The traditional dialogue between Law & Economics
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2005 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional do STJ |
Texto Completo: | https://bdjur.stj.jus.br/jspui/handle/2011/125626 |
Resumo: | Discute as diferenças entre o raciocínio jurídico e o econômico, assumindo que ambas a disciplinas divergem em relação ao significado das ações que cada uma assume. Indica a existência de conceitos econômicos na prática jurídica, demonstrando a necessidade de restaurar a distinção entre justiça comutativa e distributiva. |
id |
STJ-1_735d21477c8b71d2ea7e35e407ad3fd1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:2011/125626 |
network_acronym_str |
STJ-1 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional do STJ |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Lopes, José Reinaldo de Lima2018-09-19T18:27:50Z2018-09-19T18:27:50Z2005Revista Direito GV, São Paulo, p. 171-193, 2005. Edição especial 1.https://bdjur.stj.jus.br/jspui/handle/2011/125626Discute as diferenças entre o raciocínio jurídico e o econômico, assumindo que ambas a disciplinas divergem em relação ao significado das ações que cada uma assume. Indica a existência de conceitos econômicos na prática jurídica, demonstrando a necessidade de restaurar a distinção entre justiça comutativa e distributiva.Submitted by Lucas Henrique Alves (lucashs@stj.jus.br) on 2018-09-14T20:51:16Z No. of bitstreams: 2 traditional_dialogue_between_lopes.pdf: 291745 bytes, checksum: 5f6645528954e4f7fb0e4829d4556174 (MD5) license.txt: 1239 bytes, checksum: c9b4c351324448672315a00808efb725 (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by betanial@stj.jus.br (betanial@stj.jus.br) on 2018-09-19T18:27:50Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 traditional_dialogue_between_lopes.pdf: 291745 bytes, checksum: 5f6645528954e4f7fb0e4829d4556174 (MD5) license.txt: 1239 bytes, checksum: c9b4c351324448672315a00808efb725 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2018-09-19T18:27:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 traditional_dialogue_between_lopes.pdf: 291745 bytes, checksum: 5f6645528954e4f7fb0e4829d4556174 (MD5) license.txt: 1239 bytes, checksum: c9b4c351324448672315a00808efb725 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005Fundação Getúlio Vargas (FGV)The traditional dialogue between Law & Economicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleengreponame:Repositório Institucional do STJinstname:Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ)instacron:STJinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessORIGINALtraditional_dialogue_between_lopes.pdftraditional_dialogue_between_lopes.pdfapplication/pdf1042188http://10.15.0.85:8080/jspui/bitstream/2011/125626/4/traditional_dialogue_between_lopes.pdf7702e793c55a1b477c522b72ae6e7ee4MD54LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain1239http://10.15.0.85:8080/jspui/bitstream/2011/125626/2/license.txtc9b4c351324448672315a00808efb725MD52TEXTtraditional_dialogue_between_lopes.pdf.txttraditional_dialogue_between_lopes.pdf.txttext/plain71623http://10.15.0.85:8080/jspui/bitstream/2011/125626/3/traditional_dialogue_between_lopes.pdf.txtbc6dbe9485f3e0f54f5e176993c24dbcMD532011/1256262018-09-20 13:40:08.977oai:localhost: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ório Institucionalhttps://bdjur.stj.jus.br/jspui/PUBhttps://bdjur.stj.jus.br/oai/requestbdjur@stj.jus.bropendoar:2018-09-20T16:40:08Repositório Institucional do STJ - Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
The traditional dialogue between Law & Economics |
title |
The traditional dialogue between Law & Economics |
spellingShingle |
The traditional dialogue between Law & Economics Lopes, José Reinaldo de Lima |
title_short |
The traditional dialogue between Law & Economics |
title_full |
The traditional dialogue between Law & Economics |
title_fullStr |
The traditional dialogue between Law & Economics |
title_full_unstemmed |
The traditional dialogue between Law & Economics |
title_sort |
The traditional dialogue between Law & Economics |
author |
Lopes, José Reinaldo de Lima |
author_facet |
Lopes, José Reinaldo de Lima |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lopes, José Reinaldo de Lima |
description |
Discute as diferenças entre o raciocínio jurídico e o econômico, assumindo que ambas a disciplinas divergem em relação ao significado das ações que cada uma assume. Indica a existência de conceitos econômicos na prática jurídica, demonstrando a necessidade de restaurar a distinção entre justiça comutativa e distributiva. |
publishDate |
2005 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2005 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2018-09-19T18:27:50Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2018-09-19T18:27:50Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito GV, São Paulo, p. 171-193, 2005. Edição especial 1. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://bdjur.stj.jus.br/jspui/handle/2011/125626 |
identifier_str_mv |
Revista Direito GV, São Paulo, p. 171-193, 2005. Edição especial 1. |
url |
https://bdjur.stj.jus.br/jspui/handle/2011/125626 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getúlio Vargas (FGV) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getúlio Vargas (FGV) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional do STJ instname:Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ) instacron:STJ |
instname_str |
Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ) |
instacron_str |
STJ |
institution |
STJ |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional do STJ |
collection |
Repositório Institucional do STJ |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://10.15.0.85:8080/jspui/bitstream/2011/125626/4/traditional_dialogue_between_lopes.pdf http://10.15.0.85:8080/jspui/bitstream/2011/125626/2/license.txt http://10.15.0.85:8080/jspui/bitstream/2011/125626/3/traditional_dialogue_between_lopes.pdf.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
7702e793c55a1b477c522b72ae6e7ee4 c9b4c351324448672315a00808efb725 bc6dbe9485f3e0f54f5e176993c24dbc |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional do STJ - Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bdjur@stj.jus.br |
_version_ |
1800394954396139520 |