Assemblage in anonymity. Meanings of the action on NFT: CryptoPunks case study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | preprint |
Idioma: | spa |
Título da fonte: | SciELO Preprints |
Texto Completo: | https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/5333 |
Resumo: | This paper looks forward in investigating NFT (Non-Fungible Tokens) Communities through the case study of the CryptoPunks collection as deterritorialized assemblages with a clear ethic posture towards market (financial and art) decentralization, taking into account the interpretations of the meaning(s) of the action, having a view on philosophical theory close to the Crypto community as well as the perception of users and experts on the matter. The investigations works on the direction of finding said meaning through an analysis on the semantic and pragmatic levels, distinguishing between discourses and the practices carried out within the Blockchain, with a particular focus on the Ethereum Network to make emphasis on the mechanisms which allow said assemblage.Additionally, I hope to draw the importance of the human-inhuman interaction in the sociological field, focusing on the possibilities of sociability which are established semantically as well as pragmatically in the technical and technological advancements, taking into account our current time of growing automation and algorithmization of interactions.As a conclusion, we find that ethicity is distributed differentially between the semantic and pragmatic moments, as foundational discourses and the uses taken by the collectionists are far off in their meaning. Such discourses usually go in favour of decentralization of the economy in the privilege of heteronomic and heterarchical forms of constructing value and subjectivities, meanwhile, the uses taken by the collectionists usually undergo in the meaning of maximizing investments which were pushed onto the digital assets tied to NFT contracts, and as such, the community is bonded as far as the speculation of a collection maintains its upward momentum. The community, gestated as an assemblage on its motivation for speed, deterritorialization and decoding is captured by users co-opted by the discourses of capital as an Entrepreneur of himself, seeing digital art assets as maximizers of capital, locking into a loop much like stock market practices. |
id |
SCI-1_3bb1c6921cc7e3c20293f5d5671ec35c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/5333 |
network_acronym_str |
SCI-1 |
network_name_str |
SciELO Preprints |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Assemblage in anonymity. Meanings of the action on NFT: CryptoPunks case studyEnsamblar en anonimidad: Sentidos de la acción en colecciones de NFT: Caso CryptoPunksReunindo no anonimato. Sentidos de ação em coleções NFT: Caso CryptoPunksNon-Fungible TokensCryptoPunksensamblajerelações culturaisnível pragmáticonível semânticoNon-Fungible TokensCryptoPunksassemblagecultural relationspragmatic levelsemantic levelNon-Fungible TokensCryptoPunksensamblajerelaciones culturalesnivel pragmáticonivel semánticoThis paper looks forward in investigating NFT (Non-Fungible Tokens) Communities through the case study of the CryptoPunks collection as deterritorialized assemblages with a clear ethic posture towards market (financial and art) decentralization, taking into account the interpretations of the meaning(s) of the action, having a view on philosophical theory close to the Crypto community as well as the perception of users and experts on the matter. The investigations works on the direction of finding said meaning through an analysis on the semantic and pragmatic levels, distinguishing between discourses and the practices carried out within the Blockchain, with a particular focus on the Ethereum Network to make emphasis on the mechanisms which allow said assemblage.Additionally, I hope to draw the importance of the human-inhuman interaction in the sociological field, focusing on the possibilities of sociability which are established semantically as well as pragmatically in the technical and technological advancements, taking into account our current time of growing automation and algorithmization of interactions.As a conclusion, we find that ethicity is distributed differentially between the semantic and pragmatic moments, as foundational discourses and the uses taken by the collectionists are far off in their meaning. Such discourses usually go in favour of decentralization of the economy in the privilege of heteronomic and heterarchical forms of constructing value and subjectivities, meanwhile, the uses taken by the collectionists usually undergo in the meaning of maximizing investments which were pushed onto the digital assets tied to NFT contracts, and as such, the community is bonded as far as the speculation of a collection maintains its upward momentum. The community, gestated as an assemblage on its motivation for speed, deterritorialization and decoding is captured by users co-opted by the discourses of capital as an Entrepreneur of himself, seeing digital art assets as maximizers of capital, locking into a loop much like stock market practices.El presente trabajo busca indagar las comunidades NFT (Non-Fungible Tokens) a travésdel estudio de caso de la colección CryptoPunks como ensamblajes desterritorializados con unaclara postura ética de descentralización de los mercados (financiero y del arte), teniendo encuenta las interpretaciones del sentido(s) de la acción, tanto a través de teoría filosófica cercanaa la comunidad Crypto como la percepción de usuarios y expertos en la materia. Lainvestigación busca encontrar dicho sentido a través de un análisis tanto del nivel semánticocomo pragmático, distinguiendo entre los discursos manifiestos y las prácticas que se llevan acabo en la Blockchain, con particular énfasis en la red de Ethereum para hacer énfasis en losmecanismos que permiten dicho ensamblaje.De igual manera, se espera esbozar la importancia de la interacción humano-no humanoen el campo sociológico, enfocándose en las potencias de sociabilidad que son establecidastanto semántica como pragmáticamente en los desarrollos técnicos y tecnológicos, teniendo encuenta la pertenencia a la época actual, de creciente automatización y algoritmización de lasinteracciones.A manera de conclusión, encontramos que la eticidad se distribuye diferencialmenteentre el momento semántico y el pragmático, pues los discursos fundacionales y los usos quellevan a cabo los coleccionistas distan en sus sentidos. Los discursos suelen velar en favor a ladescentralización de la economía en privilegio a formas heterónomas y heterárquicas deconstrucción de valor y subjetividades, mientras que los usos llevados a cabo por loscoleccionistas suelen ir en el sentido de maximizar inversiones que fueron puestas en los bienesdigitales atados a los contratos NFT, por ende, la comunidad es sujetada en la medida en quela especulación de una colección mantenga su momento ascendente. La comunidad, gestadacomo un ensamblaje en su motivación por la velocidad, desterritorialización y descodificaciónes captada por usuarios cooptados por los discursos del capital en cuanto empresario de sí,caracterizando los bienes de arte digitales como maximizadores de capital, encerrándose en unbucle similar a las prácticas bursátiles.Este presente trabalho pesquisa pelas comunidades NFT (Non-Fugible Tokens) num estudo de caso da coleção Crypto Punks, vistas como como agenciamentos desterritorializados com uma clara posição ética de descentralização dos mercados (financeiro e artístico), levando em conta as interpretações do sentido(s) da ação, tanto por meio de teoria filosófica perto da comunidade Crypto, quanto pela percepção de usuários e especialistas na referida tecnologia atual. A pesquisa procura este significado através de um análise tanto do nível semântico como pragmático, distinguindo entre os discursos manifestos e as práticas que se realizam na Blockchain, com especial ênfase na rede Ethereum para fazer ênfase nos mecanismos desse agenciamentoDesse jeito, espera-se delinear a grande importância da interação humano-não humano num campo sociológico, centrando-se nas potências de sociabilidades que são estabelecidas semanticamente como pragmaticamente nos desenvolvimentos técnicos e tecnológicos, levando em conta que ela pertence à era atual, de crescente automatização y algoritmização das interações.A título de conclusão, encontramos que a eticidades distribui-se diferencialmente entre os momentos semântico e o pragmático, já que os discursos fundacionais e os usos que levam a cabo os colecionistas são diferentes nos seus sentidos. Os discursos tendem a garantir a descentralização da economia em privilégio das formas heterônomas e heterárquicas de construção de valor e subjetividades, em tanto que os usos dos colecionistas tendem ir no sentido de maximizar inversões ou investimentos que foram postas nos bens digitais vinculados aos contratos NFT, assim, a comunidade fica presa na medida que a especulação de uma coleção mantenha seu momento ascendente. A comunidade, achada como um agenciamento na sua motivação pela velocidade, desterritorialização y descodificação e capturada por usuários cooptados pelos discursos do capital em tanto empreendedor, caracterizando os bens de arte digitais como maximizadores de capital, trancando-se num loop semelhante ao práticas atuais do mercado de ações.SciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2022-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/533310.1590/SciELOPreprints.5333spahttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/5333/10314Copyright (c) 2022 Juan Camilo Ortiz-Gonzálezhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOrtiz-González, Juan Camiloreponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:SciELOinstacron:SCI2022-12-27T01:22:46Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/5333Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2022-12-27T01:22:46SciELO Preprints - SciELOfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Assemblage in anonymity. Meanings of the action on NFT: CryptoPunks case study Ensamblar en anonimidad: Sentidos de la acción en colecciones de NFT: Caso CryptoPunks Reunindo no anonimato. Sentidos de ação em coleções NFT: Caso CryptoPunks |
title |
Assemblage in anonymity. Meanings of the action on NFT: CryptoPunks case study |
spellingShingle |
Assemblage in anonymity. Meanings of the action on NFT: CryptoPunks case study Ortiz-González, Juan Camilo Non-Fungible Tokens CryptoPunks ensamblaje relações culturais nível pragmático nível semântico Non-Fungible Tokens CryptoPunks assemblage cultural relations pragmatic level semantic level Non-Fungible Tokens CryptoPunks ensamblaje relaciones culturales nivel pragmático nivel semántico |
title_short |
Assemblage in anonymity. Meanings of the action on NFT: CryptoPunks case study |
title_full |
Assemblage in anonymity. Meanings of the action on NFT: CryptoPunks case study |
title_fullStr |
Assemblage in anonymity. Meanings of the action on NFT: CryptoPunks case study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assemblage in anonymity. Meanings of the action on NFT: CryptoPunks case study |
title_sort |
Assemblage in anonymity. Meanings of the action on NFT: CryptoPunks case study |
author |
Ortiz-González, Juan Camilo |
author_facet |
Ortiz-González, Juan Camilo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ortiz-González, Juan Camilo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Non-Fungible Tokens CryptoPunks ensamblaje relações culturais nível pragmático nível semântico Non-Fungible Tokens CryptoPunks assemblage cultural relations pragmatic level semantic level Non-Fungible Tokens CryptoPunks ensamblaje relaciones culturales nivel pragmático nivel semántico |
topic |
Non-Fungible Tokens CryptoPunks ensamblaje relações culturais nível pragmático nível semântico Non-Fungible Tokens CryptoPunks assemblage cultural relations pragmatic level semantic level Non-Fungible Tokens CryptoPunks ensamblaje relaciones culturales nivel pragmático nivel semántico |
description |
This paper looks forward in investigating NFT (Non-Fungible Tokens) Communities through the case study of the CryptoPunks collection as deterritorialized assemblages with a clear ethic posture towards market (financial and art) decentralization, taking into account the interpretations of the meaning(s) of the action, having a view on philosophical theory close to the Crypto community as well as the perception of users and experts on the matter. The investigations works on the direction of finding said meaning through an analysis on the semantic and pragmatic levels, distinguishing between discourses and the practices carried out within the Blockchain, with a particular focus on the Ethereum Network to make emphasis on the mechanisms which allow said assemblage.Additionally, I hope to draw the importance of the human-inhuman interaction in the sociological field, focusing on the possibilities of sociability which are established semantically as well as pragmatically in the technical and technological advancements, taking into account our current time of growing automation and algorithmization of interactions.As a conclusion, we find that ethicity is distributed differentially between the semantic and pragmatic moments, as foundational discourses and the uses taken by the collectionists are far off in their meaning. Such discourses usually go in favour of decentralization of the economy in the privilege of heteronomic and heterarchical forms of constructing value and subjectivities, meanwhile, the uses taken by the collectionists usually undergo in the meaning of maximizing investments which were pushed onto the digital assets tied to NFT contracts, and as such, the community is bonded as far as the speculation of a collection maintains its upward momentum. The community, gestated as an assemblage on its motivation for speed, deterritorialization and decoding is captured by users co-opted by the discourses of capital as an Entrepreneur of himself, seeing digital art assets as maximizers of capital, locking into a loop much like stock market practices. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-12-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
preprint |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/5333 10.1590/SciELOPreprints.5333 |
url |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/5333 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/SciELOPreprints.5333 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/5333/10314 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Juan Camilo Ortiz-González https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Juan Camilo Ortiz-González https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:SciELO Preprints instname:SciELO instacron:SCI |
instname_str |
SciELO |
instacron_str |
SCI |
institution |
SCI |
reponame_str |
SciELO Preprints |
collection |
SciELO Preprints |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints - SciELO |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
scielo.submission@scielo.org |
_version_ |
1797047831008116736 |