Produção de etanol e hidrolisado protéico da casca de soja

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rojas, Mayerlenis Jiménez
Data de Publicação: 2012
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/4101
Resumo: Soybean hull is a lignocellulosic biomass that contains 38-51% of cellulose, which could be converted to ethanol. In addition, contains 9-14% of protein that can be hydrolyzed by endoproteases, releasing oligopeptides with nutritional applications. Although glycoside and peptide linkages can be hydrolyzed by acids, the cellulose molecules are more resistant than the protein and hemicellulose molecules. In this way, the acid treatment of the biomass would reduce its hemicellulose content, and the remnant cellulose into solid fraction would be more susceptible to hydrolytic enzymes. In this work, different routes of protein, hemicellulose, and lignin solubilization were evaluated, intending to obtain ethanol and soluble oligopeptides from the soybean hull. The protein was recovered as oligopeptides by hydrolysis of the lignocellulosic biomass using the commercial endoprotease Novo-Pro DR at 60oC, pH 9.0, 5 h, and different enzyme concentrations (1, 2, and 4%, m/m). A sequential hydrolysis using chymotrypsin and Novo-Pro DR, both at 1% (m/m) enzyme concentration, was also evaluated. The results showed that hydrolysis with 1% Novo-Pro DR allowed solubilization of 56.9% of protein from the soybean hulls. Nonetheless, at same temperature and pH, in absence of enzyme, was possible to solubilized 45.6% of the proteins. This solubilization is probably due to liberation of the physically aggregated units. The increase of endoprotease concentration from 1 to 2% increased the protein removal to 74%. However, the increase from 2 to 4% not increased significantly the protein solubilization. The use of chymotrypsin, an enzyme with high specificity and that work at mild conditions, allowed a solubilization of 44% protein. Nonetheless, the removal of lignin using chymotrypsin was higher than that using Novo-Pro DR. When in-nature soybean hull was hydrolyzed by acid or protease (1% Novo-Pro DR) followed by acid, the protein removal was around of 90%. The lignocellulosic biomass was hydrolyzed with 3% (v/v) H2SO4, solid:liquid ratio of 1:4, 120oC, and 20 min. 20 min. Carbohydrate analyses showed that the acid treatment allowed to hemicellulose removal around of 46.7% in the xylose form. The protein content of the soybean hull was almost totally solubilized during the acid hydrolysis, without significant loss of cellulose. On the contrary, large cellulose loss was observed during the acid hydrolysis of in-nature soybean hull. In this way, if it is intended to produce a protein hydrolysate containing controlled composition or ethanol from remnant solid fraction, is strongly recommended the previous enzymatic solubilization of the proteins. The chemical composition of the solid biomass after sequential hydrolyses with protease and acid showed cellulose content around of 49% for all samples. So, the biomass treated with 1% (m/m) Novo-Pro DR was saccharified with Acellerase 1500 at 50oC, pH 4.8, and enzyme/substrate ratio of 7 FPU/g of cellulose for 72 h. Under the same conditions, soybean hull in-nature, pretreated with acid, and pretreated with protease were submitted to cellulolytic hydrolyses. The cellulose-to-glucose conversion was around of 40% for the last two biomass. The increase of the enzymatic load to 20 FPU/g of cellulose allowed a cellulose conversion of 55% for biomass pretreated with 1% (m/m) Novo-Pro DR, followed by acid hydrolysis. The supplementation of the Acellarase 1500 with 120 IU of β-glucosidase and 1% (m/m) of pectinase not produced any increased in the cellulose conversion. The biomass was pretreated by organossolv method (50% ethanol, 170oC, and 1h) and saccharified with Acellerase 1500 under the same conditions described above. This procedure yielded a cellulose conversion of 52%, with less removal of hemicellulose. This result showed that lignin was causing greater steric hindrances to the enzymatic attack. The biomass pretreated with acid and with protease (1% Novo-Pro D) followed by acid yielded the same glucose-toethanol conversion, reaching an ethanol concentration around of 13 g/L.
id SCAR_c389ff95d559d05b4ee01d21ab7ea14d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufscar.br:ufscar/4101
network_acronym_str SCAR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
repository_id_str 4322
spelling Rojas, Mayerlenis JiménezGiordano, Raquel de Lima Camargohttp://genos.cnpq.br:12010/dwlattes/owa/prc_imp_cv_int?f_cod=K4780181P0http://lattes.cnpq.br/2812374302014326f0c4745f-27c5-4171-9086-8b62c4c29f3c2016-06-02T19:56:48Z2012-10-042016-06-02T19:56:48Z2012-08-10ROJAS, Mayerlenis Jiménez. Produção de etanol e hidrolisado protéico da casca de soja. 2012. 95 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Exatas e da Terra) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2012.https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/4101Soybean hull is a lignocellulosic biomass that contains 38-51% of cellulose, which could be converted to ethanol. In addition, contains 9-14% of protein that can be hydrolyzed by endoproteases, releasing oligopeptides with nutritional applications. Although glycoside and peptide linkages can be hydrolyzed by acids, the cellulose molecules are more resistant than the protein and hemicellulose molecules. In this way, the acid treatment of the biomass would reduce its hemicellulose content, and the remnant cellulose into solid fraction would be more susceptible to hydrolytic enzymes. In this work, different routes of protein, hemicellulose, and lignin solubilization were evaluated, intending to obtain ethanol and soluble oligopeptides from the soybean hull. The protein was recovered as oligopeptides by hydrolysis of the lignocellulosic biomass using the commercial endoprotease Novo-Pro DR at 60oC, pH 9.0, 5 h, and different enzyme concentrations (1, 2, and 4%, m/m). A sequential hydrolysis using chymotrypsin and Novo-Pro DR, both at 1% (m/m) enzyme concentration, was also evaluated. The results showed that hydrolysis with 1% Novo-Pro DR allowed solubilization of 56.9% of protein from the soybean hulls. Nonetheless, at same temperature and pH, in absence of enzyme, was possible to solubilized 45.6% of the proteins. This solubilization is probably due to liberation of the physically aggregated units. The increase of endoprotease concentration from 1 to 2% increased the protein removal to 74%. However, the increase from 2 to 4% not increased significantly the protein solubilization. The use of chymotrypsin, an enzyme with high specificity and that work at mild conditions, allowed a solubilization of 44% protein. Nonetheless, the removal of lignin using chymotrypsin was higher than that using Novo-Pro DR. When in-nature soybean hull was hydrolyzed by acid or protease (1% Novo-Pro DR) followed by acid, the protein removal was around of 90%. The lignocellulosic biomass was hydrolyzed with 3% (v/v) H2SO4, solid:liquid ratio of 1:4, 120oC, and 20 min. 20 min. Carbohydrate analyses showed that the acid treatment allowed to hemicellulose removal around of 46.7% in the xylose form. The protein content of the soybean hull was almost totally solubilized during the acid hydrolysis, without significant loss of cellulose. On the contrary, large cellulose loss was observed during the acid hydrolysis of in-nature soybean hull. In this way, if it is intended to produce a protein hydrolysate containing controlled composition or ethanol from remnant solid fraction, is strongly recommended the previous enzymatic solubilization of the proteins. The chemical composition of the solid biomass after sequential hydrolyses with protease and acid showed cellulose content around of 49% for all samples. So, the biomass treated with 1% (m/m) Novo-Pro DR was saccharified with Acellerase 1500 at 50oC, pH 4.8, and enzyme/substrate ratio of 7 FPU/g of cellulose for 72 h. Under the same conditions, soybean hull in-nature, pretreated with acid, and pretreated with protease were submitted to cellulolytic hydrolyses. The cellulose-to-glucose conversion was around of 40% for the last two biomass. The increase of the enzymatic load to 20 FPU/g of cellulose allowed a cellulose conversion of 55% for biomass pretreated with 1% (m/m) Novo-Pro DR, followed by acid hydrolysis. The supplementation of the Acellarase 1500 with 120 IU of β-glucosidase and 1% (m/m) of pectinase not produced any increased in the cellulose conversion. The biomass was pretreated by organossolv method (50% ethanol, 170oC, and 1h) and saccharified with Acellerase 1500 under the same conditions described above. This procedure yielded a cellulose conversion of 52%, with less removal of hemicellulose. This result showed that lignin was causing greater steric hindrances to the enzymatic attack. The biomass pretreated with acid and with protease (1% Novo-Pro D) followed by acid yielded the same glucose-toethanol conversion, reaching an ethanol concentration around of 13 g/L.A casca de soja, sendo um residuo lignocelulosico, contem celulose (38-51%) que pode ser convertida a etanol. Alem disso, contem 9-14% de proteinas, que uma vez hidrolisadas por endoproteases podem liberar de forma especifica oligopeptideos com aplicacoes nutricionais. Ligacoes glicosidicas e peptidicas podem ser rompidas por hidrolise acida, sendo hemicelulose mais susceptivel a que celulose. O ataque acido ao material permitiria assim reduzir o conteudo de hemicelulose da biomassa, tornando a celulose que permanece na fracao solida insoluvel mais acessivel as enzimas hidroliticas. Neste trabalho, foram estudadas diferentes rotas de solubilizacao de proteinas, hemicelulose lignina presentes na casca de soja, visando obtencao de etanol da fracao solida e oligopeptideos na fracao liquida. A recuperacao de proteinas na forma de peptideos foi feita hidrolisando-se a biomassa inicialmente com extrato comercial de endoprotease Novo-ProD, a 60oC, pH 9, por 5h, nas concentracoes enzimaticas de 1, 2 e 4% (m/m). Foi tambem testada, na sequencia da hidrolise com Novo-ProD1%, nova hidrolise com quimotripsina 1% (m/m). Os resultados mostraram que a hidrolise proteolitica com 1% de Novo-ProDpermitiu remocao de 56,9% da proteina presente na casca. Contudo, foi tambem verificado que e possivel remover 45,6% das proteinas nas mesmas condicoes, na ausencia de enzima, a pH9,0, possivelmente devido a liberacao de unidades agregadas apenas fisicamente. Um aumento da concentracao de endoproteases de 1% para 2% elevou a remocao para 74% de proteinas, nao se observando aumento significativo na extracao de proteinas aumentandose de 2 para 4%.. Com uso da enzima mais especifica, a quimotripsina, que opera em condicoes mais brandas, foi possivel remover 44% das proteinas, com uma maior remocao de lignina do material, comparando-se com Novo-ProD. Hidrolise acida de casca in natura ou sequencial a hidrolise com Novo-ProD1% sequencial permitiu atingir uma remocao total de aproximadamente 90%de proteinas O material solido remanescente e a casca in natura foram submetidos a hidrolise acida com H2SO4 3% (v/v), razao 1:4 (solido/liquido), 120oC, 20 min. Em todos os casos, as analises de carboidratos mostraram que foi possivel remover aproximadamente 46,7% de hemicelulose, maior parte na forma de xilose. Durante o tratamento acido ocorreu a remocao de quase toda a proteina da casca de soja, sem perda expressiva de celulose, o que se observou ocorrer na hidrolise acida da casca in natura. Assim, seja para obter-se um hidrolisado proteico de composicao controlada, seja para producao de etanol da fracao solida remanescente e recomendavel a remocao enzimatica previa de proteinas. A composicao quimica do material solido apos hidrolises proteolitica e acida sequenciais mostrou teores de celulose similares para todas as amostras (aproximadamente 49 %). Assim, o solido pre-tratado com 1% de Novo Pro-D, foi utilizado para a obtencao dos acucares fermentesciveis usando o complexo enzimatico Acellerase 1500 a 50oC, pH 4,8 e razao enzima/substrato de 7 FPU/g celulose durante 72 h. Nestas mesmas condicoes foram hidrolisadas as amostras de casca in natura pre-tratada com acido, a casca in natura e a casca apos hidrolise proteolitica. A conversao enzimatica de celulose em glicose foi em torno de 40%, tanto para as amostras pre-tratadas com Novo- ProD como para a amostra submetida so a hidrolise acida. Com um aumento de carga enzimatica para 20 FPU/g celulose foi possivel atingir uma conversao de 55% para amostras pre-tratadas com 1% de Novo-ProDe hidrolise acida sequenciais. A suplementacao do complexo enzimatico Acellerase 1500 com 120 UI de β-glicosidase e 1%(m/m) de pectinase nao produziu aumento na conversao enzimatica. A hidrolise da celulose proveniente de pre-tratado por organossolve usando etanol 50% a 170oC por 1 hora resultou em 52% de conversao com uma menor remocao de hemicelulose mostrando que a lignina estava causando o maior impedimento para o ataque enzimatico. A conversao de glicose em etanol foi similar para as amostras pre-tratadas por hidrolise acida e com as hidrolises proteoliticas (1% Novo-ProD) e acidas sequenciais chegando a uma concentracao aproximada de 13 g/L.Agência Nacional de Petróleoapplication/pdfporUniversidade Federal de São CarlosPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Química - PPGEQUFSCarBREngenharia bioquímicaHidrólise de celuloseHidrólise enzimáticaDistribuição de tamanho de peptídeosCasca de sojaHidrolisados proteicosEtanol lignocelulosicoSoybean hullProtein hydrolysateLignocellulosic ethanolENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA QUIMICAProdução de etanol e hidrolisado protéico da casca de sojainfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis-1-187b60e6c-591e-4a38-94f3-e75e2beebea0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCARinstname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)instacron:UFSCARORIGINAL4562.pdfapplication/pdf2986258https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/4101/1/4562.pdf5fe70b396cc58a5895fb6425b01994bcMD51TEXT4562.pdf.txt4562.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain0https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/4101/2/4562.pdf.txtd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eMD52THUMBNAIL4562.pdf.jpg4562.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg8802https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/4101/3/4562.pdf.jpg08669e931d3c087ea2496c259e5ca5b9MD53ufscar/41012023-09-18 18:31:33.56oai:repositorio.ufscar.br:ufscar/4101Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufscar.br/oai/requestopendoar:43222023-09-18T18:31:33Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Produção de etanol e hidrolisado protéico da casca de soja
title Produção de etanol e hidrolisado protéico da casca de soja
spellingShingle Produção de etanol e hidrolisado protéico da casca de soja
Rojas, Mayerlenis Jiménez
Engenharia bioquímica
Hidrólise de celulose
Hidrólise enzimática
Distribuição de tamanho de peptídeos
Casca de soja
Hidrolisados proteicos
Etanol lignocelulosico
Soybean hull
Protein hydrolysate
Lignocellulosic ethanol
ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA QUIMICA
title_short Produção de etanol e hidrolisado protéico da casca de soja
title_full Produção de etanol e hidrolisado protéico da casca de soja
title_fullStr Produção de etanol e hidrolisado protéico da casca de soja
title_full_unstemmed Produção de etanol e hidrolisado protéico da casca de soja
title_sort Produção de etanol e hidrolisado protéico da casca de soja
author Rojas, Mayerlenis Jiménez
author_facet Rojas, Mayerlenis Jiménez
author_role author
dc.contributor.authorlattes.por.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/2812374302014326
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rojas, Mayerlenis Jiménez
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Giordano, Raquel de Lima Camargo
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://genos.cnpq.br:12010/dwlattes/owa/prc_imp_cv_int?f_cod=K4780181P0
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv f0c4745f-27c5-4171-9086-8b62c4c29f3c
contributor_str_mv Giordano, Raquel de Lima Camargo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Engenharia bioquímica
Hidrólise de celulose
Hidrólise enzimática
Distribuição de tamanho de peptídeos
Casca de soja
Hidrolisados proteicos
Etanol lignocelulosico
topic Engenharia bioquímica
Hidrólise de celulose
Hidrólise enzimática
Distribuição de tamanho de peptídeos
Casca de soja
Hidrolisados proteicos
Etanol lignocelulosico
Soybean hull
Protein hydrolysate
Lignocellulosic ethanol
ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA QUIMICA
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Soybean hull
Protein hydrolysate
Lignocellulosic ethanol
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA QUIMICA
description Soybean hull is a lignocellulosic biomass that contains 38-51% of cellulose, which could be converted to ethanol. In addition, contains 9-14% of protein that can be hydrolyzed by endoproteases, releasing oligopeptides with nutritional applications. Although glycoside and peptide linkages can be hydrolyzed by acids, the cellulose molecules are more resistant than the protein and hemicellulose molecules. In this way, the acid treatment of the biomass would reduce its hemicellulose content, and the remnant cellulose into solid fraction would be more susceptible to hydrolytic enzymes. In this work, different routes of protein, hemicellulose, and lignin solubilization were evaluated, intending to obtain ethanol and soluble oligopeptides from the soybean hull. The protein was recovered as oligopeptides by hydrolysis of the lignocellulosic biomass using the commercial endoprotease Novo-Pro DR at 60oC, pH 9.0, 5 h, and different enzyme concentrations (1, 2, and 4%, m/m). A sequential hydrolysis using chymotrypsin and Novo-Pro DR, both at 1% (m/m) enzyme concentration, was also evaluated. The results showed that hydrolysis with 1% Novo-Pro DR allowed solubilization of 56.9% of protein from the soybean hulls. Nonetheless, at same temperature and pH, in absence of enzyme, was possible to solubilized 45.6% of the proteins. This solubilization is probably due to liberation of the physically aggregated units. The increase of endoprotease concentration from 1 to 2% increased the protein removal to 74%. However, the increase from 2 to 4% not increased significantly the protein solubilization. The use of chymotrypsin, an enzyme with high specificity and that work at mild conditions, allowed a solubilization of 44% protein. Nonetheless, the removal of lignin using chymotrypsin was higher than that using Novo-Pro DR. When in-nature soybean hull was hydrolyzed by acid or protease (1% Novo-Pro DR) followed by acid, the protein removal was around of 90%. The lignocellulosic biomass was hydrolyzed with 3% (v/v) H2SO4, solid:liquid ratio of 1:4, 120oC, and 20 min. 20 min. Carbohydrate analyses showed that the acid treatment allowed to hemicellulose removal around of 46.7% in the xylose form. The protein content of the soybean hull was almost totally solubilized during the acid hydrolysis, without significant loss of cellulose. On the contrary, large cellulose loss was observed during the acid hydrolysis of in-nature soybean hull. In this way, if it is intended to produce a protein hydrolysate containing controlled composition or ethanol from remnant solid fraction, is strongly recommended the previous enzymatic solubilization of the proteins. The chemical composition of the solid biomass after sequential hydrolyses with protease and acid showed cellulose content around of 49% for all samples. So, the biomass treated with 1% (m/m) Novo-Pro DR was saccharified with Acellerase 1500 at 50oC, pH 4.8, and enzyme/substrate ratio of 7 FPU/g of cellulose for 72 h. Under the same conditions, soybean hull in-nature, pretreated with acid, and pretreated with protease were submitted to cellulolytic hydrolyses. The cellulose-to-glucose conversion was around of 40% for the last two biomass. The increase of the enzymatic load to 20 FPU/g of cellulose allowed a cellulose conversion of 55% for biomass pretreated with 1% (m/m) Novo-Pro DR, followed by acid hydrolysis. The supplementation of the Acellarase 1500 with 120 IU of β-glucosidase and 1% (m/m) of pectinase not produced any increased in the cellulose conversion. The biomass was pretreated by organossolv method (50% ethanol, 170oC, and 1h) and saccharified with Acellerase 1500 under the same conditions described above. This procedure yielded a cellulose conversion of 52%, with less removal of hemicellulose. This result showed that lignin was causing greater steric hindrances to the enzymatic attack. The biomass pretreated with acid and with protease (1% Novo-Pro D) followed by acid yielded the same glucose-toethanol conversion, reaching an ethanol concentration around of 13 g/L.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2012-10-04
2016-06-02T19:56:48Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2012-08-10
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2016-06-02T19:56:48Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv ROJAS, Mayerlenis Jiménez. Produção de etanol e hidrolisado protéico da casca de soja. 2012. 95 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Exatas e da Terra) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2012.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/4101
identifier_str_mv ROJAS, Mayerlenis Jiménez. Produção de etanol e hidrolisado protéico da casca de soja. 2012. 95 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Exatas e da Terra) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2012.
url https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/4101
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv -1
-1
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv 87b60e6c-591e-4a38-94f3-e75e2beebea0
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Química - PPGEQ
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFSCar
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv BR
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron:UFSCAR
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron_str UFSCAR
institution UFSCAR
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
collection Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/4101/1/4562.pdf
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/4101/2/4562.pdf.txt
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/4101/3/4562.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 5fe70b396cc58a5895fb6425b01994bc
d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e
08669e931d3c087ea2496c259e5ca5b9
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1802136272849862656