Scientific production on Covid-19 in Brazil: a scoping review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | preprint |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | SciELO Preprints |
Texto Completo: | https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/464 |
Resumo: | Introduction: the national scientific production on Covid-19 has an immediate role in developing policies to tackle the disease and for guiding clinical decisions. Objective: to identify and characterize the scientific production on topics related to Covid-19 in national journals from articles published between December 1, 2019, and May 2, 2020. Method: scoping review, whose search for articles occurred in the SciELO Collection Brazil and on the websites of journal Visa em Debate and Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. The validated database was assessed by a simple quantitative analysis to provide numerical summaries of the characteristics of interest in the literature included in the review. Results: 58 (20.8%) articles from 22 national journals were included. The largest number of articles came from journals that developed fast publishing options or had been adopting a continuous flow publication model (n = 45; 77.6%). The distribution of articles in seven research categories was, in this order: Comment (n = 43; 74.1%), Descriptive study (n = 8; 13.8%), Literature review (n = 6; 10.4 %) and Analytical study (n = 1; 1.7%). Only one systematic review was found and the analytical study was classified as an ecological study. April concentrated 86.2% of the articles published, with the peak of publications occurring on April 9 (8 articles). Among 58 articles, "Social isolation, mental health and other aspects related to social behaviours” was the most prevalent theme (n = 14; 24.1%). Conclusions: this scoping review produced a map of scientific production in Brazil on Covid-19. There are important gaps, especially concerning randomized clinical trials and cohort studies, which need to be filled on further research in our country. |
id |
SCI-1_e69b8cd2be0c36b1f05a654d616453db |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/464 |
network_acronym_str |
SCI-1 |
network_name_str |
SciELO Preprints |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Scientific production on Covid-19 in Brazil: a scoping reviewProdução científica sobre a Covid-19 no Brasil: uma revisão de escopoArtigo de RevistaInfecções por CoronavirusCOVID-19PandemiasRevisão de EscopoJournal ArticleCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19PandemicsScoping ReviewIntroduction: the national scientific production on Covid-19 has an immediate role in developing policies to tackle the disease and for guiding clinical decisions. Objective: to identify and characterize the scientific production on topics related to Covid-19 in national journals from articles published between December 1, 2019, and May 2, 2020. Method: scoping review, whose search for articles occurred in the SciELO Collection Brazil and on the websites of journal Visa em Debate and Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. The validated database was assessed by a simple quantitative analysis to provide numerical summaries of the characteristics of interest in the literature included in the review. Results: 58 (20.8%) articles from 22 national journals were included. The largest number of articles came from journals that developed fast publishing options or had been adopting a continuous flow publication model (n = 45; 77.6%). The distribution of articles in seven research categories was, in this order: Comment (n = 43; 74.1%), Descriptive study (n = 8; 13.8%), Literature review (n = 6; 10.4 %) and Analytical study (n = 1; 1.7%). Only one systematic review was found and the analytical study was classified as an ecological study. April concentrated 86.2% of the articles published, with the peak of publications occurring on April 9 (8 articles). Among 58 articles, "Social isolation, mental health and other aspects related to social behaviours” was the most prevalent theme (n = 14; 24.1%). Conclusions: this scoping review produced a map of scientific production in Brazil on Covid-19. There are important gaps, especially concerning randomized clinical trials and cohort studies, which need to be filled on further research in our country.Introdução: a produção científica nacional sobre a Covid-19 tem papel imediato na formulação de políticas de enfrentamento da doença e na orientação de decisões clínicas. Objetivo: identificar e caracterizar a produção científica sobre assuntos relacionados à Covid-19 em revistas nacionais a partir de artigos publicados entre 1º de dezembro de 2019 e 2 de maio de 2020. Método: revisão de escopo, cuja busca por artigos ocorreu na Coleção SciELO Brasil e nos sítios eletrônicos das revistas Visa em Debate e Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. O banco de dados validado foi submetido a uma análise quantitativa simples para fornecer resumos numéricos das características de interesse da literatura incluída na revisão. Resultados: foram incluídos 58 (20,8%) artigos provenientes de 22 revistas nacionais. O maior número de artigos proveio das revistas que desenvolveram opções rápidas de publicação ou vinham adotando um modelo de publicação de fluxo contínuo (n = 45; 77,6%). A distribuição dos artigos em sete categorias de pesquisa foi, nesta ordem: Comentário (n = 43; 74,1%), Estudo descritivo (n = 8; 13,8%), Revisão da literatura (n = 6; 10,4%) e Estudo analítico (n = 1; 1,7%). Constatou-se apenas uma revisão sistemática e o estudo analítico publicado foi do tipo ecológico. O mês de abril concentrou 86,2% dos artigos, cujo maior pico, compreendendo o período estudado, ocorreu em 9 de abril, com 8 publicações. Dos 58 artigos, o “Isolamento social, saúde mental e outros aspectos relacionados a comportamentos sociais” foi o tema mais prevalente (n = 14; 24,1%). Conclusões: Esta revisão de escopo produziu um mapa da produção científica no Brasil sobre a Covida-19. Nesta produção, há lacunas importantes, principalmente, no que tange aos ensaios clínicos randomizados e estudos de coorte, que precisam ser preenchidas com a realização de pesquisas.SciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2020-05-15info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/46410.1590/SciELOPreprints.464porhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/464/581Copyright (c) 2020 Daniel Marques Mota, Paulo José Gonçalves Ferreira, Lisiane Freitas Lealhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMota, Daniel MarquesFerreira, Paulo José GonçalvesLeal, Lisiane Freitasreponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:SciELOinstacron:SCI2020-05-13T20:37:10Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/464Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2020-05-13T20:37:10SciELO Preprints - SciELOfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientific production on Covid-19 in Brazil: a scoping review Produção científica sobre a Covid-19 no Brasil: uma revisão de escopo |
title |
Scientific production on Covid-19 in Brazil: a scoping review |
spellingShingle |
Scientific production on Covid-19 in Brazil: a scoping review Mota, Daniel Marques Artigo de Revista Infecções por Coronavirus COVID-19 Pandemias Revisão de Escopo Journal Article Coronavirus Infections COVID-19 Pandemics Scoping Review |
title_short |
Scientific production on Covid-19 in Brazil: a scoping review |
title_full |
Scientific production on Covid-19 in Brazil: a scoping review |
title_fullStr |
Scientific production on Covid-19 in Brazil: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Scientific production on Covid-19 in Brazil: a scoping review |
title_sort |
Scientific production on Covid-19 in Brazil: a scoping review |
author |
Mota, Daniel Marques |
author_facet |
Mota, Daniel Marques Ferreira, Paulo José Gonçalves Leal, Lisiane Freitas |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ferreira, Paulo José Gonçalves Leal, Lisiane Freitas |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mota, Daniel Marques Ferreira, Paulo José Gonçalves Leal, Lisiane Freitas |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Artigo de Revista Infecções por Coronavirus COVID-19 Pandemias Revisão de Escopo Journal Article Coronavirus Infections COVID-19 Pandemics Scoping Review |
topic |
Artigo de Revista Infecções por Coronavirus COVID-19 Pandemias Revisão de Escopo Journal Article Coronavirus Infections COVID-19 Pandemics Scoping Review |
description |
Introduction: the national scientific production on Covid-19 has an immediate role in developing policies to tackle the disease and for guiding clinical decisions. Objective: to identify and characterize the scientific production on topics related to Covid-19 in national journals from articles published between December 1, 2019, and May 2, 2020. Method: scoping review, whose search for articles occurred in the SciELO Collection Brazil and on the websites of journal Visa em Debate and Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. The validated database was assessed by a simple quantitative analysis to provide numerical summaries of the characteristics of interest in the literature included in the review. Results: 58 (20.8%) articles from 22 national journals were included. The largest number of articles came from journals that developed fast publishing options or had been adopting a continuous flow publication model (n = 45; 77.6%). The distribution of articles in seven research categories was, in this order: Comment (n = 43; 74.1%), Descriptive study (n = 8; 13.8%), Literature review (n = 6; 10.4 %) and Analytical study (n = 1; 1.7%). Only one systematic review was found and the analytical study was classified as an ecological study. April concentrated 86.2% of the articles published, with the peak of publications occurring on April 9 (8 articles). Among 58 articles, "Social isolation, mental health and other aspects related to social behaviours” was the most prevalent theme (n = 14; 24.1%). Conclusions: this scoping review produced a map of scientific production in Brazil on Covid-19. There are important gaps, especially concerning randomized clinical trials and cohort studies, which need to be filled on further research in our country. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
preprint |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/464 10.1590/SciELOPreprints.464 |
url |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/464 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/SciELOPreprints.464 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/464/581 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Daniel Marques Mota, Paulo José Gonçalves Ferreira, Lisiane Freitas Leal https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Daniel Marques Mota, Paulo José Gonçalves Ferreira, Lisiane Freitas Leal https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:SciELO Preprints instname:SciELO instacron:SCI |
instname_str |
SciELO |
instacron_str |
SCI |
institution |
SCI |
reponame_str |
SciELO Preprints |
collection |
SciELO Preprints |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints - SciELO |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
scielo.submission@scielo.org |
_version_ |
1797047817793961984 |