PINEAPPLE YIELD, FRU1T CHARACTERISTICS AS AFFECTED BY SOIL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND PLANTING TECHNIQUES
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 1999 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/374 |
Resumo: | The choice of an adequate soil management system and planting techniques increases pineapple yield and lowers the production costs as well. To estimate the effect of different soil management systems (conventional tillage, strip-tillage and no-tillage), and two planting techniques (furrow and spear) on productivity, fruit characteristics, percentage of sprouting, and seedling production, a field experiment was carried out from August/1997 to January/1999 at the Estação de Pesquisa e Produção of FEPAGRO, Maquiné, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The soil type was a clay loam Argiudoll. Results showed that productivity and harvest percentage were higher in conventional tillage (1 1.94 ilha and 52%) than in no-tillage (5.67 t/ha and 27.7%). The productivity and harvest percentage in furrow and spear plantings did not differ statistically. Fruit diameter and length, crown size, brix degree, number and average weight of sprouts were not affected by the different treatmcnts. |
id |
SEAPDR_c91a0219b5eeefbbec01dba7f0a87199 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br:article/374 |
network_acronym_str |
SEAPDR |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
PINEAPPLE YIELD, FRU1T CHARACTERISTICS AS AFFECTED BY SOIL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND PLANTING TECHNIQUES PRODUTIVIDADE E CARACTERÍSTICAS DO FRUTO DE ABACAXIZEIRO EM FUNÇÃO DO PREPARO DO SOLO E TÉCNICAS DE PLANTIO Anonas comosus, production.Ananas comosus, rendimento, manejo do solo.The choice of an adequate soil management system and planting techniques increases pineapple yield and lowers the production costs as well. To estimate the effect of different soil management systems (conventional tillage, strip-tillage and no-tillage), and two planting techniques (furrow and spear) on productivity, fruit characteristics, percentage of sprouting, and seedling production, a field experiment was carried out from August/1997 to January/1999 at the Estação de Pesquisa e Produção of FEPAGRO, Maquiné, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The soil type was a clay loam Argiudoll. Results showed that productivity and harvest percentage were higher in conventional tillage (1 1.94 ilha and 52%) than in no-tillage (5.67 t/ha and 27.7%). The productivity and harvest percentage in furrow and spear plantings did not differ statistically. Fruit diameter and length, crown size, brix degree, number and average weight of sprouts were not affected by the different treatmcnts. Escolher corretamente o preparo de solo e a técnica de plantio aumentam o rendimento ,e diminuem os custos de produção de abacaxi. Buscando subsídios a estas decisões, avaliou-se, nas parcelas principais, o efeito do preparo do solo (convencional, cultivo em faixas e sem preparo) e nas subparcelas, duas técnicas de plantio (sulco e chuço) sobre a produtividade, características do fruto, porcentagem de replantes e produção de mudas em ensaio acampo, conduzido entre agosto/97 e janeiro/99 na Estação de Pesquisa e Produção de Maquiné- RS em solo franco argiloso (Brunizem Avermelhado-Vila). A produtividade e a porcentagem de colheita de abacaxi, no preparo convencional, (11,94 t/ha e 52,7%) foram maiores do que no plantio direto (5,67 t/ha e 27,7%). A produtividade e a porcentagem de colheita de frutos nos plantios em sulco e com chuço foram estatisticamente iguais. O diâmetro, o comprimento dos frutos e da coroa, o teor de sólidos solúveis totais (grau brix), o número de mudas replantadas e o número de mudas produzidas pelo abacaxizeiro, não foram afetados pelos tratamentos. Departamento de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa Agropecuária. Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural1999-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/374Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha; Vol 5 No 2 (1999): PESQ. AGROP. GAÚCHA; 209-216Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha; v. 5 n. 2 (1999): PESQ. AGROP. GAÚCHA; 209-2162595-76860104-9070reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online)instname:Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sulinstacron:SEAPDRporhttp://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/374/344MODEL, NELSON SEBASTIÃO SANDER, GUIDO RENATO info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-22T12:05:01Zoai:ojs.revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br:article/374Revistahttp://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapagPUBhttp://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/oaipag@agricultura.rs.gov.br||2595-76860104-9070opendoar:2024-04-22T12:05:01Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) - Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sulfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
PINEAPPLE YIELD, FRU1T CHARACTERISTICS AS AFFECTED BY SOIL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND PLANTING TECHNIQUES PRODUTIVIDADE E CARACTERÍSTICAS DO FRUTO DE ABACAXIZEIRO EM FUNÇÃO DO PREPARO DO SOLO E TÉCNICAS DE PLANTIO |
title |
PINEAPPLE YIELD, FRU1T CHARACTERISTICS AS AFFECTED BY SOIL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND PLANTING TECHNIQUES |
spellingShingle |
PINEAPPLE YIELD, FRU1T CHARACTERISTICS AS AFFECTED BY SOIL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND PLANTING TECHNIQUES MODEL, NELSON SEBASTIÃO Anonas comosus, production. Ananas comosus, rendimento, manejo do solo. |
title_short |
PINEAPPLE YIELD, FRU1T CHARACTERISTICS AS AFFECTED BY SOIL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND PLANTING TECHNIQUES |
title_full |
PINEAPPLE YIELD, FRU1T CHARACTERISTICS AS AFFECTED BY SOIL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND PLANTING TECHNIQUES |
title_fullStr |
PINEAPPLE YIELD, FRU1T CHARACTERISTICS AS AFFECTED BY SOIL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND PLANTING TECHNIQUES |
title_full_unstemmed |
PINEAPPLE YIELD, FRU1T CHARACTERISTICS AS AFFECTED BY SOIL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND PLANTING TECHNIQUES |
title_sort |
PINEAPPLE YIELD, FRU1T CHARACTERISTICS AS AFFECTED BY SOIL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND PLANTING TECHNIQUES |
author |
MODEL, NELSON SEBASTIÃO |
author_facet |
MODEL, NELSON SEBASTIÃO SANDER, GUIDO RENATO |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
SANDER, GUIDO RENATO |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
MODEL, NELSON SEBASTIÃO SANDER, GUIDO RENATO |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Anonas comosus, production. Ananas comosus, rendimento, manejo do solo. |
topic |
Anonas comosus, production. Ananas comosus, rendimento, manejo do solo. |
description |
The choice of an adequate soil management system and planting techniques increases pineapple yield and lowers the production costs as well. To estimate the effect of different soil management systems (conventional tillage, strip-tillage and no-tillage), and two planting techniques (furrow and spear) on productivity, fruit characteristics, percentage of sprouting, and seedling production, a field experiment was carried out from August/1997 to January/1999 at the Estação de Pesquisa e Produção of FEPAGRO, Maquiné, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The soil type was a clay loam Argiudoll. Results showed that productivity and harvest percentage were higher in conventional tillage (1 1.94 ilha and 52%) than in no-tillage (5.67 t/ha and 27.7%). The productivity and harvest percentage in furrow and spear plantings did not differ statistically. Fruit diameter and length, crown size, brix degree, number and average weight of sprouts were not affected by the different treatmcnts. |
publishDate |
1999 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
1999-12-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/374 |
url |
http://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/374 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/374/344 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa Agropecuária. Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa Agropecuária. Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha; Vol 5 No 2 (1999): PESQ. AGROP. GAÚCHA; 209-216 Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha; v. 5 n. 2 (1999): PESQ. AGROP. GAÚCHA; 209-216 2595-7686 0104-9070 reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) instname:Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sul instacron:SEAPDR |
instname_str |
Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sul |
instacron_str |
SEAPDR |
institution |
SEAPDR |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) - Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sul |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pag@agricultura.rs.gov.br|| |
_version_ |
1797068772656283648 |