Affirmative actions and horizontal stratification: comparison between bonus and Quotas Law at the UFMG

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Paula, Gustavo Bruno de
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Nonato, Bréscia França, Nogueira, Cláudio Marques Martins
Tipo de documento: preprint
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: SciELO Preprints
Texto Completo: https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/3488
Resumo: In this article, we analyze the effects of two affirmative action policies adopted by the Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG): the bonus policy and the Quota Law. We compare the social inclusion produced by them by two angles: the access itself to UFMG and the distribution of the target groups among the institution’s programs, considering its internal horizontal hierarchy. We verify the changes in the student`s profile by focusing on three variables: race, school origin and family income. Based on descriptive statistics, it is concluded that the two policies had relevant effects on social inclusion. However, this occurred in different ways. The bonus policy was able to increase the access of students from public schools, blacks and with low-income, but mainly in the less selective programs. The Quota Law contributed more effectively to increasing the access of these students to the most selective programs of UFMG, reducing the horizontal inequalities. We observe, however, that remains expressive inequalities in the access to the universities programs still need to be addressed.
id SCI-1_f1dfca0b5da6924daea90f4f3dcdb913
oai_identifier_str oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/3488
network_acronym_str SCI-1
network_name_str SciELO Preprints
repository_id_str
spelling Affirmative actions and horizontal stratification: comparison between bonus and Quotas Law at the UFMGAcciones afirmativas y estratificación horizontal: comparación entre bonificación y la Ley de Cuotas en la UFMGAções afirmativas e estratificação horizontal: comparação entre bônus e Lei de Cotas na UFMGensino superioração afirmativadesigualdades escolaresestratificação horizontalhigher educationaffirmative actioneducational inequalitieshorizontal stratificationeducación superioracción afirmativadesigualdades escolaresestratificación horizontalIn this article, we analyze the effects of two affirmative action policies adopted by the Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG): the bonus policy and the Quota Law. We compare the social inclusion produced by them by two angles: the access itself to UFMG and the distribution of the target groups among the institution’s programs, considering its internal horizontal hierarchy. We verify the changes in the student`s profile by focusing on three variables: race, school origin and family income. Based on descriptive statistics, it is concluded that the two policies had relevant effects on social inclusion. However, this occurred in different ways. The bonus policy was able to increase the access of students from public schools, blacks and with low-income, but mainly in the less selective programs. The Quota Law contributed more effectively to increasing the access of these students to the most selective programs of UFMG, reducing the horizontal inequalities. We observe, however, that remains expressive inequalities in the access to the universities programs still need to be addressed.En este artículo analizamos los efectos de dos políticas de acción afirmativa adoptadas por la Universidad Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG): la política de bonificación y la Ley de Cuotas. Comparamos la inclusión social desde dos ángulos: el acceso en sí mismo a la UFMG y la distribución de estudiantes universitarios entre los grados de la institución, considerando su jerarquía horizontal interna. Verificamos los cambios en el perfil del estudiante, enfocándonos en tres variables: raza, origen escolar y renta familiar. Con base en estadísticas descriptivas, se concluye que las políticas tuvieron efectos relevantes en la inclusión social, pero de diferentes maneras. La política de bonificación aumentó la entrada de estudiantes de escuelas públicas, negros y con bajos ingresos, pero principalmente en cursos menos selectivos. La Ley de Cuotas ha contribuido de manera más efectiva a incrementar el acceso de estos estudiantes a cursos más selectivos, reduciendo las desigualdades horizontales. Sin embargo, observamos que persisten desigualdades significativas en el acceso a los cursos universitarios que aún deben ser enfrentadas.Neste artigo analisamos os efeitos de inclusão social de duas políticas de ação afirmativa adotadas pela Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG): a política de bônus e a Lei de Cotas. Comparamos a inclusão social propiciada por essas políticas sob dois ângulos: o acesso em si à UFMG e a distribuição do público-alvo entre as graduações da instituição, considerando sua hierarquia horizontal interna. Verificamos as mudanças no perfil do alunado focalizando três variáveis: raça, origem escolar e renda familiar. Com base em estatísticas descritivas, conclui-se que as duas políticas tiveram efeitos relevantes na inclusão social, mas de formas distintas. A política do bônus elevou o ingresso de estudantes das escolas públicas, negros e de baixa renda, mas principalmente nos cursos menos seletivos. Já a Lei de Cotas contribuiu de maneira mais efetiva para aumentar o acesso desses grupos aos cursos mais seletivos, reduzindo as desigualdades horizontais. Observamos, no entanto, que permanecem desigualdades expressivas no acesso aos cursos da universidade que ainda precisam ser enfrentadas.SciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2022-01-14info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/348810.1590/SciELOPreprints.3488porhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/3488/6370Copyright (c) 2022 Gustavo Bruno de Paula, Bréscia França Nonato, Cláudio Marques Martins Nogueirahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPaula, Gustavo Bruno deNonato, Bréscia FrançaNogueira, Cláudio Marques Martinsreponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:SciELOinstacron:SCI2022-01-11T22:11:10Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/3488Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2022-01-11T22:11:10SciELO Preprints - SciELOfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Affirmative actions and horizontal stratification: comparison between bonus and Quotas Law at the UFMG
Acciones afirmativas y estratificación horizontal: comparación entre bonificación y la Ley de Cuotas en la UFMG
Ações afirmativas e estratificação horizontal: comparação entre bônus e Lei de Cotas na UFMG
title Affirmative actions and horizontal stratification: comparison between bonus and Quotas Law at the UFMG
spellingShingle Affirmative actions and horizontal stratification: comparison between bonus and Quotas Law at the UFMG
Paula, Gustavo Bruno de
ensino superior
ação afirmativa
desigualdades escolares
estratificação horizontal
higher education
affirmative action
educational inequalities
horizontal stratification
educación superior
acción afirmativa
desigualdades escolares
estratificación horizontal
title_short Affirmative actions and horizontal stratification: comparison between bonus and Quotas Law at the UFMG
title_full Affirmative actions and horizontal stratification: comparison between bonus and Quotas Law at the UFMG
title_fullStr Affirmative actions and horizontal stratification: comparison between bonus and Quotas Law at the UFMG
title_full_unstemmed Affirmative actions and horizontal stratification: comparison between bonus and Quotas Law at the UFMG
title_sort Affirmative actions and horizontal stratification: comparison between bonus and Quotas Law at the UFMG
author Paula, Gustavo Bruno de
author_facet Paula, Gustavo Bruno de
Nonato, Bréscia França
Nogueira, Cláudio Marques Martins
author_role author
author2 Nonato, Bréscia França
Nogueira, Cláudio Marques Martins
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Paula, Gustavo Bruno de
Nonato, Bréscia França
Nogueira, Cláudio Marques Martins
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv ensino superior
ação afirmativa
desigualdades escolares
estratificação horizontal
higher education
affirmative action
educational inequalities
horizontal stratification
educación superior
acción afirmativa
desigualdades escolares
estratificación horizontal
topic ensino superior
ação afirmativa
desigualdades escolares
estratificação horizontal
higher education
affirmative action
educational inequalities
horizontal stratification
educación superior
acción afirmativa
desigualdades escolares
estratificación horizontal
description In this article, we analyze the effects of two affirmative action policies adopted by the Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG): the bonus policy and the Quota Law. We compare the social inclusion produced by them by two angles: the access itself to UFMG and the distribution of the target groups among the institution’s programs, considering its internal horizontal hierarchy. We verify the changes in the student`s profile by focusing on three variables: race, school origin and family income. Based on descriptive statistics, it is concluded that the two policies had relevant effects on social inclusion. However, this occurred in different ways. The bonus policy was able to increase the access of students from public schools, blacks and with low-income, but mainly in the less selective programs. The Quota Law contributed more effectively to increasing the access of these students to the most selective programs of UFMG, reducing the horizontal inequalities. We observe, however, that remains expressive inequalities in the access to the universities programs still need to be addressed.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-14
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format preprint
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/3488
10.1590/SciELOPreprints.3488
url https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/3488
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/SciELOPreprints.3488
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/3488/6370
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Gustavo Bruno de Paula, Bréscia França Nonato, Cláudio Marques Martins Nogueira
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Gustavo Bruno de Paula, Bréscia França Nonato, Cláudio Marques Martins Nogueira
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SciELO Preprints
instname:SciELO
instacron:SCI
instname_str SciELO
instacron_str SCI
institution SCI
reponame_str SciELO Preprints
collection SciELO Preprints
repository.name.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints - SciELO
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scielo.submission@scielo.org
_version_ 1797047826568445952