METHODS FOR SOIL MICROBIAL BIOMASS ASSESSMENT:THEIR PRINCIPLES, APPLICABILITY AND FUTURE TRENDS
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 1999 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/410 |
Resumo: | The soil microbial biomass is of paramount importance for the understanding of the organic matter combover, nutrient cycling and energy flux in the soil. The most widespread and correlated methods are direct microscopy for fluorescent stained microorganisms (Biovolume), the chemical methods (ATP=adenosine triphosphate and fumigation-extraction—FE), and the physiological methods (fumigation-incubation=FI and substrate induced respiration—SIR). The biovolume method is rather subjective and time consuming, while the chemical and physiological methods are of better reproducibility and applied to a wider range of soils. For lowland soils, the methods tested are basically the same as for upland soils. The data available show that the FE and modified versions of Fl and SIR have a satisfactory performance, but the original ATP method seems to be unsuitable. The expression usually found in the literature does not refer to the total microbial biomass, but rather to specific components of the biomass I like C, N and ninhydrin reactive nitrogen. For the forthcoming years, significant increase in research is expected involving ATP, SIR, Fl and FE methods in organic matter turnover and energy cycling. The flourishing methods for biomass assessment of particular groups of microorganisms as well as the molecular techniques for the identification of individual components of the biomass are also expected to become more popular. |
id |
SEAPDR_ebd9b98a9d926cfd2245e2f29e889a0e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br:article/410 |
network_acronym_str |
SEAPDR |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
METHODS FOR SOIL MICROBIAL BIOMASS ASSESSMENT:THEIR PRINCIPLES, APPLICABILITY AND FUTURE TRENDS MÉTODOS PARA DETERMINAÇÃO DE BIOMASSA MICROBIANA DO SOLO: FUNDAMENTOS, APLICABILIDADE E PERSPECTIVAS FUTURASCarbon, nitrogen, ninhydrin, microbial respiration, microbial ATP.Carbono, nitrogênio, ninhidrina, respiração microbiana, ATP microbiano.The soil microbial biomass is of paramount importance for the understanding of the organic matter combover, nutrient cycling and energy flux in the soil. The most widespread and correlated methods are direct microscopy for fluorescent stained microorganisms (Biovolume), the chemical methods (ATP=adenosine triphosphate and fumigation-extraction—FE), and the physiological methods (fumigation-incubation=FI and substrate induced respiration—SIR). The biovolume method is rather subjective and time consuming, while the chemical and physiological methods are of better reproducibility and applied to a wider range of soils. For lowland soils, the methods tested are basically the same as for upland soils. The data available show that the FE and modified versions of Fl and SIR have a satisfactory performance, but the original ATP method seems to be unsuitable. The expression usually found in the literature does not refer to the total microbial biomass, but rather to specific components of the biomass I like C, N and ninhydrin reactive nitrogen. For the forthcoming years, significant increase in research is expected involving ATP, SIR, Fl and FE methods in organic matter turnover and energy cycling. The flourishing methods for biomass assessment of particular groups of microorganisms as well as the molecular techniques for the identification of individual components of the biomass are also expected to become more popular. A biomassa microbiana (BM) do solo é um componente fundamental para o entendimento da ciclagem da matéria orgânica, nutrientes e fluxo de energia no solo. Os métodos mais utilizados para a sua determinação são o da microscopia direta (biovolume), os químicos (ATP=trifosfato de adenosina e fumigação-extração=FE) e os fisiológicos (fumigação-incubação=FI e respiração induzida por substrato=RI). O do biovolume é considerado subjetivo e trabalhoso, enquanto que os químicos e fisiológicos possuem melhor precisão e maior abrangência quanto à diversidade de solos. Para solos alagados, os métodos testados têm sido os mesmos que para os solos bem drenados, sendo que o do ATP mostrou-se inadequado, o FE e variantes do Fl e RI, aplicáveis. A terminologia predominante na literatura não se refere à biomassa microbiana total, mas a alguns dos seus componentes, como carbono, nitrogênio ou nitrogênio microbiano reativo à ninhidrina. As perspectivas indicam um uso mais intensivo, a curto prazo, dos métodos do ATP, IR, Fl e FE, seguindo-se a popularização dos métodos para a determinação da biomassa de grupos específicos e em etapas subsequentes, dos métodos de biologia molecular para a individualização dos componentes da biomassa microbiana. Palavras -chave: Carbono, nitrogênio, ninhidrina, respiração microbiana, ATP microbiano. Departamento de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa Agropecuária. Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural1999-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/410Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha; Vol 5 No 2 (1999): PESQ. AGROP. GAÚCHA; 363-373Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha; v. 5 n. 2 (1999): PESQ. AGROP. GAÚCHA; 363-3732595-76860104-9070reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online)instname:Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sulinstacron:SEAPDRporhttp://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/410/378SEGANFREDO, MILTON ANTONIO info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-22T12:05:01Zoai:ojs.revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br:article/410Revistahttp://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapagPUBhttp://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/oaipag@agricultura.rs.gov.br||2595-76860104-9070opendoar:2024-04-22T12:05:01Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) - Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sulfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
METHODS FOR SOIL MICROBIAL BIOMASS ASSESSMENT:THEIR PRINCIPLES, APPLICABILITY AND FUTURE TRENDS MÉTODOS PARA DETERMINAÇÃO DE BIOMASSA MICROBIANA DO SOLO: FUNDAMENTOS, APLICABILIDADE E PERSPECTIVAS FUTURAS |
title |
METHODS FOR SOIL MICROBIAL BIOMASS ASSESSMENT:THEIR PRINCIPLES, APPLICABILITY AND FUTURE TRENDS |
spellingShingle |
METHODS FOR SOIL MICROBIAL BIOMASS ASSESSMENT:THEIR PRINCIPLES, APPLICABILITY AND FUTURE TRENDS SEGANFREDO, MILTON ANTONIO Carbon, nitrogen, ninhydrin, microbial respiration, microbial ATP. Carbono, nitrogênio, ninhidrina, respiração microbiana, ATP microbiano. |
title_short |
METHODS FOR SOIL MICROBIAL BIOMASS ASSESSMENT:THEIR PRINCIPLES, APPLICABILITY AND FUTURE TRENDS |
title_full |
METHODS FOR SOIL MICROBIAL BIOMASS ASSESSMENT:THEIR PRINCIPLES, APPLICABILITY AND FUTURE TRENDS |
title_fullStr |
METHODS FOR SOIL MICROBIAL BIOMASS ASSESSMENT:THEIR PRINCIPLES, APPLICABILITY AND FUTURE TRENDS |
title_full_unstemmed |
METHODS FOR SOIL MICROBIAL BIOMASS ASSESSMENT:THEIR PRINCIPLES, APPLICABILITY AND FUTURE TRENDS |
title_sort |
METHODS FOR SOIL MICROBIAL BIOMASS ASSESSMENT:THEIR PRINCIPLES, APPLICABILITY AND FUTURE TRENDS |
author |
SEGANFREDO, MILTON ANTONIO |
author_facet |
SEGANFREDO, MILTON ANTONIO |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
SEGANFREDO, MILTON ANTONIO |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Carbon, nitrogen, ninhydrin, microbial respiration, microbial ATP. Carbono, nitrogênio, ninhidrina, respiração microbiana, ATP microbiano. |
topic |
Carbon, nitrogen, ninhydrin, microbial respiration, microbial ATP. Carbono, nitrogênio, ninhidrina, respiração microbiana, ATP microbiano. |
description |
The soil microbial biomass is of paramount importance for the understanding of the organic matter combover, nutrient cycling and energy flux in the soil. The most widespread and correlated methods are direct microscopy for fluorescent stained microorganisms (Biovolume), the chemical methods (ATP=adenosine triphosphate and fumigation-extraction—FE), and the physiological methods (fumigation-incubation=FI and substrate induced respiration—SIR). The biovolume method is rather subjective and time consuming, while the chemical and physiological methods are of better reproducibility and applied to a wider range of soils. For lowland soils, the methods tested are basically the same as for upland soils. The data available show that the FE and modified versions of Fl and SIR have a satisfactory performance, but the original ATP method seems to be unsuitable. The expression usually found in the literature does not refer to the total microbial biomass, but rather to specific components of the biomass I like C, N and ninhydrin reactive nitrogen. For the forthcoming years, significant increase in research is expected involving ATP, SIR, Fl and FE methods in organic matter turnover and energy cycling. The flourishing methods for biomass assessment of particular groups of microorganisms as well as the molecular techniques for the identification of individual components of the biomass are also expected to become more popular. |
publishDate |
1999 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
1999-12-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/410 |
url |
http://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/410 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/410/378 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa Agropecuária. Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa Agropecuária. Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha; Vol 5 No 2 (1999): PESQ. AGROP. GAÚCHA; 363-373 Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha; v. 5 n. 2 (1999): PESQ. AGROP. GAÚCHA; 363-373 2595-7686 0104-9070 reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) instname:Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sul instacron:SEAPDR |
instname_str |
Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sul |
instacron_str |
SEAPDR |
institution |
SEAPDR |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) - Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sul |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pag@agricultura.rs.gov.br|| |
_version_ |
1797068772700323840 |