Scientific production on Covid-19 in Brazil: a scoping review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mota, Daniel Marques
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Ferreira, Paulo José Gonçalves, Leal, Lisiane Freitas
Tipo de documento: preprint
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: SciELO Preprints
Texto Completo: https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/464
Resumo: Introduction: the national scientific production on Covid-19 has an immediate role in developing policies to tackle the disease and for guiding clinical decisions. Objective: to identify and characterize the scientific production on topics related to Covid-19 in national journals from articles published between December 1, 2019, and May 2, 2020. Method: scoping review, whose search for articles occurred in the SciELO Collection Brazil and on the websites of journal Visa em Debate and Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. The validated database was assessed by a simple quantitative analysis to provide numerical summaries of the characteristics of interest in the literature included in the review. Results: 58 (20.8%) articles from 22 national journals were included. The largest number of articles came from journals that developed fast publishing options or had been adopting a continuous flow publication model (n = 45; 77.6%). The distribution of articles in seven research categories was, in this order: Comment (n = 43; 74.1%), Descriptive study (n = 8; 13.8%), Literature review (n = 6; 10.4 %) and Analytical study (n = 1; 1.7%). Only one systematic review was found and the analytical study was classified as an ecological study. April concentrated 86.2% of the articles published, with the peak of publications occurring on April 9 (8 articles). Among 58 articles, "Social isolation, mental health and other aspects related to social behaviours” was the most prevalent theme (n = 14; 24.1%). Conclusions: this scoping review produced a map of scientific production in Brazil on Covid-19. There are important gaps, especially concerning randomized clinical trials and cohort studies, which need to be filled on further research in our country.
id SCI-1_e69b8cd2be0c36b1f05a654d616453db
oai_identifier_str oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/464
network_acronym_str SCI-1
network_name_str SciELO Preprints
repository_id_str
spelling Scientific production on Covid-19 in Brazil: a scoping reviewProdução científica sobre a Covid-19 no Brasil: uma revisão de escopoArtigo de RevistaInfecções por CoronavirusCOVID-19PandemiasRevisão de EscopoJournal ArticleCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19PandemicsScoping ReviewIntroduction: the national scientific production on Covid-19 has an immediate role in developing policies to tackle the disease and for guiding clinical decisions. Objective: to identify and characterize the scientific production on topics related to Covid-19 in national journals from articles published between December 1, 2019, and May 2, 2020. Method: scoping review, whose search for articles occurred in the SciELO Collection Brazil and on the websites of journal Visa em Debate and Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. The validated database was assessed by a simple quantitative analysis to provide numerical summaries of the characteristics of interest in the literature included in the review. Results: 58 (20.8%) articles from 22 national journals were included. The largest number of articles came from journals that developed fast publishing options or had been adopting a continuous flow publication model (n = 45; 77.6%). The distribution of articles in seven research categories was, in this order: Comment (n = 43; 74.1%), Descriptive study (n = 8; 13.8%), Literature review (n = 6; 10.4 %) and Analytical study (n = 1; 1.7%). Only one systematic review was found and the analytical study was classified as an ecological study. April concentrated 86.2% of the articles published, with the peak of publications occurring on April 9 (8 articles). Among 58 articles, "Social isolation, mental health and other aspects related to social behaviours” was the most prevalent theme (n = 14; 24.1%). Conclusions: this scoping review produced a map of scientific production in Brazil on Covid-19. There are important gaps, especially concerning randomized clinical trials and cohort studies, which need to be filled on further research in our country.Introdução: a produção científica nacional sobre a Covid-19 tem papel imediato na formulação de políticas de enfrentamento da doença e na orientação de decisões clínicas. Objetivo: identificar e caracterizar a produção científica sobre assuntos relacionados à Covid-19 em revistas nacionais a partir de artigos publicados entre 1º de dezembro de 2019 e 2 de maio de 2020. Método: revisão de escopo, cuja busca por artigos ocorreu na Coleção SciELO Brasil e nos sítios eletrônicos das revistas Visa em Debate e Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. O banco de dados validado foi submetido a uma análise quantitativa simples para fornecer resumos numéricos das características de interesse da literatura incluída na revisão. Resultados: foram incluídos 58 (20,8%) artigos provenientes de 22 revistas nacionais. O maior número de artigos proveio das revistas que desenvolveram opções rápidas de publicação ou vinham adotando um modelo de publicação de fluxo contínuo (n = 45; 77,6%). A distribuição dos artigos em sete categorias de pesquisa foi, nesta ordem: Comentário (n = 43; 74,1%), Estudo descritivo (n = 8; 13,8%), Revisão da literatura (n = 6; 10,4%) e Estudo analítico (n = 1; 1,7%). Constatou-se apenas uma revisão sistemática e o estudo analítico publicado foi do tipo ecológico. O mês de abril concentrou 86,2% dos artigos, cujo maior pico, compreendendo o período estudado, ocorreu em 9 de abril, com 8 publicações. Dos 58 artigos, o “Isolamento social, saúde mental e outros aspectos relacionados a comportamentos sociais” foi o tema mais prevalente (n = 14; 24,1%). Conclusões: Esta revisão de escopo produziu um mapa da produção científica no Brasil sobre a Covida-19. Nesta produção, há lacunas importantes, principalmente, no que tange aos ensaios clínicos randomizados e estudos de coorte, que precisam ser preenchidas com a realização de pesquisas.SciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2020-05-15info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/46410.1590/SciELOPreprints.464porhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/464/581Copyright (c) 2020 Daniel Marques Mota, Paulo José Gonçalves Ferreira, Lisiane Freitas Lealhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMota, Daniel MarquesFerreira, Paulo José GonçalvesLeal, Lisiane Freitasreponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:SciELOinstacron:SCI2020-05-13T20:37:10Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/464Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2020-05-13T20:37:10SciELO Preprints - SciELOfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Scientific production on Covid-19 in Brazil: a scoping review
Produção científica sobre a Covid-19 no Brasil: uma revisão de escopo
title Scientific production on Covid-19 in Brazil: a scoping review
spellingShingle Scientific production on Covid-19 in Brazil: a scoping review
Mota, Daniel Marques
Artigo de Revista
Infecções por Coronavirus
COVID-19
Pandemias
Revisão de Escopo
Journal Article
Coronavirus Infections
COVID-19
Pandemics
Scoping Review
title_short Scientific production on Covid-19 in Brazil: a scoping review
title_full Scientific production on Covid-19 in Brazil: a scoping review
title_fullStr Scientific production on Covid-19 in Brazil: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Scientific production on Covid-19 in Brazil: a scoping review
title_sort Scientific production on Covid-19 in Brazil: a scoping review
author Mota, Daniel Marques
author_facet Mota, Daniel Marques
Ferreira, Paulo José Gonçalves
Leal, Lisiane Freitas
author_role author
author2 Ferreira, Paulo José Gonçalves
Leal, Lisiane Freitas
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mota, Daniel Marques
Ferreira, Paulo José Gonçalves
Leal, Lisiane Freitas
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Artigo de Revista
Infecções por Coronavirus
COVID-19
Pandemias
Revisão de Escopo
Journal Article
Coronavirus Infections
COVID-19
Pandemics
Scoping Review
topic Artigo de Revista
Infecções por Coronavirus
COVID-19
Pandemias
Revisão de Escopo
Journal Article
Coronavirus Infections
COVID-19
Pandemics
Scoping Review
description Introduction: the national scientific production on Covid-19 has an immediate role in developing policies to tackle the disease and for guiding clinical decisions. Objective: to identify and characterize the scientific production on topics related to Covid-19 in national journals from articles published between December 1, 2019, and May 2, 2020. Method: scoping review, whose search for articles occurred in the SciELO Collection Brazil and on the websites of journal Visa em Debate and Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. The validated database was assessed by a simple quantitative analysis to provide numerical summaries of the characteristics of interest in the literature included in the review. Results: 58 (20.8%) articles from 22 national journals were included. The largest number of articles came from journals that developed fast publishing options or had been adopting a continuous flow publication model (n = 45; 77.6%). The distribution of articles in seven research categories was, in this order: Comment (n = 43; 74.1%), Descriptive study (n = 8; 13.8%), Literature review (n = 6; 10.4 %) and Analytical study (n = 1; 1.7%). Only one systematic review was found and the analytical study was classified as an ecological study. April concentrated 86.2% of the articles published, with the peak of publications occurring on April 9 (8 articles). Among 58 articles, "Social isolation, mental health and other aspects related to social behaviours” was the most prevalent theme (n = 14; 24.1%). Conclusions: this scoping review produced a map of scientific production in Brazil on Covid-19. There are important gaps, especially concerning randomized clinical trials and cohort studies, which need to be filled on further research in our country.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format preprint
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/464
10.1590/SciELOPreprints.464
url https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/464
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/SciELOPreprints.464
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/464/581
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Daniel Marques Mota, Paulo José Gonçalves Ferreira, Lisiane Freitas Leal
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Daniel Marques Mota, Paulo José Gonçalves Ferreira, Lisiane Freitas Leal
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SciELO Preprints
instname:SciELO
instacron:SCI
instname_str SciELO
instacron_str SCI
institution SCI
reponame_str SciELO Preprints
collection SciELO Preprints
repository.name.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints - SciELO
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scielo.submission@scielo.org
_version_ 1797047817793961984