PORTFOLIO SELECTION OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS PROJECTS USING PROMETHEE V WITH C-OPTIMAL CONCEPT
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa operacional (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-74382014000200275 |
Resumo: | This paper presents a multicriteria decision model for selecting a portfolio of information system (IS) projects, which integrates strategic and organizational view within a multicriteria decision structure. The PROMETHEE V method, based on outranking relations is applied, considering the c-optimal concept in order to overcome some scaling problems found in the classical PROMETHEE V approach. Then, a procedure is proposed in order to make a final analysis of the c-optimal portfolios found as a result of using PROMETHEE V. Also, the organizational view is discussed, including some factors that may influence decision making on IS projects to be included in the portfolio, such as adding the company's strategic vision and technical aspects that demonstrate how IS contributes value to a company's business. |
id |
SOBRAPO-1_34aa5185c4d55d15f10e9f9823ea104e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0101-74382014000200275 |
network_acronym_str |
SOBRAPO-1 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa operacional (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
PORTFOLIO SELECTION OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS PROJECTS USING PROMETHEE V WITH C-OPTIMAL CONCEPTmultiple criteria analysisPROMETHEE Vc-optimal portfolio conceptproject portfolioinformation system planninginformation technology prioritiesThis paper presents a multicriteria decision model for selecting a portfolio of information system (IS) projects, which integrates strategic and organizational view within a multicriteria decision structure. The PROMETHEE V method, based on outranking relations is applied, considering the c-optimal concept in order to overcome some scaling problems found in the classical PROMETHEE V approach. Then, a procedure is proposed in order to make a final analysis of the c-optimal portfolios found as a result of using PROMETHEE V. Also, the organizational view is discussed, including some factors that may influence decision making on IS projects to be included in the portfolio, such as adding the company's strategic vision and technical aspects that demonstrate how IS contributes value to a company's business.Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Operacional2014-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-74382014000200275Pesquisa Operacional v.34 n.2 2014reponame:Pesquisa operacional (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Operacional (SOBRAPO)instacron:SOBRAPO10.1590/0101-7438.2014.034.02.0275info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlmeida,Jonatas A. deAlmeida,Adiel T. deCosta,Ana Paula C.S.eng2015-10-09T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0101-74382014000200275Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/popehttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sobrapo@sobrapo.org.br1678-51420101-7438opendoar:2015-10-09T00:00Pesquisa operacional (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Operacional (SOBRAPO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
PORTFOLIO SELECTION OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS PROJECTS USING PROMETHEE V WITH C-OPTIMAL CONCEPT |
title |
PORTFOLIO SELECTION OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS PROJECTS USING PROMETHEE V WITH C-OPTIMAL CONCEPT |
spellingShingle |
PORTFOLIO SELECTION OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS PROJECTS USING PROMETHEE V WITH C-OPTIMAL CONCEPT Almeida,Jonatas A. de multiple criteria analysis PROMETHEE V c-optimal portfolio concept project portfolio information system planning information technology priorities |
title_short |
PORTFOLIO SELECTION OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS PROJECTS USING PROMETHEE V WITH C-OPTIMAL CONCEPT |
title_full |
PORTFOLIO SELECTION OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS PROJECTS USING PROMETHEE V WITH C-OPTIMAL CONCEPT |
title_fullStr |
PORTFOLIO SELECTION OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS PROJECTS USING PROMETHEE V WITH C-OPTIMAL CONCEPT |
title_full_unstemmed |
PORTFOLIO SELECTION OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS PROJECTS USING PROMETHEE V WITH C-OPTIMAL CONCEPT |
title_sort |
PORTFOLIO SELECTION OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS PROJECTS USING PROMETHEE V WITH C-OPTIMAL CONCEPT |
author |
Almeida,Jonatas A. de |
author_facet |
Almeida,Jonatas A. de Almeida,Adiel T. de Costa,Ana Paula C.S. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Almeida,Adiel T. de Costa,Ana Paula C.S. |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Almeida,Jonatas A. de Almeida,Adiel T. de Costa,Ana Paula C.S. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
multiple criteria analysis PROMETHEE V c-optimal portfolio concept project portfolio information system planning information technology priorities |
topic |
multiple criteria analysis PROMETHEE V c-optimal portfolio concept project portfolio information system planning information technology priorities |
description |
This paper presents a multicriteria decision model for selecting a portfolio of information system (IS) projects, which integrates strategic and organizational view within a multicriteria decision structure. The PROMETHEE V method, based on outranking relations is applied, considering the c-optimal concept in order to overcome some scaling problems found in the classical PROMETHEE V approach. Then, a procedure is proposed in order to make a final analysis of the c-optimal portfolios found as a result of using PROMETHEE V. Also, the organizational view is discussed, including some factors that may influence decision making on IS projects to be included in the portfolio, such as adding the company's strategic vision and technical aspects that demonstrate how IS contributes value to a company's business. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-74382014000200275 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-74382014000200275 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0101-7438.2014.034.02.0275 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Operacional |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Operacional |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Operacional v.34 n.2 2014 reponame:Pesquisa operacional (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Operacional (SOBRAPO) instacron:SOBRAPO |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Operacional (SOBRAPO) |
instacron_str |
SOBRAPO |
institution |
SOBRAPO |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa operacional (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa operacional (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa operacional (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Operacional (SOBRAPO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sobrapo@sobrapo.org.br |
_version_ |
1750318017751810048 |