Productivity and quality of sweet potato roots cultivation with and without chicken manure

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Steffler, Andersson Daniel
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Canepelle, Eduardo, Rotili Junior, Rodrigo, Redin, Marciel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online)
Texto Completo: http://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/730
Resumo: Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) has cultural, social and economic importance due to its rusticity and wide climate adaptation, being cultivated in Brazil for human and animal food. However, cultivation is carried out mainly without fertilization and with Creole cultivars. The objective was to evaluate the yield and quality of roots of sweet potato cultivars with and without fertilization of chicken manure in an Oxisol. The experiment was carried out under field conditions in the 2015/16 and 2016/17 seasons in a randomized block design with three replications in 6 m2 plots. Four sweet potato cultivars, BRS Rubissol, BRS Amélia, BRS Cuia and Crioula, were used. Root productivity, number, length and diameter of roots, and cracked roots were evaluated. In both cultivation conditions, the virus-free cultivars Rubissol, Amélia and Cuia showed higher average root yields, 43,941, 45,498 and 52,095 kg ha-1, respectively, compared to the Crioula cultivar with 3,389 kg ha-1. Fertilization with chicken manure does not increase the productivity, number, length and diameter of roots, but it does increase the number of cracked roots. The cultivation of virus-free sweet potato without fertilizer reduces cracked roots by an average of 51.4%.
id SEAPDR_c1efebe7000e432e614d5b1949f904ef
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br:article/730
network_acronym_str SEAPDR
network_name_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Productivity and quality of sweet potato roots cultivation with and without chicken manureProdutividade e qualidade de raízes de batata-doce cultivadas com e sem adubação de cama de frangoIpomoea batatasAlternative fertilizerChicken manureOrganic fertilizerIpomoea batatasFertilizante alternativoDejeto de frangoAdubação orgânicaSweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) has cultural, social and economic importance due to its rusticity and wide climate adaptation, being cultivated in Brazil for human and animal food. However, cultivation is carried out mainly without fertilization and with Creole cultivars. The objective was to evaluate the yield and quality of roots of sweet potato cultivars with and without fertilization of chicken manure in an Oxisol. The experiment was carried out under field conditions in the 2015/16 and 2016/17 seasons in a randomized block design with three replications in 6 m2 plots. Four sweet potato cultivars, BRS Rubissol, BRS Amélia, BRS Cuia and Crioula, were used. Root productivity, number, length and diameter of roots, and cracked roots were evaluated. In both cultivation conditions, the virus-free cultivars Rubissol, Amélia and Cuia showed higher average root yields, 43,941, 45,498 and 52,095 kg ha-1, respectively, compared to the Crioula cultivar with 3,389 kg ha-1. Fertilization with chicken manure does not increase the productivity, number, length and diameter of roots, but it does increase the number of cracked roots. The cultivation of virus-free sweet potato without fertilizer reduces cracked roots by an average of 51.4%.A batata-doce (Ipomoea batatas) possui importância cultural, social e econômica devido sua rusticidade e ampla adaptação climática, sendo cultivada no Brasil para alimentação humana e animal. No entanto, o cultivo é realizado principalmente sem adubação e com cultivares crioulas. O objetivo foi avaliar a produtividade e qualidade de raízes de cultivares de batata-doce com e sem adubação de cama de frango em Latossolo vermelho. O experimento foi conduzido em condições de campo nas safras 2015/16 e 2016/17 em delineamento em blocos ao acaso com três repetições em parcelas de 6 m2. Foram utilizadas quatro cultivares de batata-doce, BRS Rubissol, BRS Amélia, BRS Cuia e Crioula. Foi avaliada a produtividade, número, comprimento e diâmetro de raízes e raízes rachadas. Nas duas condições de cultivo, as cultivares livres de viroses Rubissol, Amélia e Cuia apresentaram maiores produtividades médias de raízes, 43.941, 45.498 e 52.095 kg ha-1, respectivamente, comparado a cultivar Crioula com 3.389 kg ha-1. A adubação com cama de frango não aumenta a produtividade, número, comprimento e diâmetro de raízes, porém aumenta a quantidade de raízes rachadas. O cultivo de batata-doce livre de viroses e sem adubação reduz em média 51,4% as raízes rachadas.Departamento de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa Agropecuária. Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural2022-01-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/73010.36812/pag.202228136-47Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha; Vol 28 No 1 (2022): PESQ. AGROP. GAUCHA; 36-47Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha; v. 28 n. 1 (2022): PESQ. AGROP. GAÚCHA; 36-472595-76860104-9070reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online)instname:Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sulinstacron:SEAPDRenghttp://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/730/617Copyright (c) 2022 Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúchahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSteffler, Andersson Daniel Canepelle, EduardoRotili Junior, Rodrigo Redin, Marciel 2022-09-15T18:36:08Zoai:ojs.revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br:article/730Revistahttp://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapagPUBhttp://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/oaipag@agricultura.rs.gov.br||2595-76860104-9070opendoar:2022-09-15T18:36:08Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) - Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sulfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Productivity and quality of sweet potato roots cultivation with and without chicken manure
Produtividade e qualidade de raízes de batata-doce cultivadas com e sem adubação de cama de frango
title Productivity and quality of sweet potato roots cultivation with and without chicken manure
spellingShingle Productivity and quality of sweet potato roots cultivation with and without chicken manure
Steffler, Andersson Daniel
Ipomoea batatas
Alternative fertilizer
Chicken manure
Organic fertilizer
Ipomoea batatas
Fertilizante alternativo
Dejeto de frango
Adubação orgânica
title_short Productivity and quality of sweet potato roots cultivation with and without chicken manure
title_full Productivity and quality of sweet potato roots cultivation with and without chicken manure
title_fullStr Productivity and quality of sweet potato roots cultivation with and without chicken manure
title_full_unstemmed Productivity and quality of sweet potato roots cultivation with and without chicken manure
title_sort Productivity and quality of sweet potato roots cultivation with and without chicken manure
author Steffler, Andersson Daniel
author_facet Steffler, Andersson Daniel
Canepelle, Eduardo
Rotili Junior, Rodrigo
Redin, Marciel
author_role author
author2 Canepelle, Eduardo
Rotili Junior, Rodrigo
Redin, Marciel
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Steffler, Andersson Daniel
Canepelle, Eduardo
Rotili Junior, Rodrigo
Redin, Marciel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ipomoea batatas
Alternative fertilizer
Chicken manure
Organic fertilizer
Ipomoea batatas
Fertilizante alternativo
Dejeto de frango
Adubação orgânica
topic Ipomoea batatas
Alternative fertilizer
Chicken manure
Organic fertilizer
Ipomoea batatas
Fertilizante alternativo
Dejeto de frango
Adubação orgânica
description Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) has cultural, social and economic importance due to its rusticity and wide climate adaptation, being cultivated in Brazil for human and animal food. However, cultivation is carried out mainly without fertilization and with Creole cultivars. The objective was to evaluate the yield and quality of roots of sweet potato cultivars with and without fertilization of chicken manure in an Oxisol. The experiment was carried out under field conditions in the 2015/16 and 2016/17 seasons in a randomized block design with three replications in 6 m2 plots. Four sweet potato cultivars, BRS Rubissol, BRS Amélia, BRS Cuia and Crioula, were used. Root productivity, number, length and diameter of roots, and cracked roots were evaluated. In both cultivation conditions, the virus-free cultivars Rubissol, Amélia and Cuia showed higher average root yields, 43,941, 45,498 and 52,095 kg ha-1, respectively, compared to the Crioula cultivar with 3,389 kg ha-1. Fertilization with chicken manure does not increase the productivity, number, length and diameter of roots, but it does increase the number of cracked roots. The cultivation of virus-free sweet potato without fertilizer reduces cracked roots by an average of 51.4%.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-21
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/730
10.36812/pag.202228136-47
url http://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/730
identifier_str_mv 10.36812/pag.202228136-47
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/730/617
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa Agropecuária. Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa Agropecuária. Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha; Vol 28 No 1 (2022): PESQ. AGROP. GAUCHA; 36-47
Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha; v. 28 n. 1 (2022): PESQ. AGROP. GAÚCHA; 36-47
2595-7686
0104-9070
reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online)
instname:Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sul
instacron:SEAPDR
instname_str Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sul
instacron_str SEAPDR
institution SEAPDR
reponame_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online)
collection Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) - Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sul
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pag@agricultura.rs.gov.br||
_version_ 1797068776906162176

Registros relacionados