O focus imaginarius : engano e conhecimento na crítica da razão pura
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR |
Texto Completo: | https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/8286 |
Resumo: | Starting from Kant’s statement that there is an inherent transcendental illusion in the process of knowledge, we ask: how can an illusion have a positive role? It is possible to identify a paradox, that can be, considering Kant’s statement itself, overcome by a critique of reason and by a careful reading to the positive role of the transcendental idea to the empirical knowledge. By criticizing traditional metaphysics, in the same time that he shows how illusion can stop deceiving, even imperative, Kant guarantees a role to reason on knowledge sphere, engendering the way to nature’s unity desired by reason. Kant (KrV, B 673) states that focus imaginarius is an inseparable aspect of the transcendental idea and of its empirical knowledge regulator role. Considering the existence of a transcendental idea as a figurative unity projected as focus imaginarius, our goal is to show that the reason paradox can be overcome form focus imaginarius critical metaphor, as an entity of being, featured by Kant as an analogy to the transcendental idea, that takes part of knowledge game as reason’s deprecated unity, bringing forward the very reasons objects. As this investigations exemplary moment, is seen, through reason’s antinomies example, that reasons demands a systematic unity of all knowledge, by having the transcendental idea as this unity, featured from a projection: the focus imaginarius. |
id |
SCAR_dad9e5d4b57e781ff3a15a4ce77a1421 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufscar.br:ufscar/8286 |
network_acronym_str |
SCAR |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR |
repository_id_str |
4322 |
spelling |
Girotti, Marcio TadeuSantos, Paulo Roberto Licht doshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1681044854219924http://lattes.cnpq.br/4385124589465909092e098c-18e7-47e4-98ed-151cc588cf542016-11-08T18:46:30Z2016-11-08T18:46:30Z2016-08-12GIROTTI, Marcio Tadeu. O focus imaginarius : engano e conhecimento na crítica da razão pura. 2016. Tese (Doutorado em Filosofia) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2016. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/8286.https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/8286Starting from Kant’s statement that there is an inherent transcendental illusion in the process of knowledge, we ask: how can an illusion have a positive role? It is possible to identify a paradox, that can be, considering Kant’s statement itself, overcome by a critique of reason and by a careful reading to the positive role of the transcendental idea to the empirical knowledge. By criticizing traditional metaphysics, in the same time that he shows how illusion can stop deceiving, even imperative, Kant guarantees a role to reason on knowledge sphere, engendering the way to nature’s unity desired by reason. Kant (KrV, B 673) states that focus imaginarius is an inseparable aspect of the transcendental idea and of its empirical knowledge regulator role. Considering the existence of a transcendental idea as a figurative unity projected as focus imaginarius, our goal is to show that the reason paradox can be overcome form focus imaginarius critical metaphor, as an entity of being, featured by Kant as an analogy to the transcendental idea, that takes part of knowledge game as reason’s deprecated unity, bringing forward the very reasons objects. As this investigations exemplary moment, is seen, through reason’s antinomies example, that reasons demands a systematic unity of all knowledge, by having the transcendental idea as this unity, featured from a projection: the focus imaginarius.Partindo da afirmação kantiana de que há uma ilusão transcendental inerente ao processo de conhecimento, perguntamos: como uma ilusão pode possuir um papel positivo? Aqui há um paradoxo, que pode ser, no próprio argumento kantiano, superado por uma crítica da razão e por uma leitura atenta ao papel positivo da ideia transcendental no conhecimento empírico. Ao fazer a crítica à metafísica tradicional, ao mesmo tempo em que mostra como a ilusão pode deixar de enganar, ainda que indissipável, Kant garante um papel à razão no âmbito do conhecimento, engendrando o caminho para a unidade da natureza, almejada pela razão. Kant (KrV, B 673) afirma que o focus imaginarius é aspecto indissociável da ideia transcendental e de seu papel regulador do conhecimento empírico. Considerando que há uma ideia transcendental como unidade projetada figurativamente como focus imaginarius, nosso objetivo é mostrar que o paradoxo da razão pode ser superado a partir da metáfora crítica do focus imaginarius, como um ente de razão, caracterizado por Kant como uma analogia à ideia transcendental, que participa do jogo do conhecimento como a unidade pretendida pela razão, apresentando objetos da própria razão. Como momento exemplar desta investigação, vê-se, pelo exemplo das antinomias da razão, que a razão exige uma unidade sistemática de todo conhecimento, tendo a ideia transcendental como esta unidade, caracterizada a partir de uma projeção: o focus imaginarius.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)porUniversidade Federal de São CarlosCâmpus São CarlosPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia - PPGFilUFSCarIlusão transcendentalParadoxoRazãoConhecimentoFocus imaginariusTranscendental illusionParadoxReasonKnowledgeFocus imaginariusCIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIAO focus imaginarius : engano e conhecimento na crítica da razão purainfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisOnline6006005877cd14-b1a1-4dfc-a43c-c9e98c251734info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCARinstname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)instacron:UFSCARORIGINALTeseMTG.pdfTeseMTG.pdfapplication/pdf1104947https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/8286/1/TeseMTG.pdf5553dfe80ed25e72e25d376bdbd405b3MD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81957https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/8286/2/license.txtae0398b6f8b235e40ad82cba6c50031dMD52TEXTTeseMTG.pdf.txtTeseMTG.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain397602https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/8286/3/TeseMTG.pdf.txt35f3c9e9f678b59dbee1984bcb06978fMD53THUMBNAILTeseMTG.pdf.jpgTeseMTG.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg5893https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/8286/4/TeseMTG.pdf.jpg4fc7e920d305766ae8a8c9ed0364ac72MD54ufscar/82862023-09-18 18:31:01.094oai:repositorio.ufscar.br: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Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufscar.br/oai/requestopendoar:43222023-09-18T18:31:01Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
O focus imaginarius : engano e conhecimento na crítica da razão pura |
title |
O focus imaginarius : engano e conhecimento na crítica da razão pura |
spellingShingle |
O focus imaginarius : engano e conhecimento na crítica da razão pura Girotti, Marcio Tadeu Ilusão transcendental Paradoxo Razão Conhecimento Focus imaginarius Transcendental illusion Paradox Reason Knowledge Focus imaginarius CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
title_short |
O focus imaginarius : engano e conhecimento na crítica da razão pura |
title_full |
O focus imaginarius : engano e conhecimento na crítica da razão pura |
title_fullStr |
O focus imaginarius : engano e conhecimento na crítica da razão pura |
title_full_unstemmed |
O focus imaginarius : engano e conhecimento na crítica da razão pura |
title_sort |
O focus imaginarius : engano e conhecimento na crítica da razão pura |
author |
Girotti, Marcio Tadeu |
author_facet |
Girotti, Marcio Tadeu |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.authorlattes.por.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/4385124589465909 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Girotti, Marcio Tadeu |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Santos, Paulo Roberto Licht dos |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/1681044854219924 |
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv |
092e098c-18e7-47e4-98ed-151cc588cf54 |
contributor_str_mv |
Santos, Paulo Roberto Licht dos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ilusão transcendental Paradoxo Razão Conhecimento Focus imaginarius |
topic |
Ilusão transcendental Paradoxo Razão Conhecimento Focus imaginarius Transcendental illusion Paradox Reason Knowledge Focus imaginarius CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Transcendental illusion Paradox Reason Knowledge Focus imaginarius |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
description |
Starting from Kant’s statement that there is an inherent transcendental illusion in the process of knowledge, we ask: how can an illusion have a positive role? It is possible to identify a paradox, that can be, considering Kant’s statement itself, overcome by a critique of reason and by a careful reading to the positive role of the transcendental idea to the empirical knowledge. By criticizing traditional metaphysics, in the same time that he shows how illusion can stop deceiving, even imperative, Kant guarantees a role to reason on knowledge sphere, engendering the way to nature’s unity desired by reason. Kant (KrV, B 673) states that focus imaginarius is an inseparable aspect of the transcendental idea and of its empirical knowledge regulator role. Considering the existence of a transcendental idea as a figurative unity projected as focus imaginarius, our goal is to show that the reason paradox can be overcome form focus imaginarius critical metaphor, as an entity of being, featured by Kant as an analogy to the transcendental idea, that takes part of knowledge game as reason’s deprecated unity, bringing forward the very reasons objects. As this investigations exemplary moment, is seen, through reason’s antinomies example, that reasons demands a systematic unity of all knowledge, by having the transcendental idea as this unity, featured from a projection: the focus imaginarius. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2016-11-08T18:46:30Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2016-11-08T18:46:30Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2016-08-12 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
GIROTTI, Marcio Tadeu. O focus imaginarius : engano e conhecimento na crítica da razão pura. 2016. Tese (Doutorado em Filosofia) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2016. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/8286. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/8286 |
identifier_str_mv |
GIROTTI, Marcio Tadeu. O focus imaginarius : engano e conhecimento na crítica da razão pura. 2016. Tese (Doutorado em Filosofia) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2016. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/8286. |
url |
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/8286 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
600 600 |
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv |
5877cd14-b1a1-4dfc-a43c-c9e98c251734 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos Câmpus São Carlos |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia - PPGFil |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFSCar |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos Câmpus São Carlos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) instacron:UFSCAR |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) |
instacron_str |
UFSCAR |
institution |
UFSCAR |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/8286/1/TeseMTG.pdf https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/8286/2/license.txt https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/8286/3/TeseMTG.pdf.txt https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/8286/4/TeseMTG.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
5553dfe80ed25e72e25d376bdbd405b3 ae0398b6f8b235e40ad82cba6c50031d 35f3c9e9f678b59dbee1984bcb06978f 4fc7e920d305766ae8a8c9ed0364ac72 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1813715568885235712 |