Comparative retrospective analysis of the surgical treatment of intramedullary fixation versus plate for clavicle fracture

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Medeiros Storti, Thiago
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Siqueira Camilo, Mauricio, Alves Silva, Rafael Francisco, Salomon Silva Faria, Rafael, Lima Simionatto, Carolina, Firmino Paniago, Alexandre
Tipo de documento: preprint
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: SciELO Preprints
Texto Completo: https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/1580
Resumo: Objective: Studies confirm the benefit of surgical treatment for fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. Plate fixation and intramedullary nail are the two most used techniques. The purpose of this study is to compare these two surgical techniques. Method: Retrospective study, performed through the evaluation of patients treated for displaced midshaft clavicle fracture with intramedullary nail and plate and screws. Socioeconomic variables were collected, a visual pain scale questionnaire was applied, the shoulder function was measured using CONSTANT and UCLA scores, and radiography was performed to verify the consolidation and evaluation of the final clavicle shortening. Results: Sixty-five patients were evaluated, 36 (55.4%) of which were submitted to clavicle fixation with plate and screws and 29 (44.6%) with intramedullary nail. The median shortening was 0.1mm for plate and 5.8mm for nail (p = 0.001). The UCLA score shows an average of 35 in the plate group and 35 in the intramedullary group. The median CONSTANT scores were 96.5 for plate and 95 for nail, without significance. In all, 13 (20%) complications were registered, 9 fixed with plate and 4  fixed with intramedullary nail. The most common complication was skin erosion with exposure of the synthetic material. Conclusion: The two techniques present satisfactory results for the treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.
id SCI-1_7a0c508221cd956dce2f59b8bfacf097
oai_identifier_str oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/1580
network_acronym_str SCI-1
network_name_str SciELO Preprints
repository_id_str
spelling Comparative retrospective analysis of the surgical treatment of intramedullary fixation versus plate for clavicle fractureAnálise retrospectiva comparativa do tratamento cirúrgico da fratura de clavícula com haste versus placaFraturas ósseasClavículaPlacas ósseaFixação interna de fraturasBone fracturesClaviclePlate fixationIntramedullary fixationObjective: Studies confirm the benefit of surgical treatment for fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. Plate fixation and intramedullary nail are the two most used techniques. The purpose of this study is to compare these two surgical techniques. Method: Retrospective study, performed through the evaluation of patients treated for displaced midshaft clavicle fracture with intramedullary nail and plate and screws. Socioeconomic variables were collected, a visual pain scale questionnaire was applied, the shoulder function was measured using CONSTANT and UCLA scores, and radiography was performed to verify the consolidation and evaluation of the final clavicle shortening. Results: Sixty-five patients were evaluated, 36 (55.4%) of which were submitted to clavicle fixation with plate and screws and 29 (44.6%) with intramedullary nail. The median shortening was 0.1mm for plate and 5.8mm for nail (p = 0.001). The UCLA score shows an average of 35 in the plate group and 35 in the intramedullary group. The median CONSTANT scores were 96.5 for plate and 95 for nail, without significance. In all, 13 (20%) complications were registered, 9 fixed with plate and 4  fixed with intramedullary nail. The most common complication was skin erosion with exposure of the synthetic material. Conclusion: The two techniques present satisfactory results for the treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.Objetivo: Trabalhos confirmam o benefício do tratamento cirúrgico para fixação de fraturas desviadas do corpo da clavícula. A fixação com placa e haste intramedular são as duas técnicas mais utilizadas. O objetivo deste estudo é comparar as duas técnicas cirúrgicas. Método: Estudo retrospectivo realizado por meio da avaliação de pacientes submetidos à fixação com haste intramedular e com placa e parafusos para o tratamento de fraturas desviadas do corpo da clavícula. Neste caso, foram avaliadas variáveis socioeconômicas, aplicado questionário da escala visual da dor, mensurado a função do ombro pelo escore de CONSTANT e UCLA, e realizada radiografia para verificação da consolidação e avaliação do encurtamento final da clavícula. Resultados: foram avaliados 65 pacientes, destes 36 (55,4%) foram submetidos à fixação da clavícula com placa e parafusos e 29 (44,6%) com haste intramedular. A mediana do encurtamento foi 0,1mm para placa e 5,8mm para haste (p=0,001). O escore de UCLA apresentou mediana de 35 no grupo placa e 35 no grupo haste. O escore de Constant mostrou mediana de 96,5 no grupo placa e 95 no grupo haste, sem diferença significativa entre os grupos. Ao todo, foram registradas 13 (20%) complicações, 9 do grupo fixado com placa e 4 do grupo fixado com haste.  A complicação mais comum foi a erosão da pele com exposição do material de síntese. Conclusão: as duas técnicas apresentam resultados satisfatórios para o tratamento das fraturas do corpo da clavícula. Nível III: estudo terapêutico retrospectivoSciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2020-12-15info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/158010.1590/1413-78520212901231439porhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/1580/2504Copyright (c) 2020 Thiago Medeiros Storti, Mauricio Siqueira Camilo, Rafael Francisco Alves Silva, Rafael Salomon Silva Faria, Carolina Lima Simionatto, Alexandre Firmino Paniagohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMedeiros Storti, Thiago Siqueira Camilo, Mauricio Alves Silva, Rafael Francisco Salomon Silva Faria, Rafael Lima Simionatto, Carolina Firmino Paniago, Alexandre reponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:SciELOinstacron:SCI2020-12-10T15:03:49Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/1580Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2020-12-10T15:03:49SciELO Preprints - SciELOfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative retrospective analysis of the surgical treatment of intramedullary fixation versus plate for clavicle fracture
Análise retrospectiva comparativa do tratamento cirúrgico da fratura de clavícula com haste versus placa
title Comparative retrospective analysis of the surgical treatment of intramedullary fixation versus plate for clavicle fracture
spellingShingle Comparative retrospective analysis of the surgical treatment of intramedullary fixation versus plate for clavicle fracture
Medeiros Storti, Thiago
Fraturas ósseas
Clavícula
Placas óssea
Fixação interna de fraturas
Bone fractures
Clavicle
Plate fixation
Intramedullary fixation
title_short Comparative retrospective analysis of the surgical treatment of intramedullary fixation versus plate for clavicle fracture
title_full Comparative retrospective analysis of the surgical treatment of intramedullary fixation versus plate for clavicle fracture
title_fullStr Comparative retrospective analysis of the surgical treatment of intramedullary fixation versus plate for clavicle fracture
title_full_unstemmed Comparative retrospective analysis of the surgical treatment of intramedullary fixation versus plate for clavicle fracture
title_sort Comparative retrospective analysis of the surgical treatment of intramedullary fixation versus plate for clavicle fracture
author Medeiros Storti, Thiago
author_facet Medeiros Storti, Thiago
Siqueira Camilo, Mauricio
Alves Silva, Rafael Francisco
Salomon Silva Faria, Rafael
Lima Simionatto, Carolina
Firmino Paniago, Alexandre
author_role author
author2 Siqueira Camilo, Mauricio
Alves Silva, Rafael Francisco
Salomon Silva Faria, Rafael
Lima Simionatto, Carolina
Firmino Paniago, Alexandre
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Medeiros Storti, Thiago
Siqueira Camilo, Mauricio
Alves Silva, Rafael Francisco
Salomon Silva Faria, Rafael
Lima Simionatto, Carolina
Firmino Paniago, Alexandre
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Fraturas ósseas
Clavícula
Placas óssea
Fixação interna de fraturas
Bone fractures
Clavicle
Plate fixation
Intramedullary fixation
topic Fraturas ósseas
Clavícula
Placas óssea
Fixação interna de fraturas
Bone fractures
Clavicle
Plate fixation
Intramedullary fixation
description Objective: Studies confirm the benefit of surgical treatment for fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. Plate fixation and intramedullary nail are the two most used techniques. The purpose of this study is to compare these two surgical techniques. Method: Retrospective study, performed through the evaluation of patients treated for displaced midshaft clavicle fracture with intramedullary nail and plate and screws. Socioeconomic variables were collected, a visual pain scale questionnaire was applied, the shoulder function was measured using CONSTANT and UCLA scores, and radiography was performed to verify the consolidation and evaluation of the final clavicle shortening. Results: Sixty-five patients were evaluated, 36 (55.4%) of which were submitted to clavicle fixation with plate and screws and 29 (44.6%) with intramedullary nail. The median shortening was 0.1mm for plate and 5.8mm for nail (p = 0.001). The UCLA score shows an average of 35 in the plate group and 35 in the intramedullary group. The median CONSTANT scores were 96.5 for plate and 95 for nail, without significance. In all, 13 (20%) complications were registered, 9 fixed with plate and 4  fixed with intramedullary nail. The most common complication was skin erosion with exposure of the synthetic material. Conclusion: The two techniques present satisfactory results for the treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format preprint
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/1580
10.1590/1413-78520212901231439
url https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/1580
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1413-78520212901231439
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/1580/2504
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SciELO Preprints
instname:SciELO
instacron:SCI
instname_str SciELO
instacron_str SCI
institution SCI
reponame_str SciELO Preprints
collection SciELO Preprints
repository.name.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints - SciELO
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scielo.submission@scielo.org
_version_ 1797047821335003136