Validity Evidences of the Social Dominance Orientation Scale in the Brazilian Context

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Vilanova, Felipe
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Soares, Damião, Duarte, Michael de Quadros, Costa, Angelo Brandelli
Tipo de documento: preprint
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: SciELO Preprints
Texto Completo: https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/623
Resumo: This study aims to cross-culturally adapt the SDO7 for the Brazilian context, propose a reduced version of the instrument, assess its factor structure and validity evidences. Participants were 1,056 individuals across four different samples collected online. Confirmatory factor analyses indicated the best fit indices for the original four-factor structure, two substantial (Dominance x Anti-Egalitarianism) and two methodological (pro-trait x counter-trait). The substantial factors had Cronbach's alpha values above 0.70 in all samples. Furthermore, both the long and reduced versions of the scale were highly correlated with political self-categorization. Hence, the instrument in its long and reduced versions displayed good validity and reliability evidences for the Brazilian context and can be used in future studies.
id SCI-1_31549c16d2a2592cbfe66316c54368c6
oai_identifier_str oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/623
network_acronym_str SCI-1
network_name_str SciELO Preprints
repository_id_str
spelling Validity Evidences of the Social Dominance Orientation Scale in the Brazilian ContextEvidencias de validez de Escala de Orientación a Dominancia Social en BrasilEvidências de Validade da Escala de Orientação à Dominância Social no Brasilsdodominancia socialigualitarismoadaptacaosdosocial dominanceegalitarianismadaptationsdodominancia socialigualitarismoadaptacionThis study aims to cross-culturally adapt the SDO7 for the Brazilian context, propose a reduced version of the instrument, assess its factor structure and validity evidences. Participants were 1,056 individuals across four different samples collected online. Confirmatory factor analyses indicated the best fit indices for the original four-factor structure, two substantial (Dominance x Anti-Egalitarianism) and two methodological (pro-trait x counter-trait). The substantial factors had Cronbach's alpha values above 0.70 in all samples. Furthermore, both the long and reduced versions of the scale were highly correlated with political self-categorization. Hence, the instrument in its long and reduced versions displayed good validity and reliability evidences for the Brazilian context and can be used in future studies.Este estudio tiene como objetivo adaptar transculturalmente la escala SDO7 para el contexto brasileño, proponer una versión reducida del instrumento, evaluar su estructura factorial y evidencias de validez. Los participantes fueron 1.056 individuos en cuatro muestras diferentes de recolección de datos online. Análisis factoriales confirmatorios indicaron los mejores índices de ajuste para la estructura original de cuatro factores, dos de los cuales son sustanciales (Dominio x Anti-Igualitarismo) y dos son metodológicos (pro-rasgo x contra-rasgo). Los factores sustanciales, llamados "Dominancia social" y "Anti-Igualitarismo", han tenido alfa de Cronbach por encima de 0,70 en todas las muestras. Ambas versiones de la escala presentaron buenas evidencias de validez con altas correlaciones entre los puntajes de los factores sustanciales y la categorización política. Por lo tanto, el instrumento, en sus versiones largas y reducidas, mostró buenas evidencias de validez y confiabilidad para el contexto brasileño y puede usarse en futuros estudios.O presente estudo buscou adaptar a SDO7 para o contexto nacional, propor uma versão reduzida do instrumento, avaliar sua estrutura fatorial e evidências de validade entre grupos. Para tanto, realizou-se coleta de dados online em que participaram 1056 indivíduos de quatro diferentes amostras. Análises fatoriais confirmatórias indicaram os melhores índices de ajuste para a estrutura original de quatro fatores, sendo dois substanciais (Dominância e Anti-Igualitarismo) e dois de método (pró-traço e contra-traço). Os fatores substanciais, denominados “Dominância Social” e “Anti-Igualitarismo”, apresentaram alfa de Cronbach superior a 0,70 em todas as amostras. As versões longa e reduzida da escala apresentaram bons índices de validade de critério entre grupos com correlações altas entre os escores fatoriais dos fatores substanciais e a autocategorização política. Portanto, o instrumento apresentou evidências de validade e fidedignidade para o contexto nacional e podem ser utilizados em estudos futuros.SciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2020-05-28info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/62310.1590/SciELOPreprints.623porhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/623/801Copyright (c) 2020 Felipe Vilanova, Damião Soares, Michael de Quadros Duarte, Angelo Brandelli Costahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVilanova, FelipeSoares, DamiãoDuarte, Michael de QuadrosCosta, Angelo Brandellireponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:SciELOinstacron:SCI2020-05-28T13:30:38Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/623Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2020-05-28T13:30:38SciELO Preprints - SciELOfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Validity Evidences of the Social Dominance Orientation Scale in the Brazilian Context
Evidencias de validez de Escala de Orientación a Dominancia Social en Brasil
Evidências de Validade da Escala de Orientação à Dominância Social no Brasil
title Validity Evidences of the Social Dominance Orientation Scale in the Brazilian Context
spellingShingle Validity Evidences of the Social Dominance Orientation Scale in the Brazilian Context
Vilanova, Felipe
sdo
dominancia social
igualitarismo
adaptacao
sdo
social dominance
egalitarianism
adaptation
sdo
dominancia social
igualitarismo
adaptacion
title_short Validity Evidences of the Social Dominance Orientation Scale in the Brazilian Context
title_full Validity Evidences of the Social Dominance Orientation Scale in the Brazilian Context
title_fullStr Validity Evidences of the Social Dominance Orientation Scale in the Brazilian Context
title_full_unstemmed Validity Evidences of the Social Dominance Orientation Scale in the Brazilian Context
title_sort Validity Evidences of the Social Dominance Orientation Scale in the Brazilian Context
author Vilanova, Felipe
author_facet Vilanova, Felipe
Soares, Damião
Duarte, Michael de Quadros
Costa, Angelo Brandelli
author_role author
author2 Soares, Damião
Duarte, Michael de Quadros
Costa, Angelo Brandelli
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vilanova, Felipe
Soares, Damião
Duarte, Michael de Quadros
Costa, Angelo Brandelli
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv sdo
dominancia social
igualitarismo
adaptacao
sdo
social dominance
egalitarianism
adaptation
sdo
dominancia social
igualitarismo
adaptacion
topic sdo
dominancia social
igualitarismo
adaptacao
sdo
social dominance
egalitarianism
adaptation
sdo
dominancia social
igualitarismo
adaptacion
description This study aims to cross-culturally adapt the SDO7 for the Brazilian context, propose a reduced version of the instrument, assess its factor structure and validity evidences. Participants were 1,056 individuals across four different samples collected online. Confirmatory factor analyses indicated the best fit indices for the original four-factor structure, two substantial (Dominance x Anti-Egalitarianism) and two methodological (pro-trait x counter-trait). The substantial factors had Cronbach's alpha values above 0.70 in all samples. Furthermore, both the long and reduced versions of the scale were highly correlated with political self-categorization. Hence, the instrument in its long and reduced versions displayed good validity and reliability evidences for the Brazilian context and can be used in future studies.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format preprint
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/623
10.1590/SciELOPreprints.623
url https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/623
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/SciELOPreprints.623
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/623/801
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SciELO Preprints
instname:SciELO
instacron:SCI
instname_str SciELO
instacron_str SCI
institution SCI
reponame_str SciELO Preprints
collection SciELO Preprints
repository.name.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints - SciELO
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scielo.submission@scielo.org
_version_ 1797047817975365633

Registros relacionados