Avaliação cinemática, eletromiográfica e da concentração de biomarcadores inflamatórios em sujeitos com dor lombar : comparação de instrumentos de medida, avaliação de fatores que influenciam nos registros

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Batistão, Mariana Vieira
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Tese
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/9684
Resumo: Low back pain has negative impact on quality of life and work performance, and presents socioeconomic burden. Several studies have focused on investigating the dose-response relationship between risk factors and the development of low back pain. One way to evaluate this relationship is Surface Electromyography (EMG). Study 1 aimed to evaluate the influence of skinfolds, body mass index (BMI) and body mass on the amplitude of the EMG of the erector spinae (iliocostalis), multifidus and rectus abdominis muscles. Nineteen male subjects were recruited. The analysis showed that these factors influence the EMG record, explaining from 27 to 73% of the signal variance. Likewise, the evaluation of trunk movements and posture are of interest in ergonomic research. Study 2 aimed to compare two trunk movement logging systems, the three-dimensional movement recording system (Qualisys, ProReflex MCU, Sweden) and the inclinometer (Logger Tecknologi HB, Akarp, Sweden). Data from 27 volunteers were analyzed. Data were collected during three different tasks: a static in the orthostatic position, a static with 45 ° of trunk flexion and a dynamic being a manual handling of a load of 11.4 kg. The trunk movements were evaluated by the two systems simultaneously. The results showed that the systems differed between 0.9 ° in the standing static task, 10º in the static with trunk flexion and 29.3° in the dynamic task. Therefore, the use of inclinometer for posture evaluation and trunk movements should be done with caution, especially in the evaluation of dynamic tasks. In addition to the kinematic and electromyographic evaluation, another approach has been used. Recent studies have investigated the inflammatory response and its relationship to low back pain. Thus, the aim of Study 3 was to compare the levels of inflammatory biomarkers (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-10) in workers with low back pain, according to the characteristics of the symptoms, such as: functional impact, search for professional help, symptoms in the last 7 days and frequency of symptoms in the last year. Twenty-four men were evaluated. The Elisa method (Enzyme-Linked Immuno Sorbent Assay - Quantikine®HS, R & D Systems, Minneapolis, USA) was used to quantify the level of cytokines. However, no statistical difference was found. And in Study 4, the objective was to quantify, at two different times, levels of inflammatory biomarkers in experienced workers with low back pain, randomly divided into two groups: control (did not perform a load handling task) and experimental (handled ). The ELISA method was used to quantify the concentration of cytokines in twenty-five male workers (control=13; experimental= 12). The results showed that no differences were found in the concentration of biomarkers between the groups nor between the evaluations. In this way, it can be concluded that the task did not modify the concentration of biomarkers. Recommendations for future studies are to evaluate a task that generates greater overload, that is, with a longer duration, frequency or magnitude, considering the risks imposed to the population.
id SCAR_bf2f8423f9ee3104681dd63e1424d3cf
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufscar.br:ufscar/9684
network_acronym_str SCAR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
repository_id_str 4322
spelling Batistão, Mariana VieiraSato, Tatiana de Oliveirahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3456494998257229http://lattes.cnpq.br/3249665880363249e439fcc2-e132-4274-a810-077b9c793f882018-04-09T17:46:53Z2018-04-09T17:46:53Z2017-02-21BATISTÃO, Mariana Vieira. Avaliação cinemática, eletromiográfica e da concentração de biomarcadores inflamatórios em sujeitos com dor lombar : comparação de instrumentos de medida, avaliação de fatores que influenciam nos registros. 2017. Tese (Doutorado em Fisioterapia) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2017. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/9684.https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/9684Low back pain has negative impact on quality of life and work performance, and presents socioeconomic burden. Several studies have focused on investigating the dose-response relationship between risk factors and the development of low back pain. One way to evaluate this relationship is Surface Electromyography (EMG). Study 1 aimed to evaluate the influence of skinfolds, body mass index (BMI) and body mass on the amplitude of the EMG of the erector spinae (iliocostalis), multifidus and rectus abdominis muscles. Nineteen male subjects were recruited. The analysis showed that these factors influence the EMG record, explaining from 27 to 73% of the signal variance. Likewise, the evaluation of trunk movements and posture are of interest in ergonomic research. Study 2 aimed to compare two trunk movement logging systems, the three-dimensional movement recording system (Qualisys, ProReflex MCU, Sweden) and the inclinometer (Logger Tecknologi HB, Akarp, Sweden). Data from 27 volunteers were analyzed. Data were collected during three different tasks: a static in the orthostatic position, a static with 45 ° of trunk flexion and a dynamic being a manual handling of a load of 11.4 kg. The trunk movements were evaluated by the two systems simultaneously. The results showed that the systems differed between 0.9 ° in the standing static task, 10º in the static with trunk flexion and 29.3° in the dynamic task. Therefore, the use of inclinometer for posture evaluation and trunk movements should be done with caution, especially in the evaluation of dynamic tasks. In addition to the kinematic and electromyographic evaluation, another approach has been used. Recent studies have investigated the inflammatory response and its relationship to low back pain. Thus, the aim of Study 3 was to compare the levels of inflammatory biomarkers (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-10) in workers with low back pain, according to the characteristics of the symptoms, such as: functional impact, search for professional help, symptoms in the last 7 days and frequency of symptoms in the last year. Twenty-four men were evaluated. The Elisa method (Enzyme-Linked Immuno Sorbent Assay - Quantikine®HS, R & D Systems, Minneapolis, USA) was used to quantify the level of cytokines. However, no statistical difference was found. And in Study 4, the objective was to quantify, at two different times, levels of inflammatory biomarkers in experienced workers with low back pain, randomly divided into two groups: control (did not perform a load handling task) and experimental (handled ). The ELISA method was used to quantify the concentration of cytokines in twenty-five male workers (control=13; experimental= 12). The results showed that no differences were found in the concentration of biomarkers between the groups nor between the evaluations. In this way, it can be concluded that the task did not modify the concentration of biomarkers. Recommendations for future studies are to evaluate a task that generates greater overload, that is, with a longer duration, frequency or magnitude, considering the risks imposed to the population.A dor lombar tem impacto negativo na qualidade de vida e desempenho no trabalho, além de apresentar sobrecarga socioeconômica. Diversos estudos tem se dedicado a investigar a relação dose-resposta dos fatores de risco e o desenvolvimento de dor lombar. Uma forma de avaliar essa relação é a Eletromiografia de superfície (EMG). O Estudo 1 teve como objetivo avaliar a influencia de pregas cutâneas, índice de massa corporal (IMC) e massa corporal na amplitude da EMG dos músculos eretor da espinha, multífido e reto abdominal. Dezenove sujeitos do sexo masculino foram recrutados. A análise mostrou que esses fatores têm influencia no registro de EMG, explicando de 27 a 73% da variância do sinal. Do mesmo modo, a avaliação dos movimentos e postura do tronco são de interesse da pesquisa em ergonomia. O Estudo 2 teve como objetivo comparar dois sistemas de registro dos movimentos do tronco, o sistema tridimensional de registro do movimento (Qualisys, ProReflex MCU, Suécia) e o inclinômetro (Logger Tecknologi HB, Akarp, Suécia). Dados de 27 voluntários foram analisados. Dados foram coletados durante três diferentes tarefas: uma estática na posição ortostática, uma estática com 45° de flexão de tronco e uma dinâmica sendo um manuseio de uma carga de 11,4 kg. Os movimentos do tronco foram avaliados pelos dois sistemas de forma simultânea. Os resultados mostraram que os sistemas diferiram entre 0,9° na tarefa estática em pé, 10º na estática com flexão de tronco e 29,3° na tarefa dinâmica de manuseio de cargas.Dforma, a utilização do inclinômetro para a avaliação da postura e movimentos do tronco deve ser feita com cautela, principalmente na avaliação de tarefas dinâmicas. Em adição à avaliação cinemática e eletromiográfica, outra abordagem tem sido utilizada. Estudos recentes têm investigado a resposta inflamatória e sua relação com a dor lombar. Desta forma, o objetivo do Estudo 3 foi comparar os níveis de marcadores inflamatórios (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 e IL-10) em trabalhadores com dor lombar, de acordo com as características dos sintomas, como: impacto funcional, busca por auxílio professional, sintomas nos últimos 7 dias e frequência dos sintomas no último ano. Vinte e quatro homens foram avaliados. O método Elisa (Enzyme-Linked Immuno Sorbent Assay - Quantikine®HS, R & D Systems, Minneapolis, USA) foi usado para quantificar o nível de citocinas. Contudo, nenhuma diferença estatística foi encontrada. E no Estudo 4, o objetivo foi quantificar, em dois momentos distintos, os níveis de biomarcadores inflamatórios em trabalhadores experientes com dor lombar, divididos aleatoriamente em dois grupos: controle (não realizou uma tarefa de manuseio de cargas) e experimental (realizou o manuseio). O método ELISA foi usado para quantificar a concentração de citocinas em vinte e cinco trabalhadores do sexo masculino (controle=13; experimental=12). Os resultados mostraram que não foram encontradas diferenças na concentração dos biomarcadores entre os grupos nem entre as avaliações. Desta forma, pode-se concluir que a tarefa não modificou a concentração dos biomarcadores. Recomendações para futuros estudos são avaliar uma tarefa que gere maior sobrecarga, ou seja, com maior duração, frequência ou magnitude, considerando os riscos impostos à população.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)FAPESP: 2013/14098-2CNPq: 484230/2013-1porUniversidade Federal de São CarlosCâmpus São CarlosPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia - PPGFtUFSCarErgonomiaManuseio manual de cargasDor lombarErgonomicsManual handling tasksLow back painCIENCIAS DA SAUDE::FISIOTERAPIA E TERAPIA OCUPACIONALAvaliação cinemática, eletromiográfica e da concentração de biomarcadores inflamatórios em sujeitos com dor lombar : comparação de instrumentos de medida, avaliação de fatores que influenciam nos registrosKinematic, electromyographic, and concentration of inflammatory biomarkers evaluation in subjects with low back pain : comparison of measurement instruments, assessment of factors influencing the records.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisOnline600dcf669d1-e61c-43e2-9f4b-ca358eb5dd8binfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCARinstname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)instacron:UFSCARLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81957https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/9684/3/license.txtae0398b6f8b235e40ad82cba6c50031dMD53ORIGINALBATISTÃO_Mariana_2018.pdfBATISTÃO_Mariana_2018.pdfapplication/pdf1934001https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/9684/4/BATIST%c3%83O_Mariana_2018.pdf663696d9b6292ca93d0bc0538ba3c5e9MD54TEXTBATISTÃO_Mariana_2018.pdf.txtBATISTÃO_Mariana_2018.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain231396https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/9684/5/BATIST%c3%83O_Mariana_2018.pdf.txtc3f596d890a925584d9e1d409fcb7101MD55THUMBNAILBATISTÃO_Mariana_2018.pdf.jpgBATISTÃO_Mariana_2018.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg6047https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/9684/6/BATIST%c3%83O_Mariana_2018.pdf.jpg54ec1f01d8e89fc425d9d6c94c1e5bb8MD56ufscar/96842023-09-18 18:31:42.105oai:repositorio.ufscar.br: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Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufscar.br/oai/requestopendoar:43222023-09-18T18:31:42Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Avaliação cinemática, eletromiográfica e da concentração de biomarcadores inflamatórios em sujeitos com dor lombar : comparação de instrumentos de medida, avaliação de fatores que influenciam nos registros
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Kinematic, electromyographic, and concentration of inflammatory biomarkers evaluation in subjects with low back pain : comparison of measurement instruments, assessment of factors influencing the records.
title Avaliação cinemática, eletromiográfica e da concentração de biomarcadores inflamatórios em sujeitos com dor lombar : comparação de instrumentos de medida, avaliação de fatores que influenciam nos registros
spellingShingle Avaliação cinemática, eletromiográfica e da concentração de biomarcadores inflamatórios em sujeitos com dor lombar : comparação de instrumentos de medida, avaliação de fatores que influenciam nos registros
Batistão, Mariana Vieira
Ergonomia
Manuseio manual de cargas
Dor lombar
Ergonomics
Manual handling tasks
Low back pain
CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::FISIOTERAPIA E TERAPIA OCUPACIONAL
title_short Avaliação cinemática, eletromiográfica e da concentração de biomarcadores inflamatórios em sujeitos com dor lombar : comparação de instrumentos de medida, avaliação de fatores que influenciam nos registros
title_full Avaliação cinemática, eletromiográfica e da concentração de biomarcadores inflamatórios em sujeitos com dor lombar : comparação de instrumentos de medida, avaliação de fatores que influenciam nos registros
title_fullStr Avaliação cinemática, eletromiográfica e da concentração de biomarcadores inflamatórios em sujeitos com dor lombar : comparação de instrumentos de medida, avaliação de fatores que influenciam nos registros
title_full_unstemmed Avaliação cinemática, eletromiográfica e da concentração de biomarcadores inflamatórios em sujeitos com dor lombar : comparação de instrumentos de medida, avaliação de fatores que influenciam nos registros
title_sort Avaliação cinemática, eletromiográfica e da concentração de biomarcadores inflamatórios em sujeitos com dor lombar : comparação de instrumentos de medida, avaliação de fatores que influenciam nos registros
author Batistão, Mariana Vieira
author_facet Batistão, Mariana Vieira
author_role author
dc.contributor.authorlattes.por.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/3249665880363249
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Batistão, Mariana Vieira
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Sato, Tatiana de Oliveira
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/3456494998257229
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv e439fcc2-e132-4274-a810-077b9c793f88
contributor_str_mv Sato, Tatiana de Oliveira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ergonomia
Manuseio manual de cargas
Dor lombar
topic Ergonomia
Manuseio manual de cargas
Dor lombar
Ergonomics
Manual handling tasks
Low back pain
CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::FISIOTERAPIA E TERAPIA OCUPACIONAL
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Ergonomics
Manual handling tasks
Low back pain
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::FISIOTERAPIA E TERAPIA OCUPACIONAL
description Low back pain has negative impact on quality of life and work performance, and presents socioeconomic burden. Several studies have focused on investigating the dose-response relationship between risk factors and the development of low back pain. One way to evaluate this relationship is Surface Electromyography (EMG). Study 1 aimed to evaluate the influence of skinfolds, body mass index (BMI) and body mass on the amplitude of the EMG of the erector spinae (iliocostalis), multifidus and rectus abdominis muscles. Nineteen male subjects were recruited. The analysis showed that these factors influence the EMG record, explaining from 27 to 73% of the signal variance. Likewise, the evaluation of trunk movements and posture are of interest in ergonomic research. Study 2 aimed to compare two trunk movement logging systems, the three-dimensional movement recording system (Qualisys, ProReflex MCU, Sweden) and the inclinometer (Logger Tecknologi HB, Akarp, Sweden). Data from 27 volunteers were analyzed. Data were collected during three different tasks: a static in the orthostatic position, a static with 45 ° of trunk flexion and a dynamic being a manual handling of a load of 11.4 kg. The trunk movements were evaluated by the two systems simultaneously. The results showed that the systems differed between 0.9 ° in the standing static task, 10º in the static with trunk flexion and 29.3° in the dynamic task. Therefore, the use of inclinometer for posture evaluation and trunk movements should be done with caution, especially in the evaluation of dynamic tasks. In addition to the kinematic and electromyographic evaluation, another approach has been used. Recent studies have investigated the inflammatory response and its relationship to low back pain. Thus, the aim of Study 3 was to compare the levels of inflammatory biomarkers (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-10) in workers with low back pain, according to the characteristics of the symptoms, such as: functional impact, search for professional help, symptoms in the last 7 days and frequency of symptoms in the last year. Twenty-four men were evaluated. The Elisa method (Enzyme-Linked Immuno Sorbent Assay - Quantikine®HS, R & D Systems, Minneapolis, USA) was used to quantify the level of cytokines. However, no statistical difference was found. And in Study 4, the objective was to quantify, at two different times, levels of inflammatory biomarkers in experienced workers with low back pain, randomly divided into two groups: control (did not perform a load handling task) and experimental (handled ). The ELISA method was used to quantify the concentration of cytokines in twenty-five male workers (control=13; experimental= 12). The results showed that no differences were found in the concentration of biomarkers between the groups nor between the evaluations. In this way, it can be concluded that the task did not modify the concentration of biomarkers. Recommendations for future studies are to evaluate a task that generates greater overload, that is, with a longer duration, frequency or magnitude, considering the risks imposed to the population.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2017-02-21
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2018-04-09T17:46:53Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2018-04-09T17:46:53Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv BATISTÃO, Mariana Vieira. Avaliação cinemática, eletromiográfica e da concentração de biomarcadores inflamatórios em sujeitos com dor lombar : comparação de instrumentos de medida, avaliação de fatores que influenciam nos registros. 2017. Tese (Doutorado em Fisioterapia) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2017. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/9684.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/9684
identifier_str_mv BATISTÃO, Mariana Vieira. Avaliação cinemática, eletromiográfica e da concentração de biomarcadores inflamatórios em sujeitos com dor lombar : comparação de instrumentos de medida, avaliação de fatores que influenciam nos registros. 2017. Tese (Doutorado em Fisioterapia) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2017. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/9684.
url https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/9684
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv dcf669d1-e61c-43e2-9f4b-ca358eb5dd8b
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Câmpus São Carlos
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia - PPGFt
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFSCar
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Câmpus São Carlos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron:UFSCAR
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron_str UFSCAR
institution UFSCAR
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
collection Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/9684/3/license.txt
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/9684/4/BATIST%c3%83O_Mariana_2018.pdf
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/9684/5/BATIST%c3%83O_Mariana_2018.pdf.txt
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/9684/6/BATIST%c3%83O_Mariana_2018.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv ae0398b6f8b235e40ad82cba6c50031d
663696d9b6292ca93d0bc0538ba3c5e9
c3f596d890a925584d9e1d409fcb7101
54ec1f01d8e89fc425d9d6c94c1e5bb8
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1802136332894470144