Psychological empowerment of health professionals

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Salles, Bianca Gomes
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Dias, Flávia Carvalho Pena, Perissotto, Samantha, Andrade, Juliane Custódio de, Dini, Ariane Polidoro, Gasparino, Renata Cristina
Tipo de documento: preprint
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: SciELO Preprints
Texto Completo: https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/1249
Resumo: Objective: To assess whether there are differences in psychological empowerment betweendifferent health professionals working in a teaching hospital.Method: A comparative, quantitative, and cross-sectional study carried out with165 professionals selected at random and who worked in a teaching hospital in the inland of thestate of São Paulo. The participants were divided into three groups: 1) nurses, 2) physicians,and 3) other professionals (physiotherapists, psychologists, pharmacists, speech therapists,social workers, and nutritionists). For data collection, a form was used to characterize thesample, as well as the Brazilian version of the Psychological Empowerment Instrument. Tocompare the scores between the three groups, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used, followed byDunn' post-test.Results: Nurses, physicians, and other professionals scored 71.4; 69.3, and71.1 points (p=0.5959), respectively, in the total score of the instrumentConclusion: There are no statistically significant differences in the perception of psychologicalempowerment of different health professionals.Conclusion: There are no statistically significant differences in the perception of psychologicalempowerment of different health professionals.Keywords: Power, psychological. Health personnel. Clinical competence. Nursing.
id SCI-1_8c87a5fc786b4dcbc808af8337d72ec5
oai_identifier_str oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/1249
network_acronym_str SCI-1
network_name_str SciELO Preprints
repository_id_str
spelling Psychological empowerment of health professionalsEmpoderamiento psicológico de profesionales de la saludEmpoderamento psicológico dos profissionais de saúdePoder psicológicoPessoal de saúdeCompetência clínicaEnfermagem Power, psychologicalHealth personnelClinical competenceNursingPoder, psicológicoPersonal de saludCompetencia clínicaEnfermeríaObjective: To assess whether there are differences in psychological empowerment betweendifferent health professionals working in a teaching hospital.Method: A comparative, quantitative, and cross-sectional study carried out with165 professionals selected at random and who worked in a teaching hospital in the inland of thestate of São Paulo. The participants were divided into three groups: 1) nurses, 2) physicians,and 3) other professionals (physiotherapists, psychologists, pharmacists, speech therapists,social workers, and nutritionists). For data collection, a form was used to characterize thesample, as well as the Brazilian version of the Psychological Empowerment Instrument. Tocompare the scores between the three groups, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used, followed byDunn' post-test.Results: Nurses, physicians, and other professionals scored 71.4; 69.3, and71.1 points (p=0.5959), respectively, in the total score of the instrumentConclusion: There are no statistically significant differences in the perception of psychologicalempowerment of different health professionals.Conclusion: There are no statistically significant differences in the perception of psychologicalempowerment of different health professionals.Keywords: Power, psychological. Health personnel. Clinical competence. Nursing.Objetivo: Evaluar si existen diferencias en el empoderamiento psicológico entre diferentesprofesionales de la salud que trabajan en un hospital universitario.Método: Estudio comparativo, cuantitativo y transversal, realizado con 165 profesionalesseleccionados al azar y que trabajaban en un hospital universitario en el interior de São Paulo.Los participantes se dividieron en tres grupos: 1) enfermeras, 2) médicos y 3) otrosprofesionales (fisioterapeutas, psicólogos, farmacéuticos, logopedas, trabajadores sociales ynutricionistas). Para la recolección de datos, se utilizó un formulario para caracterizar la muestray la versión brasileña del Instrumento de Empoderamiento Psicológico. Para comparar laspuntuaciones entre los tres grupos, se utilizó la prueba de Kruskal-Wallis, seguida de la pruebapost-test de Dunn.Resultados: Enfermeras, médicos y otros profesionales obtuvieron promedios de 71,4, 69,3 y71,1 puntos (p=0,5959), respectivamente, en la puntuación total del instrumento.Conclusión: No existen diferencias estadísticamente significativas en la percepción delempoderamiento psicológico de los diferentes profesionales de la salud.Palabras clave: Poder, psicológico. Personal de salud. Competencia clínica. Enfermería.Objetivo: Avaliar se existem diferenças no empoderamento psicológico entre os diferentes profissionais da saúde que atuam em um hospital de ensino.Método: Estudo comparativo, quantitativo e transversal, realizado com 165 profissionais selecionados de maneira aleatória e que atuavam em um hospital de ensino do interior de São Paulo. Os participantes foram distribuídos em três grupos: 1) enfermeiros, 2) médicos e 3) outros profissionais (fisioterapeutas, psicólogos, farmacêuticos, fonoaudiólogos, assistentes sociais e nutricionistas). Para a coleta de dados foi utilizada uma ficha para caracterizar a amostra e a versão brasileira do Psychological Empowerment Instrument. Para comparação dos escores entre os três grupos foi utilizado o teste de Kruskal-Wallis, seguido pelo pós-teste de Dunn.Resultados: Os enfermeiros, médicos e outros profissionais obtiveram, respectivamente, médias de 71,4; 69,3 e 71,1 pontos (p=0,5959) no escore total do instrumento.Conclusão: Não existem diferenças estatisticamente significantes na percepção do empoderamento psicológico dos diferentes profissionais da saúde.Palavras-chave: Poder psicológico. Pessoal de saúde. Competência clínica. Enfermagem.SciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2020-10-02info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/124910.1590/1983-1447.2021.20200050porhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/1249/1927Copyright (c) 2020 Bianca Gomes Salles, Flávia Carvalho Pena Dias, Samantha Perissotto, Juliane Custódio de Andrade, Ariane Polidoro Dini, Renata Cristina Gasparinohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSalles, Bianca Gomes Dias, Flávia Carvalho PenaPerissotto, SamanthaAndrade, Juliane Custódio de Dini, Ariane Polidoro Gasparino, Renata Cristina reponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:SciELOinstacron:SCI2020-10-02T12:47:05Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/1249Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2020-10-02T12:47:05SciELO Preprints - SciELOfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Psychological empowerment of health professionals
Empoderamiento psicológico de profesionales de la salud
Empoderamento psicológico dos profissionais de saúde
title Psychological empowerment of health professionals
spellingShingle Psychological empowerment of health professionals
Salles, Bianca Gomes
Poder psicológico
Pessoal de saúde
Competência clínica
Enfermagem
Power, psychological
Health personnel
Clinical competence
Nursing
Poder, psicológico
Personal de salud
Competencia clínica
Enfermería
title_short Psychological empowerment of health professionals
title_full Psychological empowerment of health professionals
title_fullStr Psychological empowerment of health professionals
title_full_unstemmed Psychological empowerment of health professionals
title_sort Psychological empowerment of health professionals
author Salles, Bianca Gomes
author_facet Salles, Bianca Gomes
Dias, Flávia Carvalho Pena
Perissotto, Samantha
Andrade, Juliane Custódio de
Dini, Ariane Polidoro
Gasparino, Renata Cristina
author_role author
author2 Dias, Flávia Carvalho Pena
Perissotto, Samantha
Andrade, Juliane Custódio de
Dini, Ariane Polidoro
Gasparino, Renata Cristina
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Salles, Bianca Gomes
Dias, Flávia Carvalho Pena
Perissotto, Samantha
Andrade, Juliane Custódio de
Dini, Ariane Polidoro
Gasparino, Renata Cristina
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Poder psicológico
Pessoal de saúde
Competência clínica
Enfermagem
Power, psychological
Health personnel
Clinical competence
Nursing
Poder, psicológico
Personal de salud
Competencia clínica
Enfermería
topic Poder psicológico
Pessoal de saúde
Competência clínica
Enfermagem
Power, psychological
Health personnel
Clinical competence
Nursing
Poder, psicológico
Personal de salud
Competencia clínica
Enfermería
description Objective: To assess whether there are differences in psychological empowerment betweendifferent health professionals working in a teaching hospital.Method: A comparative, quantitative, and cross-sectional study carried out with165 professionals selected at random and who worked in a teaching hospital in the inland of thestate of São Paulo. The participants were divided into three groups: 1) nurses, 2) physicians,and 3) other professionals (physiotherapists, psychologists, pharmacists, speech therapists,social workers, and nutritionists). For data collection, a form was used to characterize thesample, as well as the Brazilian version of the Psychological Empowerment Instrument. Tocompare the scores between the three groups, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used, followed byDunn' post-test.Results: Nurses, physicians, and other professionals scored 71.4; 69.3, and71.1 points (p=0.5959), respectively, in the total score of the instrumentConclusion: There are no statistically significant differences in the perception of psychologicalempowerment of different health professionals.Conclusion: There are no statistically significant differences in the perception of psychologicalempowerment of different health professionals.Keywords: Power, psychological. Health personnel. Clinical competence. Nursing.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-10-02
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format preprint
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/1249
10.1590/1983-1447.2021.20200050
url https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/1249
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1983-1447.2021.20200050
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/1249/1927
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SciELO Preprints
instname:SciELO
instacron:SCI
instname_str SciELO
instacron_str SCI
institution SCI
reponame_str SciELO Preprints
collection SciELO Preprints
repository.name.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints - SciELO
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scielo.submission@scielo.org
_version_ 1797047820156403712

Registros relacionados