes na cultura da soja resistente ao glifosato e efeito da palha e precipitação sobre estes herbicidas. 2014. 60 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Agrárias) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2014.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/29
identifier_str_mv MINOZZI, Guilherme Barbosa. Diclosulam e sulfentrazone no manejo das plantas infestantes na cultura da soja resistente ao glifosato e efeito da palha e precipitação sobre estes herbicidas. 2014. 60 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Agrárias) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2014.
url https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/29
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv -1
-1
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv bfc5bfb9-6225-4b8d-a42e-76b79def61fa
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Agricultura e Ambiente - PPGAA-Ar
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFSCar
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv BR
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron:UFSCAR
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron_str UFSCAR
institution UFSCAR
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
collection Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/29/1/6148.pdf
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/29/2/6148.pdf.txt
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/29/3/6148.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv f68fc760491d5919cffc86069dd54cf8
d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e
732bf84a32583b0e5a840d375b5fca29
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1802136241870733312