Intramedullary nail versus locked plate in the treatment of two- and three-part proximal humerus fractures: a retrospective comparative study of 46 cases

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Remigio, Gustavo
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Bomfim, Leonidas de Souza, Maciel, Rafael Almeida, Almeida Neto, Jose Inacio de, Toledo, Daniel Carvalho de, Machado, Carla Jorge
Tipo de documento: preprint
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: SciELO Preprints
Texto Completo: https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/4462
Resumo: Objective: to retrospectively evaluate and compare the proportions of complications and radiographic findings of two- and three-part proximal humerus fracture osteosynthesis with two treatment methods: third-generation locked intramedullary nail and locked plate. Methods: 46 patients with a mean age of 58.9±16.6 years were evaluated between January 2020 and January 2021. In sixteen cases (34.8%), an intramedullary nail was used, and in thirty cases (65 .2%), the proximal humerus locked plate. The evaluation used included the rate of complications with a minimum follow-up of 6 months postoperatively and radiographic evaluation. Results: there was no significant difference between the groups regarding the proportion of complications (nail group 18.8%, plate group 13.3%; p=0.681). The nail group showed less residual loss in varus (cervicodiaphyseal angle, nail group 132.1º±2.3º, plate group 123.8º±10.1º; p<0.001). In the plaque group, women had a lower value (1.43±0.22) of the tuberosity-deltoid index (DTI) compared to men (1.58±0.11) (p=0.022). Conclusions: in the short-term follow-up, osteosynthesis, with locked plate and intramedullary nail, did not show differences in the proportions of complications. The nail group showed less change in the post-operative cervicodiaphyseal angle, however, there were two serious complications with cut out and varus deviation requiring a new surgical approach in the nail group.
id SCI-1_f20b026221b58f5fdf33906788541389
oai_identifier_str oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/4462
network_acronym_str SCI-1
network_name_str SciELO Preprints
repository_id_str
spelling Intramedullary nail versus locked plate in the treatment of two- and three-part proximal humerus fractures: a retrospective comparative study of 46 casesHaste intramedular versus placa bloqueada no tratamento da fratura do úmero proximal em duas e três partes: um estudo comparativo retrospectivo de 46 casoscomplicaçõesplaca bloqueadaumero proximalhaste intramedularcomplicationsintramedullary naillocked plateproximal humerusObjective: to retrospectively evaluate and compare the proportions of complications and radiographic findings of two- and three-part proximal humerus fracture osteosynthesis with two treatment methods: third-generation locked intramedullary nail and locked plate. Methods: 46 patients with a mean age of 58.9±16.6 years were evaluated between January 2020 and January 2021. In sixteen cases (34.8%), an intramedullary nail was used, and in thirty cases (65 .2%), the proximal humerus locked plate. The evaluation used included the rate of complications with a minimum follow-up of 6 months postoperatively and radiographic evaluation. Results: there was no significant difference between the groups regarding the proportion of complications (nail group 18.8%, plate group 13.3%; p=0.681). The nail group showed less residual loss in varus (cervicodiaphyseal angle, nail group 132.1º±2.3º, plate group 123.8º±10.1º; p<0.001). In the plaque group, women had a lower value (1.43±0.22) of the tuberosity-deltoid index (DTI) compared to men (1.58±0.11) (p=0.022). Conclusions: in the short-term follow-up, osteosynthesis, with locked plate and intramedullary nail, did not show differences in the proportions of complications. The nail group showed less change in the post-operative cervicodiaphyseal angle, however, there were two serious complications with cut out and varus deviation requiring a new surgical approach in the nail group.Objetivo: avaliar intra, de modo retrospectivo, e comparando as complicações e os achados radiográficos da osteossíntese da úmero proximal em duas e três partes com dois métodos de tratamento: a terceira geração e placa bloqueada do tratamento. Métodos: foram obtidos 46 pacientes com média de idade de 58,9±16,6 anos entre janeiro de 2020 a janeiro de 2021. ,2%), uma placa bloqueada de úmero proximal. A utilização de uma taxa de acompanhamento com acompanhamento de acompanhamento pós-operatório e avaliação radiográfica. Resultados: não houve diferença significativa entre os grupos quanto à proporção de complicações (grupo pressa, 8%, grupo placa 13,61; p=0,61). O grupo pressa apresentou menor perda residual em varo (ângulo cervicodiafisário grupo pressa 132,1º±2,3º, grupo placa 123,8º±10,1º; p<0,001). No grupo placa, as mulheres apresentaram menor valor (1,43±0,22) do índice tuberosidade-deltoide (DTI) em relação aos homens (1,58±0,11) (p=0,022). Conclusões: sem seguimento de curto prazo, a osteoconformidade com placas fixadas e pressa intramedular, não apresentou diferenças nas proporções de complicações. O grupo apresentou menor alteração do projeto cervicodiafisário pós-operatório, entretanto, duas complicações graves com cut out e desvio em varo com necessidade de reabordagem integrada no grupo pressa. 22) do índice tuberosidade-deltoide (DTI) em relação aos homens (1,58±0,11) (p=0,022). Conclusões: sem seguimento de curto prazo, a osteoconformidade com placas fixadas e pressa intramedular, não apresentou diferenças nas proporções de complicações. O grupo apresentou menor alteração do projeto cervicodiafisário pós-operatório, entretanto, duas complicações graves com cut out e desvio em varo com necessidade de reabordagem integrada no grupo pressa. 22) do índice tuberosidade-deltoide (DTI) em relação aos homens (1,58±0,11) (p=0,022). Conclusões: sem seguimento de curto prazo, a osteoconformidade com placas fixadas e pressa intramedular, não apresentou diferenças nas proporções de complicações. O grupo apresentou menor alteração do projeto cervicodiafisário pós-operatório, entretanto, duas complicações graves com cut out e desvio em varo com necessidade de reabordagem integrada no grupo pressa. SciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2022-07-29info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/446210.1590/SciELOPreprints.4462porhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/4462/8612Copyright (c) 2022 Gustavo Remigio, Leonidas de Souza Bomfim, Rafael Almeida Maciel, Jose Inacio de Almeida Neto, Daniel Carvalho de Toledo, Carla Jorge Machadohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRemigio, GustavoBomfim, Leonidas de SouzaMaciel, Rafael AlmeidaAlmeida Neto, Jose Inacio deToledo, Daniel Carvalho deMachado, Carla Jorgereponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:SciELOinstacron:SCI2022-07-25T21:38:01Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/4462Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2022-07-25T21:38:01SciELO Preprints - SciELOfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Intramedullary nail versus locked plate in the treatment of two- and three-part proximal humerus fractures: a retrospective comparative study of 46 cases
Haste intramedular versus placa bloqueada no tratamento da fratura do úmero proximal em duas e três partes: um estudo comparativo retrospectivo de 46 casos
title Intramedullary nail versus locked plate in the treatment of two- and three-part proximal humerus fractures: a retrospective comparative study of 46 cases
spellingShingle Intramedullary nail versus locked plate in the treatment of two- and three-part proximal humerus fractures: a retrospective comparative study of 46 cases
Remigio, Gustavo
complicações
placa bloqueada
umero proximal
haste intramedular
complications
intramedullary nail
locked plate
proximal humerus
title_short Intramedullary nail versus locked plate in the treatment of two- and three-part proximal humerus fractures: a retrospective comparative study of 46 cases
title_full Intramedullary nail versus locked plate in the treatment of two- and three-part proximal humerus fractures: a retrospective comparative study of 46 cases
title_fullStr Intramedullary nail versus locked plate in the treatment of two- and three-part proximal humerus fractures: a retrospective comparative study of 46 cases
title_full_unstemmed Intramedullary nail versus locked plate in the treatment of two- and three-part proximal humerus fractures: a retrospective comparative study of 46 cases
title_sort Intramedullary nail versus locked plate in the treatment of two- and three-part proximal humerus fractures: a retrospective comparative study of 46 cases
author Remigio, Gustavo
author_facet Remigio, Gustavo
Bomfim, Leonidas de Souza
Maciel, Rafael Almeida
Almeida Neto, Jose Inacio de
Toledo, Daniel Carvalho de
Machado, Carla Jorge
author_role author
author2 Bomfim, Leonidas de Souza
Maciel, Rafael Almeida
Almeida Neto, Jose Inacio de
Toledo, Daniel Carvalho de
Machado, Carla Jorge
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Remigio, Gustavo
Bomfim, Leonidas de Souza
Maciel, Rafael Almeida
Almeida Neto, Jose Inacio de
Toledo, Daniel Carvalho de
Machado, Carla Jorge
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv complicações
placa bloqueada
umero proximal
haste intramedular
complications
intramedullary nail
locked plate
proximal humerus
topic complicações
placa bloqueada
umero proximal
haste intramedular
complications
intramedullary nail
locked plate
proximal humerus
description Objective: to retrospectively evaluate and compare the proportions of complications and radiographic findings of two- and three-part proximal humerus fracture osteosynthesis with two treatment methods: third-generation locked intramedullary nail and locked plate. Methods: 46 patients with a mean age of 58.9±16.6 years were evaluated between January 2020 and January 2021. In sixteen cases (34.8%), an intramedullary nail was used, and in thirty cases (65 .2%), the proximal humerus locked plate. The evaluation used included the rate of complications with a minimum follow-up of 6 months postoperatively and radiographic evaluation. Results: there was no significant difference between the groups regarding the proportion of complications (nail group 18.8%, plate group 13.3%; p=0.681). The nail group showed less residual loss in varus (cervicodiaphyseal angle, nail group 132.1º±2.3º, plate group 123.8º±10.1º; p<0.001). In the plaque group, women had a lower value (1.43±0.22) of the tuberosity-deltoid index (DTI) compared to men (1.58±0.11) (p=0.022). Conclusions: in the short-term follow-up, osteosynthesis, with locked plate and intramedullary nail, did not show differences in the proportions of complications. The nail group showed less change in the post-operative cervicodiaphyseal angle, however, there were two serious complications with cut out and varus deviation requiring a new surgical approach in the nail group.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-07-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format preprint
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/4462
10.1590/SciELOPreprints.4462
url https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/4462
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/SciELOPreprints.4462
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/4462/8612
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SciELO Preprints
instname:SciELO
instacron:SCI
instname_str SciELO
instacron_str SCI
institution SCI
reponame_str SciELO Preprints
collection SciELO Preprints
repository.name.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints - SciELO
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scielo.submission@scielo.org
_version_ 1797047829185691648