Comparative retrospective analysis of the surgical treatment of intramedullary fixation versus plate for clavicle fracture
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | preprint |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | SciELO Preprints |
Texto Completo: | https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/1580 |
Resumo: | Objective: Studies confirm the benefit of surgical treatment for fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. Plate fixation and intramedullary nail are the two most used techniques. The purpose of this study is to compare these two surgical techniques. Method: Retrospective study, performed through the evaluation of patients treated for displaced midshaft clavicle fracture with intramedullary nail and plate and screws. Socioeconomic variables were collected, a visual pain scale questionnaire was applied, the shoulder function was measured using CONSTANT and UCLA scores, and radiography was performed to verify the consolidation and evaluation of the final clavicle shortening. Results: Sixty-five patients were evaluated, 36 (55.4%) of which were submitted to clavicle fixation with plate and screws and 29 (44.6%) with intramedullary nail. The median shortening was 0.1mm for plate and 5.8mm for nail (p = 0.001). The UCLA score shows an average of 35 in the plate group and 35 in the intramedullary group. The median CONSTANT scores were 96.5 for plate and 95 for nail, without significance. In all, 13 (20%) complications were registered, 9 fixed with plate and 4 fixed with intramedullary nail. The most common complication was skin erosion with exposure of the synthetic material. Conclusion: The two techniques present satisfactory results for the treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. |
id |
SCI-1_7a0c508221cd956dce2f59b8bfacf097 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/1580 |
network_acronym_str |
SCI-1 |
network_name_str |
SciELO Preprints |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparative retrospective analysis of the surgical treatment of intramedullary fixation versus plate for clavicle fractureAnálise retrospectiva comparativa do tratamento cirúrgico da fratura de clavícula com haste versus placaFraturas ósseasClavículaPlacas ósseaFixação interna de fraturasBone fracturesClaviclePlate fixationIntramedullary fixationObjective: Studies confirm the benefit of surgical treatment for fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. Plate fixation and intramedullary nail are the two most used techniques. The purpose of this study is to compare these two surgical techniques. Method: Retrospective study, performed through the evaluation of patients treated for displaced midshaft clavicle fracture with intramedullary nail and plate and screws. Socioeconomic variables were collected, a visual pain scale questionnaire was applied, the shoulder function was measured using CONSTANT and UCLA scores, and radiography was performed to verify the consolidation and evaluation of the final clavicle shortening. Results: Sixty-five patients were evaluated, 36 (55.4%) of which were submitted to clavicle fixation with plate and screws and 29 (44.6%) with intramedullary nail. The median shortening was 0.1mm for plate and 5.8mm for nail (p = 0.001). The UCLA score shows an average of 35 in the plate group and 35 in the intramedullary group. The median CONSTANT scores were 96.5 for plate and 95 for nail, without significance. In all, 13 (20%) complications were registered, 9 fixed with plate and 4 fixed with intramedullary nail. The most common complication was skin erosion with exposure of the synthetic material. Conclusion: The two techniques present satisfactory results for the treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.Objetivo: Trabalhos confirmam o benefício do tratamento cirúrgico para fixação de fraturas desviadas do corpo da clavícula. A fixação com placa e haste intramedular são as duas técnicas mais utilizadas. O objetivo deste estudo é comparar as duas técnicas cirúrgicas. Método: Estudo retrospectivo realizado por meio da avaliação de pacientes submetidos à fixação com haste intramedular e com placa e parafusos para o tratamento de fraturas desviadas do corpo da clavícula. Neste caso, foram avaliadas variáveis socioeconômicas, aplicado questionário da escala visual da dor, mensurado a função do ombro pelo escore de CONSTANT e UCLA, e realizada radiografia para verificação da consolidação e avaliação do encurtamento final da clavícula. Resultados: foram avaliados 65 pacientes, destes 36 (55,4%) foram submetidos à fixação da clavícula com placa e parafusos e 29 (44,6%) com haste intramedular. A mediana do encurtamento foi 0,1mm para placa e 5,8mm para haste (p=0,001). O escore de UCLA apresentou mediana de 35 no grupo placa e 35 no grupo haste. O escore de Constant mostrou mediana de 96,5 no grupo placa e 95 no grupo haste, sem diferença significativa entre os grupos. Ao todo, foram registradas 13 (20%) complicações, 9 do grupo fixado com placa e 4 do grupo fixado com haste. A complicação mais comum foi a erosão da pele com exposição do material de síntese. Conclusão: as duas técnicas apresentam resultados satisfatórios para o tratamento das fraturas do corpo da clavícula. Nível III: estudo terapêutico retrospectivoSciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2020-12-15info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/158010.1590/1413-78520212901231439porhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/1580/2504Copyright (c) 2020 Thiago Medeiros Storti, Mauricio Siqueira Camilo, Rafael Francisco Alves Silva, Rafael Salomon Silva Faria, Carolina Lima Simionatto, Alexandre Firmino Paniagohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMedeiros Storti, Thiago Siqueira Camilo, Mauricio Alves Silva, Rafael Francisco Salomon Silva Faria, Rafael Lima Simionatto, Carolina Firmino Paniago, Alexandre reponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:SciELOinstacron:SCI2020-12-10T15:03:49Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/1580Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2020-12-10T15:03:49SciELO Preprints - SciELOfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparative retrospective analysis of the surgical treatment of intramedullary fixation versus plate for clavicle fracture Análise retrospectiva comparativa do tratamento cirúrgico da fratura de clavícula com haste versus placa |
title |
Comparative retrospective analysis of the surgical treatment of intramedullary fixation versus plate for clavicle fracture |
spellingShingle |
Comparative retrospective analysis of the surgical treatment of intramedullary fixation versus plate for clavicle fracture Medeiros Storti, Thiago Fraturas ósseas Clavícula Placas óssea Fixação interna de fraturas Bone fractures Clavicle Plate fixation Intramedullary fixation |
title_short |
Comparative retrospective analysis of the surgical treatment of intramedullary fixation versus plate for clavicle fracture |
title_full |
Comparative retrospective analysis of the surgical treatment of intramedullary fixation versus plate for clavicle fracture |
title_fullStr |
Comparative retrospective analysis of the surgical treatment of intramedullary fixation versus plate for clavicle fracture |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative retrospective analysis of the surgical treatment of intramedullary fixation versus plate for clavicle fracture |
title_sort |
Comparative retrospective analysis of the surgical treatment of intramedullary fixation versus plate for clavicle fracture |
author |
Medeiros Storti, Thiago |
author_facet |
Medeiros Storti, Thiago Siqueira Camilo, Mauricio Alves Silva, Rafael Francisco Salomon Silva Faria, Rafael Lima Simionatto, Carolina Firmino Paniago, Alexandre |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Siqueira Camilo, Mauricio Alves Silva, Rafael Francisco Salomon Silva Faria, Rafael Lima Simionatto, Carolina Firmino Paniago, Alexandre |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Medeiros Storti, Thiago Siqueira Camilo, Mauricio Alves Silva, Rafael Francisco Salomon Silva Faria, Rafael Lima Simionatto, Carolina Firmino Paniago, Alexandre |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Fraturas ósseas Clavícula Placas óssea Fixação interna de fraturas Bone fractures Clavicle Plate fixation Intramedullary fixation |
topic |
Fraturas ósseas Clavícula Placas óssea Fixação interna de fraturas Bone fractures Clavicle Plate fixation Intramedullary fixation |
description |
Objective: Studies confirm the benefit of surgical treatment for fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. Plate fixation and intramedullary nail are the two most used techniques. The purpose of this study is to compare these two surgical techniques. Method: Retrospective study, performed through the evaluation of patients treated for displaced midshaft clavicle fracture with intramedullary nail and plate and screws. Socioeconomic variables were collected, a visual pain scale questionnaire was applied, the shoulder function was measured using CONSTANT and UCLA scores, and radiography was performed to verify the consolidation and evaluation of the final clavicle shortening. Results: Sixty-five patients were evaluated, 36 (55.4%) of which were submitted to clavicle fixation with plate and screws and 29 (44.6%) with intramedullary nail. The median shortening was 0.1mm for plate and 5.8mm for nail (p = 0.001). The UCLA score shows an average of 35 in the plate group and 35 in the intramedullary group. The median CONSTANT scores were 96.5 for plate and 95 for nail, without significance. In all, 13 (20%) complications were registered, 9 fixed with plate and 4 fixed with intramedullary nail. The most common complication was skin erosion with exposure of the synthetic material. Conclusion: The two techniques present satisfactory results for the treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
preprint |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/1580 10.1590/1413-78520212901231439 |
url |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/1580 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1413-78520212901231439 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/1580/2504 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:SciELO Preprints instname:SciELO instacron:SCI |
instname_str |
SciELO |
instacron_str |
SCI |
institution |
SCI |
reponame_str |
SciELO Preprints |
collection |
SciELO Preprints |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints - SciELO |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
scielo.submission@scielo.org |
_version_ |
1797047821335003136 |