Trends in scientific publishing and good practices in research: what do nurse-researcher know?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | preprint |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | SciELO Preprints |
Texto Completo: | https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/1781 |
Resumo: | Objective: to verify the knowledge of nurse-researchers on trends in scientific publishing and good research practices, as well as to compare the results according to the degree of training. Method: descriptive study conducted through an online survey with 197 nurses with master's and/or doctorate degrees from all Brazilian regions. To raise knowledge, a validated, self-administered and anonymous questionnaire was used. Descriptive and inferential analyzes were performed on the researchers' score (Mann-Whitney test). Results: Among the 18 specific questions, the average of correct answers was 7.1; being 6.4 for masters and 7.4 for doctors. There was a statistically significant difference in the mean of correct answers between masters and doctors (p=0.025), and between productivity scholarship holders and non-scholarship holders (p=0.021), according to means difference tests. Questions about predatory editorial practices were those in which researchers performed worse. Conclusion: We identified a low level of knowledge among the participants, regardless of their level of education (master's or doctorate). The expansion of dissemination and articulation strategies for this knowledge is necessary for the production of quality scientific knowledge in the area. |
id |
SCI-1_01107aa1288e3b7b49a79a22138327e0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/1781 |
network_acronym_str |
SCI-1 |
network_name_str |
SciELO Preprints |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Trends in scientific publishing and good practices in research: what do nurse-researcher know?Boas práticas em pesquisa e editoração científica: o que conhecem os pesquisadores-enfermeiros do Brasil?EnfermagemPesquisadoresPesquisaEditoraçãoComunicação AcadêmicaConhecimentoNursingResearch PersonnelResearchPublishingScholarly CommunicationKnowledgeObjective: to verify the knowledge of nurse-researchers on trends in scientific publishing and good research practices, as well as to compare the results according to the degree of training. Method: descriptive study conducted through an online survey with 197 nurses with master's and/or doctorate degrees from all Brazilian regions. To raise knowledge, a validated, self-administered and anonymous questionnaire was used. Descriptive and inferential analyzes were performed on the researchers' score (Mann-Whitney test). Results: Among the 18 specific questions, the average of correct answers was 7.1; being 6.4 for masters and 7.4 for doctors. There was a statistically significant difference in the mean of correct answers between masters and doctors (p=0.025), and between productivity scholarship holders and non-scholarship holders (p=0.021), according to means difference tests. Questions about predatory editorial practices were those in which researchers performed worse. Conclusion: We identified a low level of knowledge among the participants, regardless of their level of education (master's or doctorate). The expansion of dissemination and articulation strategies for this knowledge is necessary for the production of quality scientific knowledge in the area.Objetivo: verificar o conhecimento de enfermeiros-pesquisadores em temas relacionados a boas práticas em pesquisa e editoração científica e comparar os resultados de acordo com o grau de formação. Método: estudo descritivo realizado por inquérito on-line com 197 enfermeiros mestres ou doutores de todas as regiões brasileiras. Para levantar o conhecimento utilizou-se um questionário validado, autoaplicável e anônimo. Sobre o escore dos pesquisadores realizaram-se análises descritivas e inferenciais (Teste de Mann-Whitney). Resultados: Entre as 18 questões específicas, a média de acertos foi de 7,1; sendo de 6,4 para mestres e 7,4 para doutores. Houve diferença estatisticamente significativa na média de acertos entre mestres e doutores (p=0,025), e entre bolsistas e não-bolsistas de produtividade (p=0,021), segundo testes de diferença de médias. As questões sobre práticas editoriais predatórias foram aquelas em que os pesquisadores apresentaram os piores escores. Conclusão: Identificamos baixo conhecimento dos participantes independente do grau de formação (mestrado ou doutorado). A ampliação das estratégias de divulgação e articulação desse conhecimento são necessárias para a produção de conhecimento científico de qualidade na área.SciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2021-08-23info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/178110.1590/SciELOPreprints.1781enghttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/1781/4987Copyright (c) 2021 Alvaro Francisco de Sousa, Maria Helena Palucci Marziale, Evelin Capellari Cárnio, Carla Aparecida Arena Ventura, Sara Soares Santos, Isabel Amélia Costa Mendeshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Sousa, Alvaro Francisco deMarziale, Maria Helena PalucciCárnio, Evelin CapellariVentura, Carla Aparecida ArenaSantos, Sara SoaresMendes, Isabel Amélia Costareponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:SciELOinstacron:SCI2021-01-27T19:28:59Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/1781Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2021-01-27T19:28:59SciELO Preprints - SciELOfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Trends in scientific publishing and good practices in research: what do nurse-researcher know? Boas práticas em pesquisa e editoração científica: o que conhecem os pesquisadores-enfermeiros do Brasil? |
title |
Trends in scientific publishing and good practices in research: what do nurse-researcher know? |
spellingShingle |
Trends in scientific publishing and good practices in research: what do nurse-researcher know? de Sousa, Alvaro Francisco de Enfermagem Pesquisadores Pesquisa Editoração Comunicação Acadêmica Conhecimento Nursing Research Personnel Research Publishing Scholarly Communication Knowledge |
title_short |
Trends in scientific publishing and good practices in research: what do nurse-researcher know? |
title_full |
Trends in scientific publishing and good practices in research: what do nurse-researcher know? |
title_fullStr |
Trends in scientific publishing and good practices in research: what do nurse-researcher know? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Trends in scientific publishing and good practices in research: what do nurse-researcher know? |
title_sort |
Trends in scientific publishing and good practices in research: what do nurse-researcher know? |
author |
de Sousa, Alvaro Francisco de |
author_facet |
de Sousa, Alvaro Francisco de Marziale, Maria Helena Palucci Cárnio, Evelin Capellari Ventura, Carla Aparecida Arena Santos, Sara Soares Mendes, Isabel Amélia Costa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Marziale, Maria Helena Palucci Cárnio, Evelin Capellari Ventura, Carla Aparecida Arena Santos, Sara Soares Mendes, Isabel Amélia Costa |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
de Sousa, Alvaro Francisco de Marziale, Maria Helena Palucci Cárnio, Evelin Capellari Ventura, Carla Aparecida Arena Santos, Sara Soares Mendes, Isabel Amélia Costa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Enfermagem Pesquisadores Pesquisa Editoração Comunicação Acadêmica Conhecimento Nursing Research Personnel Research Publishing Scholarly Communication Knowledge |
topic |
Enfermagem Pesquisadores Pesquisa Editoração Comunicação Acadêmica Conhecimento Nursing Research Personnel Research Publishing Scholarly Communication Knowledge |
description |
Objective: to verify the knowledge of nurse-researchers on trends in scientific publishing and good research practices, as well as to compare the results according to the degree of training. Method: descriptive study conducted through an online survey with 197 nurses with master's and/or doctorate degrees from all Brazilian regions. To raise knowledge, a validated, self-administered and anonymous questionnaire was used. Descriptive and inferential analyzes were performed on the researchers' score (Mann-Whitney test). Results: Among the 18 specific questions, the average of correct answers was 7.1; being 6.4 for masters and 7.4 for doctors. There was a statistically significant difference in the mean of correct answers between masters and doctors (p=0.025), and between productivity scholarship holders and non-scholarship holders (p=0.021), according to means difference tests. Questions about predatory editorial practices were those in which researchers performed worse. Conclusion: We identified a low level of knowledge among the participants, regardless of their level of education (master's or doctorate). The expansion of dissemination and articulation strategies for this knowledge is necessary for the production of quality scientific knowledge in the area. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
preprint |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/1781 10.1590/SciELOPreprints.1781 |
url |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/1781 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/SciELOPreprints.1781 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/1781/4987 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:SciELO Preprints instname:SciELO instacron:SCI |
instname_str |
SciELO |
instacron_str |
SCI |
institution |
SCI |
reponame_str |
SciELO Preprints |
collection |
SciELO Preprints |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints - SciELO |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
scielo.submission@scielo.org |
_version_ |
1797047821984071680 |