Methodological Characteristics of the Teaching of Professional Reasoning in Kinesiology: Qualitative Study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Araya-Ávila, Jonathan
Data de Publicação: 2024
Outros Autores: Alfaro, Javiera Reyes, Ávila, Liliana Araya, Cabello, Máximo Escobar
Tipo de documento: preprint
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: SciELO Preprints
Texto Completo: https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/8301
Resumo: Background. The initial training of healthcare professionals has maintained a declared dysfunction since the Alma Ata declaration, which exposed the difficulties of conditioned reasoning due to mimetic assimilation in problem-solving. Objective. To understand the methodological characteristics of the processes used in teaching Professional Reasoning (PR) in Kinesiology students. Methodology. A qualitative interpretive study was conducted using a purposive sampling method, through Semi-Structured Interviews (SSI) with 9 expert teachers (ET) in PR, belonging to accredited universities, using recordings made on the Microsoft TEAMS® platform. These data were collected during 2020-2023 in 5 selected Chilean Kinesiology schools based on curricular evidence and ranking. Results. The emerging themes identified in the interviews with teachers were transcribed and coded using the Atlas.ti® software. It was found that the characteristics of Case Study-Analysis in different applications stood out as the predominant methodology in teaching PR, while the most recurrent assessment instrument was the Rubric. Conclusions. There is a wide range of strategies used by expert ETs to teach PR, which consist of both traditional methodologies and more student-centered active resources, with theoretical and practical aspects characterized by the formative moment, the selected model, and the imprecise taxonomic articulation of strategies and assessment instruments. This highlights the need for a greater integration of factors for the learning of PR.
id SCI-1_56e1ccc7c63f02aff446c27ac90e716b
oai_identifier_str oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/8301
network_acronym_str SCI-1
network_name_str SciELO Preprints
repository_id_str
spelling Methodological Characteristics of the Teaching of Professional Reasoning in Kinesiology: Qualitative StudyCaracterísticas metodológicas de la enseñanza del razonamiento profesional en kinesiología: Estudio cualitativoCaracterísticas metodológicas do ensino do raciocínio profissional em cinesiologia: Estudo qualitativoEnsinoaprendizagemtomada de decisãoraciocinioCinesiologiaTeachinglearningdecision makingreasoningphysiotherapyEnseñanzaaprendizajetoma decisionesrazonamientokinesiologíaBackground. The initial training of healthcare professionals has maintained a declared dysfunction since the Alma Ata declaration, which exposed the difficulties of conditioned reasoning due to mimetic assimilation in problem-solving. Objective. To understand the methodological characteristics of the processes used in teaching Professional Reasoning (PR) in Kinesiology students. Methodology. A qualitative interpretive study was conducted using a purposive sampling method, through Semi-Structured Interviews (SSI) with 9 expert teachers (ET) in PR, belonging to accredited universities, using recordings made on the Microsoft TEAMS® platform. These data were collected during 2020-2023 in 5 selected Chilean Kinesiology schools based on curricular evidence and ranking. Results. The emerging themes identified in the interviews with teachers were transcribed and coded using the Atlas.ti® software. It was found that the characteristics of Case Study-Analysis in different applications stood out as the predominant methodology in teaching PR, while the most recurrent assessment instrument was the Rubric. Conclusions. There is a wide range of strategies used by expert ETs to teach PR, which consist of both traditional methodologies and more student-centered active resources, with theoretical and practical aspects characterized by the formative moment, the selected model, and the imprecise taxonomic articulation of strategies and assessment instruments. This highlights the need for a greater integration of factors for the learning of PR.Antecedentes. La formación inicial de profesionales de la salud ha mantenido una disfunción declarada en Alma Ata que expuso las dificultades del razonamiento condicionado por la asimilación mímica en la resolución de problemas. Objetivo. Conocer las características metodológicas de los procesos que son utilizados en la enseñanza del Razonamiento Profesional (RP) en estudiantes de Kinesiología. Metodología. Estudio cualitativo interpretativo realizado con un muestro razonado, mediante Entrevistas Semiestructuradas (ESE) a 9 docentes referentes (DR), expertos en RP, pertenecientes a universidades acreditadas por medio de grabaciones realizadas en plataforma Microsoft TEAMS®. Estos datos fueron recogidos durante 2020-2023 en 5 escuelas de Kinesiología chilenas seleccionadas por evidencias curriculares y ranking. Resultados. Las temáticas emergentes identificadas en las entrevistas de profesores, fueron transcritas y codificadas utilizando el Software Atlas. ti®. Constatando que las características del Estudio-Análisis de Casos en distintas aplicaciones, se destaca como la metodología predominante en la enseñanza del RP, mientras que el instrumento de evaluación que tuvo mayor recurrencia fue la Rúbrica. Conclusiones:. Existe una variada gama de estrategias utilizadas por DR expertos para enseñar RP las cuales están compuestas por metodologías tradicionales y recursos activos de mayor protagonismo para el estudiante, con vertientes teóricas y prácticas que se caracterizan por el momento formativo, el modelo seleccionado, y la imprecisa articulación taxonómica de estrategias e instrumentos de evaluación lo que advierte respecto de una necesaria mayor integralidad de factores para el aprendizaje del RP.Enquadramento. A formação inicial dos profissionais de saúde manteve uma disfunção declarada em Alma Ata que expôs as dificuldades de raciocínio condicionadas pela assimilação da mímica na resolução de problemas. Objetivo. Conhecer as características metodológicas dos processos que são utilizados no ensino de Raciocínio Profissional (RP) em alunos de Cinesiologia. Metodologia. Estudo qualitativo interpretativo realizado com uma amostra fundamentada, através de Entrevistas Semiestruturadas (ESE) a 9 professores de referência (DR), especialistas em RP, pertencentes a universidades acreditadas através de gravações efetuadas na plataforma Microsoft TEAMS®. Esses dados foram coletados durante 2020-2023 em 5 escolas chilenas de Cinesiologia selecionadas por evidência curricular e classificação. Resultados. Os temas emergentes identificados nas entrevistas com os professores foram transcritos e codificados com o software Atlas. você®. Observando que pelas características do EstudoAnálise de Casos em diferentes aplicações, destaca-se como a metodologia predominante no ensino de RP, enquanto o instrumento de avaliação que teve maior recorrência foi a Rubrica. Conclusões. Existe uma ampla gama de estratégias utilizadas por especialistas em DR para ensinar RP, que são compostas por metodologias tradicionais e recursos ativos de maior destaque para o aluno, com aspectos teóricos e práticos que se caracterizam pelo momento formativo, o modelo selecionado, e a articulação taxonômica imprecisa de estratégias e instrumentos de avaliação, que alertam para uma maior abrangência necessária de fatores para a aprendizagem de PR.SciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2024-03-26info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/830110.1590/SciELOPreprints.8301spahttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/8301/15500Copyright (c) 2024 Jonathan Araya-Ávila, Javiera Reyes Alfaro, Liliana Araya Ávila, Máximo Escobar Cabellohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAraya-Ávila, JonathanAlfaro, Javiera ReyesÁvila, Liliana ArayaCabello, Máximo Escobarreponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO)instacron:SCI2024-03-19T19:42:53Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/8301Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2024-03-19T19:42:53SciELO Preprints - Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Methodological Characteristics of the Teaching of Professional Reasoning in Kinesiology: Qualitative Study
Características metodológicas de la enseñanza del razonamiento profesional en kinesiología: Estudio cualitativo
Características metodológicas do ensino do raciocínio profissional em cinesiologia: Estudo qualitativo
title Methodological Characteristics of the Teaching of Professional Reasoning in Kinesiology: Qualitative Study
spellingShingle Methodological Characteristics of the Teaching of Professional Reasoning in Kinesiology: Qualitative Study
Araya-Ávila, Jonathan
Ensino
aprendizagem
tomada de decisão
raciocinio
Cinesiologia
Teaching
learning
decision making
reasoning
physiotherapy
Enseñanza
aprendizaje
toma decisiones
razonamiento
kinesiología
title_short Methodological Characteristics of the Teaching of Professional Reasoning in Kinesiology: Qualitative Study
title_full Methodological Characteristics of the Teaching of Professional Reasoning in Kinesiology: Qualitative Study
title_fullStr Methodological Characteristics of the Teaching of Professional Reasoning in Kinesiology: Qualitative Study
title_full_unstemmed Methodological Characteristics of the Teaching of Professional Reasoning in Kinesiology: Qualitative Study
title_sort Methodological Characteristics of the Teaching of Professional Reasoning in Kinesiology: Qualitative Study
author Araya-Ávila, Jonathan
author_facet Araya-Ávila, Jonathan
Alfaro, Javiera Reyes
Ávila, Liliana Araya
Cabello, Máximo Escobar
author_role author
author2 Alfaro, Javiera Reyes
Ávila, Liliana Araya
Cabello, Máximo Escobar
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Araya-Ávila, Jonathan
Alfaro, Javiera Reyes
Ávila, Liliana Araya
Cabello, Máximo Escobar
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ensino
aprendizagem
tomada de decisão
raciocinio
Cinesiologia
Teaching
learning
decision making
reasoning
physiotherapy
Enseñanza
aprendizaje
toma decisiones
razonamiento
kinesiología
topic Ensino
aprendizagem
tomada de decisão
raciocinio
Cinesiologia
Teaching
learning
decision making
reasoning
physiotherapy
Enseñanza
aprendizaje
toma decisiones
razonamiento
kinesiología
description Background. The initial training of healthcare professionals has maintained a declared dysfunction since the Alma Ata declaration, which exposed the difficulties of conditioned reasoning due to mimetic assimilation in problem-solving. Objective. To understand the methodological characteristics of the processes used in teaching Professional Reasoning (PR) in Kinesiology students. Methodology. A qualitative interpretive study was conducted using a purposive sampling method, through Semi-Structured Interviews (SSI) with 9 expert teachers (ET) in PR, belonging to accredited universities, using recordings made on the Microsoft TEAMS® platform. These data were collected during 2020-2023 in 5 selected Chilean Kinesiology schools based on curricular evidence and ranking. Results. The emerging themes identified in the interviews with teachers were transcribed and coded using the Atlas.ti® software. It was found that the characteristics of Case Study-Analysis in different applications stood out as the predominant methodology in teaching PR, while the most recurrent assessment instrument was the Rubric. Conclusions. There is a wide range of strategies used by expert ETs to teach PR, which consist of both traditional methodologies and more student-centered active resources, with theoretical and practical aspects characterized by the formative moment, the selected model, and the imprecise taxonomic articulation of strategies and assessment instruments. This highlights the need for a greater integration of factors for the learning of PR.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-03-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format preprint
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/8301
10.1590/SciELOPreprints.8301
url https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/8301
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/SciELOPreprints.8301
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/8301/15500
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SciELO Preprints
instname:Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO)
instacron:SCI
instname_str Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO)
instacron_str SCI
institution SCI
reponame_str SciELO Preprints
collection SciELO Preprints
repository.name.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints - Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scielo.submission@scielo.org
_version_ 1797047815352877056