Profile Analysis of Political Science Theses and Dissertations in Brazil (2013-2020)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | preprint |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | SciELO Preprints |
Texto Completo: | https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/4565 |
Resumo: | Postgraduate courses in Political Science in Brazil have proliferated considerably since the 2000s, surging from three doctoral courses to eleven. This expansion has been accompanied by several studies on the intellectual configuration of this academic area and the profile of this community. However, the predominant sources of such analyses have been research articles published in academic journals. In this paper we explore another type of data: Masters dissertations and PhD theses defended in eleven postgraduate programs in Political Science between 2013 and 2020. Our research investigated the metadata (titles, abstracts, and keywords) of 1,849 theses and dissertations and mapped the patterns and hierarchies of this scientific production, underlining the prevailing topics, objects, and methodologies. Our analysis of social networks revealed three main findings. In methodological terms, dissertations and theses are divided into two well-structured universes: empirical (related to “data”) and theoretical (related to the notion of “interpretation”). The prevailing research technique seems to be case studies. Thematically, we found three dominant communities – “parties and elections”, “State and international relations”, and “public policies”, with a slight predominance of studies about Legislative and Executive institutions. |
id |
SCI-1_5f9599ae617c41e2e05a0b91440e72b1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/4565 |
network_acronym_str |
SCI-1 |
network_name_str |
SciELO Preprints |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Profile Analysis of Political Science Theses and Dissertations in Brazil (2013-2020)Análise do perfil das teses e dissertações de Ciência Política no Brasil (2013-2020)Ciência Política brasileirapós-graduaçãoteses de doutoradodissertações de mestradoanálise de redes sociaisBrazilian Political Sciencegraduate studiesdoctoral thesesmaster’s dissertationssocial network analysisPostgraduate courses in Political Science in Brazil have proliferated considerably since the 2000s, surging from three doctoral courses to eleven. This expansion has been accompanied by several studies on the intellectual configuration of this academic area and the profile of this community. However, the predominant sources of such analyses have been research articles published in academic journals. In this paper we explore another type of data: Masters dissertations and PhD theses defended in eleven postgraduate programs in Political Science between 2013 and 2020. Our research investigated the metadata (titles, abstracts, and keywords) of 1,849 theses and dissertations and mapped the patterns and hierarchies of this scientific production, underlining the prevailing topics, objects, and methodologies. Our analysis of social networks revealed three main findings. In methodological terms, dissertations and theses are divided into two well-structured universes: empirical (related to “data”) and theoretical (related to the notion of “interpretation”). The prevailing research technique seems to be case studies. Thematically, we found three dominant communities – “parties and elections”, “State and international relations”, and “public policies”, with a slight predominance of studies about Legislative and Executive institutions.A pós-graduação em Ciência Política no Brasil se desenvolveu bastante desde os anos 2000 passando de três cursos de doutorado para onze. Com isso surgiram também uma série de estudos sobre a configuração intelectual da área e o perfil dessa comunidade. Porém, nas análises desse campo de conhecimento, esses estudos utilizaram como fonte quase exclusivamente artigos de pesquisa publicados em periódicos acadêmicos. Este paper explora outro tipo de dado: teses de doutorado e dissertações de mestrado defendidas em onze Programas de pós-graduação de Ciência Política entre 2013 e 2020. Investigando os metadados (títulos, resumos e palavras-chave) de 1.849 trabalhos de conclusão, nossa pesquisa mapeou os padrões e as hierarquias dessa produção científica, destacando as problemáticas, os objetos e as metodologias em vigor. A partir da análise de redes sociais, há três achados principais. Em termos metodológicos, as dissertações e teses dividem-se em dois universos bem estruturados, um empírico (conectado a “dados”) e outro teórico (conectado à noção de “interpretação”). Em termos de técnicas de pesquisa, os estudos de caso parecem prevalecer. Em termos temáticos, há três comunidades dominantes – “partidos e eleições”, “Estado e relações internacionais” e “políticas públicas” com uma vantagem para os estudos de instituições do Legislativo e do Executivo.SciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2022-08-09info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/456510.1590/SciELOPreprints.4565porhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/4565/8768Copyright (c) 2022 Nilton Sainz, Rodrigo da Silva, Adriano Codatohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSainz, NiltonSilva, Rodrigo daCodato, Adrianoreponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:SciELOinstacron:SCI2022-08-08T23:34:37Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/4565Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2022-08-08T23:34:37SciELO Preprints - SciELOfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Profile Analysis of Political Science Theses and Dissertations in Brazil (2013-2020) Análise do perfil das teses e dissertações de Ciência Política no Brasil (2013-2020) |
title |
Profile Analysis of Political Science Theses and Dissertations in Brazil (2013-2020) |
spellingShingle |
Profile Analysis of Political Science Theses and Dissertations in Brazil (2013-2020) Sainz, Nilton Ciência Política brasileira pós-graduação teses de doutorado dissertações de mestrado análise de redes sociais Brazilian Political Science graduate studies doctoral theses master’s dissertations social network analysis |
title_short |
Profile Analysis of Political Science Theses and Dissertations in Brazil (2013-2020) |
title_full |
Profile Analysis of Political Science Theses and Dissertations in Brazil (2013-2020) |
title_fullStr |
Profile Analysis of Political Science Theses and Dissertations in Brazil (2013-2020) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Profile Analysis of Political Science Theses and Dissertations in Brazil (2013-2020) |
title_sort |
Profile Analysis of Political Science Theses and Dissertations in Brazil (2013-2020) |
author |
Sainz, Nilton |
author_facet |
Sainz, Nilton Silva, Rodrigo da Codato, Adriano |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Rodrigo da Codato, Adriano |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sainz, Nilton Silva, Rodrigo da Codato, Adriano |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ciência Política brasileira pós-graduação teses de doutorado dissertações de mestrado análise de redes sociais Brazilian Political Science graduate studies doctoral theses master’s dissertations social network analysis |
topic |
Ciência Política brasileira pós-graduação teses de doutorado dissertações de mestrado análise de redes sociais Brazilian Political Science graduate studies doctoral theses master’s dissertations social network analysis |
description |
Postgraduate courses in Political Science in Brazil have proliferated considerably since the 2000s, surging from three doctoral courses to eleven. This expansion has been accompanied by several studies on the intellectual configuration of this academic area and the profile of this community. However, the predominant sources of such analyses have been research articles published in academic journals. In this paper we explore another type of data: Masters dissertations and PhD theses defended in eleven postgraduate programs in Political Science between 2013 and 2020. Our research investigated the metadata (titles, abstracts, and keywords) of 1,849 theses and dissertations and mapped the patterns and hierarchies of this scientific production, underlining the prevailing topics, objects, and methodologies. Our analysis of social networks revealed three main findings. In methodological terms, dissertations and theses are divided into two well-structured universes: empirical (related to “data”) and theoretical (related to the notion of “interpretation”). The prevailing research technique seems to be case studies. Thematically, we found three dominant communities – “parties and elections”, “State and international relations”, and “public policies”, with a slight predominance of studies about Legislative and Executive institutions. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-08-09 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
preprint |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/4565 10.1590/SciELOPreprints.4565 |
url |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/4565 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/SciELOPreprints.4565 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/4565/8768 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Nilton Sainz, Rodrigo da Silva, Adriano Codato https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Nilton Sainz, Rodrigo da Silva, Adriano Codato https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:SciELO Preprints instname:SciELO instacron:SCI |
instname_str |
SciELO |
instacron_str |
SCI |
institution |
SCI |
reponame_str |
SciELO Preprints |
collection |
SciELO Preprints |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints - SciELO |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
scielo.submission@scielo.org |
_version_ |
1797047829742485504 |